Post-Game Breakdown: Colts 15, Texans 1
I don't have the slightest bit of positivity in this introduction to the PGB this week. How could I? Your Houston Texans were up 17-0, lost 35-27, and no Houston fan was even remotely surprised.
Think about it: Was there a single moment where you honestly thought the Texans had the game put away? Granted, some of that uneasiness is due to Peyton Manning being the guy on the other sideline, but a great deal of it is simple history. No matter what kind of lead the Texans have, it's never safe. Never. It can be 28 points; it can be 10 points; it can be a single point. No lead is too large for the Texans to blow.
If you're looking for silver linings, I suppose you can celebrate the fact that this latest affront had offenders on the offense, the defense, and the coaching staff. That's teamwork! Let's continue cutting ourselves so we can feel alive, shall we?
1. I wonder whether Rick Smith feels a perverted sense of satisfaction with every pass thrown at or tackle blown by Dunta Robinson. Dunta essentially negotiates against himself every snap. On the increasingly rare occasions Dunta does make a nice play, he still manages to hurt himself and the team. For proof of the accuracy of that last statement, scroll down to the bottom of this post by Lance Zierlein.
2. A text I never thought I'd send out during a Texans game, but one I sent out repeatedly yesterday: "Dunta Faggins."
3. Final Dunta-related blast, I promise. We've reached a point where you can basically call a completion to Dunta's man before it happens whenever a safety is not rolled over to his side. Virtually automatic.
4. I want to like John Busing. Really, I do. It's easy to root for the last guy to make the roster. It is not easy to root for players who seem to be so totally outclassed by no fault of their own. It's nauseating to think that Frank Bush and/or David Gibbs looked at their available safeties after Eugene Wilson went down and said, "Yup, Busing's the best of the lot."
5. Absurd pass interference penalty aside, Jacques Reeves played his worst game of the season yesterday. Back when Petey Faggins was turning me into a candidate for psychiatric confinement every Sunday from August to January, I used to have nightmares that the Texans featured a secondary comprised of nothing but Petey Faggins. Petey at CB, Petey at SS, Petey at FS. It was horrifying. Yesterday, it felt like that nightmare became reality. It truly was a Houston secondary full of Peteys.
6. I'll break up the depression with a positive. Kris Brown did not miss a field goal. Huzzah!
7. One more bit of happiness before I drain the fun out of the internet again. Brian Cushing continues to find new ways to make me look like an idiot. While his interception was awesome, I was even more impressed with his return after the pick.
8. Cushing's amazing return was, of course, negated by Antonio Smith's penalty for unnecessary roughness. There it is...the familiar stench of reality.
9. You knew Matt Schaub would have to atone for his turnover-less performance on Monday Night Football. And he did, in grand fashion. I'm not sure which was more horrid--the pick-six or the fumble. Oh, who can choose?
10. More words I never thought I'd be typing: Chris Brown played a really good football game. For the Texans, even.
11. Not sure if it was due more to the run-blocking or the cuts of Brown and Steve Slaton, but I think the Texans had, all things considered, their best rushing effort of the season.
12. In light of the aforementioned point, I will never understand why Kyle Shanahan called a pass on third and one from the IND 15 with slightly more than a minute to go in the first half. Why do you not run there? If the Colts stuff you, you're getting the same three points you would've had anyway, probably with the luxury of forcing the Colts to burn a timeout. If the Colts don't stuff you, you get a fresh set of downs and another couple of shots at the end zone. What's the rationale for passing there? Seems to me like a classic case of trying to outsmart the opposition when there's absolutely no need for it.
13. Despite leaving a potential four points on the board thanks to his playcalling, K. Shanahan should buy Brice McCain a bottle of Dom for bailing him out with that pick on the final Colts drive of the first half. That had potential to be a disaster. You know, like the second half.
14. Once the Colts took the lead 21-20 with more than eight minutes left, do you know how many running plays the Texans ran during the remainder of the game? ZERO. Not a one. Instead, the offense reeled off twenty-one (21!) consecutive passing plays. Balance, thy name is not Kyle Shanahan (or Gary Kubiak, because [clears throat] "it starts with [him]").
15. Seriously...21 straight passing plays, occurring as the deficit fluctuates between one point and fifteen points. If that's not calling a game with one's hands firmly around one's neck, I don't know what is.
Want to know the most disgusting part? I have every confidence that the Texans are going to do something ridiculous like reel off wins in their next four games, just to suck us all back in. Sure, we're all ready to drink antifreeze now, but it's nothing a few wins in a row can't cure. And then, after imbuing us with new hope, your Houston Texans will poke us in the eye, knee us in the groin, and leave us in a heap on the pavement. You can make book on it.
Colts vs Texans coverageTexans vs Jaguars coverage
0 recs |
70 comments
|
Comments
If we can get to 9-7, fine by me.
Just playing meaningful games for the rest of the season would be something of a victory after this. By Houston standards…
At the risk of not fitting the fan stereotypes presented
Yeah, I thought the game was over at 17-0.
I knew Manning would bring them back, but I thought we’d keep scoring. And we did move the ball down field pretty well in the second half IMO, we had that defense on its heels. We just couldn’t hold on to the damn ball.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
yeah,
I see a four game winning streak followed by an epic match with the Patriots…….. who we needed to win last night so they’d take off week 17. Booo, Saints!
Sounds like
Beer and goose in Germany was the better call.
When I'm on the mic, I'm like global warming, you can't ignore me.
by tehGrindCrusher on Dec 1, 2009 9:19 AM CST via mobile reply actions
Against the Colts.
It’s never over until the final whistle blows.
I was never confident about us winning this game even when we were up 17-0.
I prefer us being down halftime because we always seem to make good adjustments.
But then again, losing like this is easier for everybody. It keeps those rooms in the psych ward open for more serious offenders.
re: adjustments
This is obviously not a direct reply to what you said about them, but it reminded me…
People keep bringing up how the team made no halftime adjustments during this last loss. I’ve been meaning to ask this: If we’re kicking the shit out of a team in every facet of the game, what adjustments would you expect the WINNING team to make? Granted, the Colts might’ve looked seriously at what they were doing, but what were we supposed to adjust to? If anything, you should be pissed off if we STOPPED doing what was working all first half (which some of you have said about running the ball).
The bottom line is, many of you are full of it. You keep spilling out the same tired blame-game responses.
It’s not like I’m above blaming someone for fugging up (see: Robinson, Cunta), but if you’re gonna wildly blame Kubes or the coaching staff, please try to find something more concrete. Of course, I might as well be talking to the wall.
Again, Jordann, this had nothing to do with what you done writ.
Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.
You make the point for the anti-Kubiak crowd while at the same time asking for more concrete proof of his ineptness?
You point out that the we stopped running the ball, (a coaching decision) and stopped doing what had been working.
Again, Kubiak made poor adjustments at halftime. He obviously thought that the Colts would have made adjustments in the run defense and tried to predict that by coming out more pass oriented. It was a bad idea and didn’t work.
So again, the Texans show that when they find a winning formula, they are unwilling to keep their foot on the gas for an entire game.
Kubiak is not the only problem to be certain. Cunta isn’t helping matters and having a pass rush might help things along as well.
But not being the only problem does not exclude him from being a major part of the problem.
I am torn on Kuiak. I genuinely like the guy’s attitude and what he has done with the offense, but he has not shown an aptitude for managing games and winning. It may just be that he is an offensive coordinator and better suited to that role than as a head coach.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Dec 1, 2009 10:01 AM CST up reply actions
How many NFL coaches, off the top of your head
Would you say are NOT better equipped to be a coordinator? That’s a ludicrous statement given how often they succeed as coordinators and fail as HC’s.
I’m not saying Kubiak’s end of game tactics overall have been beyond criticism, but I’m not sure Sunday was the place to bitch about them. For all the flack, the Texans were moving the ball on the Colts easily. It was just, you know, the two interceptions and the fumble.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
by riversmccown on Dec 1, 2009 10:06 AM CST up reply actions
Oh, and...
The craptacular defense. You know, the one that has never been above average in our franchises entire existence? But that we keep giving leeway to our defensive coordinator about? And saying is “improving” when it would be hard-pressed to suck as awful as it has the last four years? That one?
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
by riversmccown on Dec 1, 2009 10:12 AM CST up reply actions
blaming the defense
to me is just an “end of the year, look at the stats and see where we rank” view of the team. Right now I feel thats too broad a stroke.
The defense did not lose the game vs. Indy. Their history of being craptacular aside, they were put in a few bad positions in the second half. They were not responsible for the loss.
This year is different, and each game this year was different. But as I look at it game by game, our defense has played well enough to win 7-9 games by now.
Last year looking at it game by game, I would say the exact same thing for our offense.
Our offense is good, but doesn’t play well when it matters. Our defense at the end of the season will probably improve over years past to around mediocrity, I’ll give you that.
But to say that our mediocre defense couldn’t have taken us to the playoffs this season is inaccurate.
I’m not saying that our good offense needs to play better because our defense is just mediocre. I’m saying our offense can’t be considered good just because we finish in the top 5 every year. That is misleading. They are not getting the job done when it counts.
Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.
"The defense did not lose the game against Indy"
Uhh…what?
By my count, the Texans offense scored 27 points, and Indianapolis’ offense scored 28 despite having 7 at halftime (31 if you count the missed gimme FG). The defense gave up points in impossible situations such as “1st & 10 at the Indy 20”, “1st & 10 at the Indy 35”, and “1st & 10 at the Indy 17”. Gosh, they were just screwed by that evil offense!
Just because they didn’t give up an absolute stink bomb and let Peyton throw up 45 doesn’t mean they didn’t lose the game. We don’t have a mediocre defense any more than we have a Top 5 offense. We have a top 10 offense and a bottom 10 defense. Which unit has more room to go up?
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
by riversmccown on Dec 1, 2009 11:30 AM CST up reply actions
I have to disagree
The offense, while scoring 27, gave up 7.
The offense put the defense in a bad situation which led to another quick 7. If that blame comes off the defense, the offense is up 27-14.
If the offense moves the ball in those drives, or punts, or comes up with a drive when we need it most, we win that game.
The last two sentences of your reply are what I’m talking about. Its not about “end of the year where do we rank.” Save that for the end of the year. Its that our offense did not make the plays to win the game, and specifically gave Indy a much better chance to win the game on two drives.
Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.
I can see it now
Texans run every time they have the ball for the first two downs, then throw an incomplete pass on third down, then they punt. Yes! That would be mondo popular around here! Everyone would be praising Kubiak for such effective play calling!
It’s a close loss, you can play what if games with it anyway you want to. If there is no phantom PI, we win the game. If we hold them on 3rd and goal, we win the game. If our interior o-line can block, we win the game. If Antonio Smith doesn’t hit Peyton Manning in the head, we win the game. If I wake up and decide not to watch the game, we win the game. Etc. etc. etc.
Bottom line: Offense came to play and had some awful turnovers but moved the ball well. Defense was Peyton’s bitch.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
by riversmccown on Dec 1, 2009 11:54 AM CST up reply actions
show me where I said
run, run, pass?
I’m saying the second half offense cost the team more than it helped the team. When we needed it most.
I said “move the ball.” Not get ultra conservative.
My only “what if” was defending my position that “if” the offense didn’t commit two game-changing turnovers, we win the game. Thus, the offense lost us the game.
Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.
Well I strawmanned because
I simply have no clue what point you are trying to make. You didn’t even bring up the turnovers there.
Yes, the cost of having merely a very good quarterback instead of Drew Brees is that we will have some turnovers. The second half offense was fine apart from the turnovers. It moved the ball well. The only time we punted was the one time that our rushing game didn’t get us more than 3-4 yards.
I can play the what if game too, as I showed above. Just because we have one good unit and one bad unit doesn’t mean that you need to blame the good unit for not playing excellent for the entire game. It’s not their fault the Colts drive on us at will. Saying the Texans offense lost this game is just being intellectually dishonest.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
by riversmccown on Dec 1, 2009 12:14 PM CST up reply actions
ok, you obviously disagree
But don’t say I’m being intellectually dishonest when you make a statement that basically says, “other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?”
Yeah, the offense moved the ball great, other than the two game-changing turnovers.
Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.
Yeah, those fucking sucked.
…but they didn’t lose the game any more than anything the defense or penalties did. Which is my whole point.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
by riversmccown on Dec 1, 2009 12:23 PM CST up reply actions
Have to agree with
Confucius says "man who stands on toilet, high on pot".
Would like to add...
Momentum killers I would like to add; and the Texans can and have to eliminate them; are the stupid personal foul penalties and celebrations. They are playing like idiots. Someone else mentioned Keith Bullock’s remarks and they are ringing true. He said that the Texans play like they have never done it before. Dammit, they have to get their collective heads screwed on right or they will NEVER get there.
I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?
It most certainly NOT a ludicrous statement.
Successful NFL head coaches have probably been coordinators at one time.
However, they have the ability to go beyond that and manage both sides of the game as well as motivate players to excel and win games.
Kubiak has done great things with the offense here. THATS ALL.
Winning Record? NO
Winning Division record? NO
Playoff Appearance? NO
Good Offense? YES
That, my friend, is the mark of an offensive coordinator who just may not have the ability to be more than that.
You have to take the emotion out of it and look at the facts. If we have another year of mediocrity with a poor divisional record and no playoff appearance, why would you sign up for more?
I like Kubiak as much as the next guy, but you are either going forward or not. Right now, we are NOT.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Dec 1, 2009 10:55 AM CST up reply actions
Hahaha
Did you really just tell the FO charting guy that he needed to take the emotion out of it and look at the facts? Hahaha. Oh that tickles.
I think at this point in NFL history, the majority of coaches have a successful background in offense or defense. Most of these coaches keep this tendency when they are a coach. That’s why you get a coach who is good at one and a coordinator who is good at the other. The Texans have yet to find this coordinator who knows defense.
You are looking at the facts with emotion. There are underlying improvements written in every season Kubiak has been in charge, we’ve had our best offense yet this season despite interior line injuries and poor running back play. Cushing has improved our defense despite Bush’s best efforts. We’ve been pretty unlucky by the underlying statistics, and I’m not saying Kubiak is completely infallible, but he isn’t the one who made Steve Slaton fumble and made Matt Schaub throw pick 6’s. Kubiak’s been roundly criticized for using Chris Brown too much the last few games, yet if he’d left Slaton in and watched another fumble go out, everyone would immediately bitch him out here. He’s playing a zero sum game here just because he’s been the coach for more than two years. Just like a senior draft prospect who gets a bum rap for bad tape because he’s had more opportunities to have bad tape.
Yes, this stretch has burned, and yes, a loss is a loss, and we aren’t going to be able to make up those games this year. But going through the roughest stretch of our schedule, being outscored by a total of 14 points in those 3 games, and in any just world, getting to overtime in two of them AT LEAST, isn’t the end of the world. You want to cover your hands over your ears and shout “SAME OLD TEXANS”, “SAME OLD TEXANS”. We’ve improved from being a slightly sucky team that won some lucky ones to a slightly good team that is getting shafted. Going forward, that means a lot more than you are letting it mean right now.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
by riversmccown on Dec 1, 2009 11:24 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
You say that, "But going through the roughest stretch of our schedule, being outscored by a total of 14 points in those 3 games, and in any just world, getting to overtime in two of them AT LEAST, isn’t the end of the world."
Then go on to accuse me of covering my ears and shouting same old Texans.
Pointing out to us how a bunch of close LOSSES are better than…what? Not close losses? That is the most absurd thing I have heard yet today.
WHO CARES how close a loss was? You don’t get points for close. You won, or you didn’t.
If you won, you are improving. If you lost, you are not improving. THAT is the final analysis and in the end it is the ONLY thing that matters in the NFL.
Right now, the team is not improving. In fact they have regressed. You can wave stats around all day long, but you don’t get points for those either.
Kubiak has, THUS FAR, failed to secure either a winning record, winning division record, or a playoff berth.
That is what he will be judged on and nothing else.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Dec 1, 2009 11:30 AM CST up reply actions
So you'd have rather been blown out of the water like we were in 2004, 2005, etc?
Me personally, I’ll take my team being close in a game against an undefeated team as a sign that they aren’t that far from contending and just need to improve their talent a little more. Yes, close losses are better than not-close losses going forward. Shocking, I know, that you can be judged on things besides your record!
I agree with you on one thing though: that is definitely what he will be judged on. I am starting to hope that Kubiak gets fired just so we can see how hindsight affects our little Fire Kubiak Krew. As we all know, the great Cowher will take over, because who can think of a more prestigious franchise that has players that fit his schemes better than the Texans? And if not, I’m sure we’ll find a much better coach than Kubiak…I just don’t know his name yet. And everything will be hunky dory! DelJuan Robinson, finally freed from Kubiak’s shackles, will become the best defensive tackle in football and key a Houston defensive renaissance that takes us all the way to the Super Bowl under Coach Unknown. Yes! I can see it now!
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
by riversmccown on Dec 1, 2009 11:39 AM CST up reply actions
The picture is not that clear though.
Do I think Kubiak needs to go? Yes.
Is Cowher the answer? Who the hell knows.
All we know right now is that Kubiak is not the solution as things stand. It is impossible to predict the success of anyone until they caoched the team for a few years, which is the boat Kubiak is in,
Again, I LIKE Kubiak. I think he has a winning attitiude and is a great offensive mind. He just can’t seem to make that leap that great head coaches do to get their teams winning. In his defense even, I would hazard to ghuess that most head coaches fall into this category. It takes a special coach with the right combination of players to do well in this league. Unfortunately, Kubiak + Texans doesn’t seem to be a winning recipe.
It remains a crapshoot once he leaves and there is no garauntee that the next guy is any better. But you deal with the facts on the ground. Kubiak has to go if we don’t get this turned around somehow and make a run at the playoffs.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Dec 1, 2009 11:48 AM CST up reply actions
All "we know"
Kubiak was a solution for the area he was brought in to fix, the offense.
Kubiak, SHOCKINGLY, has not made the defense good. Almost as if he had an offensive background or something… Additionally, he has done a pretty mediocre job of head coaching responsibilities such as time management and challenges, which places him in company with…well, every NFL coach beside Belicheck.
Frank Bush, SHOCKINGLY, has not made the defense good. Almost as if he had a background with a terrible defense or something…
The rest of it is all window dressing.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
by riversmccown on Dec 1, 2009 12:06 PM CST up reply actions
kubiak doesn't get a pass on the defense
he was hired as a head coach, not offensive coordinator.
He was not brought in to fix the offense. He was brought in to lead the entire team.
You can’t blame Bush for hiring Bush. The last eight years have just taught you to blame Bush for everything I guess.
Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.
Criticizing Kubiak for not running a good defense
Is like hiring an excellent chef for your restaurant, hiring people on physical rehab as waiters, and being shocked when the joint fails because the food comes out cold.
Is Kubiak the one who approved Bush? I don’t know. I know there were stories that he wanted him, but in the end it’s not Kubiak’s job to be the general manager. I’ve always seen him as head coach, offense. If the Texans hired him expecting him to lead the defense back to prominence, then this organization is so fucked up that we should all just give up and find a new team anyway.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
by riversmccown on Dec 1, 2009 12:20 PM CST up reply actions
Are you Kubiak's agent?
because thats the only guy who could ever make the argument that “we don’t even know if Kubiak hired Bush!” with a straight face.
Seriously?
Was the chef hired to run the kitchen, or the restaurant? Did the chef (hired to run the restaurant) hire the waiters?
Luckily Kubiak stands up and takes the heat, whereas you seem to go out of your way to exonerate him.
Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.
Chill, guy.
This is starting to step beyond the bounds of argument and into the realm of personal attacks.
I said that I didn’t know how it went down, not that “we” didn’t know. Perhaps there is documented proof all over the internet. I said I didn’t know, mainly because I am too lazy to go tracking.
All I am saying is that Bush has presided over a bad defense and that Kubiak should not have been trusted to know a good defensive mind from a bad one. There are positions above the head coach that probably should be watchdogging this.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
by riversmccown on Dec 1, 2009 12:32 PM CST up reply actions
nah, not personal
you just have your head in the sand re:head coaching responsibility
Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.
WTF is the head coach of offense?
ROFL…I mean seriously?
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Dec 1, 2009 12:25 PM CST up reply actions
Haha, great addition to the conversation!
Clearly I hadn’t established my point earlier that most head coaches are better at one side of coaching! Except I did! ROFL!
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
by riversmccown on Dec 1, 2009 12:35 PM CST up reply actions
Clearly common sense hadn't established its point that the head coach is in charge of all apects of the team!
Except it did! ROFL!
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Dec 1, 2009 12:36 PM CST up reply actions
So does Kubiak call the defensive plays then?
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
by riversmccown on Dec 1, 2009 12:38 PM CST up reply actions
Cause if so I am willing to ship him right on out of here
But I’m really doubting he has any influence on that at all.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
by riversmccown on Dec 1, 2009 12:39 PM CST up reply actions
Kubes calling the defensive plays?!
Oh god, so thats the problem with our defense. It’s definitely not our lack of reliable CB’s or a NT that can collapse the pocket or a FS that doesn’t suck. It’s Kubiak calling the defense. Great. Mystery solved.
Last time i checked, DC’s are hired to coordinate the defense.
Oh
Well I guess TexansForever will always have the time he tried to be snarky on the internet and failed then.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
by riversmccown on Dec 1, 2009 12:57 PM CST up reply actions
Wishing doesn't make it so.
Much like your entire argument.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Dec 1, 2009 1:34 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
"That is what he will be judged on and nothing else."
Straight from Bob Mcnair, to be sure.
Or was that from the guy who gave up and quit cheering for the team in September?
Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.
You are right.
McNair will probably judge his head coach on something other than success.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Dec 1, 2009 11:43 AM CST up reply actions
And as for giving up on the team in Septmeber. You are right.
I said inn Septmeber that they were looking like the same old Texans and I didn’t expect them to do better than 8-8.
Then I saw a spark and started drinking the kool-aid.
Now, it is starting to look like I may have been right all along. Thanks for the reminder.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Dec 1, 2009 11:50 AM CST up reply actions
There's two sides, re: adjustments...
There’s one crowd complaining that he doesn’t make any. There’s another one that says the adjustments he makes are poor.
Here’s how the second half drives transpired: (r=run, p=pass)
- - p, r, r, p- int
- - p, r, penalty, p – punt
- r, r, p, p – punt
- (down 21-20 now) – p, p (pick 6)
- (down 28-20) This is where we started the streak of 21 passes or whatever Tim said.
Doesn’t look like any “halftime adjustments” threw us off, as they didn’t go into pass happy mode until we were down 8 pts. I agree that they probably panicked a bit, but this is pretty telling.
Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.
The Difference in the two halves is telling.
First Half:
18 Run
17 Pass
Second Half:
5 Run
25 Pass
Down by 8 points and they completely panicked and fell apart. The coaching from that point on was poor.
The way I look at it is, that, at the most critical juncture of the game, Kubiak abandoned what had been successful and went into panic mode.
He thought like an ex-Qb turned offensive coordinator, which is, lets put the ball in the air and go get some TD’s.
In theory that sounds great, but I believe a true “head coach” would have stayed calm and kept pounding the rock, knowing that you have to keep Peyton off the field and you have to trust your defense to get you the ball back. The odds of beating Peyton Manning in a shootout are not good, that is a bad strategy, ask the Patriots.
Of the 9 possessions the Colts had that mattered (not icluding the last 18 seconds) your defense allowed scores on four drives but held them scoreless on five other drives.
Don’t panic. Pound the rock. Stay patient. Trust your defense to show up.
Kubiak is still thinking like a coordinator, not like the head coach it seems.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Dec 1, 2009 11:12 AM CST up reply actions
Just to be pedantic
I could argue that one might want to have some adjustments ready to counter the adjustments that one might expect the Colts to make.
When I'm on the mic, I'm like global warming, you can't ignore me.
by tehGrindCrusher on Dec 1, 2009 10:25 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Along with
“Get a gift INT TD” and “stop throwing interceptions”.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
by riversmccown on Dec 1, 2009 10:35 AM CST up reply actions
At this point in the season, it is really frustrating to think we have to go 4-1 to post a winning record.
They really need to figure out why they collapse in games.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
I've stayed away
since the mnf disaster, because it just hurt too much. And I was about to give myself heart/blood pressure problems.
Now I have calmed down, and I fully agree with Tim that most Texans fans expected this. I’m one of the more optimistic, usually, and I was never confident.
I’m also one of Kubiak’s stronger supporters, and feel he deserves the full year before passing judgment. This resume he’s building during crunch time is not helping him in the least, however.
Players and coaches are all to blame.
Lets start with coaches, because it makes sense.
#. if you objectively look at the job Kubiak has done, you have to look at results. If he took us to a 10-1 record to this point, and did a terrible job at it, we would be singing his praises. Its not “how he’s doing as a coach” its “how is his team responding to his coaching.” I think that has to be a thumbs down to this point. I agree 4 wins in december will help, which is why I’m firmly entrenched in the camp that says we’ll evaluate at the end of the season.
#. Its said that a team takes on the personality of its coaching staff. I believe this, and there are a couple things that trouble me in this area. The play calls seemed to tell the players, “we need to panic,” at the time where we needed to calm the team down. The deep pass pick in the third, the 50 straight pass plays, etc. Then Kubiak doesn’t watch the kicks. The coach is nervous that his players won’t succeed. I think that’s poor leadership.
Players
#. Whatever the coaching staff does/doesn’t do, why isn’t there a desire for these professional football players to step up in a big game, and get the job done? I guess there’s a desire, I don’t see lack of effort (until the 5th TD v. Colts). But the players could have won the game v. tits, and they didn’t. They being Schaub and Kris Brown, and a few others.
#. Talent is there, but leadership on the field is lacking. Schaub needs to fix this on the offensive side. Meco needs to get his troops in line in crucial situations. They are trying this, I’m sure. They are not succeeding. They need to fix this as leaders of their respective units. Someone has to step up and do what needs to be done to win games that need to be won. There’s so much blame to go around, that everyone seems to be looking around for someone else to win the game. Not acceptable.
Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.
If we win 4 games in December...
what does it really show? I ask this because Kubiak has always shown an ability to have his teams play well in December.
2006: 3-2 in December, 3-8 rest of the year
2007: 3-2 in December, 5-6 rest of the year
2008: 4-1 in December, 4-7 rest of the year
I bring this up because if we go 4-0 or 3-1 in December why should it help Kubiak retain his job? Every year he has coached the team has gotten better in december and given us hope that if we can figure it out at the beginning of the year we can go to the playoffs/have a winning record. IMO, if the Texans play well in December it only shows that Kubiak can get his team to play well when his job is clearly on the line. What makes a good december this season different than a good december in years past, which have all led to nothing?
To all Houston sports fans, Houston is the 4th biggest city in America, there will be traffic on the way to your respective sports game. Come Early, Be Loud, Stay Late.
by TexasHoosier on Dec 1, 2009 11:20 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Agree 100%
I have belabored the pooint but I will mention it again.
Kubiak needs to do at least two of three things in my mind in order to show progress.
1. Have a winning record.
2. Be above .500 in the division.
3. Make the playoffs.
Well, #3 is out in all but the most absurd scenarios. #2 is not possible and #1 requires us going 4-1 just to be one game over .500.
I just don’t see how any of that at this point shows significant progress.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Dec 1, 2009 11:24 AM CST up reply actions
four wins in december
makes 1 of your 2 happen.
And the final game v. the Pats could take us to #3.
So by your own definition, its all out there for Kubiak.
Four wins in December, or you will probably have a lot of people agreeing with your position. I say keep supporting him until he proves me wrong.
Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.
No.
1. Winning record.
2. Winning record IN THE DIVISION.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Dec 1, 2009 12:18 PM CST up reply actions
9-7
is 4-1 from here.
10-6 is 5-0 from here, and possible.
I agree his resume does not look good. But 4-1 or 5-0 would help. And you would be hard pressed to defend firing a 10-6 coach.
So thats how 4 wins in december would help.
Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.
Dont get me wrong,
If the Texans run the table and go to the playoffs I would probably be a fan of Kubiak again, but who wouldnt? At the same time it would probably mean that Kubiak has been coaching better, or the team was responding to him more. Either way a coach who makes the playoffs should not be fired.
But, if the Texans go 9-7 and have another good December, I would still probably want Kubiak gone. It would be the 4th straight year of a bad start to the season but a good finish, continually giving the franchise some hope for the next season. Im not a fan of firing Kubiak now because I think he should have the chance to finish the season, but if the downslide continues the current course, I may change my mind about letting him finish the season.
To all Houston sports fans, Houston is the 4th biggest city in America, there will be traffic on the way to your respective sports game. Come Early, Be Loud, Stay Late.
lets just loose out
and get a new coach and staff and some nice high draft picks, maybe around the 12th spot
Boooo kubiak! Take a hike
Let’s all face it, kubiak is not the answer. He’s gotta go and we all know it. I’ll be damned if we make the playoffs. Win 5 in a row? Possible but not likely. With his poor poor clock managment I dunno it’s hard to say. He never gets in players faces and is jus not agressive enough and shows no emotion. I like the guy but not as our head coach anymore. Bill Cowher is the answer we been looking for I’m tellin you! Hope we win the 5 and sneak in. Kubiak needs to get on the players asses not now but right now.
by Texan_4_life on Dec 1, 2009 4:48 PM CST via mobile reply actions
If we were to win 5 in a row.
Koobs will be here next season.
You are banned from Music City Miracles.
Happy Now Tits?
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.
Steel Blue uni's
The last time we wore the all “Steel Blue” uni’s we had the same results:
http://rosencopter.ytmnd.com/
That’s on the PR/Marketing Dept! Must have pissed off Durga? Bad Mo-Jo….

by 
























