Tape Study: Giants 34, Texans 10 -- Too Close (II)
"I guess there's only one thing left to do: Win the whole ****ing thing." -- Major League
Although the Major League Indians had the slight advantage of being a .500 unit, watching the Texans defense fills me with with many sad emotions, and sad sports emotions always take me back to that quote.
I'd like to tell you that this is a fairy tale, and that the Texans defense eventually wakes up, slays the dragon, and sacks the princess. I just don't see any way that the pass defense can outperform what it's already done with the players that are on the field right now though. Brian Cushing will help (did help) the pass rush, but barring immediate improvement from Kareem Jackson, the Texans just can't do enough on defense to slow anyone down.
Frank Bush's attempts to rush the passer have actually increased as he's realized how poor his coverage will be. In fact, through five games, he's rushing the quarterback more often than he has in any year so far. The problem is that he can't trade out one bit of vanilla without giving up another. Bring a creative blitz and (in Frank's mind) the secondary has to play off the line, and the resulting quick pass is almost always successful. Behind the jump we have a look at the Texans coverage, try to be a little more optimistic over some successful stunts, and share some defensive charting statistics.
Take The Given. Seriously, take them, I don't want to hear them.
Okay, so everyone remembers the Redskins game, yes? Joey Galloway ravaged the Texans deep and had Donovan McNabb not overthrown his receivers just a few times, we would be a sub-.500 team. The Texans have had 32 balls thrown against them that have gone 20 yards or more in the air. Only four of them were in this game. Why?
Because Bush has become so scared of getting beat deep (okay, of Jackson getting beat deep) that he has cheated the corners back. We've wound up allowing an insane amount of short passes. That sounds great in theory, but because of the depth of the zones we're playing, those short passes are getting gains that make you question why we're worried about getting beat deep if we're just going to let them march right down the field on us. In the past couple of weeks, I've shown you the Zach Miller catches and how Zac Diles had no chance at stopping them, and I've shown you some dumpoff passes to completely uncovered running backs that have given away huge chunks of yards.
Dumpoff passes, which normally come as a result of pressure and are plays where the offense has to give up, are 14/15 so far against the Texans. For 101 yards. I don't want to suggest that giving up 6.7 YPA on dumpoff passes is unheard of, but it's definitely execrable. Look at the numbers on screens and draws and they both show the same thing: This team is playing so far off the ball that the short game is just going to ride right down the field on them.
Here's a failed blitz. It didn't fail because the blitz was not of quality, and it didn't fail because the players on the blitz didn't get penetration. It failed because of the scheme.
If the cornerbacks had been playing up enough to get a bump, or at least slow up the receivers for a bit, the pass rush might have had a chance to get there before this ball goes off. Instead, not only is this a successful short gain, it's a successful long gain.
I'm not saying that Bush has been tasked with an easy solution to this plan. Until Jackson starts playing like an actual NFL corner, he's basically trying to play pass defense with two safeties that can't cover, a bunch of corners who aren't ready to be seeing extensive NFL time, and Glover Quin. I don't think he has enough capable secondary talent to put together a good defense; I do think that he could achieve better results with a game plan that is more aggressive. In short, I think more of this is in order:
They need to bring the blitzes more often, as they did in the second half, and they need to play up on the line, have a deep safety over Jackson's man, and start gambling. Of those 32 deep passes I mentioned earlier, 16 of them were incomplete. It's a lot harder to pass deep than it is to pass short. And as I don't think there is any hope in sight for the pass defense, I'd rather them try to play boom and bust football (especially against non-Peyton Manning teams) then get consistently steamrolled. That's not very conducive to Bush keeping his job, since everyone wants to kill the defensive coordinator when long gains are allowed, but I really don't see a way around it considering the secondary's play right now.
Stuntin'.
One way the Texans were able to get pressure was with the help of stunts. In the second half, Bush went to a lot of 3 lineman sets and put some ketchup out there. The result was that despite the defense continually getting shredded on a play-to-play basis, they were able to get some turnovers. Witness Sherrick McManis's pick:
The Giants' offensive line had a lot of problems picking these up. It probably won't be a week-to-week thing, especially since they had so many players out of position, but it was nice to see regardless. Bush does deserve a sliver of credit for changing it up. And it has become apparent that Brian Cushing is going to be a damn important part of our pass rush. Five hurries in one game puts him fourth on the Texans in hurries. For the season. He's played one game.
Defensive Charting Statistics, The Final Frontier (of Sadness):
Completions Allowed/Pass Targets -- Yards After Catch -- Once again, these don't consider complete context. Don't think that because Player X had a better completion percentage against him than Player Y that Player Y is better in coverage. Player Y has his own demons, after all. I heard he wears crocs. These go by the FO-sanctioned definition of coverage: Look for the person who had the man in coverage, and if you can't tell, pick the closest person. This time, I've added Hole In Zone (our old friend) and Uncovered, Frank Bush's pal.
Kareem Jackson - 27/49 -- 217
Glover Quin 25/38 -- 61
Zac Diles 31/33 -- 116
Brice McCain - 8/18 -- 20
DeMeco Ryans - 10/15 -- 39
Bernard Pollard - 9/13 -- 42
Xavier Adibi - 3/4 -- 22
Eugene Wilson - 1/3 --1
Brian Cushing - 1/2 -- 2
Mario Williams - 0/2 -- 0
Shaun Cody - 1/1 - 5
Earl Mitchell - 1/1 - 3
Adewale Ogunleye - 0/1 -- 0
Sherrick McManis - 0/1 -- 0
Hole In Zone: 10/12 -- 77
Players "responsible" for zones (if applicable): Bernard Pollard 3, Eugene Wilson, Troy Nolan, DeMeco Ryan, Xavier Adibi, Glover Quin, Zac Diles all with 1.
Uncovered - 19/21 -- 224
Versus Play Types:
Draw: 22 carries, 115 yards.
Dumpoff pass: 14/15, 101 yards
End Around: 2 carries, 0 yards.
Pitch: 4 carries, 18 yards
Quick Hitch: 2/2, 1 yard (5 yard penalty on the other)
Quick Slant:: 7/11, 67 yards
RB Screen: 8/9, 108 yards
Shotgun Sweep (Draw play without the tackles moving back): 3 carries, 31 yards
Swing Pass: 1/1, 5 yards
TE Screen: 1/1, 7 yards
WR Screen: 9/9, 63 yards
Rush Percentages (i.e., how many we send at the QB)
Rush 3: 10 (4.3%)
Rush 4: 145 (62.7%)
Rush 5: 67 (29%)
Rush 6: 9 (3.8%)
Pass Pressures:
Mario Williams: 18
Antonio Smith: 14
Amobi Okoye: 10
Brian Cushing: 5
Zac Diles: 4
Earl Mitchell: 3
Jesse Nading: 2
Shaun Cody: 1
Ryan Denney: 1
Tim Jamison: 1
Adewale Ogunleye: 1
Bernard Pollard: 1
DeMeco Ryans: 1
Glover Quin: 1
Missed Tackles:
Zac Diles: 6
Eugene Wilson: 5
Glover Quin: 4
Bernard Pollard: 4
Kareem Jackson: 3
Brice McCain: 3
DeMeco Ryans: 2
Mario Williams: 2
Troy Nolan: 1
Dominique Barber: 1
Amobi Okoye: 1
Shaun Cody: 1
Adewale Ogunleye: 1
34 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'd much rather...
see a “Boom or Bust” type of defense. It’s not like anyone here is kidding themselves and think that we’re a top 10 pass defense. We know what we have, no one is going to be bitching about “How come bush didn’t play a soft zone!” when someone gets burned 1 on 1.
Blitzing more makes things happen, whether it be good or bad, but it’s better than watching our soft zone defense get picked apart when we only rush 4 or 5 and they max protect. At least with a blitz, something favorable CAN happen, while right now we’re hoping one of the 4 D lineman can make a miraculous move to get penetration.
Exactly.
Plus what’s the worst that can happen with a boom or bust defense? The QB gets 300+ yrds a game? Oh wait.
Like Rivers said, I like the odds of having to throw one to a WR 40 yards with a hand in his face over plopping one to a TE with PLENTY of room to move.
Come on Bush, bring the heat and let the LBs (one of the few good things on our DEF) bust some snot bubbles out of someone.
by CowboyH8ter on Oct 15, 2010 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Wow...I had already put this behind me and was looking forward to KC.
Now, if you would just provide the razors and bleach, this article will be complete.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
What happens when an unstoppable force meets three defensive players? THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpWqMqrZwTU
by TexansForever on Oct 15, 2010 10:19 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Seriously
by sunday night i had drank this game into a deep repressed memory.
Texas. Gods favorite country.
So what you're saying is...
we need to drop Mario into coverage? I mean, just look at those stats!
Wonderful post.
A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com
If I'm not mistaken
Mario didn’t allow a coverage TD all year. Therefore, he is the best cover man on the team.
When we went a few possessions without giving up a billion points
where we primarily blitzing and pressing at the line?
"Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to find easier ways to do something." -Robert Heinlein
http://www.accessorizeyourvehicle.com/
It was more the stunts than anything
There were a few blitzes, there were a few times they were up on the line, but the Giants offensive line looked like they hadn’t seen a stunt thus far in their careers.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter | SB Nation Houston | Battle Red Blog
by riversmccown on Oct 15, 2010 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions
Well a lot of them where playing out of position weren't they?
and didn’t their LT go out for a wee bit?
"Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to find easier ways to do something." -Robert Heinlein
http://www.accessorizeyourvehicle.com/
Ack
While I love being enlightened by these posts, I’ve also come to hate them for explaining so very well why the Texans defense can’t stop anyone. They amplify my angst.
Great post, Rivers. Rec’d.
Looking forward to a day when being a Texans fan doesn't mean that April is the highlight of my season...
I'm worried that the other teams are lurking here
They’re discovering the Texans secrets thanks to Rivers. (You bastard)
A Texas Wannabe, born and raised in New Zealand. Currently located 7343miles South west of Houston.
by distant_texans_fan on Oct 15, 2010 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions
I've received absolutely nothing to make me believe that.
My ego loves that you would think this though.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter | SB Nation Houston | Battle Red Blog
by riversmccown on Oct 15, 2010 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions
Well I'm damn sure
Frank Bush didn’t get the message.
Sorry to paste a comment but I put this on a stale thread and got no reply-love so i thought I'd give 'er another shot and see if I can get some feedback on this:
I think depth is overrated. If someone guys down at a key position it is really rare to have 100% confidence in the backup. Talent is discovered in those situations most of the time (ex. Arian Foster ’09) My point is this: I would ratehr have a standout #1, than TWO average to slightly above/below average type players that are serviceable but never show any signs of greatness (ex. Texans DTs). Why cant we put a package of our "younger/potential/serviceable" players together and try to get ONE great player in return? First off, correct me if it isnt possible in the NFL or something because Im not 100% locked in on the trade rules. However, would anybody mind the Texans trading any combo of three or four of these players: [Amobe Okoye, Steve Slaton, Matt Leinart/Dan-O, one of our many competent TEs, Xavier Adibi, etc.] to a young team trying to build a good foundation (Seahawks, Bills, Arizona, etc.) in exchange for ONE veteran nasty ball hawking free safety or DT that could shore up our CURRENT team and possibly put us over the top. THATS what a team that believes they have what it takes to win a SUPER BOWL does.
Other than that, if we bring a blitz and get pressure and the opposing QB makes a great throw and the reciever got open bc it was one on one coverage, I would be 100% okay with that. I am 100% NOT okay with watching us bring no one and STILL give up 300+ yds passing. Its not hard to understand.
by theSpaceCityKid on Oct 15, 2010 12:43 PM CDT reply actions
Re: Trade Proposal
It’s a fine thought, but I find it hard to believe any team would want to acquire Okoye/Slaton/Leinart/Orlovsky/Adibi, much less at their current salary (e.g., Okoye) and/or if it meant giving up a real asset (you used the phrase “great player”) like a true FS or DT.
I see how it’d make the Texans better; just don’t see how it would make sense for another team. They’d be getting the short end of the stick.
Looking forward to a day when being a Texans fan doesn't mean that April is the highlight of my season...
Well I know this is really specific
But what if we recieved a player in return that only had a yr or two left on the deal? A player that would have to be signed to a big deal if he was to be kept a part of that team anyways? The team would be getting 4 players that could be a big part of a foundation of a good football team. IF we gave up James casey/Dressen thats a starting level TE in my opinion, then if we gave em Leinart thats a respectable backup w potential to push your starter, same with Slaton, Adibi and Okoye. Thats a lot of useful “tools” for an upcoming team that would only lose ONE great player thats obviously not helping them win NOW and would have to be paid big money in the next couple offseasons to stay— big money that could be sued to build up the young teams in numerous other places. (I know its a diff sport but its like the Astros dumping Roy O and Berkmans contracts bc they werent in the runnings this year and the money could be spent better elsewhere) The other team is getting a lot in exchange for a player they might or might not even be able to keep around for much longer. Like i said, I know its awfully specific but it feels like the move we should make. Stop trying to stockpile quality backups and sp teamers and start trying to put a Super Bowl quality starting D and O in the field every week. Am i crazy?
by theSpaceCityKid on Oct 15, 2010 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions
Trades like this just don't happen in the NFL
In fact, there really aren’t many trades that don’t involve draft picks.
In theory, your trades could make sense. In practice, there were only four “real” trades made last year, and they involved Prescott Burgess, Tyler Thigpen, Braylon Edwards, and Tank Tyler.
A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com
I'd give a 4th rounder...
to Washington for Haynesworth. In a non-cap year it doesn’t hurt the Texans this season and then they can cut him if he doesn’t work out. It’s a win/win IMO.
"There's two kinds of coaches, them that's fired and them that's gonna be fired." ~ Bum Phillips
by H-town Fanatic on Oct 15, 2010 11:53 PM CDT up reply actions
Wait let me get this straight. You are willing to GIVE UP a potential game changing tight end pick for Haynesworth?!?!
/boggle
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
What happens when an unstoppable force meets three defensive players? THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpWqMqrZwTU
by TexansForever on Oct 16, 2010 6:07 AM CDT up reply actions
give up a 3rd for him
that would be our DT/NT pick anyway
I would challenge you to a battle of wits, but you appear to be unarmed.
by The Night Owl on Oct 17, 2010 12:25 AM CDT up reply actions
That would work
If we were a baseball team.
Exactly.
Because of Roster limits, these kind of trades just CAN NOT happen
A Texas Wannabe, born and raised in New Zealand. Currently located 7343miles South west of Houston.
by distant_texans_fan on Oct 15, 2010 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions
/reply fail
all i know is that… Randy Moss just went to the Vikings for a 3rd rd pick and the Viks made that move bc they needed something to boost their playmaking abilities since Sidney Rice has been out. I know that this was an unheard of type trade and that Moss and NE might have been having issues but Champ Bailey is in a very similar situation. They are thinking in the NOW not the “we are on our way” mentality. I see big name players moved all the time and we have NEVER been involved, besides the Schaub trade that has proven to be a good trade but at the time was just another question mark. We dont need to “pick up the phone and see what Denver wants” we need to MAKE IT HAPPEN. Kubiak needs to go to McNair and say, “Hey we need to make this move if you want to make the playoffs and give me a chance to keep my job.”
by theSpaceCityKid on Oct 15, 2010 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions
like i said in my post, I dont have a great grip on football trades
but why wouldnt it work? I dont care about roster limits, if the players we are offering are better than the ones they have why wouldnt they want em instead? Thats like us saying “damn we cant get another FS because we already have 2 on the roster”. You just get rid of em and cut your losses financially and come out a better football team.
by theSpaceCityKid on Oct 15, 2010 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions
I do agree with "Boom or Bust" defense wholeheartedly
If Frank wants to blitz then he needs to be aggressive with the secondary as well.
"Lord, beer me strength."
I wouldn't mind a boom or bust kind of defense.
After all, it’s kind of what the Saints won their Super Bowl with. Blitz, chase the ball, make picks, and force them to do what they’re uncomfortable doing. I think we have the personnel for that (well, maybe not the making picks part at least not this year).
Attention Rice Cake, the way to win is to force the QB to wet himself! Blitzing the bejeebus out of him will accomplish that!
I am a visionary, I am a genius, and now I am angry! Now help me find my pants!
We don't make picks
Because we either leave someone wide open underneath, or play so deep that they hitch or slant underneath and the QB makes the easy competition.
When we went man on man, it gave the CB’s the oppurtunity to make a couple of picks.
A Texas Wannabe, born and raised in New Zealand. Currently located 7343miles South west of Houston.
by distant_texans_fan on Oct 15, 2010 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions
So you're suggesting
The Texans defense should be bipolar as opposed to merely clinically depressed? I can get behind that.
The thing about the Texans is that we really just need ONE side of the ball to produce.
We can win if Offense or Defense show up.
havng both would be nice, but it rarely happens.
It’s when NEITHER shows up that we get faceraped.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
What happens when an unstoppable force meets three defensive players? THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpWqMqrZwTU
mmmm facerapage...
I heard Brian Cushing like to do it with girls in a really uncomfortable place and i am not talking about the back seat of a Volkswagen
Go Texans!

by 






















