Texans to Try Out Larry Johnson
The Houston Texans will hold a workout for embattled running back Larry Johnson. Johnson was cut today by the Kansas City Chiefs after several run-ins with new head coach Todd Haley, most notably a recent public questioning of Haley's background followed by a homophobic slur.
I would hope that there is no chance that the Texans will claim Johnson off waivers and therefore inherit his $4.55 million base salary. If the Texans sign Johnson, it will most likely be as an unrestricted free agent after he has passed thru waivers. That will depend on if Houston makes an offer, and if that offer is favored by Johnson over any other offers he might receive.
I personally hope this is just Kubiak and company doing their due diligence. Larry Johnson is exactly the kind of person you try to keep out of your locker room. It isn't a recent development either; Johnson had a history of acting up with the Herman Edwards administration as well. And what do you get at this point in his career for your troubles? 2.7 yards per carry. Granted, the Chiefs' offensive line is abysmal, so he might do better elsewhere, but I don't think he is worth the risk.
What say you? Do you want to see Larry Johnson in a Texans uniform?
0 recs |
239 comments
|
Comments
Whoa now
Where was anything said about a tryout?
He has to clear waivers first.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 6:04 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
The link
says that they’re going to work him out. Apparently there are a few other teams interested in Johnson,most notably the Redskins. I say that the Redskins are the most notable because Dan Snyder is notorious for over-paying free agents. So, if both teams give an offer, he’ll either go with the skins for money or another team because he wants to win.
You know... for kids.
by Jake on Nov 9, 2009 6:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The link says they're going to check him out
This is EXACTLY why I was taking the Chron (and McClain) to task on my blog today. All Kubiak said was that they would look into LJ like they would ANY other free agent. The actual quotes from Kubiak said nothing at all about a workout, a tryout, bringing him in, or anything. Just that they’ll do their due diligence on LJ just like they do with ALL FAs at need positions.
The Chron just took bits and pieces of the press conference and put what they wanted to put up. They’re being VERY sloppy with context today.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 6:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This is different from what you expect from the Chron?
by chrisjay84 on Nov 9, 2009 6:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, the link now just says
The Texans’ running game is so bad they are interested in signing former Kansas City running back Larry Johnson.
The Texans, who are 5-4 and averaging only 90.8 yards rushing, are one of several teams showing interest in Johnson, who was placed on waivers Monday.
"We’re going to do our homework on him just like we did our homework on Edgerrin James last week," coach Gary Kubiak said. "Obviously, I think when a name like that (Johnson) comes on the free agent market like today, we’ll take a look at him just like any other player.
"He’s been a good player in this league, and I’m sure he’ll get a lot of interest from a lot of people."
That’s not even a check him out. This post is waaaay overblown, thanks to the Chron.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
by riversmccown on Nov 9, 2009 7:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
But the original article never said anything about a tryout. It was just McClain not including the proper context, thus making it VERY misleading.
McClain has probably now figured that out, and changed the article accordingly.
Context, context, context.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 7:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL, but still - LOOK at the FIRST SENTENCE!!!
“The Texans’ running game is so bad they are interested in signing former Kansas City running back Larry Johnson.”
“Interested in signing” is NOT the same thing as “we’re going to do our due diligence.”
If someone puts a pile of cocaine in front of me, my LOOKING AT IT doesn’t indicate that I’m about to SNORT the fucking thing. Jesus Fucking Christ.
Man, I’m just really, really irritated today.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 7:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m just going to post that on my blog as well. Because right now, I probably WOULD snort the fucking thing.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 7:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll be really sad when the Chron dies
j/k it will make no difference in my life at all.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
by riversmccown on Nov 9, 2009 7:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Remember when they toyed with the idea of making people pay to read it online?
I really hope that happens.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 7:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
true
Especially when it’s not worth it to read for free.
If I want to kill brain cells, I’m going to get drunk. Dammit.
Note to self: Insert something witty here.
by bigfatdrunk on Nov 10, 2009 8:37 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Also... uh
I guess by now everyone knows my opinion… not no, but HELL F*CK NO.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 6:05 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
He's not worth it.
He may play well and solve the short yardage problem. But NO. Even if he does not become a distraction to the team, he’s one dimensional. He can’t block. He is terrible at catching the ball. He does not even sell plays well like a play action or screen play. He does one thing and is not worth it for that one dimension.
by theaxeeffect4721 on Nov 9, 2009 6:12 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, that's another thing that I left out in my blog entry
For a big guy, he’s a PATHETIC pass-blocker? I wonder why?
Well, it’s because he’s a pussy. He hits women, and he has now started to avoid contact.
Big. Pussy. Fuck. No.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 6:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know...
But if he proves he can fumble it at the 1 even BETTER than Slaton, Moats or Brown – then why wouldn’t we?
by WhiskeyR on Nov 9, 2009 6:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
LOL please
Adding LJ would add another ring to the circus that is this blog.
On a serious note, I wouldn’t touch him with a 20 ft pole and I think the Texans would make a huge mistake to take TO in running back form.
Big Cat Country Radio, Every Wednesday Night at 10 PM EST
by Jonathan Loesche on Nov 9, 2009 6:18 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think certain guys deserve a 2nd chance.
But not LJ.
You are banned from Music City Miracles.
Happy Now Tits?
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.
by CFHTim on Nov 9, 2009 7:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He had plenty of chances not to be a dickbag. 4 arrests. FOUR.
by nolander on Nov 9, 2009 7:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
JUST for the violence against women
Who knows how many times he has done it without arrests.
And let’s not forget that he called his own fans fags, and the media faggots. You might think that’s okay, and it’s not a big deal – and maybe it’s not – but it goes to further prove he’s not very smart, OR that he was trying to talk his way out of KC.
That’s a cancer. That’s a selfish player. That’s a piece of shit.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 7:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's the thing that irks me
If you go to any sports blog or msg board you’ll see fans talking about players or other teams’ fans being “pussies” or make any of a hundred different references to someone being gay, yet when an athlete mirrors their own poor decorum then he’s just a scumbag. Hate on him for his legal run ins if you want, but it’s a little hypocritical to bag on him for hin non-PC rants on “twitter” or whatever.
by Bryan72076 on Nov 10, 2009 9:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
We're fans.
He’s a football player. Our rants are heard by other fans. We are held to a different standard. LJ? He’s a professional football player. HE SHOULD KNOW BETTER. He’s under the media spotlight. He’s supposed to be a role model. It’s not a good comparison to use. It’s not hypocritical at all.
by Jordann on Nov 10, 2009 9:56 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You can't see the hypocricy in that?
At the end of the day he’s just another guy like anyone else. Athletes aren’t given uber social interraction skills at birth, they’re prone to the same follies as anyone else. No one should be held to higher standards than we hold ourselves, to do so is being hypocritical. You can argue that we have the right to put double standards on athletes and public figures, doesn’t make it less hypocritical though.
by Bryan72076 on Nov 10, 2009 12:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
When he signed that fucking contract and became a professional football player
he should already know how to act. He needs to act accordingly. He’s under the media’s spotlight. And what he said was very UNPROFESSIONAL. No one should be held to higher standards that we hold ourselves? That’s not how it works. We live different lives. Your standards are different than mines. If you wanna have a player that acts the way he does more power to you. But it makes me ashamed to be put in the same category as you because we’re fans of the same team.
by Jordann on Nov 10, 2009 12:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't say I have no moral standards.
Just that I think we should hold ourselves to the same standards we hold others to. I didn’t say it wasn’t “unprofessional” or distastefull what he “tweeted” or whatever, just that it bothers me that the same people who railroad him for those comments make nearly identicle comments on their own. That’s hypocritical and I simply named it as such and stated that it’s irksome to me when people do it. Do you really think that he should behave in a “professional” and “moral” manner and if he doesn’t then he’s a total scumbag, but when a “fan” echoes his sentiments they’re just fans being fans?
I disagree with that thinking, but whatever floats your boat, just don’t make hypocritical comments then get offended if someone calls you on it. Yes we all hold different standards personally, but honestly i’d be more inclined to believe that the person that deserves the label “scumbag” is the one that expects others to be moral and decent while they hold themselves to a much more lenient set of standards. If you think LJ is wrong for making homosexual references online, you should be against anyone including yourself making those same comments.
by Bryan72076 on Nov 10, 2009 1:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I never said you didn't have moral standards.
But if you’re willing to tolerate that man’s actions and have him on the team then tell me that nobody should be held to a higher standards than our own? It paints a picture Bryan.
The words that LJ used doesn’t bother me. It’s what the comment meant. He was bagging on his fans. He was bagging on the organization that’s been so nice to him and has given him so many chances. Its shows how ungrateful and how unprofessional he is. Im not against making homosexual references. Im sorry. I call Peyton a fag as much as I can. I dont have a problem with that. But if I was under the media spotlight. If I was getting paid millions of dollars. If thousands of kids look up to me because im a professional football player. I would fucking clean my act up. I wouldn’t act the way he’s acting. I wouldn’t say shit that I know would be scrutinized by the media. Its fucking ridiculous.
by Jordann on Nov 10, 2009 1:36 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I never implied that the Texans should sign LJ....
All I said was I find hypocrisy bothersome. And yea, I believe that you shouldn’t hold others to higher standards than you are willing to live by yourself. He was baggin on his fans and bagging on his team, and I find that distasteful and wouldn’t want him on the team because of it, but then again I don’t bag on my team or its players. If I did then it would be hypocritcal of me to expect him to behave better than I expect of myself.
So if you were a millionaire, if kids were looking up to you, and if people knew who you were enough to be interested in your posts, then you’d find it important to “clean your act up”? You shouldn’t have to be in the spotlight to want to be a decent human being and respectfull towards others. See I say that because I myself try at least to be decent and respectfull. Not saying one belief is “right” or “wrong” but in either way it’s hypocritical to hold one person or group of people to a higher standard than you hold yourself to. You can argue that it’s ok to be a hypocrite in this situation, but I don’t see how you can claim it’s not hypocritical at all, it’s darn near a text book example of it.
by Bryan72076 on Nov 10, 2009 1:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I never said you were in that bandwagon.
That why I said WILLING TO (since you like using your bold) and not WILL
I dont know what world you live in but in my world, players are held to a different standard because they are public figures that can help shape the mind of young kids everywhere. He should’ve been careful with his choice of words because there are kids that follow football and when they see somebody in the news that acted the way that LJ did then they’ll mirror their actions. The fans can say whatever the fuck they want about the player because they dont have the media dissecting every single word they say or slur they choose to use. It’s completely different. I dont know how you can’t see that. Different situations. You can stick to your mind frame about how you shouldn’t hold others to higher standards than you are willing to live by yourself but you can’t forget that everybody has different standards. So it’s just not gonna work like that.
And to answer your barrages of IF’s, yes I would clean up my act. Me saying all the things i’ve said(like Peyton is a douchefag or BIGBADBRAD is a fagtastic blogger) doesn’t mean that im not a decent human being and im not respectful to others. Unlike LJ, I dont have to watch what I say because im not under the media’s microscope. I love my freedom of speech and being able to say what the fuck I want. I dont have kids that are not mine that looks up to me as a rolemodel. But if I did, I would choose my words in order to convey the message that im trying to send.
I said it wasn’t a good comparison and I admit, I shouldn’t have put that it’s not hypocritical at all it is but yeah players and fans are held to different standards. If all you’re trying to argue was that I said it wasn’t hypocritical at all then you’re correct. I retract that statement.
by Jordann on Nov 10, 2009 3:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Disclaimer.
I dont have kids that are mine either.
by Jordann on Nov 10, 2009 3:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ladies, ladies....
You’re both right.
Jordann is being hypocritical AND LJ is held to a higher standard than Jordann. It’s about consequences and repurcussions.
Let’s say Jordann (if that IS your real name…) calls Chris Johnson a nelly fag with a crop of dildos in his rectum, what happens to him professionally? Financially? Nada nada nada… nada damn thing. He’s got complete anonymity, along with almost every other overweight, smoking, living in mom’s basement (yeah right… like we’ve got basements in TX) blogosphere resident.
Yet, Larry Johnson is Larry Fucking Johnson. A dude with a face, job, social security number, and possibly some fans. Can he be hurt professionally or financially for making an ass of himself? Absofugginlutely.
I admire your selfless stance of, “we should all be good to one another and what we do in this life reflects in eternity.” But CFTim and the internet killed that shit years ago. savvy?
Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.
by beefy on Nov 10, 2009 3:23 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
WOW MAN, YOU ARE SO WRONG....JUST.../FACEPALM......
..
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Ok just kidding. Agree with everything you just said 100%.
Go Bills!
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Nov 10, 2009 3:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Dont make Patrik Willis
slap some sense into you TF.
It’s “GO NINERS” not “GO BILLS”
by Jordann on Nov 10, 2009 3:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So CFHTim and the interweb...
used to be partners in crime? So that’s why he keeps breaking the interwebz. They have a history together. Gotcha.
Jordan(n) is my real name and I wouldn’t call CJ a nelly fag with a crop of dildos in his rectum. I would call him a sheep-fucking inbred douchenozzle that snorts coke from beezlebud’s decaying corpse. There’s clearly a difference there.
P.S.
Thanks for ending this beefy. I wanted to keep this going as long as possible because I realized earlier that I have to go two weeks without Texans football. What the hell am I supposed to talk about or who the hell am I supposed to argue with now?
by Jordann on Nov 10, 2009 3:44 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Good point...
Carry on. Nothing to see here.
Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.
by beefy on Nov 10, 2009 3:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Decency wasn't killed off
It’s just getting rarer to find anymore. That doesn’t mean someone reading a msg board can’t point out the hypocrisy in it. With luck someone reads it and says “you know what, I have been a hypocrite lately, I should work on that”, the worst that happens is someone argues that holding public figures to a different set of moral standards than you have for yourself is not actually a form a hypocrisy and you spend a little time debating the definition of the word.
Certainly public figures are affected on a grander scale by everything they do in life, but everyone’s actions are a reflection of themselves. It’s just with us regular Joes 90% of our actions go completely unnoticed, but the reflection is still there to be seen by anyone who pays attention to it.
by Bryan72076 on Nov 10, 2009 5:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok reverend... we get it.
Just like a team is what their end season record says they is, people are what they put out in the world. i do agree with that.
The me I am doesn’t need to bite his tongue here to keep his paycheck though. (is that second person? third?)
I am in no way admired or looked up to, though, so my p’s are not minded, nor are the q’s.
Preach on, though, brother! I hear there is a group around these parts that not only eats babies, but fucks sisters to top off the sindae. They could sure use some enlightenment.
.
.JJ = Just Joking
JK = Just Kidding
LOL = Luc O’Flaherty Longley
Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.
by beefy on Nov 10, 2009 9:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not preaching that everyone be saints
Just that we expect the same behavior from others that we put out there ourselves. In short, that we make an attempt not to be hypocrites.
I agree that public figures are affected by their actions, good or bad, than the average Joe. It’s just if your moral values only stand up when others are watching, what’s the point? You’re right that it’s why there are so many “keyboard warriors” who seem to make it their life’s work to use every insult known to man and possibly make up a few of their own, but should these same people also be “preaching” when guys like LJ step over the line with comments made? The first thing that crosses my mind when I see it is “yea, and you have room to talk”.
by Bryan72076 on Nov 11, 2009 8:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Beefy...
I admire your selfless stance of, "we should all be good to one another and what we do in this life reflects in eternity." But CFTim and the internet killed that shit years ago. savvy?
Hey I try to be good to others most of the time. Me and the internet are enemies, not partners in crime.
You are banned from Music City Miracles.
Happy Now Tits?
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.
by CFHTim on Nov 10, 2009 6:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It was the perfect storm situation I was referring to...
Not a combination of efforts. You ever watch nature shows when those mountain rams rare back and slam the fuck out of each other’s head? That’s the shit I was talking about. A clash so devastating that we are all left as merely spectators to its awesomeness.
Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.
by beefy on Nov 10, 2009 8:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Haha
ok now it makes more sense.
You are banned from Music City Miracles.
Happy Now Tits?
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.
by CFHTim on Nov 10, 2009 8:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
DAMN DAMN DAMN.
I missed all of these yesterday.
And now it’s dead.
BLAH.
by Jordann on Nov 11, 2009 12:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LJ is not TO version running back
because TO was very good for a long time. LJ, well, was good for like two seasons and now is completely abysmal.
by cubic on Nov 9, 2009 11:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
True
We already have beef and his animals to worry about.
Note to self: Insert something witty here.
by bigfatdrunk on Nov 10, 2009 8:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You can add
grade school kids to that list.
I heard Beefy can keep up with the best of them.
by Jordann on Nov 10, 2009 9:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Different kind of fuckin'
Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.
by beefy on Nov 10, 2009 3:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd touch him with a 4 foot pole though...
…really hard across his forehead.
by BrownCrayon on Nov 11, 2009 12:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL, from Texans Talk...
“Who will protect our cheerleaders?”
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 6:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
ME!
Note to self: Insert something witty here.
by bigfatdrunk on Nov 10, 2009 8:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Realistically
There is absolutely no way in hell the Texans would ever ever EVER in a million years sign that guy.
But they should at least see how good he is at fumbling. Just in case.
by WhiskeyR on Nov 9, 2009 6:38 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I've made my stance pretty clear
If he comes in and works out and shows burst and power and looks like he wants to be here than why the f not
could be a big help. Could be nothing. Worst case is lose money, and it’s not our money so who gives a fuck right
by AllenOU on Nov 9, 2009 6:42 PM CST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
See, details are important.
On my blog, I don’t recall you ever saying anything about how he needs to show that he has burst and power or that he needs to show he wants to be here. I just saw you say that they need to bring him in. To me, that means you think they should pick him up off waivers, which is INSANE because of how much he would cost for what little he would do for the offense.
But when you say he needs to be brought in – well, that’s just not going to happen unless he CLEARS waivers. You really sounded like you were blindly supporting us signing the guy, and didn’t say what you just said above… which definitely would have changed my responses to your original posts.
I hope this doesn’t sound like semantics… it’s not. In this case, the details and context are important.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 6:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If he comes in and looks good
I say take him and his salary. What , about 2.22 mil for half a season.
Can you work him out before you decide to take on his salary.
Have to see what he looks like in person if your the texans, but he does know how to hold on to the rock
he’s got a little left
by AllenOU on Nov 9, 2009 6:59 PM CST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
But it doesn't work like that.
He’s on waivers. He’s not going to do tryouts before tomorrow at 3pm. You either claim him right now sight unseen, or you hope he clears waivers then negotiate against everyone else who wants him.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 7:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok then with what you said
No way unless you see him for a full day on your own practice field and he looks good
sorry if I wasn’t more clear
by AllenOU on Nov 9, 2009 7:23 PM CST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
BANNED!!!
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 7:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Please don't ban me
Big blue fuckstick. He might be LJs brother
by AllenOU on Nov 9, 2009 8:03 PM CST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
People may not like LJ, but they need to look at this from a perspective of what we need.
If he can come in and NOT fumble inside the 5 yard line, SIGN HIM IMMEDIATELY.
This is NOT a contest to see who can be the nicest football player. I want the Texans to win, and right now, they can’t because they can’t hold onto the ball inside the 5.
There is nothing to lose here. What’s the worst thing that happens? HONESTLY? He comes in and has a bad attitude and gets in trouble? Fine, so you cut him.
It’s not like he is some disease that will infect the other players.
The Texans have a class organization. In fact I would say they are one the few organizations with the kind of players and coaching that could take a guy like LJ and turn him into a good player again and help him stay on the straight and narrow.
Take the emotion out of this argument and give the guy a workout. He could be EXACTLY what this team needs inside the red zone.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Nov 9, 2009 7:10 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
This would all make perfect sense
If he was LJ circa 3-4 years ago. He’s not the same guy. It has nothing to do with emotion. He’s finished. It shows on his tape from this season, what little I’ve seen.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 7:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't buy into that. I think he has been disillusioned with the Chiefs organization for a while now....
A fresh start may make all the difference in the world.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Nov 9, 2009 7:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
new city to beat women in might perk him right up.
by nolander on Nov 9, 2009 9:07 PM CST up reply actions 3 recs
Thats the spirit.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Nov 9, 2009 9:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Honestly i'm not sure he's "finished"
Analysts have pointed out that he’s running too tall, yet if you go back and look at tape of him 3 years ago, there he is running straight up like a no. 2 pencil. He looks to me like he’s running about the same as always, maybe he’s a little slower or what have you, it’s hard to really see that on tape, but style wise he looks pretty much the same. I think his biggest trouble the past couple years is not having a line to block for him, you could put Barry Sanders in the Chiefs’ backfield and he’d be doing good to average 3 yards per carry. Our line isn’t doing a whole lot better opening holes for backs so i’d expect somewhat similar results to what we’re already getting from our backs, just with less versatility when he’s in the game. Maybe it’s just me, but i’d rather have a 5’ nothing 215lb running running short yardage than a taller back who has troubles taking on hits low, which is almost a pre-req to get those extra few yards in the middle of the line. If the RB gets hit by a 280+ lb lineman at the line of scrimmage while doing his best impression of a ruler, it’s not going to matter how big and strong that back is, he’s going down.
So obviously I don’t think he’s a good fit for us either, but it has more to do with his style of running not fitting the role they’d want him to fill rather than the belief that he’s “finished”. I think if he goes to a team with a decent O-line, he could have a pretty good couple of years left.
by Bryan72076 on Nov 10, 2009 9:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Someone photochop his face onto Wayne Brady. “Is LJ gonna have to choke a bitch?”
PS I would lose some respect for Bob McNair if they signed him.
Be judgmental about the actions of the past, be hopeful about the actions of the future. -The Homers Creed
by DaGoaT on Nov 9, 2009 6:47 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Told ya so...
Just sayin.
With all the fumbling problems, the Texans would be crazy NOT to try him out.
You may not like LJ, hell I DONT LIKE LJ, but if he can come in and not fumble inside the 5, GIVE HIM A JOB.
If he becomes a distraction, you cut him.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Nov 9, 2009 7:00 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Told us what?
I don’t understand.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 7:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No
That is all.
Looking forward to a day when being a Texans fan doesn't mean that April is the highlight of my season...
by Tim on Nov 9, 2009 7:14 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Adam Schefter reported the Texans tried out 4 TEs today
Martez Milner, Joe Klopfenstein, Tony Curtis, and Tory Humphrey. Ive only heard of Milner from Georgia and Klopfenstein from Colorado I believe.
by TexasHoosier on Nov 9, 2009 7:20 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
What about that Bear Pascoe guy?
Is he on someone’s practice squad somewhere?
He’s supposed to be a phenomenal blocker.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 7:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I like Klopf
Lots of untapped potential there. He was an excellent pass catcher while at CU. Good route runner.
Note to self: Insert something witty here.
by bigfatdrunk on Nov 10, 2009 8:40 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
For the record I hate the fuckstick
But I hate our running game an fumblitis a lot more. Just put lj on the 5 yd line, and paint the goal post to look like hot young chick
problem solved
by AllenOU on Nov 9, 2009 7:25 PM CST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know, LJ might just decide to try and see from how far away he can spit on her, instead of trying to run the ball in.
by nolander on Nov 9, 2009 9:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Just for the pure joy of advocating for the devil...
After vomiting out "the good" of VY winning games, I might as well dust off the old welcome mat for, what do you call him, f*ckstick? So, here’s my case for F*ckstick.
F*ckstick is a great nickname, "Schaub drops back, hands off to F*ckstick, OH NO! F*ckstick runs it THROUGH the endzone, into the crowd and proceeds to beat up a woman for her beer. We’d all be like, "Oh F*ckstick!! Not Again!" Then the camera zooms in, F*ckstick turns to the camera smiles sheepishly and shrugs, (que wacky sound effect) everyone starts laughing…Close scene.
Now that is a picture perfect ending, if I’ve ever imagined one!
"I rest my case"….Sorry, I mean, "Case Closed!"
by Smittybaby on Nov 9, 2009 7:27 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
IDK
Idk if the Texans should get him or not. Is it worth it? Thats a question only he can answer..
by aaronscolandry on Nov 9, 2009 7:39 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Re: IDK
I think his statistical production since 2007 and his rap sheet can answer it too.
Looking forward to a day when being a Texans fan doesn't mean that April is the highlight of my season...
by Tim on Nov 9, 2009 7:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Second Chance
The Texans are not known for signing players with troubled pasts…..hell no houston teams sign anyone with a past besides Tejada in recent memory. However, Larry Johnson still has some quality games left. He played for some terrible KC teams and tried to make the best of it. Their line this year is absolutely horrible….hence one win on the season. Not LJ’s fault…notice the other two backs haven’t done anything as well. All LJ needs is a second chance on a contending team. Everyone deserves a chance to start over.
Slaton’s fumbling and yards per carry is horrible. Moats is NOT the answer. Last year they needed a power back to help on short yardage and goalline situations and who did they add?? Chris Brown….NOT the answer. I was hoping they would sign Deuce just for these situations…a dependable back that will get u the one to two yards when needed. We do not need LJ to carry the ball 30 times a game and forget about Slaton. 10-15 carries tops and mostly in goalline and third and short. If we had a dependable power back I would go on a limb and say we would be 8-1 going into the bye with the only loss coming against NYJ. Pound it in against JAX….at least send game into OT against AZ where they were doing nothing on offense the second half and def win against IND.
LJ will never win the Humanitarian Award but he is NOT a cancer judging by Herm Edwards comments. He might be a loner and have some personal problems but he is NOT a cancer in the locker room were his exact words.
The answer might not be with LJ but judging by our current RB situation this cut seems to have been made just at the right time. If we do not solve the RB situation we will not make the playoffs at all. At least with him one of our problems will be fixed. Hell, LJ can show Slaton how to hold onto the ball and Slaton can show him how to block.
BottomLine LJ sitll has some life left and the Texans would be wise to at least take a chance to do what no other Texans team has done….have a winning record and a good chance at the playoffs.
by Perrilous on Nov 9, 2009 7:49 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
"besides Tejada"
Yeah, his steroids thing clearly overshadows Artest’s inability to restrain himself from beating up fans, as well as his domestic violence chargers.
"I'm just looking forward to something great happening in the city of Houston" - Tracy McGrady
Still waiting...
by DreKeem on Nov 9, 2009 8:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
FIFTH NOT SECOND
He has FOUR ARRESTS. He then called his coach fans and the media fags. Why give him a 5th chance?
by nolander on Nov 9, 2009 9:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bottom line
He can’t be any worse from the five yard line in than what we have seen this year
by AllenOU on Nov 9, 2009 8:01 PM CST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Actually
He very well can be. I think, and correct me if I’m wrong, you’re letting your view of LJ when he wasn’t shit (06-07) get in your way. Thing is though, he’s played like shit right ever since he was the shit. On top of being shit, he’s injury prone as shit. To top it off, he’s a general piece of shit character who wants to be paid like he’s the shit when he’s really just shit.
And you want this guy? Are you shitting me?
"I'm just looking forward to something great happening in the city of Houston" - Tracy McGrady
Still waiting...
by DreKeem on Nov 9, 2009 8:19 PM CST up reply actions 4 recs
I'm tired of nothing but boy scouts
If he can hold onto the ball and not fumble within the red zone, I say do it. I see that I am in the minority here, but I also think VY is a below average QB. So what weight does my opinion hold?
BattleRedBlog.com DontMessWithTexans.com
Clutchfans.net - Chuck 4 TexansTalk.com - Frak The Jags
Twitter - Zepp1978 Facebook - Zepp1978
by Mike Kerns on Nov 9, 2009 8:04 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
I really don't get what boy scouts have to do with anything
The Texans don’t have boy scouts. They have bad guys on the team just like every other team. Just nothing that’s gotten them in hot water yet.
Schaub has been arrested.
Jacoby has been arrested.
Mathis would have stayed if he could have stayed healthy.
But these are bad decisions, not things done by horrible human beings. LJ is just a bad citizen. Being a bad citizen doesn’t mean DICK as far as improving a team’s attitude or demeanor on the field.
Look at Pollard. He’s as nasty as ANYONE on the field, but you don’t have to be a woman-beater and a POS off the field to be nasty on the field.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 8:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Saying vy is below average
Is a compliment my friend
by AllenOU on Nov 9, 2009 8:13 PM CST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
True
I didn’t want to make any VY mancrushers cry into their pillow tonight.
BattleRedBlog.com DontMessWithTexans.com
Clutchfans.net - Chuck 4 TexansTalk.com - Frak The Jags
Twitter - Zepp1978 Facebook - Zepp1978
by Mike Kerns on Nov 9, 2009 9:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If Moats didn't fumble
I’d think there was zero chance Smithiak would even look at him.
Now there’s a chance they’ll look, but I’d say near zero chance he wears a Texan uniform.
For all of the reasons mentioned above.
Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.
by texanphil on Nov 9, 2009 8:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
See, you've got it all wrong!
They’re going to look at him, SO THEY ARE INTERESTED AND ARE GOING TO SIGN HIM!!!
Sincerely,
John McClain
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 8:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm surprised
You’ve obviously kept your cool through all this, Chris. How do you do it?
"I'm just looking forward to something great happening in the city of Houston" - Tracy McGrady
Still waiting...
by DreKeem on Nov 9, 2009 8:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
I KNOW, RIGHT!?!?!
I guess it’s delayed reaction from the loss yesterday, but I’ve been on the verge of detonating all day today. I am, admittedly, in a foul mood.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 9:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Chris, did LJ kick your dog or something? This is worse than the T-Mac hate.
BattleRedBlog.com DontMessWithTexans.com
Clutchfans.net - Chuck 4 TexansTalk.com - Frak The Jags
Twitter - Zepp1978 Facebook - Zepp1978
by Mike Kerns on Nov 9, 2009 9:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He kicked mine
Repeatedly. He said she looked like a girl he used to go with or something, it was weird.
by JimboTexan on Nov 9, 2009 9:17 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
You wouldn't believe it by my comments so far
But it really is more about how he’s done as a player than anything else.
I don’t have tolerance for a guy as selfish as he is. He’s such a diva. If you look back on his career and remember how he’s acted, he’s VERY passive-aggressive and exudes diva-like behavior. I cannot STAND people like that in “real life” so I like it even less when it comes to my team.
He didn’t kick my dog, but he might hit my wife if he ever sees her.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 9:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
T-Mac and LJ in the same city
Oh, what a slap-fight that would be if they ever showed up in the same club wearing the same jacket.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 9:20 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I honestly think Kubiak
may be interested.
I think he and Smith ultimately will do the right thing, but all the fumbles and Cedric Benson have him thinking real hard about this.
Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.
by texanphil on Nov 10, 2009 8:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
FML
He’s Chris Brown with 50% more diva. I see no way in which this ends badly. We’re probably too cheap to sign him even after waivers though.
by JimboTexan on Nov 9, 2009 9:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Second Chance.....Fifth Chance.....whatever
This guy doesn’t need to be a role model for anyone but he’s still a good player. At least he’s better than the guys we have at the position now. Butterfingers Slaton, Forever a Backup Moats, and I Can Only Play in Houston Brown. We’re not talking about keeping the guy around for years to come just help push the team over the edge this year and possibly next year if everything works out. Money is not an issue and his off field problems could easily be solved with a little bit of guidance. Sorry DreKeem I forgot about Artest in previous post….I don’t even think the guy got a traffic ticket while in Houston let alone get in trouble. Look at what Artest did with Houston. We gave the guy another chance when many people wouldn’t and he helped us get within a game of the Finals. Same could go for Johnson. What’s the worse that could happen? Another incident at a nightclub…..come on…..a change of scenery will do him and Houston a lot of good.
by Perrilous on Nov 9, 2009 10:01 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
If you want to root for thugs
Go root for the Raiders, Tits or Chargers.
by nolander on Nov 9, 2009 10:26 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
If you want to lose all the time
Keep a rotating rb combo of moats and slaton and see how far they go. Guarenteed another sub par record of 8-8. Some people want to see the team take a chance to have a contending club. If you want to root for losers root for Raiders, Browns, or Chiefs.
by Perrilous on Nov 9, 2009 10:51 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
theres more to football than just winning at all cost. I for one do not want to have to explain to my kids why its not ok to be like his heroes who drive drunk and smack a bitch. I want my team to win, but being entertained and supporting an organization whose beliefs are in line with my own are more important. If you dont care about thugs and bad characters making millions to win for you, the cowboys are just up the interstate.
Be judgmental about the actions of the past, be hopeful about the actions of the future. -The Homers Creed
by DaGoaT on Nov 10, 2009 6:44 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Here is how you know he would be a waste of money:
The Redskins want to sign him. Run, don’t walk away from any player they are trying to sign.
by nolander on Nov 9, 2009 11:02 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
especially
if you have to get into a bidding war for him.
double wammie
Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.
by texanphil on Nov 10, 2009 8:42 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yes he did
Which is why I don’t root for him, the Chiefs, the Raiders, or the Browns. I dont like the guy but can’t help rooting for the Texans to improve their team. Huge upgrade from Chris Brown. In a goalline situation or crucial 3rd &1 would u want LJ or Brown running with the ball. We would have 3 more wins right now if we had him or someone like him earlier in the year and who knows how many wins we will leave on the table if we don’t solve the problem.
by Perrilous on Nov 9, 2009 11:07 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Sigh.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 9, 2009 11:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You just lost all credibility with the last sentence. 1) its the line thats the issue not the runners. Good running back or no, no blocking = no td. 2) Why would tying the game = winning the game?
by nolander on Nov 9, 2009 11:31 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
agree
but regarding your point 1.
the Chris Brown fumble was on 4th down. The line didn’t cause that.
On third down, he should have gotten in. I think several other runners in RB2 spots on other teams would have scored with that blocking on that play.
Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.
by texanphil on Nov 10, 2009 8:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think that's what is missing in this discussion
Our o-line sucks. We are getting consistently blown up at the point of attack. Anybody short of Jerome Bettis would not be productive in a goal line situation.
Also, have we already forgotten that Slaton got one in on Sunday? Play calling is also key here. Removing Chris Brown for the goal line role is addition by subtraction.
Note to self: Insert something witty here.
by bigfatdrunk on Nov 10, 2009 8:52 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why does everyone blame the backs ?
When the O-Line gets pushed around and doesn’t open any holes on the goaline it doesn’t matter who has the ball. Blame the backs for their fumbles, but the line has to share blame for our pitiful goaline offense.
You are banned from Music City Miracles.
Happy Now Tits?
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.
by CFHTim on Nov 10, 2009 8:31 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
our o-line isn't built for the heavy jumbo package needed at the goal line
so we should just throw the ball on every down inside the 10. (I have Schaub in fantasy)
Just make sure the throws are into the end zone, so there’s no chance of fumbling.
5 wide, spread the field, someone will be open.
Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.
by texanphil on Nov 10, 2009 8:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
beat me
took me 30 minutes to post my comment. stupid conference call.
Note to self: Insert something witty here.
by bigfatdrunk on Nov 10, 2009 8:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not the line
You are out of your mind if you think our O-line is the problem rather than the runners. Jacksonville = win if brown didn’t fumble. Arizona = tie and probably win in OT since cardinals didn’t do jack in the second half. We all know what happened in Indy in the redzone with Moats. Line has nothing to do with bad hands guy.
by Perrilous on Nov 9, 2009 11:35 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
LOL
Did we fumble on the goal line against arizona? Oh right we didn’t, the line got blown into the backfield. LJ would be only for short yardage, so again he wouldn’t have had the ball when moats fumbled. This guy is averaging 2.7 yards, are you really saying he should be the feature back? Get real man, and pay attention to how horrid our run blocking is.
by nolander on Nov 10, 2009 12:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Same defense. LJ is behind a line that is WAY WAY WAY worse than ours and Cassell can't throw the ball for jack so teams stack the box.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Nov 10, 2009 6:55 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
wow you are delusional. Your comments make less and less sense the more of them I read. Our run blocking is clearly the issue and anyone who isnt blind, deaf, mute, and possibly genetically inbred knows that.
Be judgmental about the actions of the past, be hopeful about the actions of the future. -The Homers Creed
by DaGoaT on Nov 10, 2009 6:54 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
wait...
I thought the role of “completely useless RB that is a total fuck-up in short yardage situations” was already filled by one Chris Brown?
… why overpay for LJ to do the same thing?
by grungedave on Nov 10, 2009 12:07 AM CST reply actions 2 recs
never said feature back
In earlier post I said he would be great for about 12-15 touches a game especially when game is on the line; not a feature back. Slaton still has a bright future. I never said we fumbled against Arizona but backs didn’t come through. That’s one of the reasons to get him….goalline situations at Arizona. Give him the ball 3 times and I guarantee a score from that close. No fumble was made but he or another power back other than brown would have been the difference. Fumbles definitely cost 2 games and lack of a power runner a third. Even so no one would even think about LJ if the backs did their job and we were 8-1 or at the worst 7-2. LJ might only be averaging 2.7 but look at what his backups in KC did without him. Nothing because the line, just like the rest of KC, is terrible. Johnson is an upgrade compared to Brown however you want to look at it.
by Perrilous on Nov 10, 2009 12:10 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
It must be nice living in la la land.
by nolander on Nov 10, 2009 12:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I say...
Give the dude a shot! We need a damn running back!!! I had high hopes for slaton this year. If he fumbles on mnf I’m gonna go protest!!!! Can’t they put some damn gum or somethin on his gloves ahhhhhhhh!!!
by Texan_4_life on Nov 10, 2009 12:12 AM CST via mobile reply actions 1 recs
All this talk about we need another RB
just makes me wish that Bob McNair would have offered more money to Cedric Benson in the offseason
I would challenge you to a battle of wits, but you appear to be unarmed.
by The Night Owl on Nov 10, 2009 12:19 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
LOL
They should do something and do it quick. If not LJ somebody who’s not going to cough the ball up all the time especially in the redzone.
by Perrilous on Nov 10, 2009 12:21 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I’m sorry man. Its really not that easy to just go out and sign a guy in the middle of the season.
by nolander on Nov 10, 2009 12:32 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I say bench Meyers
that is a change that we can try, to get the running game sparked. And that doesn’t require bringing in any dirtbag that beats women.
You are banned from Music City Miracles.
Happy Now Tits?
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.
by CFHTim on Nov 10, 2009 8:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
We can't
We need White at G, Caldwell isn’t ready, and we probably need to replace Studdard, first.
Note to self: Insert something witty here.
by bigfatdrunk on Nov 10, 2009 8:54 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Just wishful thinking.
I’m tired of watching Meyers get pushed around all game, Schaub’s 2nd int was all Meyer’s fault.
You are banned from Music City Miracles.
Happy Now Tits?
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.
by CFHTim on Nov 10, 2009 9:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It’s not easy at all but it can definitely happen and for the better too. I just hate saying “Just wait till next year….” Now is our chance to at least give it a shot. If he’s a bust, fine. Just take the chance that it could work out. I just don’t want to wait till the draft or free agency to solve a problem that could possibly be fixed now. LJ will never be a great back for any organization but he could be the situational back that we need right now.
by Perrilous on Nov 10, 2009 12:38 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I don't know
why every just assumes LJ is a great back who doesn’t run into the back of linemen and holds onto the ball. Stop looking at him from two years ago; he’s not the same guy. I go to college in KC and have had to watch Chiefs games for the past two years. He is regressing as a runningback. Earlier in his career he had a problem with fumbles. Last year, he had 5 fumbles. He already has two this season. His fumbles don’t even come from big hits. Just a guy gets a hand on the ball. He’s running too upright now which lead to more fumbles. He does not run with the same tenacity and strength he used to. He can’t break the first tackle in the backfield. He’s not a goal-line back because he can’t push the pile and he can’t read holes anymore. He runs into the back of players all the time. Not to mention that once he comes into the game, the defense will just blitz. Ask the Chiefs. Because when he’s in, he’s either getting the ball or he’s missing a block that leads to a sack. LJ in the backfield makes the offense one dimensional because LJ is one dimensional. And let’s face it, the Texans’ line is not that much better than the Chiefs’ line when it comes to run blocking. Sure, the Texans can pass block, but the Chiefs almost have as many rushing yards (709 yards on 204 attempts) as the Texans (736 yards on 225 attempts). He’ll do no better here than he did in KC. He’s averaging 2.7 yards a carry with no touchdowns, so someone tell me why that makes him a goal-line back?
by theaxeeffect4721 on Nov 10, 2009 12:40 AM CST reply actions 3 recs
thanks for the insight
but what is this “push the pile” stuff you speak of?
Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.
by texanphil on Nov 10, 2009 8:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How many of his fumbles are inside the five yard line?
That is all I care about it.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Nov 10, 2009 9:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
2 fumbles < 8 fumbles
Anytime a team thinks Ryan Moats is a starter has a horrible rb situation. Slaton’s 8 fumbles is the reason to be searching elsewhere. We don’t need LJ handling the ball 30 times a game like he’s used to. Save the legs and use him in certain situations. Johnson would be an upgrade to Brown any day of the week. He was the feature back in KC but that would not and could not be his role in Houston. That would make him a goalline and short yardage back. Johnson for 10-15 carries a game; I would take those situations over the mess we have now anyday. Imagine him in the backfield, defense blitzing him like they did in KC all the time, and Slaton or Andre in the slot. Run a simple slant pattern and defense will stop blitzing all the time so that bigger holes will open up in the run game. Someone who at least made a name for himself will take the pressure off Slaton. From what I’ve seen, Johnson has not been happy in KC for quite some time and it could be a reason for lack of production. Great stats though.
by Perrilous on Nov 10, 2009 1:02 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
10-15 is way more then goal line short yardage duty man. No one is going to waste time blitzing LJ. Its a fantasy. His lack of production is because his legs are dead, 336 one year 416 the next? That ends careers. Open your eyes to reality, not what you wish could be.
by nolander on Nov 10, 2009 1:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yes imagine him in the backfield, with his 2.7 YPC ability, getting tackled for a loss by defensive tackles because we still cant block. That will totally be worth the 2-3mil price tag he will come with.
Be judgmental about the actions of the past, be hopeful about the actions of the future. -The Homers Creed
by DaGoaT on Nov 10, 2009 7:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So what’s the solution to have a winning season and playoff contention this year? Magically our backs will start producing and stop fumbling. Or is it another wait till next year answer? This team is so close to achieving this that it is worth a few million dollars to try to remedy. We are talking about taking a chance for half a season and it will not do anyone harm.
by Perrilous on Nov 10, 2009 1:45 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
get OUT of here
You guys would be saying the same thing right now if this was Cedric Benson last year. LJ is a talent who has been stuck behind a line worse than ours during the david carr sack era. Especially considering the chiefs opponents stack the box because Cassell can’t throw LJ has been given absolutely no shot to produce. A change of scenery on a team that has the ability to stretch the field and spread out the defense would work wonders. This guy CAN play and I’m not at all worried about his off the field issues. Winning keeps LJ happy, and with LJ we can win. Now I will say he doesn’t need 30 carries a game, but its a shame that I’m more comfortable with the Texans in a 3rd and 6 situation than a 3rd and inches….
by cowhandcal on Nov 10, 2009 6:47 AM CST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Smokin Weed,
is not the same as beating women on multiple occasions. So don’t compare him with Ced Benson.
You are banned from Music City Miracles.
Happy Now Tits?
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.
by CFHTim on Nov 10, 2009 8:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
get over it
im not nominating him for a peace prize. this guy can play football though and we need his talent and short run game ability to make us legitimate playoff contenders. leave your macho-man chivalrous bullshit at the door because the quality of your character doesnt effect the quality of your ability. also dont forget he is now playing for a contract, which means he comes in, does his work, and looks for another big payday next season. the best kind of player is one who is playing with his career on the line.
by cowhandcal on Nov 10, 2009 8:54 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah,
he’s really good with that 2.7 yards/carry 0 TD’s, and 2 fumbles on a team that’s won one game. You get over it.
Confucius says "man who stands on toilet, high on pot".
by Bobobigbro on Nov 10, 2009 8:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He COULD play football a few years ago.
Now he is just another guy, unless he plays center or guard he won’t help our running game.
You are banned from Music City Miracles.
Happy Now Tits?
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.
by CFHTim on Nov 10, 2009 9:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
As a human this guy is a TERD! But if Terd Johnson was carring the ball for us at the goalline we would be at least 7 – 2. Should we sacrifice wins and not sign him because he is an asshole? We need a RB that can get in the endzone if we are to have any chance to get in the playoffs, or actually win a playoff game. Spend the money and take a chance. The running back issue will have to be addressed sooner or later. And later may be a game short .
by big daddy texan#1 on Nov 10, 2009 7:53 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
You know what they say when you
ASSUME something.
Confucius says "man who stands on toilet, high on pot".
by Bobobigbro on Nov 10, 2009 10:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Stats
I know we hate stats here (joke!), but we are dead last in stuffed rank.
The o-line is responsible for a significant part of this burden. Yes, the RBs deserve some blame, as well. But if you’ve been watching games, are you saying to yourself: “Wow, Steve missed that hole.” Or are you saying: “They blew that play up.”
Note to self: Insert something witty here.
by bigfatdrunk on Nov 10, 2009 9:00 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
O-line is a problem that we cannot fix right now.
That doesn’t mean we should also ignore the backs.
The short of it is this.
Take the emotion out of this argument.
4th and 1 on the goal line. Game is on the line. 30 seconds on the clock. Who do you want to hand the ball to? Slaton, Moats or Johnson?
I have to say Johnson in short yardage if I am honest.
I say bring him in for short yardage.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Nov 10, 2009 9:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
well you don't just walk into 4th and Goal
so on 1st, I’d throw a fade to AJ.
I would do the same on downs 2-4, and tell me he isn’t catchin one of them.
Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.
by texanphil on Nov 10, 2009 9:48 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Again
It’s not an emotion-based argument.
It’s based mainly on his skill. It’s just that he sucks AND he’s a bad citizen.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Nov 10, 2009 10:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
my take
If they work him out and if they think he can help us win, I say pull the trigger. Cause dammit, I wanna win! Im tired of this goalline bullshit. Arent yall?
by Corn on the Schaub on Nov 10, 2009 9:12 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
agree - sign him. How often has this team been a legit SB threat.
If it doesn’t work out, he acts like an asshole in public or inside the locker room or his 2.7 YPC is legit, cut him. IMFWHO, the Texans could use someone on the offense with a bad nasty fuck you attitude. (I can’t picture anyone right now who would give Santa the finger if it meant winning a game.)
by Farmer Fran on Nov 10, 2009 9:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You want some hit em in the face attitude
then tell the Texans coaching staff to give Leach the ball and bash some heads in and there you have it. You don’t need to bring in a cancer and all this talk about bringing him to be a SB contender – please. I can’t believe you would even think that LJ would all of a sudden put us in that position. We also have two guys that run very similar to LJ, Chris Brown and Foster on our practice squad. Bottom line is LJ wont make us any better and we have ther options to try with out bringing him in and his attitude alone could bring down a team.
Confucius says "man who stands on toilet, high on pot".
by Bobobigbro on Nov 10, 2009 10:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
cancerous SB contender
I didn’t say bringing in LJ would make the Texans SB contenders. IMHO, they already are SB contenders and that does not happen every day. Have no idea if he is a cancer, but coming out of KC which is fucked up right now, willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. AS far as his relationship with the community – you put him on a very short leash. I’m saying if this guy has the potential to play a significant role, he should be looked at.
So what would be wrong with LJ runnin behind Leach?
by Farmer Fran on Nov 10, 2009 12:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously?
Like are yall for real? Why is this even being talked about? Are we really this desperate to win?
Wow. Just wow.
I for one am done talking about this.
Why would we even consider signing a diva for a RB?
Yes, I understand that we do have fumbling problems but im pretty
damn sure that there are plenty of undrafted FA’s out there that deserves a chance more than Larry “Fuckstick” Johnson and can hold on to the ball.
This is gonna be a long two weeks with no Texans football.
by Jordann on Nov 10, 2009 10:09 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
Yep, "Bye Week Blues" already setting in.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Nov 10, 2009 10:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He will sign with he texans
It’s only for 7 games. And to the moron that thinks LJ can do worse than the current backs inside the five, u either don’t watch texans gams or you are from tennessee.
LJ is not a bad ass anymore, but I would bet he could run it in from the fucking 1 for a team that might make the playoffs
worse case he does shit and he’s gone in 2 months.
WIN AT ALL COSTS???? Your damn right
by AllenOU on Nov 10, 2009 10:18 AM CST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Have you
watched any Cheifs games? I didn’t think so. You are also missing the biggest point – we have no Oline to push anyone of f the ball and IF you watched any Cheifs games you would see the exact same thing – Oline gets pushed off the ball and LJ gets stood up in the back field. This guy is not a beast or as stong of a runner as you are giving him credit for.
Confucius says "man who stands on toilet, high on pot".
by Bobobigbro on Nov 10, 2009 10:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He used to be.
That’s what people are forgetting.
by Jordann on Nov 10, 2009 10:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's what...
About a mil or 2 mil that we’re going to lose? Why don’t we just sign an undrafted RB that can do the same but with a higher ceiling?
Seriously. Win at all cost? What are we, the fucking patriots?
Leach can run it from the one. He’s not afraid of contact and he doesn’t beat women. Why are we looking outside the organization when we already have players in this team that can fill in for that role?
ITS NOT BECAUSE WE CAN’T RUN IT IN FROM THE ONE BECAUSE WE JUST DID THAT LAST GAME. THE PROBLEM IS THE O-LINE. WE BLOCK BETTER, WE GET IN THE ENDZONE.
by Jordann on Nov 10, 2009 10:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Only problem I have with Leach running on the goal line
is if he has the ball, who is gonna be his lead blocker? Here’s another question. Who else is out there on the free agent market? Ain’t Rudi Johnson & Deshaun Foster still out there? I think those two would be pretty good in short yardage situations
I would challenge you to a battle of wits, but you appear to be unarmed.
by The Night Owl on Nov 10, 2009 10:39 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe a direct snap to him would work.
And he really wouldnt need a lead blocker.
by Jordann on Nov 10, 2009 10:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
Leach can be the begining and the end. Just hand the man the rock and let him take it to them. Hell let Pollard block for him I think he would love to do that or vice versa.
Confucius says "man who stands on toilet, high on pot".
by Bobobigbro on Nov 10, 2009 11:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How would that formation work?
You would want someone lead blocking if you’re snapping to Leach. If you do that, you’d probably want 7 lineman on the line with Casey, Dreesen, & Hill lead blocking Leach. Hell, what would you call that formation? The Coke Zero, as in zero chance we’re throwing the ball?
I would challenge you to a battle of wits, but you appear to be unarmed.
by The Night Owl on Nov 10, 2009 12:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You had something going with the coke zero thing but you just didn't end it right.
Try again some other time.
It doesn’t even have to be a direct snap to Leach. Goal line formation. Faking a toss to the HB then hand it off to Leach. I dont understand why we never try anything different on goal line situations. Not even a fucking QB sneak. Seriously.
by Jordann on Nov 10, 2009 12:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LJ sucks
Other then ONE fumble on the goal line, having butterfingers isn’t what the problem has been in short yardage. So lets remember that when we discuss how LJ is going to solve fumble problems, because at most he will be a goal line short yardage back.
I think everyone is getting mixed up with the fumbles and short yardage situations. We have actually done a good job of getting the ball in the end zone or getting a first since the Cardinals game. Moats and Slaton haven’t fumbled in short yardage situations, and have actually punched a few in as of late.
LJ is used up anyways, ran for 750 carries in two seasons and hasn’t been the same and more then likely won’t be. We would be better off giving Foster a chance or giving the ball to Leach or even Casey.
by nolander on Nov 10, 2009 10:35 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I want to win.
If Kubes and Smith think that LJ would help us, go for it. What have we got to lose? IMO a very low risk move if they think hes still got something in him.
by Corn on the Schaub on Nov 10, 2009 10:38 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
He has a great interview with dan Patrick
I have watched EVERY chiefs game actually, my GF is from there
yes the chiefs o line sucks
but LJ stopped trying and with a change of scenery might do well
all I’m saying is look at the guy
by AllenOU on Nov 10, 2009 11:23 AM CST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Ok I'll accept that,
BUT I especially don’t want a guy that stops trying either.
We’ll just agree to disagree. There are plenty of other FA running backs I would take ahead of him and two guys on our practice squad that I would try out before him.
Confucius says "man who stands on toilet, high on pot".
by Bobobigbro on Nov 10, 2009 11:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I see your point
I also saw pollard come in after getting cut
I’m just saying take a look
why not
by AllenOU on Nov 10, 2009 12:06 PM CST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
LEAVE BRITTANY ALONE!!!!!!
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Nov 10, 2009 11:31 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
if i read one more comment that mentions him beating women
i am going to lose my mind! this is not a matter of character! he still has the ability to play well and if you for one second try to tell me that Chris Brown is a better option then you are only lying to yourself. Have you ever seen LJ play? 7 games is all we need from him and thats it. His 2.7 ypc are really deceiving, i watched him play against the redskins and he looked good. the chiefs feature a line that gets blown up every play and he still makes stuff happen. this is a guy who still has the ability to be a far better short yardage possibility than our options in the backfield now. This is not a win at all cost mentality, this is simply an opportunity that has been awarded to the league. he talked himself out of KC, so he’s selfish, whatever. He needed a change of scenery, that franchise is simply one of the worst in the league. The Texans are winners, and we are right on that hump. I think he’s the one who can finally push us over.
by cowhandcal on Nov 10, 2009 12:08 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
1) He beats women, and that is an issue. Maybe its ok that he beats women to you, but it isn’t to me.
2) He quite on his team, that is completely relevant
3) You are the only one I have heard saying that he looks good this.
by nolander on Nov 10, 2009 12:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
HE BEATS WOMEN
and has crap stats and according to someone else he gave up trying two years ago. He is NOT an upgrade to anyone we already have, oh and did I mention and he beats women, waves guns at them and spits at them. I’m sure as hell glad that your not running this team. Also we need a better line for any RB to make any kind of goalline push NOT a new RB. Oh yeah, and he beats women too.
Confucius says "man who stands on toilet, high on pot".
by Bobobigbro on Nov 10, 2009 12:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and one more thing
character does matter. I’m not sure if your young or not but I would guess you are based on your comment but character is important. That is a major problem in this world today is that people can’t control themselve or be of good moral character and responsible for their actions. The Texans have gone a long way to bring in good people and surround themselves with people of good character and you don’t sacrifice that for one person and especially someone like LJ who hasn’t even made a good case for himself that he can even be a good RB anymore. I will agree with your last statement that the Texans are winners but with that being said we don’t need to bring in someone of bad moral character that likes to beat on defensless people. This is a stand up orginaztion that is starting to find itself as a good team and a great member of this community and they will continue to grow that way. I like the path that they are on and I wouldn’t trade that for LJ.
Confucius says "man who stands on toilet, high on pot".
by Bobobigbro on Nov 10, 2009 12:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The cheifs haven't exactly evaluated their talent well
by AllenOU on Nov 10, 2009 12:08 PM CST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
EVERYONE
Needs to listen to his interview with dan Patrick this morning. They guy just wanted out of KC at all costs
I hope he gets picked up because we need another back to go with slaton
SS and LJ could be quite a tandem for the last 7 games
by AllenOU on Nov 10, 2009 12:40 PM CST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Nothing he says changes his four arrests, or the pathetic effort he gave in KC. I want winners not quitters.
by nolander on Nov 10, 2009 1:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Your right about that
But with a 7 game audition for other teams I think we would be getting a highly motivated guy. But the arrests or what they are. I’ve been arrested once but that doesn’t make me a bad person. Four times is a lot but give the guy another shot
look at pollard. You MUST take a look if your the texans. Just my 2 cents
by AllenOU on Nov 10, 2009 1:30 PM CST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
People are arrested for many things
and I’m not sure what you did (and no one is perfect) but there is a difference in crimes. If he had a DUI or was caught with a blunt in the car or reckless driving or never showed up in court for a parking ticket that’s one thing but beating up on women enough to be arrested 4 times is completely different. I’m all for second chances but not 5th or 6th chances and again I don’t think that he’s that great and especially not worth what you would have to pay for him.
Confucius says "man who stands on toilet, high on pot".
by Bobobigbro on Nov 10, 2009 1:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I guess it comes down to:
Chris Brown vs. Larry Johnson. Take away his issues off of the field. Who is the best option carrying the football between the two? Thats what Chris Brown is here for, right? Our short yardage back. Its not so cut and dry.
by Corn on the Schaub on Nov 10, 2009 12:44 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
u like your cake and eat it to
a lot of you r talking about how bad Larry Johnson is an you dont want him here, well seeing the way most of you talk to each here Larry OUGHT to be the one afraid of YOU ALL. YOU make all kinds of slurrs here an call each other bad names. LJ dont look so bad to me. When i see more respect here then an only then will i respect (most of you) your opinion on some of these matters. LJ IS A VERY GOOD FOOTBALL PLAYER AND IS NOT WASHED UP! Most of you you just talk to be diagreeable. The Texans would improve tremendiously on offense with the LJ addition
by 1sleepy1 on Nov 10, 2009 1:12 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Great
Thanks for stopping by, Peter Schaffer.
Note to self: Insert something witty here.
by bigfatdrunk on Nov 10, 2009 1:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
There aren't words to describe this
I suggest you go away before someone on here let’s you have it
you can’t match wits with us bro, so save yourself the trouble
by AllenOU on Nov 10, 2009 1:27 PM CST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd it
I had to.
Confucius says "man who stands on toilet, high on pot".
by Bobobigbro on Nov 10, 2009 1:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Disagreeable?
Is that you George W?
Confucius says "man who stands on toilet, high on pot".
by Bobobigbro on Nov 10, 2009 1:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You want us to respect each other but want to sign a guy who has shown zero respect to his team and pretty much women everywhere? I’m trying to understand you, but your illiteracy is getting in the way.
by nolander on Nov 10, 2009 1:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The good news is...
…this person found a way to unite us.
Note to self: Insert something witty here.
by bigfatdrunk on Nov 10, 2009 1:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What's the point in having a cake
if you can’t eat it. I’ve never understood that one.
Confucius says "man who stands on toilet, high on pot".
by Bobobigbro on Nov 10, 2009 1:40 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Yep
One of the worst sayings ever. Seriously, how many situations have you ever been in that you got to have a cake and not eat it? Yet the saying assumes that to be the normal scenario.
If the Treasury Secretary doesn't have to pay taxes, then why do I?
by Shake on Nov 10, 2009 4:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The saying refers to the fact that you cannot both "HAVE" the cake and also "EAT" it...
If you eat it…it is gone, and you no longer have it….
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Nov 10, 2009 5:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Though this reminds me of the late George Carlins ranting against stupid sayings...lol so funny.
“Pre-heated is a meaningless fking term. There are only two states an oven can possibly be in: Heated or Not Heated!”
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Nov 10, 2009 5:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So I'm just supposed to
stare at the damn thing? Why did I get the cake if I wasn’t going to eat it? I expect it to be gone if I eat it.
Confucius says "man who stands on toilet, high on pot".
by Bobobigbro on Nov 10, 2009 5:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Tecnically...
If you eat it, you still have possession of the cake. Permanently…..or at least until the next time you take a major shit.
If the Treasury Secretary doesn't have to pay taxes, then why do I?
by Shake on Nov 11, 2009 10:01 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It will always be with you
in spirit.
So yeah that saying needs to be thrown out.
Free cake on Veterans day!
Only for veterans?
Damn.
by Jordann on Nov 11, 2009 12:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He probably hates ice cream, too.
Note to self: Insert something witty here.
by bigfatdrunk on Nov 10, 2009 1:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow LJ.....lame.....at least use your real name.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Nov 10, 2009 2:10 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
Please take your racist diatribe elsewhere
But leave the cake. I will then have said cake and eat it just to spite you Larry Johnson.
If the Treasury Secretary doesn't have to pay taxes, then why do I?
by Shake on Nov 10, 2009 5:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
There was racism in there? To be fair I’m still working on cracking the code he was using.
by nolander on Nov 10, 2009 5:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously?
At what point is everyone going to catch on to the fact that anytime I call “Racism”, I’m fucking with someone?
Everyone is prejudiced in some way or another. It’s just human nature. And I get sick and fucking tired of ‘racism’ being used by someone to end a discussion. So I mock it. Frequently.
If the Treasury Secretary doesn't have to pay taxes, then why do I?
by Shake on Nov 11, 2009 10:04 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
<3
no not seriously. I was simply joking that for all I know he could have been being racist and I would never know since I still don’t know what he was trying to communicate.
by nolander on Nov 11, 2009 11:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Here's your first problem
You actually assumed that he was “trying to communicate”. I’m pretty sure he passed out with his face on the keyboard, and this comment is what happened. Or it’s Larry Johnson. Definitely 1 of those 2 things.
If the Treasury Secretary doesn't have to pay taxes, then why do I?
by Shake on Nov 11, 2009 12:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Racist
The thing about being called a racist is the same as being called a rapist. If you didn’t do it, the word that you’ve been labeled really fuggin stings.
Prolly why you can very easily get someone to jump offsides for a 5 yarder when throwing it out there.
Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
Rape, that is.
Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.
by beefy on Nov 12, 2009 10:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not rape
if Jordann consents
If the Treasury Secretary doesn't have to pay taxes, then why do I?
by Shake on Nov 12, 2009 3:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not rape
if you’re not penetrating with you penis.
by Jordann on Nov 13, 2009 12:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
haha
I think 1sleepy1 is just what the doctor ordered.
by Corn on the Schaub on Nov 10, 2009 1:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I had a dream last night....
…. that KC had cut DERRICK Johnson, who came straight to the Texans.
Not that we need the help, but that was a good dream. Alas.
by clarky1661 on Nov 10, 2009 2:11 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Awesome
My dreams usually involve cheerleaders, but that would be a close 2nd.
Note to self: Insert something witty here.
by bigfatdrunk on Nov 10, 2009 2:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
"LJ"
I keep seeing this shortening of his name everywhere.
As someone who has spent way too much time on the internet, I keep reading this as Livejournal. “New LJ article in the Chron”…did they figure out the internet now?
Proposing this as a new nickname. He does bring the drama, after all.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
by riversmccown on Nov 10, 2009 2:29 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Who's next?
Instead of signing LJ. What do yall think about activating Chris Henry or Arian Foster?
by Jahon on Nov 10, 2009 4:15 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
the question then becomes
At the expense of who?
Note to self: Insert something witty here.
by bigfatdrunk on Nov 10, 2009 5:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Brown is more or less useless so I vote for him.
by nolander on Nov 10, 2009 5:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
oh, but to actually answer your question...
I’m gonna go with Carl Mauck and Mike Munchak.
Note to self: Insert something witty here.
by bigfatdrunk on Nov 10, 2009 5:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t see why not give Chris Henry a shot if all we want is short yardage. He is big, may not have much vision but if he can hit a whole why not. Was he ever capable of that in the NFL?
by nolander on Nov 10, 2009 5:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Is TJ Duckett still a free agent ?
You are banned from Music City Miracles.
Happy Now Tits?
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.
by CFHTim on Nov 10, 2009 6:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
the better question is...
Can he play Center??
Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.
by beefy on Nov 10, 2009 9:10 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
He's certainly big enough.
You are banned from Music City Miracles.
Happy Now Tits?
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.
by CFHTim on Nov 10, 2009 9:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
TURD JOHNSON
Is exactly that, a TURD. But all you people that are against this because of his moral character are crazy. We need WINS! One low character player in a locker room full of class act guys is a pretty good ratio in the NFL. He is a shithead but if he can get in the endzone more effectively than what we’ve got than sign him up. He will be a highly motivated player at this point and he wants to play with winners. Think of all the AFC teams that are in the playoff race. Ravens, Bengals, Broncos, Steelers, Pats, Colts, Chargers, Jets. How do we compare with these teams? Kinda scary to me. We need all the help we can get… If he sucks or gets in trouble then cut him loose at the end of the year. Wont cost that much. We carried Chris Brown for how long???
by big daddy texan#1 on Nov 10, 2009 8:46 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Just wanted to point out that Chris Brown has given us 142 yrds and 1 TD in two years. I think its safe to say he isnt our power back. And never will be. We need a RB before its too late. Worth a shot to me!
by big daddy texan#1 on Nov 10, 2009 8:54 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Right...
We need a RB that can play Offensive Guard or Center, so the decent backs we already have on the roster aren’t getting prison loved in the backfield, immediately after handoff.
Good thinking, big diddy.
Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.
by beefy on Nov 10, 2009 9:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe LJ is just misunderstood…
I just had to say it !
by WarWolf on Nov 11, 2009 11:29 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'm pissed off that we took a flyer on LJ
Regardless of the fact that we lost Benson on Sunday, we still beat the stoolers without him. LJ brings nothing at his age, and even less in terms of maturity. I drank to celebrate victory yesterday, as well as a 2 game division lead, but I was absolutely bummed when I heard we signed LJ. I almost drank liquor, which I only do when the Bengals lose. I have you guys to thank for drinking liquor the last time I did. I managed to just stick with beer, though. Then again, you guys tried out Benson before he signed with us, but he’s also 5 years younger and still has a lot of football ahead of him. Good game this year, you’re the only team that flat out beat us. Broncs got lucky.
WHO DEY You Dey.
by Danimal, Destroyer of Worlds on Nov 17, 2009 3:51 AM CST reply actions 2 recs
Rec'd
For class and “You Dey.”
Looking forward to a day when being a Texans fan doesn't mean that April is the highlight of my season...
by Tim on Nov 17, 2009 9:09 AM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 






















