Quick thoughts on the Bengals game
Back from a busy week at work and home followed by a week of vacation. I'll hopefully be back on my regular posting schedule soon. Didn't want to bump the game thread, so here's a FanShot.
1. Brian Cushing: What Matt said (especially the part about the announcers). However, my conclusion is extremely different.
Cushing's bipolar play has been symbolic of the Texans' season to date. He's a gap gambler, and this has led directly to several long runs (obviously, with an assist to Frank Bush, John Busing, etc.).
And, no, he really isn't very good in coverage. FO will "prove" this as the year goes on, but it's still apparent he struggles in short- to intermediate coverage. Yes, he did a good to great job in coverage in the Bengals' game.
However, these are very, very fixable flaws, and both could be directly attributable to his simply being a rookie. He needs to better understand his responsibilities and stop getting caught out of position so easily. He'll likely not be a true cover linebacker, but that's OK. Being average would be fantastic. And he needs to start shedding blockers far better.
At SLB, he was going to put up stats. Remember that Zac Diles was our second leading tackler last year, and he played only half the season.
However, it's looking like I was wrong about him. Through his six games so far, he has shown flashes of brilliance and incompetence, but the incompetence can be fixed. You can't find the brilliance just anywhere.
2. DeMeco Ryans: But let's not kid ourselves: DeMeco Ryans is one of the elite MLBs in the NFL today, and this is his defensive squad. While Cushing was very good against the Bengals, Ryans was spectacular, and Ryans was responsible for the forced fumble in the second half. Ryans and Cushing are like a good cop/bad cop relationship, and the combination is awesome. Zac Diles is playing pretty well, too. Our speed at LB is outstanding.
3. The Announcers: Honestly, that was the worst called game I've ever heard. When I finally watched the game Friday night, I was amazed to learn these idiots (Criqui and Cross) still have their damn jobs. NO, you morons, Frank Okam is NOT responsible for securing the Texans run defense. Teams need a Carson Palmer to win championships (and Matt Schaub isn't that type of player)? And precisely how many rings does Palmer have? Here's one last message to you: FOAD. I'd even be willing to sit through Brent Musburger than listen to those guys again. No, not Tim McCarver, though.
4. Glover Quin and Jacques Reeves: These guys are difference makers in the secondary. Reeves was outstanding against the Bengals, and while I still don't think Quin is a long-tern answer at CB, the prospects of him at FS with his range and tackling ability gives me wood. And if y'all remember correctly, I was down on the Quin pick. Being proved wrong there, as well.
5. Dunta Robinson: Yay, you had a tough hit on a guy after he got a first down. But your ass was burned repeatedly all game. Have no doubt, Dunta, that you are a complete liability in coverage, and you don't even tackle well anymore. Once we finally start Quin and Reeves at the corners, getting Dunta off the field, we'll be that much better.
6. Dear Mario Williams: I miss you. I miss the sacks. Hugs, bfd. We still aren't getting enough pressure on the QB on a consistent basis, and we rarely close the deal when we do.
7. Steve Slaton: Stick-um. Buy it. Use it.
8. JUGGERNAUT Offense: Honestly, the "player" of the game was the offensive play-calling, whether it was Baby Shan or Kubiak himself. There are just so many freaking weapons, and we did a great job mixing up plays while still "establishing" the run behind a weakened offensive line...by not establishing the run. While Chris Myers is Ragdoll against bigger DTs, he's simply outstanding blocking on screens.
That's it. Need to go make breakfast before my fam strings me up!
1 recs |
12 comments
| Add comment
Comments
Nice Post
Good to have you back, BFD.
Looking forward to a day when being a Texans fan doesn't mean that April is the highlight of my season...
by Tim on Oct 25, 2009 9:13 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I generally agree with you
I would note that our dbs are much better in man coverage than they are in zone (I say this after the Niners game). And our run d seems very legit.
When I'm on the mic, I'm like global warming, you can't ignore me.
by tehGrindCrusher on Oct 25, 2009 3:32 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
agreed
The zone shit is killing me, and it hurts the team. Badly.
Note to self: Insert something witty here.
by bigfatdrunk on Oct 25, 2009 4:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Snore.....
What, no stats, to back up your blindly polarized opinion? Only a twisted mind can try to argue with success. If you didn’t notice, Cushing got the NFL’s award for Defensive Player of the Week. You’re on an island of one with your steadfast refusal to accept the obvious…something that the other 99.9999% of Texans’ fans and now the NFL league award giver-outers and I’m sure the fans and coaches of other teams, too, have already realized. Give respect where respect is due. You can’t even see beyond the tip of your nose when it comes to Cushing. In your eyes, everything he has done is because he is lucky, or the play came right to him and he made the catch or tackle in self-defense. or he just couldn’t help but get out of the way. No one expects him to make every play and every tackle, but seems, you won’t be satisfied until he does. You need to chill out and try to enjoy the game a little. Enjoy the good plays. Take pride in your team. I think this is your team, because you write about them all the time, but I’m not really sure. You seem to be the harshest critic at times.
I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?
by Rip Jersey on Oct 25, 2009 3:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
WTF?
How exactly do you equate BFD saying he was wrong about Cushing and he has shown “brilliance” with your statement of “In your eyes, everything he has done is because he is lucky, or the play came right to him and he made the catch or tackle in self-defense.”
Yes RJ, you were a fan of the Cush pick since April. But your attacks of anyone who questions/criticizes aspects of his game are uncalled for and tired.
by Shake on Oct 25, 2009 4:39 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
What's that on you chin?
You attack me but you don’t discuss the points I made. You are nothing more than what you accuse of others of doing.
I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?
by Rip Jersey on Oct 25, 2009 4:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
? -- Then I'll go to another of your "points"
Actually, I quoted you. Which is a lot like “discussing the points [you] made.” (Oops, did it again) And to follow up, you still didn’t answer my question of how you equate those.
But since you didn’t notice (or like) the discussion regarding that particular point you made, then let’s try another one:
Please show me the research proving that “99.9999% of Texans’ fans, NFL award giver-outers (sic), and fans & coaches of other teams” already “accept the obvious”. Also, please define “obvious” since this was not addressed despite the eloquent use of multiple run-on sentences.
by Shake on Oct 26, 2009 8:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
- would say the writer's comments are bi-polar
The writer says that the player can play brilliantly, but he also says that even Zac Diles can accumulate stats at the SLB position. That is a copout in my opinion. You can’t give a guy credit and also take it away by saying anybody can do it just by playing the position. The writer has steadfastly, week after week, refused to acknowledge the impact the player has on the team by his effort, his intensity, his intangibles, his football IQ and his on-field production. He repeatedly chalks it up to the player just being there and he couldn’t help but reach out and tackle the opponent, or catch the ball, or pressure the passer, or close the gap. It is always because, well, he’s the SLB and anyone can do that. Never any regard to, the guy has put himself there through years of training, looking at tape, and playing with speed, power and using the smarts that he has developed. The writer made a huge oversight in his original opinion and still, after having been named the NFL Defensive Player of the Week, that has followed a stellar rookie season, he still can’t give the player the credit he deserves. That is all I’m saying.
If you think the writer is supposed to be immune from criticism, then you haven’t been following the comments made by the writer on a constant basis. The writer takes every opportunity to lambast other writers for their opinions, even once jokingly saying that he would rape one with a rusty chainsaw. And then, when I joked about it, actually giving him a sideways compliment, he gets his nuts twisted out of shape. Go figure. Long story short. He has been wrong about Cushing right from the start. Inferring the he is a cheat and PED-user, saying that he can’t tackle, saying that anyone including himself could make the plays he makes. The writer is open to crticism. If he can’t take it, he is in the wrong place at the wrong time and this is all just an accident.
I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?
by Rip Jersey on Oct 26, 2009 1:07 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
OK
So you have a grudge against BFD. Got it.
But I would also say that this grudge is changing the way you read his post. I thought it meant something along the lines of "don’t just look at the stat sheet because it will always be misleading for a SLB…..look at the film, where Cushing has shown brilliance (which cannot be easily found/taught) and also rookie incompetence (which is expected from a rookie and can be fixed.
Also, to help your own side of the debate, please don’t use Player of the Week to ever justify any player as being awesomely awesome. Hell, even Vince Young won Rookie of the Year and has a Pro Bowl on his resume’.
by Shake on Oct 26, 2009 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If my reaction to the writer
Has colored the way I read his post then maybe I can be forgiven this one time. Yes, the player is a rookie and he makes rookie mistakes. I am tryin, but I really don’t read it the way you do. I see somone saying, sure the player has shown some flashes of brilliance and yes, he has some stats, but don’t look at that because even Zac Diles racked up stats…it’s inherent with the position. He’ll rack up stats just because he’s on the field. Keep in mind the player is screwing up all over the field. Look at the tape! He is responsible for all kinds of big plays. He has a long way to go before he will be a reliable LB.
That’s what I read. Let’s hear what the writer says.
I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?
by Rip Jersey on Oct 26, 2009 5:06 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Dunno
BFD also says that Diles is playing pretty well. I don’t think he hays a problem with Diles at all. So if BFD is comparing the rookie (Cushing) to a veteran who finished second on the team in tackles in only half a season (Diles) then perhaps we can interpret it to mean that Cushing is also playing pretty well. He’s probably also acknowledging that SLBs tend to make a lot of tackles.
And I think it’s totally fair to point out that Cushing has made some rookie mistakes. This seems totally uncontroversial.
Honestly, if someone other than bfd had written this post, you would probably agree with it. I mean, is it controversial to say that Cushing has played extremely well at times (“brilliance”), needs to improve in coverage and has made some rookie mistakes?
Really, I think you’re overreacting.
When I'm on the mic, I'm like global warming, you can't ignore me.
by tehGrindCrusher on Oct 27, 2009 7:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did someone put sand in your vagina? You really should go back and reread his post.
by nolander on Oct 26, 2009 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















