Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Yeah, But What If…

Everyone seems to be building an ark in preparation for the torrential downpour of a terrible defense.  I won’t tell you to stop gathering the animals just yet, but I am prepared to slightly play the role of a Nike-wearing, Kool-Aid swilling wacko.  I really do think our defense could be better, but not only because of the defense.

For those of you that haven’t taken a gander, BFD just wrote a great state of the union article about the defense, and last week Riott laid out the blueprint for our new defensive scheme, the 4-3 Under.  Both were honest about the way they feel--that the defense is still in a state of disarray.  I can’t disagree with that completely, but I am optimistic; it’s a flaw. 

My optimism isn’t just for the defense; in fact, out of all the three units, the defense receives the least amount of it.  Any defensive squad that is still prominently features the likes of Travis Johnson can’t garner too much confidence.  The majority of my hope relies on the offense, like most Texans fans. 

They’re not stand-alone units though.  The terrible play on the defense last year is mostly the responsibility of those players, but it can be attributed to the offense as well.  Yes, the offense was 3rd in the league last year, but only in yardage.  They were 17th in scoring, 2nd in interceptions thrown with 20, and 8th in fumbles lost with 12. 

The turnovers and the lack of scoring adds up and it effects the rest of the team.  The offense is high powered enough to play from behind, but that’s a recipe for disaster for a struggling defense.  The opposing offense can play ball control and run more with less risk.  This sets up playaction, which leads to deeper passes for big gains because the secondary has committed to helping with the run. 

Furthermore, turnovers lead to shorter fields.  It’s a lot easier to play aggressively on the opponent’s 20 yard line when the defense can still overcome a big gain rather than a big gain that results in a trip to red zone.  Shorter fields lead to more conservative play, exactly what Frank Bush and the new Texans defense is trying to counteract.

Riott and BFD are in agreement that 17th overall is the best possible result for the defense and a place in the lower 20s is more realistic.  I’m not trying to argue with that per se, but I do believe that if the defense and the offense can improve, the two sides will help each other.  It is right for us to focus on the defense because it is the true Achilles' heel right now, but it will take more than just improvement on that side of the ball to get the Texans into the playoffs.

Comment 4 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Reduced offensive turnovers

with more touchdowns, and increased defensive turnovers are always a formula for success. We will be better as a team, but I just don’t think we will be able to stop the run, which means we wont be able to stop the play action, and it just goes downhill from there.

The strong do what they have to do; the weak accept what they have to accept

by Riott on Aug 2, 2009 11:09 PM CDT reply actions  

Rec'd

For the middle school smack.

Looking forward to a day when being a Texans fan doesn't mean that April is the highlight of my season...

by Tim on Aug 3, 2009 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think run defense is going to see the most improvement.

Personnel wise the Texans have probably strengthened the strongside of their front 7 by leaps and bounds with the additions of Cushing and Smith. Improving the strongside LB and DE will probably have a pretty large effect on the defense’s ability vs the run. I think it’s more likely that the Texans will continue to struggle getting pressure on the QB than it is that they’ll be just as soft on run defense. Whether they’re a “good” run defense or not remains to be seen, but I have a hard time believing they won’t be better than in years past in that area.

They’re also changing their scheme slightly to a 4-3 under which is generally pretty strong against the run. Not only is the strongside ’backer playing on the line often for intents and purposes giving the team an extra lineman on many plays, typically one safety or the other will also slide into the box giving the team another “linebacker” of sorts in running situations. The weakness of the 4-3 under is the secondary if their front 7 is unable to put adequate pressure on the QB as CBs are pretty much left on an Island in coverage.

It could be the Texans don’t get enough pressure on opposing QBs and they give up alot of yards through the air, but no matter how many yards are given up by the defense they’re almost sure to be stronger vs the run.

by Bryan72076 on Aug 3, 2009 11:12 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your big-time home for big-time analysis and big-time rants about all things Houston Texan.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Imgres_small
AFC South Eternal Thread #219: I love 80085
Heehaw_small
Google Ad Blocker  FTW
Heehaw_small
Said, Weekly Caption Contest Winner, Winner

Recent FanPosts

Small
Looking for info on Mario Williams contract
Small
Sanu vs. Jeffery
Small
Why not trade Tate/TJ?
Img00136-20110130-0953_small
Some Important Dates This Offseason
Small
Play the Draft
Obama-they-live_small
Dallas fan crying about his treatment in houston!
Charlie_small
Would you trade...
Johns_small
If I'm Rick Smith
Tah_lion_3_700_dpi_small
So the reason I didn't see a post announcing that JJ Watt won DROY

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Hate Mail Goes Here

Brb_small Tim

Absurdly Talented Writers

Lucy_small bigfatdrunk

Screwdriver_small MDC

Vlcsnap-00003_small riversmccown

Tumblr_l4i6iruxha1qbs5d3o1_400_small TexansDC

Chairman_meow_blink_small UprootedTexan

Absurdly Talented Writers, Part Deux

Copy_of_homer_simpson_small Vega

Alec-baldwin-glengarry-glen-ross-always-be-closing_small tehGrindCrusher