2008 Opponents Shall Be...
by Tim on Jan 1, 2008 4:31 PM CST
in News
Email
PrintBam:
AT RELIANT
Indianapolis
Jacksonville
Tennessee
Baltimore
Cincinnati
Chicago
Detroit
Miami
AWAY FROM RELIANT
Indianapolis
Jacksonville
Tennessee
Cleveland
Pittsburgh
Green Bay
Minnesota
Oakland
Initial thoughts...
- Comfortable home schedule.
- Tough, tough road schedule.
- Really hope the bulk of the AFC and NFC North road schedule is played before December.
- Road trip to Lambeau?
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
tough, indeed
But for that to happen, Cincy needs a defense, Chicago needs an offense, and Baltimore needs coaches and an offense.
Also, I'm hoping that Derek Anderson asks for eleventy billion dollars from Cleveland and they can't keep him and they have to start the Medicine Woman. In such a case, they could return to the cellar where they belong.
In the meantime, I will dream of Adrian Peterson thinking he can get to the corner only to have Mario pop out and clothes-line him.
What me worry no schedule
by Tom @ Battle Red Blog on Jan 2, 2008 10:26 PM CST reply actions
Acronyms
It's fucking brilliant, and easily the most talented work I have ever witnessed.
to quote
And one more thought...
The first time, you get "sick" from drinking too many wine spritzers.
And who could ever forget the 400lb transvestite prostitute in October? How you survived that, nobody knows.
Thanks
Now fuck off.
Replying to this comment for no reason
I tracked it
Duh
it's dallas
Color me surprised they actually have computers in Dallas, much less something as fancy as a modem. I thought they all communicated by sniffing each other's asses and peeing on everything like dogs do.
Oh... gotcha
Dial-up? They still have that? What do you bet he also carries a bag phone and uses a VCR?
My Daddy's Cunt
yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk.
No don't even blow me.
Just let R. Smith call the defense with the cast offs he's been handed, because if More Dumd Collective called the defense the Texans would be 0&16 till he was down sized.
Actually there was an explanation in the Chronicle why Multiple Dipshit Calls wouldn't work, but a wise man (Hitler) always gets his friends to mindlessly attack his critics.
by Tom @ Battle Red Blog on Jan 4, 2008 9:27 PM CST reply actions
You know, I shouldn't even respond to this shit...
In a post I titled "I'm Dreaming of Some Zone Blitzes" as a play on "White Christmas" (because it was a few days before Christmas), you said
"Are they blitzing enough now for you, dipshit?"
Now, whatever points you gained for having a sentence that approached generally accepted notions of grammar and syntax, you managed to lose with your general premise. Because, as I pointed out before I banned your ignorant ass, only ONE of the TDs was scored against a blitz and, even better, the yards per play were less against the blitz than against the standard defense.
Even better, the next week, when they went passive 4-3, they managed to make Quinn Gray look like Peyton Manning.
In short, you are a fucking retard. You are also apparently too cheap or poor to afford anything better than dial-up. Either way, you serve no purpose. Kill yourself.
By the way...
Seriously, get raped to death with a branding iron.
Matts a Dumb Crapper
and then selecting the most wrong answer just to screw with the self important asshole that wrote the test. Now do you know how stupid you are, because I know people much smarter than me. NO, I'm the one who shouldn't bother to respond, but unlike you, I accept my humanity, and I'm decent, and I don't pass judgement on my friends. I accept them one at a time, based on how they are and how they treat me. You're the dumbass with the problem Matt, and I have 0 doubts about me.
You want to try another twist on words and a non sequitur?
Why do you argue like a right wing fundamentalist?
You're supposed to have a law degree.
Arguement should be your speciality.
by Tom @ Battle Red Blog on Jan 4, 2008 10:45 PM CST reply actions
ironic ironies
The problem is, Tom, that you use normative statements as positive statements, show no supporting argument, and mangle it with poor syntax and grammar. So while you may have a point, and while that point might even be valid, saying something like the blitz comment noted above is ridiculous. Personally, I don't even remotely understand your first post on Jan 2. By the looks of things, I wasn't the only one who was confused.
Even though Matt may have kidnapped my puppy in order to make me say what he wants, I still think on my own (sorry, Fido).
Look, your post on 11/22 is coherent. That's making a statement and backing it with a remotely viable argument. Otherwise, as you do above, you are saying that the Avogadro constant is 42 because you say so.
No you don't
My guess would be either:
a) you're an unattractive middle schooler who has trouble making friends - and decided to troll around in between watching 15 second shit fetish clips
or
b) you're very new to our country and an avid soccer fan - and despise all things gridiron because you know it's a much cooler game.
Either way you're lashing out and I think you need help... and by help I mean to get done Marcellus Wallace style.
Freakin nerd.
yadda yadda yadda
by Tom @ Battle Red Blog on Jan 4, 2008 11:45 PM CST reply actions
Sad fact
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
