Now, If You Just Cut Out The Rotten Part...
...the good part might have a chance to get paid.
As I wake up in this new, wonderful 2009, I felt this sudden urge to take a gander at the cap and sees what happens when we cut all the dead players. I mean TJ, Weaver, Greenwood, and Ahman. I may or may not have not thought of the idea at all, but rather been nudged by Tim, Shake, and OTD.
Either way, lets take a look at what it would cost us to carve out some of the "lazy" and "bad" that permeates Mr. McNair's pocketbook, and what the final cap space may look like after we sign rookies, re-sign OD, and re-sign Dunta. Numbers and stuff after the break.
Taking information provided by Oiler-Texan Diehard in the comments section, I went and took a gander at In The Bullseye.com Cap Figures for your Houston Texans, along with some fact-checking over at Rotoworld, and here's what it looks like.
In 2009, the cap for the team is an estimated $124,000,000.00. The Texans, at the moment, have an estimated $29,695,000.00 available under the cap.
First, let's give Salary Cap 101 -
The salary cap was created by the NFL to allow salaries to remain relatively constant and to allow smaller market teams to compete. However, as star players started getting paid more, their cost against the cap started to rise, and the difficulty of fielding a full team rose. This facilitated the creation of the signing bonus. A signing bonus is guaranteed money that the player physically receives up front, BUT the cap cost is distributed across the length of the contract.
For example, say we sign Player X to a 4 year, $8 million dollar contract, with a $4 million dollar signing bonus.
Player X gets paid the entire $4 million dollar signing bonus up front, but the cost of the bonus gets evenly distributed throughout the contract even though it has already been paid. Say we cut this player immediately after his second season. His normal salary in no way affects us, but his signing bonus does. His total signing bonus of $4 million has already been physically paid, and as 2 years have passed, 2 years of the bonus have been cleared out of the cap. When he gets cut, the final 2 years of signing bonus that are still owed to the salary cap all get bundled up and added to the current year's salary cap. So after we cut Player X, we owe him no money, but our cap takes a $2 million dollar hit (the final 2 years of the signing bonus that would have counted against the cap).
So, Texans that we have an interest in getting rid of may or may not include Ahman Green, Anthony Weaver, Dick Smith, Travis Johnson, and/or Morlon Greenwood. What would that cost us?
Travis Johnson's contract is through 2011, and for the next 3 years his signing bonus against the cap counts $1,190,500.00 per year, or a total hit of $3,571,500.00 against the 2009 cap.
Anthony Weaver's contract is through 2010, and for the next 2 years his signing bonus' value against the cap is $2,700,000,00 or a total hit of $5,400,000.00 against the 2009 cap.
Morlon Greenwood's contract is through 2009, so we would take his final year of cap damage, which is $1,500,000.00.
Ahman Green, after his new contract , is owed $500,000.00 in bonus money for 2009 and 2010, totaling $1,000,000.00 in cap penalties if the team parted ways with him.
So, if we cut all 4 of these players, we are looking at a cap penalty totaling $14,546,500.00.
That's about half of our cap space. However, we will save just as much when we don't have to pay their salaries as well (detailed a little later on). With re-signings to OD and Dunta, and the possible holdout of Steve Slaton, plus the cost of new rookies and free agents - it will be interesting. That's definitely testing the financial acumen of Rick Smith. Now, if any of these players are cut after June 1, 2009, we pay their 2009 bonus on this cap, but all of their other penalties count toward the 2010 cap, and we do not pay the salary. This really only makes a difference in TJ's contract, because all other contracts mentioned finish in 2010.
Now, Nnamdi Asomugha was franchised by the Raiders and was paid $9,765,000.00. If we franchise Dunta, we would have to pay somewhere around that. I very, very seriously doubt we are going to front $10 million bucks for an (I'm sorry Dunta) above-average corner coming off an absolutely grotesque leg injury.
Owen Daniels is probably going to want to be paid like a top ten, or maybe top 5, tight end. Well, the contracts of Dallas Clark , Antonio Gates , Tony Gonzalez , Todd Heap, and Vernon Davis averaged somewhere around 5 years, $25 million. That probably what we can expect to be desired from O.D's agent (hopefully less).
Also, we have to think out the cost of our first round pick as well. Last year's #15 pick, Branden Albert, did not have his contract released, so we will look at cost of #14 Chris Williams, and #16 Dominque Rodgers-Cromartie. Chris Williams received a 5 year, $12.73 million contract with a ton of escalators (play time, Pro Bowl appearances, etc). DRC received a 6 year, $16 million contract, with $9 million guaranteed. I believe I read somewhere that rookie contracts increase, on average, between 6 and 10 percent per year. That implies we might be looking at a 5 year, $14 millionish contract for Taylor Mays whatever rookie Rick Smith happen to choose. I'm sure I'll be happy with Taylor Mays Rick Smith's decision.
These are all estimates and options that our relatively savvy GM has available to him. This doesn't include any free agent contracts we might sign, which would get very expensive very quickly.
To sum up this makeshift set of calculations, if we cut all 4 waste-of-oxygen players, our 2009 estimated cap space goes down to $15,150,000.00. We also don't have to pay their salaries, which reduced the "total cost" on the In The Bullseye lists by $14,098,000.00. What that means, <pushes glasses up) if my calculations are correct, is that we get our cap penalized by $14,564,500.00 but also save $14,098,000.00 if we cut them, netting essentially a wash, taking us back to roughly $30 million under the cap.
We now have space for $30 million dollars worth of players, plus the benefit of having our cap expand by $15 million in 2010 due to clearing the cap penalties we got by cutting the four previously mentioned players.
Now, if we re-sign OD to a 5 year, $25 million contract, he probably takes up $3 millionish worth of cap space in 2009 (I'm guessing a scaling base salary and a $5 million signing bonus).
If we re-sign Dunta for something similar, its another $3 million into the 2009 cap. If we franchise him, it's $10 million right out of the cap, as that would roughly be his one year base salary for the 2009 season.
That leaves us either $24 or $17 million available to sign all of our rookies and whatever free agents we can manage. It cost us about $4.1 million against the 2008 cap to sign our 2008 rookies, so if we account for a little inflation, we will probably have $5 million in rookie signings against the 2009 cap. That leaves us at either $19 or $12 million under the cap, depending on the Dunta franchising, available for free agent pick-up.
Who could we sign for $12 million bucks? It could be a corner, a defensive end, or perhaps a certain wonderfully mean-spirited strong side linebacker.
Well guys, I hope you enjoyed that. First, I want to disclaim that this is my first attempt at cap analysis. Second, if I screwed up, please let me know - I want to be able to do this right in the future. So read up, heckle and cajole, and get hyped up for 2009!
4 recs |
59 comments
|
Comments
One point on June 1 cuts.
You can cut two people before June 1 and just call them “June 1” cuts. The end result is the same, but you don’t have to wait so long.
Yay, sports.
by MDC on Jan 3, 2009 9:06 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Also...
don’t forget that rookie signings come from a specific part of the cap money, the rookie pool.
Yay, sports.
by MDC on Jan 3, 2009 9:08 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
excellent analysis, thanks
Last years 4.1 mil didn’t include a 15 pick, but a 26th after the trade. I’m not sure if that will affect it much, and I’m hoping we’re able to trade down again this year, as Smithiak have proven their 3-7 rounds are worth multiple picks.
I’m sure there will be other castoffs (JJ), much smaller $$‘s, but the cap may move slightly there as well. Also, the $30 mil on that site is based on news reports, so there’s a chance we are in place to sign Haynesworth, Pacman, and all the other thugs that will take us to the super bowl next year.
Before reading your post I was concerned, since we don’t have two studs signed yet. But now that cutting the fat is a wash, and signing those two don’t cost us a tremendous amount v. the cap, I’m optimistic about the free agency period.
I don’t see Slaton holding out. I could be wrong, but he doesn’t seem like the type. Plus, we’re drafting a back, so if he does, I say play hardball with him if we don’t have the cap room. I know the NFL contracts are slanted towards the owners, but I have a big problem with “I know I signed the contract, but now I want more…”
Please draft some defensive stars for the next DC.
by texanphil on Jan 3, 2009 9:09 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you
I know the NFL contracts are slanted towards the owners, but I have a big problem with "I know I signed the contract, but now I want more…"
But Larry Johnson does not subscribe to your theories.
by Shake on Jan 3, 2009 11:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Rec'd
for the 1st ever number-crunching salary post on the main page of BRB.
I know because I’ve been around since the beginning, and I’m old (but not as old as BFD).
by Shake on Jan 3, 2009 11:28 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
MDC
Thanks – did not know there was a separate part of the cap for rookies and about the June 1st thing.
by Riott on Jan 3, 2009 11:46 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
For people interested in the rookie pool
Here’s an interesting read
Warning: There will be math involved.
by Riott on Jan 3, 2009 11:56 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Freaking Amazing Post, Riott
I bow to your research and writing skills. Very, very well done.
Oh, and I know it doesn’t make “cap sense,” but I’m at the point where I would take a $30,000,000.00 cap hit for the next eight (8) years if it meant Travis Johnson never played for the Texans again.
Looking forward to a day when being a Texans fan doesn't mean that April is the highlight of my season...
by Tim on Jan 3, 2009 12:05 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for taking the time to crunch the numbers, another fine post sir :)
Good to know that trimming the 4 overpaid underachievers will cost us almost nothing in terms of cap space.
In addition to the not so Fab 4 that are destined to be cut, I think we should include Will Demps. He was a complete non-factor in the 2nd half of the season and his 2009 salary of $2.35 million, with a bonus of $500,000 makes him a target.
by oiler-texan diehard on Jan 3, 2009 12:10 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Demps
Is the biggest lock of the entire team to be cut, other than Green.
www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Jan 3, 2009 4:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Taylor Mays is a man
…and, great post.
When I'm on the mic, I'm like global warming, you can't ignore me.
by tehGrindCrusher on Jan 3, 2009 12:45 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
for the first time in my life
i understand the salary cap. thank you so much for explaining it so clearly, because seriously i have been baffled
by cubic on Jan 3, 2009 2:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
That was amazing
About Steve Slaton. Why would he holdout? Does that penalize us any?
by TexanFanFromTheStart on Jan 3, 2009 3:56 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
That was just my speculation a while back
I thought it was worth bringing up because of what went down with Ryan Grant. Pretty much everyone thinks I’m nuts for even thinking it… but hey, RBs don’t have a long shelf life in the NFL, and honestly he and his agent have a lot of ammunition, but not much leverage.
I know he’s a rookie and he has to prove it’s not a fluke – but when you lead the conference in yards from scrimmage and have repeated long runs (tied for 1st in the league w/ 5 runs of 40+ yards), I would not at all be shocked if he at least put his toe in the waters of asking for a new deal. PLUS – let’s not forget that he’s not getting paid first-round money, but he’s clearly first-round talent. Again, not really leverage – but definitely strong ammunition.
www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Jan 3, 2009 4:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd be very surprised
if he doesn’t hold out this summer. He plays the riskiest position on the team for a third-round contract. While it would be great for the team if he would wait to hold out until he has proven the first year wasn’t a fluke, he has every right to hold out for more cash. And, as far as I’m concerned, he definitely deserves more money. After Andre Johnson, he’s the most valuable player on the offense.
by Only_A_Lad on Jan 3, 2009 4:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think you're nuts.
I think it’s a good bet to happen. Lead the conference in yards from scrimmage on a third-round deal? Hell yeah he’s going to hold out, and I don’t blame him. He won’t get Larry Johnson money since he only has a year’s worth of work, but if I’m Steve Slaton, I’m pissed that Darren McFadden, much or less Ahman Green, is getting paid more than me.
Well, I don’t think it’s a lock for him to hold out, but I will bet my bottom dollar that his agent and Rick Smith have already started talking about a new deal for him. GMs are reluctant to do that after just one year, though, because they set a precedent where every player’s agent comes knocking on the door after they’ve had a good year.
Maybe he sits tight and plays in 2009, and then holds out in the 2009 off-season, since he’ll have another year of proof under the belt and he’ll be that much closer to the end of his original contract, which gives him more leverage. He’ll also be able to debate a larger paycheck then.
As far as there being a “type” to hold out – hey, you don’t look at the players, you look at their agents. I don’t blame a player for holding out at all.
by socctty on Jan 3, 2009 9:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If he kicks ass in 2009
I don’t think he’ll need to hold out. I think they’ll take care of him.
www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Jan 4, 2009 6:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: "Does that penalize us any?"
Not in terms of cap or anything. But RBs who hold out tend to struggle that year and have a higher-than-usual injury rate, both of which are probably due to missing minicamps/OTAs/TC.
Yay, sports.
by MDC on Jan 3, 2009 5:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I dont agree
with players holding out. You should want to play for the love of the game not for money. Dont get me wrong i would love the money but i would take what they offer me and leave it at that. No player is good enough to hold out
by TexanFanFromTheStart on Jan 3, 2009 5:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Great post Riott
You’re a fantastic addition to the Texans Blogger community.
www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Jan 3, 2009 4:10 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
By the way - my gut about the under contract guys:
Anthony Weaver stays, but is a backup
Travis Johnson stays, but is a backup
Will Demps goes
Ahman Green goes, obviously
Morlon Greenwood goes
I know you can’t afford to pay backups tons of money – but like Riott showed, the cap hit would be ENORMOUS if we cut all of these guys.
www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Jan 3, 2009 4:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
We're in agreement.
I think Weaver (for whatever reason) and TJ (because he was a first-rounder) get one more year, this time under a real DC, to pull their heads out of their asses and get it together.
Yay, sports.
by MDC on Jan 3, 2009 5:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
and hopefully
thats for the best… but I’m not holding my breath
Please draft some defensive stars for the next DC.
by texanphil on Jan 3, 2009 5:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
also maybe they fit into our new "system"
did we have a system the last 3 years?
Please draft some defensive stars for the next DC.
by texanphil on Jan 3, 2009 5:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Weaver and TJ are both dramatically overpaid
The only way Smithiak should keep them is if they agree to restructure their contracts to be more cap friendly. This is routinely done in MLB & NBA where the contracts are almost always guaranteed, not so much in the NFL. The emergence of DelJuan and Bulman, along with the continued good play from Cochran before he was hurt make these 2 very expendable IMO. If you think they will stay, but only as backups, then all the more reason they would have to agree to much lower salaries.
by oiler-texan diehard on Jan 3, 2009 10:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No way Weaver stays...
…although I’ve been proven wrong before. This guy has less sacks in his entire Texans career than Tim Bulman did THIS YEAR. His salary is higher than his signing bonus, which makes him a ripe pick for getting cut. That guy is done in Houston. Morlon Greenwood is in the same boat as well, except he’s actually had somewhat productive seasons in the past (although he’s clearly a backup now).
I’d say that Ahman Green has a better chance of staying around than Anthony Weaver. They both cost us the same in 2009, but most of Green’s cap number is due to his signing bonus, meaning the difference between keeping him and letting him go is a “measly” 1.8 mil.
You gotta look at these guys individually and ask yourself, “How much does it cost to keep this guy, and how much does it cost to let him go and sign someone in his place? What the difference there in terms of skill and in terms of money?”
Weaver is gone
TJ stays
Demps goes
Green probably goes just because of injury liability
Greenwood is gone
by socctty on Jan 3, 2009 9:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Scratch that about Ahman
He’s totally done, not a chance in the world of staying around. I was looking at the 2008 figures, not the 2009 ones.
by socctty on Jan 3, 2009 10:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
My favorite Anthony Weaver stat
…during his tenure with the Texans – one sack, two interceptions. LOL
www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Jan 4, 2009 6:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
trade?
can the texans deal TJ for a 3-7th rounder? how would that work against our cap
by EveryHoustonTeamRox! on Jan 3, 2009 7:20 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
No way you get a third-rounder
Maybe a fifth for him. I’m pretty sure the contract transfers and whatever team gets him absorbs all the salary cap ramifications for that, clearing him off of our books.
by socctty on Jan 3, 2009 9:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
TJ As Trade Bait?
I think trading Travis Johnson is much like trading David Carr after the 2006 season—a pipe dream. In the event any team really wanted TJ, there’s no way they’d agree to trade anything of value (e.g., a draft pick in any round) for him. His salary is vastly greater than what he’s worth, and I can’t see a team giving up value for the right to overpay an underachieving, mouthy DT.
Looking forward to a day when being a Texans fan doesn't mean that April is the highlight of my season...
by Tim on Jan 4, 2009 8:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
re: trade
The thing with a trade, also, is that they pick up the contract. Now, if TJ were to agree beforehand to restructure, we might be able to get a deal done, but as it stands, no one will touch him for that price. We couldn’t get a day-old burrito for that sack of piss.
Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.
by beefy on Jan 5, 2009 3:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Clarification
“…we get our cap penalized by $14,564,500.00 but also save $14,098,000.00 if we cut them, netting essentially a wash, taking us back to roughly $30 million under the cap.”
Shouldn’t that read “…we get our cap penalized by $14,564,500.00 in 2009 but also save $14,098,000.00 over the lifetime of the contracts if we cut them…”
If that is the case, we wouldn’t be roughly $30 million under the cap in 2009. The 2009 salaries of the players in question is $10,024,500 which means we’d be down around $4.5 million against the cap.
Unless I’m missing something, it seems like you are under the impression that if we take a salary off of the 2010 books, we get credit for it in 2009. (Which may very well be the case, but it wasn’t mentioned in the post)
by socctty on Jan 3, 2009 8:54 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
What I was looking at..
was the 2009 salaries of Weaver, TJ, Ahman, and Greenwood according to the In The Bullseye.com salary rankings. Their SALARIES (not bonuses) total $14,098,000 in 2009 alone. The cost of their salaries is included in the figure that has us at aprox. 30 million under the cap. By cutting them, you take the cap penalty but you also don’t pay that 14 million ish in salaries that season, lowering the projected figure on the website. We do not get any “credit” for salaries, as salaries are not guarenteed. We just have the benefit of not paying their salaries in the 2009 season.
I think, also, in your $10,024,500 you may be forgetting that Ahman Green is due 4.8 million in salary in 2009, but I’m not sure.
Im at work right now, but I will finish this idea when I get home.
by Riott on Jan 3, 2009 9:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ahman
By bad, I added the numbers up using the 2008 figures, not the 2009 figures.
by socctty on Jan 3, 2009 10:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Does it make sense now?
Or should I go over it again, I just want to make sure its clear.
by Riott on Jan 3, 2009 11:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I understood how it functioned; I just added up the wrong numbers and thought you had forgotten to carry a 1 or something.
by socctty on Jan 4, 2009 6:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Nice post.
Cutting those four may be a wash in terms of cap space, but satisfaction we’ll all feel can’t be measured in mere dollars.
And is $12 enough for Julius Peppers? Based on Jared Allen’s deal, I’d imagine he’d get at least 12 per year.
Also, any idea where we stand in relation to the rest of the league in cap space? Particularly within the division. Seems like Indy and Jacksonville aught to really have their hands tied in terms of cap space.
by Nashmeister on Jan 4, 2009 2:45 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
We have to forget about Peppers
He’s a lock to be franchised if they don’t get a long-term deal. Their only other FA who was possible to get the franchise tag was Chris Gamble, and they locked him up long-term during the season. We’re not getting Peppers. Nobody’s getting Peppers.
www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Jan 4, 2009 6:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why do you crush my dreams with such heartless logic?
Yay, sports.
by MDC on Jan 4, 2009 8:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If we don't sign Dunta, sure
… I can’t imagine that in the span of two off-seasons, we’d give two pretty good-sized deals to Frenchie, Dunta, and a HUGE deal to Asomugha.
That is, of course, assuming that the Raiders don’t franchise Aso again, as they’ve said they would. :(
The biggest-impact name that I’m allowing myself to consider even a REMOTE possibility is Bart Scott. I think he’d be a KILLER on our defense… plus, he hates the entire world. My kind of football player.
www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Jan 4, 2009 9:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Scott
I am 100% on board with signing Bart Scott. The Ravens have Ray Lewis and Terrell Suggs to sign this off-season, so Scott is probably the odd man out.
He’d be a beast of a player next to DeJesus.
by DisplacedTexan on Jan 5, 2009 9:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Tommie Harris
I keep seeing him on FA lists. If he’s really available – that could be a good target, imo.
by DisplacedTexan on Jan 5, 2009 9:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Tommie Harris is way better than any DT we currently have
From ESPN:
Player News (last updated: January 3, 2009)
News: Harris had 37 tackles and five sacks this season.
Spin: Harris started just 13 games this season due to a knee injury. His productivity suffered, as an ankle injury conspired with his ailing knee to limit his explosiveness. When healthy he wreaks havoc along the line, but that’s something he hasn’t been since 2005.
He is a Texan from Killeen, and dissed the Longhorns by going to OU. Then he beat up on the Horns for a few years. He gets 5 sacks this year playing injured? Even if he is not 100% of the player he was a few years ago, he is still head and shoulders above TJ and Weaver. Definitely worth investigating.
by oiler-texan diehard on Jan 5, 2009 3:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Does he have character issues?
That we know of?
I know Tank Johnson does – but I’d bring either one of them in. Neither of them are choir boys, but neither of them are Pacman Jones, either.
www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Jan 5, 2009 3:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He hasn't been healthy since 2005
That’s three years ago. No thanks. Unless we could get him for $15 in hamburger meat.
When I'm on the mic, I'm like global warming, you can't ignore me.
by tehGrindCrusher on Jan 6, 2009 10:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sign him!
Just the mere fact of him dissing the horns gives me the horny pants.
Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.
by beefy on Jan 5, 2009 3:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
According to rotoworld
Tommie Harris signed an 4 year, 40 million dollar contract on 6/19/08
http://www.rotoworld.com/Content/playerpages/player_contract.aspx?sport=NFl&id=2776
So, scratch Tommie Harris off of our free agent boards.
by Riott on Jan 6, 2009 12:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Assuming Peppers and Nnamdi are tagged...
Bart Scott is at the top of my list.
Yay, sports.
by MDC on Jan 5, 2009 10:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought that
Nmandi Asomugha signed the franchise contract only on the condition that they would not franchise him the next year? Or maybe I’m crazy. I haven’t seen it though
by Riott on Jan 5, 2009 12:55 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
He doesn’t have a “Haynesworth Clause” in his contract – at least, not publicly. IIRC, it was discussed that he was seeking that sort of agreement – but it never came out that it went down that way… that, plus there’s been talk from the Raiders FO and writers that they would just franchise tag him again in 2009 with no objections from Nnamdi or anyone who follows the team closely. In other words, all season through the talk of him being re-franchised, none of the writers ever said “but they can’t because of his contract.”
There was also a LOT of talk that when DeAngelo Hall was cut, part of the reasoning was the Raiders knew they were going to concentrate on Aso in the off-season. I mean, there’s no way they could pay both of those guys – especially since Hall got a huge deal from them while being lined up across from a guy who’s 100x the player he is or ever was. (Of course that begs the question – why did they sign Hall in the first place, but that’s a different topic).
Looking over the list of free agent Raiders – there isn’t anyone on there who you would even consider franchising over Nnamdi. The closest name is a freaking punter – Lechler. LOL
2009 Raider UFAs: (this is from KFFL,so it’s not totally up to date – but you get the point. He’s going to be franchised)
QB Marques Tuiasosopo
WR Drew Carter
WR Johnnie Morant
TE Tony Stewart
P Shane Lechler
OG Cooper Carlisle
LB Sam Williams
CB Nnamdi Asomugha
CB Justin Miller
CB Duane Starks
FS Rashad Baker
Anyway – this guy would absolutely be at the top of my list if he were available. Maybe Aso will raise enough hell with the Raiders that they won’t tag him again, but he doesn’t seem like the type to do so. I think the best he can hope for to get out of Oakland is a sign-and-trade deal… but the asking price will be ridiculous.
It’s fun to kick around, though. sniffle
www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Jan 5, 2009 1:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
does this affect our cap numbers above?
from here:
In a year when it will be more difficult than ever to restructure contracts because none of the money can be pushed into 2010 when there’s no salary cap, Indianapolis and other teams will struggle to find salary-cap room.
Please draft some defensive stars for the next DC.
by texanphil on Jan 6, 2009 12:58 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 
























