Battle Red Blog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Headlines: BC Beats BU 4-3 in 58th Beanpot Championship

Gary Kubiak's Clock Management And Why It Makes Me Question The Existence Of A Benevolent Creator

While there have certainly been hiccups along the way (e.g., an ongoing and staggering failure rate at throwing the red flag), I've been a relatively steadfast supporter of Gary Kubiak. He inherited a 2-14 team with holes almost everywhere and presided over an overhaul of 99% of the roster. Kubes transformed an offense that was totally impotent into a unit that's as dangerous as any in the league. The defense...well, the jury's still out, but his decision to cede control of that facet of the squad to Richard Smith and then Frank Bush looks as though it could eventually be his ultimate undoing. As I wrote back in January, Kubes' future in Houston is likely to be determined by Frank Bush's success this season. And while I still feel that way, that's not the purpose of this entry.

I want to talk about how Kubes handled the last four minutes and twenty-five seconds of Sunday's loss to the Jaguars. By way of context, I'm talking about what went down after Dunta Robinson's strip of Mike Sims-Walker and Zac Diles' recovery of the ball. From the play-by-play on NFL.com, with your Houston Texans taking over on the Jags' 49-yard line and trailing 31-24:

1-10-JAC 49 (4:25) 8-M.Schaub pass short middle to 83-K.Walter to JAX 31 for 18 yards (21-D.Cox).

1-10-JAC 31 (3:52) 20-S.Slaton left guard pushed ob at JAX 11 for 20 yards (27-R.Mathis).

1-10-JAC 11 (3:45) 8-M.Schaub pass incomplete short middle to 85-J.Dreessen.

2-10-JAC 11 (3:39) 8-M.Schaub pass short middle to 81-O.Daniels to JAX 1 for 10 yards (52-D.Smith).

1-1-JAC 1 (2:54) 8-M.Schaub pass short middle to 85-J.Dreessen for 1 yard, TOUCHDOWN NULLIFIED by Penalty. PENALTY on HST-83-K.Walter, Offensive Pass Interference, 10 yards, enforced at JAX 1 - No Play.

1-11-JAC 11 (2:48) 8-M.Schaub pass short middle to 89-D.Anderson to JAX 2 for 9 yards (26-B.Russell).

2-2-JAC 2 (2:10) 22-C.Brown right guard to JAX 1 for 1 yard (52-D.Smith). FUMBLES (52-D.Smith), RECOVERED by JAX-52-D.Smith at JAX 0. Touchback. Houston challenged the fumble ruling, and the play was Upheld. (Timeout #2 at 02:00.)

At the outset of this analysis, a couple of things to bear in mind:

1. After their failed challenge on Dunta's strip, Jacksonville was down to a single timeout, plus the two-minute warning.

2. The Texans' defense had given up more than 390 yards of offense to the Jags and did not look capable of slowing a Pop Warner team comprised of blind four year old girls.

Knowing this, I ask you: Why in the world was Kubiak in such a hurry to score?

Think about it. If Schaub's TD pass to Dreessen isn't called back, the Jags get the ball back with nearly three minutes to play. Seeing as how his defense hadn't managed to stop Jacksonville all afternoon, what would make Kubes think they'd stop 'em now? Indeed, even factoring in K-Dub's pass interference call (which Kubes sure as heck wasn't banking on), the Texans were primed to score with more than two minutes remaining until Chris Brown fumbled. When your defense is as pathetic as Houston's is/was, how can you justify leaving that much time on the clock? Once you hit the 11-yard line, why aren't you running Slaton or Brown right into the back of your offensive line to burn time off the clock and/or to force Jacksonville to use its last timeout? Or at least to get the two-minute warning out of the way?

Wait a second, you say. Is this moron really advocating tying the game with as little time left as possible to go to overtime, where 60% of the time the team that wins the coin toss wins the game? Yes, I am. Give me the 50% chance of winning the coin toss and having Schaub & Co. controlling the Texans' destiny over the miniscule percentage that would accompany the Texans' defense actually stopping Jacksonville from scoring late in the fourth quarter, be it by FG or by TD, especially when the Jags would have had the opportunity to stop the clock twice. I'd rather play the percentages, thankyouverymuch.

Thus, we're left with the bitter reality that even if things had gone according to Kubes' plan, the Texans were still almost assured of suffering the loss, just in a different heartbreaking fashion. The most aggravating part of this is that I'm just a schmuck in the stands. How is it that I was thinking and yelling about this as it happened, yet Kubes seems oblivious? In his FOURTH YEAR as a head coach in the NFL? Doesn't it terrify and/or frustrate you, the fan, that something so elementary as burning clock seems to evade the head coach of our beloved squad?

Am I missing something? Making too much of a non-issue, seeing as how it was all made irrelevant by Brown's fumble? Sound off in the Comments below.

0 recs  |  Comment 58 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Kinda agree

Kinda don’t.

We very obviously had the Jags on their heels. I mean, we were just moving the ball at will. Is it a bad thing if Slaton breaks of his run and scores?

And then you look at the times. We were running time off the clock during these plays when we could. Clock stops for the penalties and the OOB, so we have little choice there.

Look at the plays: short middle, off LG, short middle, short middle. In a lot of ways, we were doing what we do offensively that makes us effective.

Then again, we have a defense made of thin layer of styrofoam.

We were in a bad position, one in which I didn’t really see a happy ending. I didn’t envision a ghost PI call and subsequent fumble, either.

Note to self: Insert something witty here.

by bigfatdrunk on Sep 29, 2009 9:07 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

*

*breaks off his run

Note to self: Insert something witty here.

by bigfatdrunk on Sep 29, 2009 9:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Might just be me...

But in this situation (and most situations) I will never understand passing the ball on a 1st and goal from the one. Even without a true goal-line back, why put the ball in the air on the smallest field possible? If a run play fails to score, you’re still burning clock. If a pass falls incomplete, clock stops and saves 30 seconds for JAX. And then it’s just second down! You still have 3 more tries for a TD!

by BigTexBD on Oct 1, 2009 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Say we did score...

What do you think the chance is that Kubes went for 2 for the win? I would not put it past him…

that being said…would you be more mad that we scored and lost on a 2pt conversion…or the way we did lose..fumble on the 1

by schillingb on Sep 29, 2009 9:15 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Or the more likely scenario...

Score TD, then 2 pt, only to have our D give up the W on a Scobee FG or a flat out TD?
Better?

Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.

by beefy on Sep 30, 2009 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah...

I get your point. I was wondering during the game if Kubes would do something stupid like go for two if they scored with little time left on the clock because the defense sucked all game. I was, of course, getting ahead of myself by assuming a TD. I remember 20% coming to mind on whether he’d do it. I obviously don’t expect coaching greatness out of Kubiak yet.

That being said, you’re asking if I’d be angrier at losing based on a stupid coaching decision versus a fumble mistake by a player. I’d be angrier at the stupid coaching decision, especially since beefy’s “more likely scenario” could happen anyway.

The true test in the life of a Texans fan is how gracefully you endure it.

by TexanKurt on Sep 30, 2009 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

When you need a touchdown...

I’m not sure you can really play the clock. You’ve got to use whatever will best get you into the endzone, and our play-calling did that. Unfortunately, refs and certain RBs did not.

As for going for two; I’d have done it in a heartbeat. The match-up you want is our offense against their defense. Odds are they still march down for a field-goal, but it at least prevents you from getting a stop in the 4th, then getting your spirits crushed by giving up that game-winning drive in OT.

by Nashmeister on Sep 29, 2009 9:21 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree...

You have to weigh two things here: taking time off the clock and the need to score a touchdown. It doesn’t do you any good to run the ball the entire time, face fourth down a couple times and get the clock down to 30 seconds left if the end result is not a score. The more plays you run, the greater your chances that things can go wrong (penalties, fumbles, etc.). The K-Dub penalty play bears that out. If the official was looking elsewhere, touchdown! You run a few more plays, fumble!

So, ideally you want to score a touchdown and have the ball in your offense’s hands at the end of regulation so they can preserve the tie, go for the win or respond to any points scored by the Jags. If anything, I say they should have scored more quickly. Score with 4:00 or 3:30 left if possible. If it’s a tie game and the Texans defense manages a stop on third down (I know, blaspheme!) with 2:00 or 1:30 left on the clock, the Jags might elect to punt. If the Texans give up a quick score, you at least get the ball back. Both of those situations give you the ball at the end of the game.

The Texans were behind by a touchdown in the last 6 minutes of the game. Any team in that situation is going to have to ask their defense to make a stand. They actually did that once with the Sims-Walker fumble. The offense played horribly and punted prior to that play. Thus, the defense had to make two stops. They almost did that too, but the horse collar penalty was called on Mario. If Mario had eyes in the back of his head, he’d have seen Ryans and Cushing bearing down behind him to make the stop. No Chris Brown fumble, tie game, deep in their own territory, the Jags would have punted.

The true test in the life of a Texans fan is how gracefully you endure it.

by TexanKurt on Sep 30, 2009 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I have to agree with pretty much everything you said. 5 minutes left in the game, and you are losing, you can’t get cute with the clock. You have to score.

by nolander on Sep 30, 2009 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

sorry Tim

totally agree with these dudes.

If we ran it when you wanted we’re putting the cart before the horse.

Also, if the defense is as bad as you say (and it was on Sunday, and usually is) it didn’t matter to Kubes if we scored with 3 mins or 3 seconds. Hell, we’d probably get the ball back after the 90 yard TD run by MJD!

Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.

by texanphil on Sep 30, 2009 6:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Watching the gamecast

On my cellphone my thoughts went from “Ok, we’re going to score with too much time. We will still probably lose because we’ve already given up over 450 yards of offense and we are a profoundly unlucky franchise.” to “ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME? SERIOUSLY?” when the lines “Hou fumble at Jac 2” appeared. My wife and I were at a ‘couples’ shower. I think I may have dropped the f-bomb as my buddy and his fiancee were opening their springpan (or whatever you call the things you make cheesecakes in).

Kubiak generally speaking displays poor clock management skills. But in the greater scheme of things it’s completely irrelevant due to our defensive play, so whatever. I’ll trade hiring a decent coordinator over calling timeouts appropriately any day. The fact of the matter is that It takes Maurice Jones Drew very little time to run 62 yards. More than it takes Chris Johnson, but less than it takes Thomas Jones. A 2 minute offense against us is far too generous really, I think a minute would’ve done the trick for Jacksonville. The only scenario in which we were going to win that game involved a coin toss and Kris Brown. Gary Kubiak should have known that. Maybe he did. At least he won a challenge.

I then headed home only to learn on the radio that my college team’s star quarterback is out for the year. It goes without saying that all of my fantasy teams were destroyed. Best football weekend ever.

by JimboTexan on Sep 29, 2009 9:51 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

As we learned two years ago...

Even against the Kerry Collins aerial attack, 45 seconds is too much time left on the clock.

by Nashmeister on Sep 29, 2009 10:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

who makes there own cheese cake anyway

pans get old, memories like that last forever…..like a certain quarterback twirling to earth, the ball flying from his fingertips. everytime i start to think about my reaction to this game i recall rosencopter and suddenly the picture is less grim. its not like we were dominating and fell apart. we were falling apart already, it just so happened that brown dropping the ball was the straw that broke the camels back.

poor clock management? maybe but if you’re moving the ball why kill momentum. a coach can’t have the mindset “boy i can’t wait till my defense fucks up again”

u put faith in your guys and go for it.

maybe next time put the faith in your starting running back….or a qb that has thrown over 700 yards for 7 td’s in 2 weeks

In Canada our balls are bigger

by canadian texan on Sep 29, 2009 10:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

baylor fan??

Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.

by beefy on Sep 30, 2009 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Indeed

And a Houston fan. It’s been a rough decade.

by JimboTexan on Sep 30, 2009 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, BUT...

Baylor has some serious upside. Goodness.

Note to self: Insert something witty here.

by bigfatdrunk on Sep 30, 2009 1:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That upside...

Is who he was referring to being out for the year.
Sucks because I like Griffin.
Jimbo, gimme a shout if’n you come into tha ‘co for a game or for any reason. George’s welcomes all comers.

Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.

by beefy on Sep 30, 2009 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

With open arms

And a big O. Will do.

by JimboTexan on Sep 30, 2009 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't mind the play calling

Except for the incomplete pass and Slaton being pushed out of pounds, there was a significant portion of game time going off the clock between each play – it looks like Kubes was trying to run the clock down. Granted, there were no good streams of the game so I couldn’t actually see what was happening, but it certainly doesn’t look like the Texans were doing anything but trying to burn clock time. But like I said, I couldn’t actually see the game (living in Ohio sucks; watching the Browns is worse than watching the Texans), so I could be getting the wrong impression.

This is not to say that Kubes is good at managing the clock; he sucks pretty bad at it. I just don’t think that this is especially terrible management. And hey, he won a challenge!

by cubic on Sep 29, 2009 10:55 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Good play calling

I think he was making good calls. The plays were designed to take time off, but if they didn’t oh well, Score!!! Out of the 4 possessions the Jags had in the 2nd half (i’m not including the last one where they ran the clock out) they scored twice on bad defensive positioning (not the Defensive Coordinator’s fault). You have to think that Kubes spoke with Frank Bush about trying to at least contain MoJo for one more series and then kicking a field goal. The Texans could move the ball extremely well with the exception of some basic football plays (i.e. the PI and Fumble).

by Cougsfan on Sep 29, 2009 11:13 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

much ado....

about nothing. you play for the tie, and you dont waste time trying to eek out every second on the clock. i think it wasn’t so much the play calling as much as the execution of the plays that were called. give koob a break! i think that we have lost so much we are trying to come up with new ways to describe why we suck. we are 8 years into this thing…. and we still make the same mistakes. now while we aren’t tampa bay bad, or arizona bad, we ARE bad. sometimes we have to remind ourselves that just because we have a dynamic offense, we still are bad. we aren’t a top tier team. YET. we are still in the process of trying to get there. i dont care if they go 8-8 2-14 or 14-2. im gonna love em and support em anyway.

You are banned from Music City Miracles. (twice)
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.

by chrisd21 on Sep 30, 2009 10:11 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

"I think that we have lost so much we are trying to come up with new ways to describe why we suck"

I could certainly be guily of that.

Looking forward to a day when being a Texans fan doesn't mean that April is the highlight of my season...

by Tim on Sep 30, 2009 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

stats.

                                G Solo Ast Total
Brian Cushing 3 14 12 26
DeMeco Ryans 3 16 7 23
Fred Bennett 3 12 3 15
Mario Williams 3 13 1 14
Zac Diles 3 10 2 12

someone once said before the season started that cush got a lot of tackles by jumping in at the end of the pile… guess that’s true. almost 50% of his tackles are assists. and look at mario… anyone have any doubts that he is one of the best run defenders at his position?

You are banned from Music City Miracles. (twice)
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.

by chrisd21 on Sep 30, 2009 10:43 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

That good for Cushing thogh.

It doesn’t mean he is getting cheap stats.

It means he finishes every play.

I for one am glad to have someone like that who is attacking until the whistle.

"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."

The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related

by TexansForever on Sep 30, 2009 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Especially against tough runners like Mojo, its all about gang tackling, swarming to the ball. Hell he is still second in solo tackles right?

by nolander on Sep 30, 2009 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

for sure

I got pretty damn tired of seeing heads down diving “tackles”

by sammocyr on Sep 30, 2009 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

DUNTA ROBINSON FOR INSTANCE?????

So sick of his superman, bounce off the runner crap.

"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."

The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related

by TexansForever on Sep 30, 2009 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

dunta......

wasn’t doing it as MUCH last game. he whiffed on a couple, but i did see some of that “pop” come back when he hits. so, he’s still working himself back. remember, he came back early last year. he shouldn’t have actually played football until this season. and another thing. i wonder if dunta wasn’t “stalling” during pre-season, knowing he wasn’t at 100%? maybe he wanted that long term deal because he KNEW that he wasn’t the player that he was? trying to sell rick a lemon… but rick isn’t a fan of lemonade. nice try #23!

You are banned from Music City Miracles. (twice)
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.

by chrisd21 on Sep 30, 2009 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I dont care what Dunta's reasoning is..

He is making 10 million and he skipped training camp.

He needs to make tackles.

Hopefully Pollard is a hard hitter.

"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."

The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related

by TexansForever on Sep 30, 2009 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

So hard

The Chiefs cut him. The chiefs.

by JimboTexan on Sep 30, 2009 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

But at least

we’d have one other player on our defense that we can’t say “he wouldn’t be starting for any other NFL team,” because he did, all year.

So that would give us a total of 4?

Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.

by texanphil on Sep 30, 2009 6:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And when the D finally got Jags in a 4th down,

Dunta was free and just dived on the ground completley missing MJD.

If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be fucked up.

You are banned from Music City Miracles.
Happy Now Tits?
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.
You are banned from Silver Screen and Roll.

by CFHTim on Sep 30, 2009 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

CUSH

is a man child. and playing all over the field. i only mentioned the assists because i remember before the season started someone saying it in a post, thought it was pretty funny…. and the biggest surprise? mario williams having more tackles than diles. that’s pretty depressing.

You are banned from Music City Miracles. (twice)
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.

by chrisd21 on Sep 30, 2009 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Diles had made some key plays though..

In fact he has a few big ones.

I’m ok with that as long as he keeps it up.

"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."

The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related

by TexansForever on Sep 30, 2009 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bring back X man

If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be fucked up.

You are banned from Music City Miracles.
Happy Now Tits?
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.
You are banned from Silver Screen and Roll.

by CFHTim on Sep 30, 2009 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I loved the stuff

He made on the goal line in the Tits game. that was hardcore!

You can't fix Dumb

by Texans-Brocos on Oct 1, 2009 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This was kinda dumb

You just need to score, man.

by MadMartygan on Sep 30, 2009 11:41 AM CDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

In 99.999% of cases you are correct...

However, when your defense is currently ON PACE to be the worst rated defense in yards given up EVER, you have to think about how much time you are leaving the opposition to score.

Unfortunate but true in the Texans case.

"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."

The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related

by TexansForever on Sep 30, 2009 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not a big fan of the "on pace" stats 3 games into the season

The Titans are “on pace” to go 0-16 but I doubt there’s very many who really believe that’s going to happen. Our defense has struggled big time in its first three games, but it’s done so with 3 rookies getting significant playing time, many others in just their second or third years, and are playing with a new scheme and new DC, it’s going to take a little bit of time for them to become the defense they can whether that defense ends up even being meiocre or not. Even if they’re still giving up alot of yards, they will give up less per game by the end of the year than they are now so rewriting the record books for that stat isn’t all that likely.

by Bryan72076 on Sep 30, 2009 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You think our offense is good enough

to plan WHEN to score a TD?

I say get it in, IF we can, WHENEVER we can. If we can settle for a FG, sure, lets milk that clock. Otherwise, get er done, maybe we’ll get lucky on defense.

Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.

by texanphil on Sep 30, 2009 6:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Kinda Dumb

Noted. But I think it’s very short-sighted not to consider how scoring too quickly is going to effect your ultimate goal—winning the game. Given how terrible the defense has looked so far, why wouldn’t you want to minimize the time they have to be out there to lose the game?

Looking forward to a day when being a Texans fan doesn't mean that April is the highlight of my season...

by Tim on Sep 30, 2009 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

simple.........

because our offense, as good as it is, has a tendency of shitting on itself when the times get tough. ride the momentum!

You are banned from Music City Miracles. (twice)
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.

by chrisd21 on Sep 30, 2009 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah I get what you're talking about

But this is completely ridiculous. First of all, we are notoriously bad in the red zone. You are asking a team that consistently fouls up their red zone opportunities to pretty much waste downs. Second, sometimes boneheaded mistakes like offensive pass interference or fumbling in the endzone happens. You never know which play will be your last. Unless it is a tie game, the goal is to score whenever you can get it. If it had been a tie game, then yeah, you are totally right. We were losing though you can’t dick around and run out the clock in this situation. After we fucked it up and wasted a timeout, we still almost had a hail mary chance if there would have been a stop. If anything, we should have tried to score even faster to answer their inevitable touchdown. To make a rambling, incoherent response short. You take what you can get and worry about everything else later. After all we’ve been through, a post about how we try to score to fast is like worrying about dandruff when you have brain cancer.

by MadMartygan on Sep 30, 2009 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hasn’t the offense actually been rather good in the red zone this year? Hell its killing me in fantasy, Kris Brown was supposed to be booting me fg after fg.

by nolander on Sep 30, 2009 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

no shit!

lol.

You are banned from Music City Miracles. (twice)
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.

by chrisd21 on Sep 30, 2009 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They are doing very well

It’s 2 games though. I’m not going to call them a good red zone team just yet. Well maybe 3 games, I’ll count the Chicago game last year.

by MadMartygan on Sep 30, 2009 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

but on the drive in question

WE DIDN’T SCORE!

If we were so freakin’ automatic, as all of y’all are assuming, WE WOULDA SCORED.

So the argument is lost because, in fact, this offense is fallible.

Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.

by texanphil on Sep 30, 2009 6:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's almost

As shortsided as hiring from within to fill your defensive coordinator position, recognizing that that necessitates hiring someone who once worked for Richard Smith, the undisputed zen master of poor scheming.

Personally, I think Kubiak wanted to get us in the endzone while we could, because I don’t think he feels like we’re a team that can finish yet. But that’s on him. We’d alll have his head if he’d run 3 run plays up the middle at the 11 and hadn’t gotten in anyway. Which is a distinct possibility.

by JimboTexan on Sep 30, 2009 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Possibility???

Or it’s happened before, several times?
That’s my take on the “stall a little longer before scoring” bit… Like MadMarty was saying, we’ve screwed up so much down there, by trying to be “prototypical” in our playcalling, and it’s prolly ruined how Kubes approaches those situations. I agree that he should’ve been trying to just get in the endzone, and worry about next series next series.

Bacon tastes good... Pork chops taste good.

by beefy on Sep 30, 2009 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wasn’t bush a Kubiak hire since he originally was supposed to be the D-Coordinator instead of Smith?

by nolander on Sep 30, 2009 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think

Kubiak always wanted him….I just don’t know why.

by JimboTexan on Sep 30, 2009 5:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pressing

They were pressing a tired defense. Why waste time and let them rest. Also try and win in regulation. The real question is if we’re supposed to be an aggressive turnover causing defense why are we playing so damn soft off the Wide outs. Even if you get burned playing tight causes the QB to hold the ball a little longer allowing Mario and crew some more time to get there.

by sammocyr on Sep 30, 2009 12:19 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

other

teams are killing us on just three step drops

by sammocyr on Sep 30, 2009 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

uh

“other teams are killing us on …”

Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.

by texanphil on Sep 30, 2009 6:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I put

“insert anything here” where the dots are, but it got htmled out, I guess.

Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.

by texanphil on Sep 30, 2009 6:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yep

3 steps. 5 steps. 2-stepping. 48 step drops. Pi. Just really no end here.

Note to self: Insert something witty here.

by bigfatdrunk on Sep 30, 2009 8:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I dunno

1) when you are behind, I think you gotta have scoring be your absolute top priority, with taking time off the clock relegated to using up all the play clock. Doing anything else sounds like something I might do in a videogame, but not something I really see a real coach do.

2) But also, Jacksonville hadn’t scored since the second play of the 4th quarter. This wasn’t a college game where both teams were scoring every single drive. Admittedly the Texans’ defense was crap, but the last two JAX possessions were a fumble and a punt. It was hardly guaranteed that JAX would have been able to score.

by killtacular on Sep 30, 2009 2:26 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Kubiak

Defend him or attack him, I still don’t see him getting fired this year unless we win < 6 games. I don’t see that happenin, so I see him coaching next year.

I don’t know if Bush will be around, the jury is still out, and should be. But the news of Kubiak’s demise is greatly exagerrated.

He’s on pace to win 8. As frustrating as it sounds, I don’t see him getting fired for that.

I’ll reserve my judgment on whether he should be fired until this coming Sunday night.

Smushiak will take us to the playoffs in 2009.

by texanphil on Sep 30, 2009 6:46 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your home for analysis and rants about all things Houston Texan.
Start posting about the Texans »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Comcast NFL RedZone Moments from SB Nation

Music City Miracles
Tennessee Titans Red Zone Report
Bleeding Green Nation
Comcast NFL Red Zone stat of the week - Something doesn't have to give
Niners Nation
49ers Red Zone numbers: How effective are they?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Falconry_t-shirt72_small
Big Time Falcons
N1519980050_30046950_9681_small
Fellow Battle Red Blogger Needs your help!

Recent FanPosts

11wsmaller_small
Texans Make Two Staff Changes
Stars_moons_planets_small
Fuzzy Math: Why the Texans Should Select an O-lineman In the 1st Round
Rump_20motocycle_small
2010 Houston Texans????
10docwtf_small
Goodell is thinking of banning 3 point stance
Johns_small
LT a fit in H-Town
Stars_moons_planets_small
Mock Draft Tracker
Football-girl_small
Funny SB Prop Bets
Carr_small
Free Agent Running Backs Thread
Small
DRAFT Q?: What 3 Upgrades (K aside) would've ==> the most W's this past season?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Big Blue View
Eli talks Peyton, Super Bowl
Niners Nation
100 in 100: Tony Pike (29 of 100)
The Falcoholic
Dave's Rad New Logo Idea

Editor

Brb_small Tim

Managers

Receiverchart_small bigfatdrunk

Funny_kubiak_small Jake

Authors

Dan_halen_small MDC

Falconry_t-shirt72_small tehGrindCrusher

Comic_zombies_attack_circa_1999_small Riott

Sunaipa_small Mike Kerns

Pimp_small DreKeem

000xx1hf_small riversmccown