Battle Red Blog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

What To Do At RT?

I briefly considered addressing the offensive line as one unit in a single post, but decided against it for two (2) reasons.  First, I don't want to gloss over a particular position in the name of keeping it under 5,000 words.  And second, it ain't like we're pressed for time here.  The 2008 NFL Draft is still nearly three (3) months away.  Crap.

So let's build toward the crescendo that is left tackle, shall we?  Here's where the Texans stand at right tackle:

  1.  Eric Winston
  2.  Rashad Butler
Annnnndddd...according to the depth chart on the official site, that's it.  

Now, before we all have a simultaneous coronary, we should take stock of the fact that Ephraim Salaam (currently the starting LT) was originally signed to be a reserve tackle who could swing between the left and right sides.  He has, of course, been forced into a more prominent role because of Charles Spencer's injury (for a disheartening update on Spencer, check out Lance Zierlein's response to the first comment in this post or Steph's comment at DGDB&D here).  And Jordan Black was signed to....well, I'm not quite sure.  To make Kansas City fans point and laugh?  Seriously, it's not a good sign when fans are openly questioning whether you, a recent free agent signee with a $1,200,000.00 signing bonus, should be released before your first regular season game.  Brandon Frye still has to be considered a project; it's tough to know whether the team is counting on him to contribute after a rookie season that saw him on the practice squad for nearly the entire campaign.

Yikes.  That's every offensive tackle on the roster.  As I'm dangerously close to hyperventilating, let's readjust our focus to right tackle.  Winston is a stud and should have the starting spot locked up for the next several years.  Clearly, the depth behind him (and at left tackle) is a sizable issue that demands immediate attention.  Despite this black hole, we shouldn't despair for one simple reason:  Alex Gibbs.  He's an offensive line witch who has consistently turned his charges into a team strength everywhere he's been.  At the risk of ordering another pitcher of Kool-Aid, I'll hang my hat on the fact that Alex Gibbs will be able to camouflage the line's deficiencies to the greatest extent possible.

So what about the draft?  There can be little doubt that the team will look to add depth and talent at tackle (most certainly left tackle, but that's a different post), but I have no idea where, when, or who.  Rare is the team that targets a weakside tackle with its first round pick, so I think I'm on solid footing in suggesting that Smithiak won't go RT in Round One.  Frankly, with Eric Winston's progress and the possibility (hope?) that Ephraim Salaam and/or Brandon Frye could slide into the primary back-up role, there's a pretty good argument to be made that RT is considerably down the list in terms of draft and free agent priorities.  What say you, BRB?

0 recs  |  Comment 6 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

RT & LT are not mutually exclusive
As your summary dives into (and then quickly retreats from), you cannot really discuss our RT situation without some talk about LT.  Well, at least you cannot talk about the depth issue(s).  Winston has the starting job for as many years as his body can hold out.

But the depth behind E-Dub really looks as though it will (again) depend on what happens on the left side.  If we get a true starter via FA, the Draft, Barbaro gets back on the track, etc.....then we have Lunch Meat as a swing backup, and all of a sudden the situation at RT looks pretty damn good with Winston supplemented by Salaam.

We can be critical of the draft picks, but in the end we always support the new Texan.

by Shake on Jan 30, 2008 8:17 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Re: RT and LT
I concur that they're not exclusive, particularly given Salaam's ability to play either side.  In a perfect world, the 2008 Texans feature a healthy (and slimmer) Spencer starting at LT, Winston at RT, Salaam backing either or both up, and a draftee or two pushing for snaps.
Looking forward to a day when being a Texans fan doesn't mean that April is the highlight of my season...

by Tim on Jan 30, 2008 8:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Salaam = Sage??
A great backup for a tough position, but will get exposed with too many starts?
We can be critical of the draft picks, but in the end we always support the new Texan.

by Shake on Jan 30, 2008 12:03 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

what shake said.
not really a lot to say about RT except Winston has turned out to be a great draft pick. I'm sure by the time Camp begins we'll have plenty of competition for depth behind him through FA's and the draft. I could see us drafting two OL in this years draft. One on the first day and one on the second day.

by bullpen116 on Jan 30, 2008 11:46 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Winston
Winston's tremendous.  I've heard talk from fans about him moving to LT, but he's been so good at RT I hate to change that.  Plus I've heard - I think it was Lance Zierlein - say that Winston's arms aren't long enough to play LT.  I don't see how that would make THAT much of a difference... some, sure - but not so much that it wouldn't work.  I'm sure Kubes is gonna leave all that mess to Alex Gibbs now.

God, is it really still January?  Sigh.  

by HoustonDiehards on Jan 30, 2008 8:16 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Rashad Butler
Looking at the pre-2006 draft scouting reports, Rashad Butler was a decent prospect. He was athletic, but needed to bulk up.  However, due to an illness, he was unable to bulk up and was waived by Carolina. Houston picked him up, he got better medical treatment, and ended up replacing Jordan Black as the swing tackle.  He sounds like a valuable pick-up. So RT looks to be in good shape.

Of course, I thought 2006 would be Carr's breakout year, that the OL was responsible for all those sacks, and we had only one good receiver. So I could be wrong....

by kozanack on Jan 30, 2008 11:14 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your home for analysis and rants about all things Houston Texan.
Start posting about the Texans »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

The_catch_small
The Real Reason Tennessee has won 3 in a row...
Small
BESF Halloween
Receiverchart_small
"You stay classy, Bud Adams"
New_ar15_small
Veterans Day

Recent FanPosts

Dock_small
An Evening with the Titans: Bud Adams Style, Part 1
Car-mario-stop-1024_small
One last Texans bedroom poll
10865_1264495206215_1044784186_841568_1224909_n_small
Bartering
Small
Why not spread the field more?
Small
What positions should the Texans focus on in the draft?
Cuntler_small
If I where coach (and I'm sure everyone is glad I'm not)
Mc_small
Ask Music City Miracles
Texans_small
Arian Foster promoted to 53 man roster
Stars_moons_planets_small
Cushing Maintains Top Spot on the Rookie-Meter During Bye

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Editor

Brb_small Tim

Managers

Receiverchart_small bigfatdrunk

Funny_kubiak_small Jake

Authors

Comic_zombies_attack_circa_1999_small Riott

Sunaipa_small Mike Kerns

Pimp_small DreKeem