Five Questions With: Blogging the Boys
In what we hope will become a regular feature here at BRB, we sent five (5) questions to our compatriot over at Blogging the Boys about Dallas' prospects this season as we march forth to Saturday night's Governor's Cup. Dave also sent us five questions, which we boldly answered; those eloquent responses can be found over here. Without further ado, here's what a guy who actually roots for Jerry Jones thinks:
BTB: I would have to say that most of the Cowboys faithful have taken a big swig of Romo-flavored Kool-Aid. I've even hoisted a few glasses myself. Romo was so good in those first five games that it was impossible to keep up that pace. So the arc of his story went from great to good to playoff gaffe for the ages. But when you watch him play, you can see he has the tools to be a great QB. Quick release, accuracy, strong arm, mobility, ability to read the defense and a leadership quality that has his teammates in full support of him. I expect big numbers from Romo this year and I expect him to be the Cowboys QB for years to come. And the playoff thing from last year hasn't bothered him one bit. He admitted that for a couple of weeks it really hurt, but he got over that and has looked great in training camp and preseason. I think Romo will be one of the better QBs in the league this year.
2. Bill Parcells was undeniably good for Dallas, lack of a ring during his tenure there notwithstanding. Now that it's Wade Phillips' show, what shift (if any) will we see in terms of the offensive and defensive schemes?
BTB: On defense, you'll still see the 3-4 defense, but it's a totally different scheme than Bill Parcells' version. In fact, this has been one of the major stories for the Cowboys this offseason. Parcells ran a two-gap read-and-react scheme. Phillips runs a one-gap attacking defense with plenty of blitzes, stunts and movement of players. The Dallas defense is excited about the change, especially the line and linebackers who will get more opportunities to get after the QB and disrupt plays in the backfield. Of course the downside comes if you don't get the pressure; then your secondary has a big challenge.
On offense, we've imported the timing passing offense that Dallas used in the 90s under Norv Turner. That's because the new offensive coordinator is former Dallas backup QB Jason Garrett, who toiled behind Troy Aikman and learned the timing offense under Turner. Look for precise drops by the QB, throwing the ball before the WR makes his break, and good use of the TE position. The running game with Julius Jones and Marion Barber is mostly a hold-over from the Parcells era. Offensive line coach Tony Sparano, who served under Parcells, is doing a lot in helping Garrett coordinate the running game.
3. Tell us about the progress of the Cowboys' 2007 draft picks, especially first-rounder Anthony Spencer out of Purdue and Isaiah Stanback out of Washington, who apparently has gotten reps as a wide-out in the preseason. Has Terry Glenn's rigor mortis gotten so bad that the Cowboys are actually considering lining up a QB at WR?
BTB: Anthony Spencer has been thrust into the starting lineup because Greg Ellis is not ready to play yet due to injury. So far he's shown great athletic ability and is starting to understand the difference between playing DE in college and playing OLB in a 3-4. He's still a little slow in making the reads on run vs. pass, but looks to be getting better each week. Isaiah Stanback was out all training camp with a foot injury until he started practicing last week and played in the last preseason game. In his first game as a WR in the NFL, he caught a TD pass and it was a tough catch. We've got high expectations for him as an athlete and his conversion to WR. Terry Glenn had a bone spur in his knee and had surgery but should be back on the field on opening day. But if he wasn't there, we would line up a QB at WR, just not Stanback. 4th-year veteran Patrick Crayton is a former college QB who has successfully transferred to WR and was one of the better #3 WRs in the NFL last year. He's a solid backup for Glenn.
4. For those of us who have permanently banned ESPN from our households due to BondsVickSeligDonaghy Syndrome, fill us in on the early returns on Wade v. T.O. We have not heard anything about Ed Werder collapsing in a hysterical fit, so our assumption is that the two men are thus far co-existing relatively peacefully (i.e., no suicide attempts from #81, the Coach actually referring to #81 by name, etc.).
BTB: T.O. has been a model citizen since Wade was hired - frankly, it's weird. I compared the new T.O. to a pod-person from Invasion of the Body Snatchers. It's not T.O.; it's an alien entity who has taken over his body. Seriously though, he has been on very good behavior and has made ESPN schedulers work overtime to fill the blank spots they had marked for a T.O. controversy report. Wade calls him Terrell, calls him part of the family, and seems to have created a nice working environment with him. We'll see if it lasts when we lose a game and he's not involved, but he likes Wade Phillips so far, likes his new position coach, and really likes Tony Romo. It's hard to explain unless you cover him every day, but he really does seem different this year. We're enjoying it while it lasts.
5. Fill in the blank: At the end of the regular season, Dallas' record will be 11-5. At the end of the playoffs, Dallas will have won at least one playoff game(s).
0 recs |
21 comments
Comments
Wait...
He conveniently leaves out the step between "good" and "playoff" where Romo was "craptastic." See, e.g., December 2006, wherein Romo had 6 TDs, 8 INTs, 7 fumbles, and a 77 rating (including games of 45.5, 58.8, and 58.1).
"T.O. has been a model citizen since Wade was hired."
Ask Philly phans how TO as the nice guy worked out in the end.
Great Q and A, though. Nicely done.
by MDC on Aug 24, 2007 1:51 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
And you my friend
And while in the Giants game he did have a rating of 58.1, if you actually watched that game we won because of him. He threw a perfectly placed bomb up the middle to Jason Witten to set up the game winning field goal. If there is one thing I love about Romo is he always puts the team in position to win.
by burt d on Aug 24, 2007 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
2/5
Fact is, Romo got appreciably worse in December after having a great November. (And his rating in the playoff game was not 90, it was 89.6. When you are dealing with standard deviations, .4 makes a difference.) I am not buying that he's the next Troy Aikman based a on a fantastic four-game November.
by MDC on Aug 24, 2007 3:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
First of all
Second of all .4 points is not significant. I am pretty sure if you found the standard deviation of all qb's that week the sd would be much more than .4 points, and I also rounded down on a couple of those other numbers when i shouldn't have. (i.e. 113 instead of 113.9 and 111 instead of 111.6)
But much of his problems later in the year were due to the defense crapping out on him and Romo having to carry the team on his arm. A situation that is not good for any qb, let alone a first year starting qb.
by burt d on Aug 24, 2007 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
RE: "carry the team on his arm"
I must admit, this sarcasm thing is fun.
by Shake on Aug 24, 2007 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That doesn't make sense
As for having to carry the team on his on, his average pass attempts per game only went up one from November to December. That extra pass must've counted for more than the others or something.
by MDC on Aug 24, 2007 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well first of all if you would look at the
So what you have is shorter time of possession, much less of a running attack, yet a slight increase in passing attempts. What that means is we became a pass heavy offense in the december, very uncharacteristic of a Parcells offense. And we had to do that because we were always playing catch up due to the defense crapping out on us.
Secondly, when you are mentioning SD what are you comparing his numbers to. His own? Other QBs? You are being very nonspecific. Anywho lets look at this graph of qb consistency http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Article.php?Page=85 Marc Bulger was the most consistent qb with a SD of 12.9 with the median SD being around 28. Thus .4 points is neglegible.
by burt d on Aug 24, 2007 4:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i agree that people get ahead of themselves
by 325424 on Aug 24, 2007 6:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What?
by MDC on Aug 25, 2007 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again...
12/03 (W). TOP 26:39, ATT 34
12/10 (L). TOP 22:49, ATT 33
12/17 (W). TOP 33:21, ATT 29
12/24 (L). TOP 22:54, ATT 29
12/31 (L). TOP 27:53, ATT 32
AVG TOP 26:43
Your time of possession went down across the board in December, as did Romo's completion percentage. At least some of the blame for having the ball less has to fall on the QB who is completing fewer passes. Besides you are putting the cart before the horse here: You didn't lose because you had the ball less; you had the ball less because losing teams generally have the ball less.
As for rushing attempts, you had less of a running attack because you were playing from behind. I'll grant you that. Of course, when your QB is throwing more INTs than TDs and fumbling the ball 7 times, that is probably going to be a cause of your team not scoring (rather than a result of not scoring, which is how you seem to be painting it).
As for rating, I was not comparing Romo to anyone. I was saying that, in the context of how rating is calculated, 89.6 is not the same thing as 90. If my math is correct, that (in the context of the game at hand) .4 is roughly 2 more completions or 10 more yards, either one of which could have negated the need for that last second FG.
Mainly, though, with the 89.6 distinction, I was just being flippant.
by MDC on Aug 24, 2007 6:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
what came first the chicken or the egg
by burt d on Aug 24, 2007 6:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
MDC
by mello on Aug 24, 2007 10:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Schaub
Of course, I will be the first to admit that my hopes for Schaub are based more on speculation and crossed-fingers than hard data.
As for the difference between 89.6 and 90, in the context of an entire season, it is negligible; in the context of a game that came down to a botched short field goal, it's not so easily written off. That was the point of the flippant comment in the first place.
by MDC on Aug 25, 2007 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
For the love of crap almighty...
by mello on Aug 25, 2007 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You love crap?
by Shake on Aug 25, 2007 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
From the idiot savant
On a side note, do you also "eat pieces of shit like me for breakfast?"
by Shake on Aug 25, 2007 3:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How bout dem Cowboys
Good luck you guys will need it
by burt d on Aug 24, 2007 11:16 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















