BREAKING NEWS: Frank Bush Named Defensive Coordinator
What most of us were resigned to happening actually happened today when your Houston Texans formally elevated Frank Bush to defensive coordinator. This is about the most predictable thing Smithiak could have done, and the most predictable thing doesn't appear to be the panacea for an 8-8 team that featured quite possibly the worst defense in the entire NFL the last four (4) years. Consequently, it's entirely reasonable to question whether Kubes conducted a search befitting the responsibility of the position. When you read things like Bush was the "only one interviewed for the defensive coordinator position that became available when Richard Smith was fired after the season," you have to wonder whether the team did all that it could to bring in the best guy available. My initial reaction is that the Texans did not do anything close to everything they could have. Instead, Bush was Kubes' guy from the outset, and they "searched" accordingly.
I'll reserve judgment on the quality of the hire, if only because Bush has done nothing to show that he isn't capable of doing the job. Of course, he also doesn't have a track record to show that he is capable of doing the job. All I know is this: Gary Kubiak's opinion of Frank Bush's aptitude had better be validated in 2009. If it isn't, Kubes is likely looking for work in January 2010.
More to come...
0 recs |
41 comments
|
Comments
bush as dc
I am kind of deflated. Was hoping for McDermott. I just hope Bush knows that the status quo is going to bring a shit storm down upon him, and acts accordingly. We need aggression, aggression and more aggression. Dump Weaver, TJ, Petey, and Morlon. We need an identity on defense because we already have a playoff offense.
meaningful football games in '08
by do on Jan 13, 2009 1:51 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bush as DC
I think most of us are a bit deflated, if only because this time of year necessarily makes guys like McDermott awfully enticing. As a professional football coach, Bush has to know that the policies and philosophy of Richard Smith didn’t work. It’s time for a change, and I’m betting that Bush won’t be Smith II.
If Bush is simply a repackaged Richard Smith, he (and the majority of the coaching staff, including Kubes) won’t be here long.
Looking forward to a day when being a Texans fan doesn't mean that April is the highlight of my season...
by Tim on Jan 13, 2009 1:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Telling myself to be optimistic...
FWIW, this interesting “scouting report” on Bush gives me some hope that he won’t be Richard Smith 2.0.
by bv on Jan 13, 2009 3:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Dunta
If Bush is crediting him for being a large part of why the defense sucked less at the end of the year, I’m really hoping that we’re going to see something about Dunta being resigned very soon.
by Crawl on Jan 13, 2009 5:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That has to be a top priority for Rick Smith
The subjext has been brought up several times here, most recently by Tim in his final PGB part deux, Item 5. http://www.battleredblog.com/2009/1/4/708640/post-game-breakdown-i-pref
For Bush to go on record how strongly he feels about Dunta’s importance to the D only gives his agent more ammunition to bring to the table. Because Dunta has not fully regained his preinjury all-pro form, it would be a gamble to give him elite money. I believe that he will continue to rehab strongly and will come back in 2009 as good as new, but that is just my opinion. If we can’t get him in a long term deal, we can always franchise him for about $10 mil, but run the risk of alienating him and eventually losing him to another team. If he has a pro bowl type season next year he would be even harder to sign then than he will be now. Time for Rick Smith to earn his salary and get Dunta locked up.
by oiler-texan diehard on Jan 13, 2009 9:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree
One: we were denied permission to interview Jerry Gray.
Two: why wait for one possibly three weeks to get a CHANCE to interview McDermott? What’s the difference? Just because his boss is a better playcaller than Smith? We know nothing about his playcalling or his scheme – just the system he’s worked under. Bush and McDermott were a wash in my eyes.
Three: I really think it’s unfair to peg Bush so closely to Smith. The Texans is a class organization – what Bush was doing behind the scenes this season, we will never know. He could have been railing to anyone who would listen about our lack of blitzing.
If anything, this should be the least moving piece of news you ever read as a Texans fan. It was totally predictable, but not necessarily bad. Let’s fire up the hot-stove and start taking free agents!
by DisplacedTexan on Jan 13, 2009 1:54 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
True On All Counts
Though I’m a tad skeptical that Jerry Gray was really a candidate, given the fact that the ’Skins could block him from interviewing from anything but a head coaching position. To that point, Philly could have blocked McDermott as well.
I’ll agree that we have no evidence to show that Bush shares Richard Smith’s views. Bush could absolutely be the kind of fiery, blitz, make-the-offense-adjust-to-us-instead-of-the-other-way-around DC that we’ve been praying for.
My beef, really, isn’t with Bush; it’s with the process. If Bush was the guy, why not cut ties with Smith last season, when the Texans were out of the playoff hunt and Smith clearly was not the answer? Wouldn’t that kind of on-the-job audition have answered a lot of the doubts?
Looking forward to a day when being a Texans fan doesn't mean that April is the highlight of my season...
by Tim on Jan 13, 2009 2:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Logically speaking, yes.
But that’s not really the way the NFL, and especially the Texans, works. You don’t often see mid-season firings in the NFL and you never see McNair bail on someone without giving them the surest benefit of the doubt. I can’t actually remember the last coach fired… Lane Kiffin this season? Who before him?
It can be insufferably frustrating, but I also greatly respect that part of our organization. Everyone knows they get every chance to succeed (seriously, TJ, just go away)… and Smith was given his. Notice you never see anyone after leaving the Texans organization say “Well they never….” or “Those jerks….” Dickie J does it for them!
Also consider this…. what do the Texans learn about Bush’s playcalling? What if his system is totally different? Is he going to call using Smith’s book? Is he going to somehow implement his system in the middle of the season? All you’d really learn is how he adjusts to game situations… and possibly having inherited a scheme he absolutely detests. It’s best to give him the entire offseason… then from Week 1 – 17, it’s all Bush all the time.
by DisplacedTexan on Jan 13, 2009 2:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m pretty sure there were a handful of coordinators let go during the season last year. It’s not all that rare.
www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Jan 13, 2009 2:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
the chargers definitely dropped theirs
and thank god, watching his defense was more painful than watching richard smith’s, and that is really saying something
by cubic on Jan 13, 2009 4:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I may be wrong, but I am under the impression that
a team cannot block another team from interviewing a coach that is currently under contract as long as the interview is for a higher ranking position. Sean McDermott is the Eagles secondary coach. We are allowed to interview him for the DC position. Jerry Gray is the Redskins secondary coach. We were denied permission to interview him? I don’t remember reading that, but I may have early onset Alzheimers.
I made a few searches to find the rules on coach hirings but acme up empty. Anyone have a good source that explains the do’s and dont’s of hiring NFL coaches?
I am disappointed that the Texans did not bring in a single DC candidate for an interview. When did they decide Bush was their man? Something doesn’t smell right here. I am not satisfied that Smithiak did any search whatsoever, and if that is the case, then I am with you Tim, they should have given Bush a mid-season bump and an 8 game tryout. Then this thing would seem above board. Right now it just seems wrong.
by oiler-texan diehard on Jan 13, 2009 2:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's easy to think of all the sexy picks for DC out there
But realistically, how many of them were going to come to Houston? It reminds me of our draft wish lists: Taylor Mays, Brian Orakpo, or last year DRC. They would be great fits for the Texans (I mean, who would’t love to have DRC in our secondary, assuming Richard Smith would have let him on the field, lol), but they probably weren’t realistic (I know Mays isn’t coming out, but I sincerely doubt he would have been available had he come out). As bfd noted on his blog, pretty much the only person on the wishlist still available was McDermott, who is in the middle of a playoff run.
Bush may not be the next incarnation of Buddy Ryan, but that doesn’t mean that he won’t bring a significant improvement to the Texans D. The way I look at it, this past season we had an average D talent-wise, and were well below average when it came to the play on the field. If we’d had merely an average defense, we would likely have been in the playoff hunt.
We don’t know a lot about Bush’s attitude towards defense, but apparently the players love him (so Dickie Justice must approve) and I sincerely doubt that he could be any worse than Richie Smith.
In short, he may not be the best DC in the world, but he will likely be an upgrade and he’s probably the best we could do given the circumstances.
I expect our D to improve, even if they don’t rise to the level of the Ravens or Steelers.
And I agree that if this doesn’t work out, Kubes is on thin ice.
When I'm on the mic, I'm like global warming, you can't ignore me.
by tehGrindCrusher on Jan 13, 2009 3:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
In hinesight
I’m ok with Bush. I like that he seems to be a quiet professional because it fits the general M.O. of the team. The players on the defensive squad seem to respect him which seems to be a sign that he will be different than Smith because of their apparent discontent with him.
What’s important now though, is that the Texans take steps to show that it will not be business as usual. I’m not trying to be upity and say that they owe it to us to show immediate change, I just think it is better for the team, the fans and the rest of the league to see it immediately. I would really like to see an interview with him devoid of the cliche laiden coach speak so I know that he thinks that the Defense has been broken and what he plans on doing to fix it.
Let's get a better fight song.
by Jake on Jan 13, 2009 2:30 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I hope that he brings back the "House of Pain" style of
aggressive play. One thing about the Oiler defense from his day of play is that they hit hard and played aggressive. (I guess that’s two things)
by shiner37 on Jan 13, 2009 2:47 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
And blew big leads
D’oh!
When I'm on the mic, I'm like global warming, you can't ignore me.
by tehGrindCrusher on Jan 13, 2009 2:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Some Bad Memories
If it hadn’t been for Glanville, I believe the Oilers would have gone to at least one Superbowl during that time. To be frank, it was more on the offense than the defense. Glanville would become ultraconservative when the Oilers had the lead.
by kozanack on Jan 13, 2009 3:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You could also make the argument about Pardee
Because his offense couldn’t take time off the clock.
Fun to watch, though.
When I'm on the mic, I'm like global warming, you can't ignore me.
by tehGrindCrusher on Jan 13, 2009 4:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
bush style, mays going back to school
according to pancakes, bush’s style is to blitz from the time he gets out of bed in the morning. Maybe it will be House of Pain Deux. Saw also that Taylor Mays opted to go back to school.
meaningful football games in '08
by do on Jan 13, 2009 3:05 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
along with the big DT from OU Gerald McCoy
Mays and McCoy are ranked 6th and 8th respectively on the Scouts Inc top 32. That really hurts our chances of getting an immediate impact guy at either D line or Safety with the 15th pick.
by oiler-texan diehard on Jan 13, 2009 3:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Trade Back, then
I just like being the first person to call for trading back each year.
by Shake on Jan 13, 2009 4:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's Sort Of Your Thing
Kind of like how MDC has exclusivity on calling for Petey Faggins to be publicly drawn and quartered.
Looking forward to a day when being a Texans fan doesn't mean that April is the highlight of my season...
by Tim on Jan 13, 2009 4:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Trade back in the first round...
and attempt to get Greg Hardy, the pass-rush specialist DT from Ole Miss, should he not pull out of the draft in the next couple days.
by BigTexBD on Jan 13, 2009 4:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What does Riott think?
When I'm on the mic, I'm like global warming, you can't ignore me.
by tehGrindCrusher on Jan 13, 2009 6:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well
The loss of these two players essentially means that finding a starter on the two positions we want the most (safety and DL) will be more difficult in the second round. The “starting caliber” safeties in my mind are now William Moore, Patrick Chung, and Rashad Johnson. The starting caliber DT’s are B.J. Raji and Peria Jerry. Starting Caliber DE’s Orakpo, Everette Brown, MAYBE Hardy and Johnson (Tyson Jackson will probably start for a 3-4 team).
I think almost all of them will be available at 15 except Orakpo and Brown. However, I would be very happy if we traded down to 20-24.
At 16, Chargers need OL bad, might take Maualuga if hes there
At 17, Jets desperately need a play-making ILB to solidify their front 7
At 18, Bears desperately need something that resembles a play-making receiver, also OL to groom behind aging RT and C
At 19, Bucs need a QB of the Future, a Wide Receiver of the Future, a running back that doesn’t break on first contact – if Moreno or Wells is still here, I bet they take him. Then, they need 2 DTs, a new RT and a new RG.
At 20, Lions need everything, but probably go OT or LB
At 21, Cards need a new OLB because 3 of their 4 are over 30 years old. Then a tweener DT/DE that can play both 3-4 DE and DT positions
At 22, Eagles need OL or TE help. I hate watching LJ Smith play football.
At 23, Vikings need OT or secondary help – primarily corner
At 24, Pats desperately need a corner, followed by LB to help refresh its aging defensive core
What that means is aren’t a lot of teams, until pick 25 with the Falcons, that need an impact starter of DT, DE, or Safety. I think most of the guys we would be targeting will still be available at the 20-24.
An interesting thing to note is in the interview with Bush, he talked about using his defensive line to penetrate and disrupt. In my mind, that screams B.J. Raji. At 6-1, 325, not only is he a monstrous DT with a low center of gravity, but he had 14 TFL and 7.5 sacks. He is fast off the ball. I think he could play 1 technique and DEMAND 2 blockers, doing exactly what we need.
What ever Frank Bush thinks he needs/wants, I think he will get. I think trading down to get what we still want, and picking up 3rd and 4th rounders will be our best bet. When you can get Slaton and Adibi in the 3rd and 4th round, I start to trust our talent evaluators to see the gems later in the draft.
Again, this all depends on what happens in free agency. If we some how land Oshiomogho Atogwe (unlikely) or Dawan Landry (equally unlikely) we definitely go DE or DT ( or do we go safety anyway to try and solidify our secondary for the next 7 years? ). I don’t know how much the wants of a new DC will affect the way Rick Smith drafts this year, so lets speculate more after free agency.
by Riott on Jan 13, 2009 10:39 PM CST up reply actions 7 recs
Damn
I may seriously Rec all of your posts from now until the Draft. Well done, sir.
by Shake on Jan 13, 2009 10:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Indeed.
www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Jan 13, 2009 11:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What about Aaron Maybin, DE Penn State?
You know anything about him, Riott? I’ve seen his name in our slot on a couple of mocks. I didn’t see him in your DE analysis from a while back.
www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Jan 13, 2009 11:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He wasn't in the DE posts..
..cause at the time he was “for sure staying at Penn State”.
Aaron Maybin is an interesting, and frightening, prospect. He is full of the dreaded p-word, potential. After 4 sacks on temporary playtime his red shirt freshman year, he burst on to the scene in his red shirt sophomore year after Maurice Evans (the starting DE) , and 2 defensive tackles got kicked off the team for marijuana possession. He came in and had 49 tackles, 20 TFL, and 12 sacks in his RS sophomore year.
He’s 20 years old, 6’ 3" and weighs… 233, 235, 240, 244, 248, depending on where you look. He’s apparently pretty strong and has lots of room to grow on his frame without affecting his speed. Has great football instincts and is pretty coachable. He’s very, very football fast for a DE.
That’s about all we know about this kid. He is literally a one year wonder – no film on him at all. I haven’t heard of any character issues, so that seems good. He’s young, doesn’t have an injury history, and has all the potential in the world. We just don’t know what he’s going to do. If I am Rick Smith, I don’t think I take a totally unproven kid with my first round pick and expect him to make an impact on a defense that wants to take the next step.
He may be the next best thing since sliced bread, but he’s a total unknown. Our front office gets more time to scout him, so if they see something, they will probably pull the trigger, but I don’t see it right now.
by Riott on Jan 14, 2009 12:42 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think we can't draft a DE/DT for potential
We need help yesterday, and Kubiak’s career is likely on the line this upcoming season. We need someone who can pressure the passer immediately.
When I'm on the mic, I'm like global warming, you can't ignore me.
by tehGrindCrusher on Jan 14, 2009 9:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What sets you apart Riott is the thoroughness of your analysis
Excellent post once again sir. To date Rick Smith has been so-so at free agency, but excellent at drafting. Rick’s a bright guy and I expect him to get better at free agency. Hopefully he read this post and it will give him food for thought.
by oiler-texan diehard on Jan 14, 2009 12:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
We traded down last year and still got "our guy" Duane Brown, and an extra 3rd rounder
so unless there is a player that is too good to pass up on the board I would expect Smith to try that maneuver again.
Oh by the way, that extra 3rd rounder turned out to be Steve Slaton. Not too shabby.
by oiler-texan diehard on Jan 13, 2009 9:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
frank bush wanted okam on the field more
just kiddin.
But if Okam helps us next year, our draft needs may change slightly.
Please draft some defensive stars for the next DC.
by texanphil on Jan 13, 2009 7:08 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Bush
In his interview on the Texans Official Website. Frank Bush wants to be alot more aggressive and play as a unit and i like that
by TexanFanFromTheStart on Jan 13, 2009 8:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
werd
I saw that too, and I feel a little bit better about the decision to hire Bush. But still only a little bit, because in reality, Kubiak should have fired Smith early this season (eh hem, or before it started) and handed the reigns to Bush.
by Leein3D on Jan 13, 2009 9:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
For the record...
Richard Smith was also alleged to be an aggressive, attacking DC.
Then again – you could see Bush keeping himself from throwing Smith under the bus when he was asked why the defense finished in the 20s the last few years.
www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Jan 13, 2009 9:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bush is Kubiak's Guy
So I think Kubiak wanted to set him up for as much success as possible. The go ahead to fire Smith probably wasn’t given until at least half way through the season, and by that time Kubiak probably didn’t want to throw Bush right into the fire. I think Kubiak knew that his job was safe, so he wanted it to be an offseason move so if Bush does turn it around, there is no doubt that he is soley responsible.
Let's get a better fight song.
by Jake on Jan 14, 2009 6:08 AM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 

















