Taking a Closer Look At The Running Back Depth
When it comes to the running game, the number one debate amongst Texans fans is that of who will be starting in the Houston backfield when they open the season against Indianapolis is Week One. Right now, all the rumblings out of camp is that it will be second year man Arian Foster. We all know his story: An undrafted free agent out of Tennessee who was actually cut in the final preseason game last year and eventually stashed on the practice squad for the majority of the 2009 season. But after Steve Slaton's nightmare of a sophomore season finally landed him on the IR, Foster got his chance and made the most of it. In the last two games of the season he rushed for 97 yards and a touchdown against Miami and then had a breakout performance in the season finale against New England, amassing 119 yards and a pair of scores. Since then, he's been most fans pick to be "the answer" to the teams rushing woes in 2009.
Next, you have the aforementioned Steve Slaton returning from a pretty serious injury. All the talking heads in OTAs were saying that he is on track to be ready for the season, but probably won't take contact until the preseason at the earliest. Recovery from the surgery he had was no joke, and it still has me skeptical that he will ever truly be able to be more than a third down back ever again. Which, as you'll recall, is what the Texans originally drafted him for. File this one under "to be determined."
After that, you have some unknowns. Obviously, the team didn't draft Ben Tate in the second round for him to not play. But he will have to earn his playing time. Sure, Matt Schaub is saying good things about him, but you have to prove it on the field to get in there. Chris Henry...well, I'm shocked he didn't get cut before Ryan Moats. Which, as most of us thought, was probably done as a favor to Moats more than anything, so he could catch on with a new team before camp starts. But Henry has pretty much been nothing but a disappointment since entering the league. Nothing out there suggest that the light will suddenly come on for him. Lastly, you got Jeremiah Johnson. While he is a personal favorite of mine, one has to wonder if he has any chance at all at the final roster. He would have to put on a real show in the preseason to have anything more than a spot on the practice squad.
With the five guys the Texans have on the current roster, and with Henry and Johnson long shots to break camp, the trio of guys seems to be Foster, Tate and Slaton. I guess you could certainly do worse with a "three-headed monster" than that. But my question that I'm putting up for debate on BRB nation is this: What if all three guys exceed expectations and have a high level of success? Sure, it's a good problem to have. But say they're all very good. Who sits? We've never really suffered a true running back controversy on this team before. And the Moats vs. Slaton thing was a feeble attempt last year, so let's not bring that up. I mean, if all three guys are just studs out there, who would you sit? All three have arguably different playing styles. But running back by committee has rarely been too successful at a high level to simply split the carries equally. You have to have a lead dog who is spelled by someone when he gets winded, followed by a short yard specialist and third down back.
Personally, I think the plan is to have Tate be the lead guy eventually. He won't be there in Week One probably. But, as I said before, his draft status means they are expecting him to be the guy, with Slaton doing what he was originally drafted for, being a third down back. Also, Slaton is so dangerous on a screen. Remember the success he had against Cincinnati last season on those dump offs? This leaves Foster to be the guy to spell Tate or to step in if he struggles or goes down with an injury.
Just my personal opinion on how it could work out. As camp draws nearer (Praise Durga!), the time for speculation is quickly coming to a close. Tate could come to camp and lay an egg, Slaton could look like he needs a walker. Foster could prove to be just a flash in the pan. We really don't know until they get out there. But it's nice to imagine having a running back tandem that's worth its weight on the roster. And, God willing, can actually punch the ball over the pylon in a short and goal situation.
I'd just like to end this piece by saying...eight days until the team reports for camp. It's almost here, my friends.
0 recs |
43 comments
|
Comments
Easy answer.
What if all three guys exceed expectations and have a high level of success? Sure, it’s a good problem to have. But say they’re all very good. Who sits?
Who cares?
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter | SB Nation Houston | Battle Red Blog
Thanks, Rivers
Whilst I agree with you, I’m just trying to think of something to talk/debate about until camp starts…
Haha, I knew you'd appreciate that
If all of them are playing at an equally great level, it’s gotta be Tate. He’ll be salary controlled the longest.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter | SB Nation Houston | Battle Red Blog
by riversmccown on Jul 22, 2010 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions
I would say you're correct on how they want it to be
Tate #1 with Slaton on 3rds and Foster stepping in if anyone gets hurt.
At the start of the year, barring a surprising preseason, I would say it’ll be Foster as the #1….Slaton on 3rd down if he proves he’s healthy…..and Tate being worked in slowly….maybe not getting his big break until after the bye week.
Regardless of who starts, I expect to see a heavy dose of the 3-headed Monster in week , but that’s a topic for another time.
"Lord, beer me strength."
I expect to see a heavy dose of the 3-headed Monster in week , but that’s a topic for another time.
Which week?
typing fail....
Week one. The game plan should include all 3 pretty heavily.
"Lord, beer me strength."
I dub thee Chimera
So that we have an actual three-headed monster instead of having to type three headed monster every time.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter | SB Nation Houston | Battle Red Blog
by riversmccown on Jul 22, 2010 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions
That might be better than Larry, Moe and Curly....
I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?
Ghidora the Three-Headed Monster, took on Godzilla

I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?
Wasn't being a smartass
at least not intentionally. I honestly wanted to know which week you were referring to.
No worries
I would’ve gone on a self-rant about my typing fail, but that’s bfd’s gimmick.
"Lord, beer me strength."
That would be nice to open a can of three-headed whoopass on the Colts...
I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?
I don't think the coaches know how it will shape up
They have ideas. But those ideas are shaped on a lot of unknowns. As mentioned, Slaton’s neck injury progress; Tate coming off the bench to start the season; Foster’s limited yet successful production last season, are all big IFs. What if Foster gets the nod to start the season and he is lights out? What if Slaton excels, his neck is not an issue two games into the season and he doesn’t fumble? What if Foster is not who we hoped after two games? What if Tate gets a few carries and immediately is taking it to the house from long distance? Let’s face it, this whole thing is a “see what happens” scenario. But, it looks like there is some talent there, so it is a good situation.
I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?
I say for the first few preseason games, have foster run all first down plays, tate run all second down plays and slaton run all third down plays and see if anyone steps it up. That would be your starter. Yes I know this wouldn’t be the best idea as we have an awesome offense and might not see many third down plays (this is me dreaming about first downs in just two downs) but I think it works bc we all know what a healthy slaton can do. And if no one steps it up, I say let foster take most of the carries in week one with tate getting the goal line/ red zone work and slaton coming in for screens and short passes.
Miss-placed Houstonian living and going to school in the wilderness of Wyoming.
When does AJ get the ball?
I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?
Usually it's harder to run well and get going effectively
If u only run one play and then take some off and then go back in for one more, and so on. It’d prolly be better to give each one a series or two and see how they do in each down so they can easily be compared. Then you’ll know which down u should occasionally change backs during the season.
by ReggieVilma on Jul 22, 2010 11:51 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Welcome
But I very much disagree, preseason or not.
There’s a lot to be said about establishing consistency and a rhythm. If you start yanking guys in and out, it has a detrimental effect for everybody. You have to give players a chance to succeed or fail, and this cannot be done after just a couple of carries each.
A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com
by bigfatdrunk on Jul 22, 2010 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions
Howdy.
Yea. That was the point I was shooting for in my post. Giving each one a series or two would give them from 5 to 10 carries, if the drives went well. Thats a substantial amount. Enough to get a solid rhythm going and see what they got.
by ReggieVilma on Jul 22, 2010 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions
Easy answer
Tate and Foster share the load…Slaton is solely a 3rd down back. Problem solved. Ride the hot hand baby.
meaningful football games in '08...MAKE THAT 09, okay 10, definitely 10..i am an excellent driver
Tate is an unknown
Let foster run against the small Indy D, and get Tate 8 or so carries. Keep Tate fresher so WHEN we go to San Diego for the first round of the playoffs Tate will be fresh and be able to make Ryan Matthews look like a bitch, with some help from cushoids.
by AllenOU on Jul 22, 2010 1:33 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
San Diego will be coming to us
if anyone is comin to anyone around here! but I think we should hope for great seasons out of all three just so we can trade either Foster or Slaton to another team for a quality FS.
by theSpaceCityKid on Jul 22, 2010 2:01 PM CDT reply actions
Just for you, little Dave
Just for you.
A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com
Preseason games guys
Fuck it! just let foster play an entire preseason game and tate another and so on lol. sparing them a little with slaton. and we havent mentioned one word about poor jeramiah johnson or chris henry. i guess no one expects them to make the roster or even play at all in preseason. personally i dont want these guys to play in preseason cus i wanna watch tate foster and slaton because along with everyone else, i think they will surely be the guys!
by houstonduckhunter on Jul 22, 2010 3:16 PM CDT reply actions
I love trips to Imaginationland!
Sooo… this is less a look at running back depth, and more an exercise in fantasy?
Isn’t the real question here what each of them brings to the table, known qualities, and what our realistic expectations are regarding their production? Logic and reason commands us to assume that for the time being: Foster starts, Slaton spells him, and Tate is worked into the system.
It’s flawed logic to assume Smithiak drafted Tate with a preconceived notion that he would start. According to that logic, Barwin should be starting opposite Mario. Tate was drafted with an eye toward enhancing the talent pool. After that it’s up to the production on the field to dictate what the depth chart looks like.
Blind speculation backed only by fantasy serves no purpose. Let’s talk about what each of them brings substantively:
Foster: Health, 1 year familiarity, production in a limited sample size
Slaton: Health and fumbling concerns, familiarity with the system, a mixed bag of production but the largest sample size
Tate: Talent, production at a lower level
Looking at that – my opinion is we can safely say that until preseason action, Foster is our starter, Slaton is #2, Tate is #3. I’m optimistic in thinking that the early season will see Slaton regain form and see split action with Foster, while Tate sees limited action. I think eventually you’ll see Slaton as the clear #1 with Tate behind him, and Foster in reserve. Production wise, I would be thrilled if we got "decent’ production out of all three in relation to their roles – considering what we had last year.
There’s depth at running back, but too many questions and not enough answers.
?????
and where do the runningbacks fir into the te’s scenario? I thought they were running the rock next year.
Feeling the five stages of grief since 2002.
by NoSafetiesNeeded on Jul 22, 2010 5:40 PM CDT reply actions
Foster should start...
mainly since he is the last 100 yd rusher we’ve had. Slaton as 3rd down and as a pass catcher and let Tate work to prove himself.
GO TEXANS!!!!
Our time will come...
Here's my thought on that
EMFM
I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?

by 

























