Battle Red Blog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Headlines: BC Beats BU 4-3 in 58th Beanpot Championship

The case for Bush

I'm a little surprised at the disappointment throughout the blogosphere.  Here's my case for why Kubiak selected Bush without devoting much time to interviewing. 

Casserly et al. lasted a while, but no more than six years.  We're already entering year 4 of the Smithiak regime.  Kubiak needs results on defense NOW, not three years from now, and the only way to do that is by bringing in someone who is very familiar with the defense, knows exactly what the players can do, and more importantly, knows exactly what the players can't do. 

How else will the incoming DC understand precisely the holes that need filling in the off-season?  Does anyone else remember Kubiak's experience with David Carr?  He saw Carr tape and thought he could still turn him into a great QB.  It took Kubiak until the Oakland game in 2006 before he finally came to grips with the futility of making shell-shocked Carr into a top shelf starting NFL QB.  In other words, Kubiak has learned firsthand that merely watching tape doesn't give an incoming coach an accurate enough sense of the players' abilities and limitations. 

Plus, this coming season is critical for the franchise.  The following players have contracts expiring in 2009:

Chester Pitts,
Kevin Walter,
Will Demps (blech),
Kris Brown,
Demeco Ryans,
Matt Turk,
Ephraim Salaam (double blech),
Tim Bulman, and
Deljuan Robinson

The following players are free agents, restricted or otherwise:

Dunta Robinson,
David Anderson, and
Owen Daniels

I'd be happy to see some of these names go.  But most of them, like Chester Pitts, KEVIN WALTER, Kris Brown, DEMECO RYANS, Matt Turk, Tim Bulman, DUNTA ROBINSON, OWEN DANIELS, and David Anderson represent some of the few bright spots on the team.  Plus -- though no one much talks about it -- the team has to decide whether to exercise a pretty big option on Schaub.  It sure would be easier to decide whether to spend this money if we move beyond 8-8 mediocrity.  Otherwise, Kubiak will be hard-pressed to convince Smith or McNair that they need to open up the wallet for all of these players.

My point is strengthened still further because I believe that the team assumes it will franchise Dunta (though probably trying desperately to come up with some mutually beneficial arrangement) and rely on signing him to a contract in 2010.  And Steve Slaton will likely demand a new contract to match his incredible performance, if not for 2009, then for 2010.  Those are two upcoming major expenses that the regime will need to justify to McNair. 

Ultimately, I just don't think Kubiak could afford to wait another year before seeing results in his defense.  Heck, I think we're only two or three players on defense away from making a run through the playoffs.  Hasn't anyone else seen our offense?  Why aren't we crying out for a playoff team next year?

Yes, it's possible that some DC out there could have made an immediate impact during the season.  Some people will point to Gibbs' experience on offense.  True, by the end of the season, Gibbs had done a phenomenal job, but the running game didn't start to gell until a few weeks into the season... too late to salvage a winning season and too late to let us make a playoff run. 

In the end, who has the best chance of making an immediate impact on the defense?  The answer is plain and simple: Bush. 

0 recs  |  Comment 10 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Good Points

I think you misunderstood a lot of the dissapointment. I can only speak for myself, but I can sum up my frustration easily. If you knew that Bush was going to be “the guy” then promote him two or three days after you fire Smith. Let him have as much of a jump as possible on revamping the defense in the offseason, scouting college players, and selecting D Line and Secondary coaches. Why wait two or three weeks, interview no one for the position (the only interviews were Marinelli for D Line and Gibbs for Secondary) and THEN announce it. It just didn’t make sense to me. Those two or three weeks tells me they weren’t %100 sure, but if you weren’t %100 why not interview someone else?

Let's get a better fight song.

by Jake on Jan 15, 2009 8:32 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

True...

But why couldn’t Bush be doing all that work behind the scenes either way for the 2-3 weeks, regardless of what Kubiak told the public?

We also don’t know that Kubiak didn’t interview anyone; all we know is that he didn’t tell the media that about any interviews. That’s not the same thing. It’s not far-fetched, either. If you follow Lance Zierlein’s blog (one of the few things worth checking out on the Chron website; the guy is pretty connected and is privy to a lot of information that we non-media, non-related-to-coaches types don’t have access to), he drops several mentions of his suspicions that Kubiak has been interviewing behind closed doors.

Plus, can you imagine the outcry if he’d elevated Bush immediately after letting go of Richard Smith? Jesus, we’d be tearing down the doors. This way, he, Bush, Smith, and McNair got some time to talk and make sure that they’re on the same page, which is particularly important in regards to the upcoming draft.

The Houston Texans. Bleeding battle red since 2002.

by HtownJuggernaut on Jan 15, 2009 8:41 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with your points

But the pessimistic side of me wonders if this isn’t sort of like when GW Bush tried to appoint his personal attorney to the Supreme Court. Is Kubiak going too far to reward loyalty?

I like to think that he isn’t, but only time will tell.

When I'm on the mic, I'm like global warming, you can't ignore me.

by tehGrindCrusher on Jan 15, 2009 8:39 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I'm not too concerned about that

now that he’s let go two coaches that had been with the team since the beginning. Granted, they weren’t brought in by Kubiak, but they were still loyal to the team as a whole.

I’d rather think of it as Kubiak sticking to his guns. If Kubiak thought Bush was the man for the job 3 years ago, why wouldn’t Bush be an even better fit now? Today’s Bush has all the qualities of Bush of three years ago plus experience with the players, the assistant coaches, and a damn solid understanding of what Smithiak are trying to accomplish.

I guess we’ll see, though. Who knows how it’ll pan out.

The Houston Texans. Bleeding battle red since 2002.

by HtownJuggernaut on Jan 15, 2009 8:45 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I certainly hope that's the case

And Kubes has made some pretty good personnel decisions.

When I'm on the mic, I'm like global warming, you can't ignore me.

by tehGrindCrusher on Jan 15, 2009 8:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yup

I’m hoping that it’s not the eternally optimistic fanboy in me (it took me a bit longer to let go of Carr, though I was on board with skipping Reggi Bush from day one).

The Houston Texans. Bleeding battle red since 2002.

by HtownJuggernaut on Jan 15, 2009 9:19 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You just compared Bush...

to Harriet Miers.

I… um… don’t know WHAT to say to that. Other than, holy FUCK, I hope you are WAY off.

Yay, sports.

by MDC on Jan 15, 2009 9:29 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I debated calling him on it, too

But then decided against forever remembering that I dropped her actual name into a sports blog. Good luck dealing with the shame. There’s no way I could handle it.

The Houston Texans. Bleeding battle red since 2002.

by HtownJuggernaut on Jan 15, 2009 9:46 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, that was my point.

I hope I’m way off too. I made the analogy to point out when rewarding loyalty goes too far.

Besides, I understand that Miers is more of a 3-4 person anyway.

When I'm on the mic, I'm like global warming, you can't ignore me.

by tehGrindCrusher on Jan 15, 2009 11:16 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Im just glad

you weren’t “making a case” for Reggie Bush.

Which is what I thought the title meant…

Please draft some defensive stars for the next DC.

by texanphil on Jan 17, 2009 3:47 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your home for analysis and rants about all things Houston Texan.
Start posting about the Texans »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Comcast NFL RedZone Moments from SB Nation

Music City Miracles
Tennessee Titans Red Zone Report
Bleeding Green Nation
Comcast NFL Red Zone stat of the week - Something doesn't have to give
Niners Nation
49ers Red Zone numbers: How effective are they?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Falconry_t-shirt72_small
Big Time Falcons
N1519980050_30046950_9681_small
Fellow Battle Red Blogger Needs your help!

Recent FanPosts

Small
Chester Taylor available?
11wsmaller_small
Texans Make Two Staff Changes
Stars_moons_planets_small
Fuzzy Math: Why the Texans Should Select an O-lineman In the 1st Round
Rump_20motocycle_small
2010 Houston Texans????
10docwtf_small
Goodell is thinking of banning 3 point stance
Johns_small
LT a fit in H-Town
Stars_moons_planets_small
Mock Draft Tracker
Football-girl_small
Funny SB Prop Bets
Carr_small
Free Agent Running Backs Thread

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Pats Pulpit
NFL Free Agents: anything worth a second look for our Patriots?
Arrowhead Pride
Scouts Inc. On the Chiefs Draft Needs
Arrowhead Pride
Chiefs Give Missouri Teachers A Discount On Season Tickets

Editor

Brb_small Tim

Managers

Receiverchart_small bigfatdrunk

Funny_kubiak_small Jake

Authors

Dan_halen_small MDC

Falconry_t-shirt72_small tehGrindCrusher

Comic_zombies_attack_circa_1999_small Riott

Sunaipa_small Mike Kerns

Pimp_small DreKeem

000xx1hf_small riversmccown