Excitement....And Trepidation
See that picture above? I'll take a moment to let you look. Done?
So, I've got a question for ya: Is our season riding on that picture? Or this one?
That's Frank Bush, our new defensive coordinator, in case you didn't know.
See, I've had kind of a crazy but super stressful week this week. Two good friends of mine are hurting, one was in the hospital, and my streak of avoiding a relative's funeral will be broken next weekend. Fudge. Basically, this has led to a lot of sleepless nights with thoughts often wandering around to the Texans. More specifically, what am I going to write about?
But I'm worried. As I mentally map out the team, I keep falling back into the trap that our defense is going to suck. I've read and analyzed the Football Outsiders 2009 Almanac, and there's no way around the fact that our defense was last year and has been historically horrific every year .
I'm not going to go into much detail yet, but when you look at our defense, there are only two personnel changes: Brian Cushing in for Zac Diles, and Antonio Smith replacing the corpses that played at LDE last year. Obviously, the latter will be a tremendous upgrade, and the former will be an upgrade, but how much?
Otherwise, we are going to need to put a bu a fu a boat-load of faith in Frank Bush and what appears to be our new base defense, the 4-3 under. Is this enough to take us from the 29th best defense (out of 32) to 20th? Or 15th? And how much do we need to improve defensively to turn us into a legitimate playoff contender?
I'm worried, I admit. Theoretically, with a fairly young squad and a change in coaching philosophy, our defense should improve. But with the notable exception of the BE-SFs, each team expects to improve year after year. It helps considerably that we all know and understand Richard Smith is dysfunctionally moronic, but we still need to improve substantially this year.
I'd like to hear from y'all and what you think about the defense. What are the coaching and scheme changes worth? Are we going to rely too heavily on Vigo Steven Seagal Brian Cushing to make an immediate impact under this new system? Smith most certainly seems like a good piece in this scenario.
Am I stressing for no particular reason?
Oh, and I just noticed that we signed Jeff Zgonina, last year's league leader in being an ineffectual speed bump. And you wonder why I stress.
0 recs |
37 comments
|
Comments
Yep
I REALLY could’ve done without that Zgonina news today, especially since Rick should probably be occupying his time with a certain two rookie’s agents right now. I will be furious if JZ (not the cool one) is on the gameday roster during a single series this year.
As to the main point(s) of your post, I’m with you, brother.
I honestly feel that if the only thing that changed from last year to this, was the full-out, up the field push, as opposed to the “read and react” bullshit from last year, there is going to be huge strides made by the whole unit. All the other perceived improvements to date(i.e. Bill Kollar, Cushing, Smith, not having Greenwood, or Faggins, or Weaver, “aggressive/attacking” scheme, Mario having another year to perfect his badass-ery, etc.) should be gravy, compared to that one. Hell, even Travis Johnson may look moderately effective, utilizing an up-field rush.
The Kool Aid tastes like The Tears of Methopotamia.
fuck #23
Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.
by beefy on Jul 30, 2009 2:36 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
also
It looks like Matthews and Oher have signed, so that’ll hopefully get the ball rolling on 1st round signings (I think DHB got signed earlier today, but I’m a bit behind).
by bigfatdrunk on Jul 30, 2009 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
dhb
Yeah, he agreed to terms.
My buddy who’s a raiders fan (ugh) said early reports from practice were that he dropped several passes, and then tweaked his hammy.
Great job, AL!!
Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.
by beefy on Jul 30, 2009 4:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He probably dropped those passes
because of the glove-like coverage of Mike Mitchell.
When I'm on the mic, I'm like global warming, you can't ignore me.
by tehGrindCrusher on Jul 30, 2009 10:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or the perfect deep ball
thrown by the savior or Raider Nation, Jamarcus Russell.
I seriously have way too much fun hating Al Davis. And hate him I do.
The strong do what they have to do; the weak accept what they have to accept
by Riott on Jul 31, 2009 8:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I used to hate Al too
but now he is so hapless, dragging his once proud franchise down into endless mediocrity, that he is laughable. Hard to hate a bottom feeder, even if his name is Al Davis.
It took the Astros 44 years to get to the Series, the Oilers-Texans are due to get to the big dance...Go Texans!!!!!
by oiler-texan diehard on Aug 1, 2009 7:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Other changes
Dunta starting for a full season instead of just six games will help. Let’s not let the contract issues distort reality; he’s a much better CB than anybody else we have. Eugene Wilson will also be the opening day starter at FS; that improves our secondary as well.
Travis Johnson is in a contract year. I’m assuming he’s stupid to the point that he has already gone and spent his rookie contract on white tigers and shit like that, so it would behoove him to give a little effort this season.
No more Greenwood. This is big. Whether it’s Adibi, June, or Diles in that WLB position, I think it makes our defense more dynamic.
But most importantly, the scheme is different. Forget the fact that Frank Bush has never been a DC before. I don’t feel like I even need to justify this with a sound argument, because it’s too damn obvious. Richard Smith’s defense was absolutely incapable of working with the players on our team. In fact, unless he had Reggie White and Warren Sapp playing on that line with Mario, his defense was guaranteed to suck hard.
29th to 15th would be nice, but with this offense, we don’t even need that much improvement. Just force a few more turnovers and get decent field position and Schaub, ‘dre, and Stevie will do the rest en route to 10-6 or 11-5. It certainly can’t get any worse, can it?
by Nashmeister on Jul 30, 2009 3:26 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Greenwood
Greenwood was truly awful last year. Thanks for the reminder.
TBH, I am just no convinced about Dunta. While he’s been very good, he’s never been elite, and he obviously wasn’t good last year. There’s a valid argument to make as to if he’s the 2nd or 3rd best CB on the team, and I would argue that it’s actually Bennett with real coaching.
by bigfatdrunk on Jul 30, 2009 7:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We are relying on Cushing to do good, he has to do good.
Tho, like other people said, I believe the new more aggressive scheme is our biggest asset, this new scheme could really bring out the best in everybody.
All we need is a slightly better DB corp, and this defense could be decent.
by Schlauton on Jul 30, 2009 4:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Coaching
is the most important thing for the development of the team. Want to know how bad and/or inconsistent coaching affects a team? Ask the Detroit Lions or Raiders. Without consistent direction and motivation from staff to go along with a good game plan, your team is nothing, especially if it is populated by young players.
Scheme means absolutely NOTHING if not backed up by quality, consistent teaching. Frank Bush is the key to the defense, changing the scheme is just one of his tools.
by Riott on Jul 30, 2009 4:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
good points
But it’s important to remember those teams also lack in defensive talent. And how much of a difference can we expect in one year of a new scheme? Most importantly, do we lack in defensive talent? I know there is a lot of man-crushing on Barwin, but as of today, he’s a third-down kind of guy, somebody to help in rushing the passer. It’s nice to get some help there, but we were even worse against stopping the run.
I guess I’m trying to focus on quantifying the unquantifiable before looking farther down the defensive rabbit hole. We’ve got a new coach, new scheme, and a couple of new faces, but we’re still returning a lot of familiar faces.
by bigfatdrunk on Jul 30, 2009 7:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trust me
I am not gonna be the guy who says the Texans D is going to go from zero to hero in one season. It is not even moderately rational to think so.
Understanding what talent we do have on defense is just as important as understanding where we lack talent. We have play makers, but we simply aren’t good. That takes time, chemistry, coaching, and all of the other unquanitifiables out there.
While I said I don’t expect everyone to become super heroes over night, I do expect certain things out of a new (hopefully superior) coach – increased emphasis on tackling, alignment, situational awareness, and general honing of technique. Little mistakes are what big plays are made of – if Jacques turns his head, if Weaver keeps outside leverage, if TJ puts his hands up, a big play for the opposing team could have been negated.
Little things can make a big difference for our guys, and while it doesn’t change the talent level we have on defense, I hope Bush can put our talent in a position to help the team win.
by Riott on Jul 30, 2009 8:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"If Weaver Keeps Outside Leverage..."
Zuh? How can a (released) corpse keep leverage?
Looking forward to a day when being a Texans fan doesn't mean that April is the highlight of my season...
by Tim on Jul 30, 2009 9:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Was totally in reference
to last years play, hence the “what if’s”
by Riott on Jul 30, 2009 9:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
In retrospect
it is not as obvious as I ment it to be, but it should have been implying, “Hey, if we didn’t suck so bad at small technique details, it could have drastically affected the way our defense played!”
So yeah.
by Riott on Jul 30, 2009 9:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Giving You A Hard Time
Please indulge me; I have to use all my “Corpse Formerly Known As Anthony Weaver” jokes before they get stale.
Looking forward to a day when being a Texans fan doesn't mean that April is the highlight of my season...
by Tim on Jul 30, 2009 9:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmmm.....
No Blogger Choice Award for your entry, bfd. I was expecting better after all the buildup. I understand, you’re worried. Now you have me worried. Is this what we are to expect for the rest of the year? Pot shots at the departed defensive coordinator; pot shots at the hairdo of the starting rookie LB; I thought you might be more decisive in your delivery. I will just wait on you, like you are waiting on the Texans defense.
It will happen
by Rip Jersey on Jul 30, 2009 6:27 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I hope that's sarcasm
b/c the only other option is bitterness
by Shake on Jul 30, 2009 6:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Neither, more like the title says, excitement...and trepidation

I liken this to someone pulling the teeth out of the abominable snowman. This isn’t the bfd I used to know! I think some pussy stole his password and got on BRB and tried to pass himself off as the real bfd. Plus, I have one more bone to pick, but I’ll save that for later…that is if the real bfd has the balls to come in here and say he thinks I’m wrong.
It will happen
by Rip Jersey on Jul 30, 2009 7:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude
Chill out. You’re getting a little too personal with what you’re saying about one of the best Texans bloggers out there. We get that you didn’t agree with all of his points. Why don’t you concentrate on arguing with BFD’s arguments rather than attacking him.
You know... for kids.
by Jake on Jul 30, 2009 7:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Honestly Jake...
Don’t worry about it. I’m here. He knows where I am. If he doesn’t like the post, that’s definitely his(?) prerogative. If he has bones to pick, that’s fine.
I think it’s this quote from FO that’s really bothering me:
he (Bush) will still be running out many of the same players.
That’s harshing the buzz. The new scheme helps, but how much? As of right now, that’s a pretty squishy answer.
by bigfatdrunk on Jul 30, 2009 7:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Critiques are one thing.
Personal attacks are another. This is not the Titans or Raiders blog; we are capable of civil discourse, even when in disagreement. If you have a problem with the contents of a post, by all means, comment. It is why the comment system exists. However, attacking or insulting any of your fellow posters or bloggers in absolutely unacceptable.
We, as a community, are better than that. Keep the quality high.
by Riott on Jul 30, 2009 9:10 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
I wasn't attacking the person...
I expect better of bfd. I expect him to bring his own brand of blogging to the BRB. I thought he fell far short of what I have seen him do in the past. I hope that doesn’t translate into I don’t like him or I don’t think highly of him. I hope that what I said is a dose of reality and inspiration to bfd and a message to the rules-makers. He has set his own high standards of blogging, elsewhere and now he is here, heralded by his own unique style of ingrained irreverence. That is what I want from bfd. I can’t disagree with anything he said. It just didn’t sound like the usual words dancing off his keyboard. Maybe this is the bfd that we will see when shackled and restrained by the rules of this board. I say unshackle the mofo so we can revel in his unbridled expression of emotions and thoughts. I want the old bfd!
It will happen
by Rip Jersey on Jul 31, 2009 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I must say...
You suck at compliments.
Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.
by beefy on Jul 31, 2009 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and maybe I'm the only one that feels that why, didn't hear anyone else say even close to the same thing
Maybe I’m the only one with the balls to say something. I guess if y’all are happy about it, and nothing left for me to say about it. I’ll just shut up now.
It will happen
by Rip Jersey on Jul 31, 2009 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Question
What exactly do you think is “shackled” here? The language? The style? I’m curious as to what message the rules-makers are supposed to be receiving.
Looking forward to a day when being a Texans fan doesn't mean that April is the highlight of my season...
by Tim on Jul 31, 2009 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
good with me
That’s partly why I wasn’t offended. This is a wishy washy post, as it was meant to be. It also gave me the answer(s) I was looking for (along with the Kollar article).
As far as shackles? Naw, no shackles, so I do disagree with that. Anyway, Tim’s more of a handcuffs kind of guy.
by bigfatdrunk on Jul 31, 2009 4:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
all righty then
guess I’ll be moving on to your next post where you will hopefully take off your self-imposed restraints, which sound like they might be fur-lined handcuffs as I didn’t hear ANY complaining.
It will happen
by Rip Jersey on Jul 31, 2009 5:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I want to state for the record the bfd is a bitch
A sexy bitch, that is.
When I'm on the mic, I'm like global warming, you can't ignore me.
by tehGrindCrusher on Jul 30, 2009 10:48 PM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
rec'ed
For giving me masturbatory fuel.
by bigfatdrunk on Jul 31, 2009 4:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I liken that...
to a brown gravy-type substance.
On target?
Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.
by beefy on Jul 31, 2009 4:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If our defense last year
was merely average we might have won nine or ten games. So if we could even be within one standard deviation of average, that would hopefully mean a successful season. And that’s about as much improvement as we can expect.
I don’t think it’s a big deal that we’ll be trotting mostly the same personnel out there. It’s not like we can change a whole bunch of personnel, and it’s not like our personnel was uniformly bad. We had two or three glaring holes, but the defense as a unit was probably average talent-wise, which speaks to the suckiness of Richard Smith, since he managed to mold this unit into something almost historically bad. If Frank Bush can just get the team to play up to its abilities, we’ll have an average defense. That’s all I can realistically hope for.
When I'm on the mic, I'm like global warming, you can't ignore me.
by tehGrindCrusher on Jul 30, 2009 10:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Haven't read all the comments yet...
…but I think we’re sucking each other’s d**ks a little too much. There’s a lot of reasoning that basically sounds like the reasoning of a compulsive gambler: if only it lands on black four times in a row, we’re going to be rich! Please forgive me for pissing on the parade.
Why are we so quick to assume that the offense will be as good or better than it was last year? A lot of things went right for the Texans offense last year. FO says that offense is more consistent from year to year, so I guess if you’re going to have a good unit, you want it to be the offense. But it’s not a given that things go great for us again. Let’s remember that the offensive line was healthy all year, a pretty rare feat itself. We’re going to be breaking in a new offensive lineman (let’s take this moment to remember that I predicted his selection — thank you!), as well. Now, I have confidence in Mr. Caldwell, but he is a new addition to the line. There are going to be injuries all over the offense, and chances are pretty good that it’s going to be someone important. But we’re taking for granted that we’re going to have a healthy offense.
And this says nothing of the (albeit measured) optimism on defense. (I’ll concede that losing Richard Smith can only be a good thing.)
Lately I’ve adopted into my philosophy that chance and circumstance play a larger role in life than a lot of us are willing to admit. We don’t admit this since it’s a scary proposition that things aren’t completely under our control. (I know that I’m not the first person to see things this way, hence my use of the word “adopt”.)
I’d guess that a greater deal of a team’s success than we generally acknowledge is based on the mistakes and misfortunes of the other teams that it faces. We all know that this Jets are easier to beat without Kris Jenkins, or the Colts without Dwight Freeney, so we can understand how victories against those teams might be devalued. Others argue that everyone always has some injury problems so you can’t rationalize away wins by qualifying them like that – which is understandable. And then we assume that it all evens out in the end, and that a 10-6 team is a pretty good team.
But let’s take a 30,000-ft approach on this. The reality, I fear, is that this hypothetical 10-6 team isn’t that different than a 6-10 team. Thinking about things in this manner would seem to take a lot of fun out of sports – “my team won largely due to chance!” isn’t a great chant in a sports bar.
This isn’t something unique to Texans fans – every fan base is doing this sort of thing this time of year.
I guess a different way of putting this is that I think there are a few exceptional teams (outliers), and even fewer horrible teams (Lions and Raiders), and in between there is everyone else with varying degrees of luck. I think the Texans fall into that last group again this year, unless the players we’ve drafted this year have even more exceptional talent than has been proposed already (and thereby make the Texans outliers).
Don’t get me wrong – not everything is luck and chance! There are things under our control, and it’s very worthwhile to pursue means to exploit those opportunities. But we have to concede that there are things outside of our control as well, which doesn’t make for very interesting blog posts.
After all, you can’t do anything about luck (other than to not put yourself in a position to be affected by it in the first place), so it’s pretty useless to focus on the discussion of it.
The point is, let’s not assume we’ll keep catching good breaks and get angry over the bad ones we’ve caught in the past or are sure to catch in the future..
by socctty on Jul 31, 2009 9:11 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Devil's advocate against myself
I should also have acknowledged that the original post topic was the uncertainty about the defense. Since the discussion is framed about the defense, it’s only natural to assume that the offense is a constant.
by socctty on Jul 31, 2009 9:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















