Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Why Hockey Fans Should Root For Devils Vs. Kings

Post-Game Breakdown: Texans--Dare I Say It--Dominate Colts

A day and a half later, I'm still stunned. Your Houston Texans were in the driver's seat for nearly the entirety of their season opener against the Indianapolis Colts. The Colts, man! The team that had won 15 of the 16 games played! The team that features Peyton Manning at QB! The team coming off a Super Bowl appearance! And now, the team that's sitting in the cellar of the AFC South, complete with a loss to a divisional foe. Who'd have thunk it?

This in no way means Texans fans should start blocking off the second weekend of January. Just as a loss wouldn't have been the end of the world, a win doesn't stamp the Texans as anything except a home team that held serve in an intradivision matchup. Nonetheless, it is exciting, and we should enjoy it. Wins, much less wins against the Colts, have been all too rare around these parts. I have to remind myself, however, that they don't determine the postseason participants based on Week One records. Fifteen more games to play, and if they are anything like what we saw in Week One, we're in for a treat. Some specific thoughts after the jump...

Star-divide

1. Arian Foster...there are no words. How weird is it to see "33" in front of "rushing attempts?" Oh, and the small matter of 231 FREAKING YARDS AND 3 TDs. I hate to fall into the "best ever" trap. Really, I do. Yet watch me do it. Best game by a Texans running back ever.

2. Underrated aspect of Arian Foster's historic afternoon--maybe people will stop calling him "Adrian."

3. As amazing as Foster was--and he was a revelation on par with sliced bread and/or cold-activated aluminum cans--the offensive line was opening up monstrous holes for him. I can't remember the last time a Texans RB had that kind of space in which to operate. Maybe during Steve Slaton's glorious 2008 campaign? Regardless, the offensive line's run-blocking (and that necessarily includes Vonta Leach, who was as good as I've ever seen him) was phenomenal. It'll be very interesting to see whether that domination will still be in effect against the Redskins on Sunday. In other words, was Sunday's awesomeness just as much an indictment of the Colts' front seven?

4. He only had six carries, but Steve Slaton looked good running the ball. We didn't even get to see him where he should really shine--catching the ball out of the backfield. But hey...six carries, 29 yards, no fumbles. I'll take it.

5. Matt Schaub went 9-17 for 107 yards, with a TD and a patented whatthehellishedoing interception. As many have observed, if you had told me he'd post that line before the game, I would have thought the Texans lost by 21 points. Instead, they won by 10. Black is white, up is down, and the Texans are winning by running the ball. Insane.

6. Andre Johnson had only 3 catches for 33 yards. The Texans still won by 10 points.

7. Perhaps the best part of such a quiet opener for the Texans' passing game? Giving the Redskins, who figure to know the Texans offense better than anyone thanks to Mike and Kyle Shanahan, what should be a very uneasy feeling about Sunday's tilt. You can't just expect the Texans to air it out like they did last year. Small sample size and all, but the Texans have shown they have the means to be much more than a one-trick pony on offense.

8. Jacoby Jones continues to frustrate. His opening punt return was a thing of beauty, but he dropped a very catchable ball in the end zone. In fairness to Jakespeare, he didn't have much of a chance to atone in the receiving game, what with the OL and Arian Foster laying waste to everything in their path.

9. Only one catch for Owen Daniels in his return from a torn ACL. This would be fine by me even if the passing game had been humming along at its normal pace. Easing OD back into the offense, considering he had no live preseason game snaps, makes all the sense in the world.

10. Have to make special mention of Kevin Walter. The box score shows his first half TD catch, and it was tremendous. But his recovery of the Colts' first onside kick in the fourth quarter was perfection. He timed his jump flawlessly, grabbed the ball at the height of his jump, and managed to hang onto the ball despite slamming into the turf from a significant height. HUGE play.

11. Neil Rackers didn't miss any FGs, which was good. He also threw in a stupid unsportsmanlike conduct penalty, which was bad. Then again, he didn't miss any FGs, so no "WE CUT THE WRONG GUY!" lamentations yet.

12. I almost felt bad for the Colts offensive line. Almost. I look forward to Bill Polian petitioning the Rules Committee to pass an edict permitting opposing teams to tackle defensive linemen whose first name rhymes with "Nario."

13. If Mario Williams is 75% as effective all season as he was on Sunday, my calculations indicate that he will finish the 2010 campaign with 158 sacks and 1,298 QB hurries.

14. Antonio Smith was solid, which was not unexpected. So was Amobi Okoye, which was completely unexpected. I'm anxious to see what Rivers' tape study reveals. I don't think Amobi's looked as good as he did Sunday since his rookie year.

15. Keep a good thought for Connor Barwin. His injury was about as nasty as anything you'll see this side of Willis McGahee's leg reversing anatomical structure on the fly.

16. Pressuring Peyton Manning is generally a futile proposition. He's so smart and so quick getting rid of the ball that he can almost always beat the rush. The fact that he was consistently hit and frustrated by the Texans speaks volumes and is a great testament to the players and Frank Bush.

17. The Houston secondary was by far the most glaring weakness of the afternoon. Of course, they did have to deal with an abnormal number of pass attempts (57) from the Colts. And they did manage to keep the Indy receivers in front of them for the vast majority of the game. It's nitpicking right now, sure. Yet it was the area Texans fans were, on balance, the most concerned with, and it remains the primary concern after the first game of the season.

18. Anybody else screaming, "NOOOOOOO!!!" when Kubes elected to go for it on 4th and 1 from the IND 20 early in the third quarter, with the Colts only trailing by 3 points? That was the play of the game in what was the back-breaking drive of the game. You don't often see the Houston Texans impose their will on another team. Especially not the Colts. But that's precisely what happened there.

19. Fake Game Balls: Offense--Arian Foster; Defense--Mario Williams; Special Teams--Neil Rackers. And I'd give Gary Kubiak and Rick Dennison a weepy hug if I saw them. Tremendous game plan and even more importantly, halftime adjustments the likes of which we've rarely seen in Houston.

I don't want to say the Texans stole a victory, because they're a legitimately talented team that was fortunate enough to open at home. Against the Colts, though? Without Brian Cushing? It's something, man. Here's to keeping that indescribable feeling going on Sunday in our nation's capital.

Comment 91 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I was deff scared about the fourth and 1

I never thought i would see kubes go for it… but obviously running the ball was not hard for our texans… god i can’t wait till sunday…

I am tattooing a picture of Jacobi Jones to my Mannschaft, Because it loves to go deep and always does a dance in the end...zone!
Go Texans!

by Taco Joe on Sep 14, 2010 5:58 AM CDT reply actions  

^^^ This.

I never for one moment thought it was the wrong call, regardless of the outcome. I hope we see more of that kind of thing from Kubes.

I'll eliminate you like I eliminate gluten from my diet.
www.battleredblog.com

by tehGrindCrusher on Sep 14, 2010 7:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

It was a weird feeling

But before that play I started thinking “Oh my god…we’re going to win this game…”

But I didn’t DARE say it out loud…

by Mike Kerns on Sep 14, 2010 8:14 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I once said that on BRB a few years ago

And literally a few minutes later, the Rosencopter took flight.

Learned my lesson good that day, I did.

I'll eliminate you like I eliminate gluten from my diet.
www.battleredblog.com

by tehGrindCrusher on Sep 14, 2010 8:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Oh man

My friends where trying to calm me down because I was so nervous in the 4th, and I just pulled up the Rosencopter on youtube and handed them the phone. The understood instantly.

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 14, 2010 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

I too loved the call ...

and only became concerned when I saw that it was a sweep to the right and our line didn’t have much of a push on that side. However, they contained well (as did the TE) and Foster (henceforth known as ColtsKiller) easily made the edge before the LB’s and secondary of the Clots caught up. Every past year that play would have gone for a 4-5 yard loss and would have changed the momentum of the game for good.

I am vvv pleased with our Texans and thought they won this game handily. Much more of a beat-down that the score indicated. I predicted the final score on this game in another post as 34-24 so was perfect there but I also predicted the season record in another post as 13-3 and after the first game I actually feel more confident that it could happen.

Here’s to Smithiak having both the best game-plan and the best halftime adjustments in the history of the franchise IMO. Texans forever! Peace!

by Mikus318 on Sep 14, 2010 9:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

excellent example

of how Arian made the OL look better than they were on Sunday.

They were good. Foster was great.

"I'm trying to get a feel for Booty" - GK

by texanphil on Sep 14, 2010 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was worried about not getting it

but I definitely thought it was the right call.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 14, 2010 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

+1

When I saw where they placed the ball, the first thought on my mind was “Go for it!”….and then I saw Pterodactyl gesturing for the same thing. It was all over his face, “Give it to me coach, I’ll ram it down their fucking throats.”

Just my $.02
Even duct tape can't fix stupid

by txknight on Sep 14, 2010 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

iirc, it was 14-0 last year

we were imposing our will on their DL with our running attack, we got a third down and short, and BabyShan called a pass?! Then we kicked a FG and later lost.

Like Kerns, I was not concerned about going for it, and glad they made the right call (halfback pass run).

"I'm trying to get a feel for Booty" - GK

by texanphil on Sep 14, 2010 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

two things

Maybe I have no objectivity on this, but it’s been my impression over about the last three seasons that, in reasonable field position and with the distance in the neighborhood of a yard, Kubiak has not been shy about making the attempt to convert a first down.

Secondly, everything this team has been building to for this season in terms of attitude, intestinal fortitude, and the design for over-the-hump, kick-it-up-a-(big freakin’) notch-BAM improvement to the Texans offense absolutely necessitated going for it on fourth and 1. Antonio Smith stated in the post-game press conference that this game was a statement game to the Houston Texans. That fourth and 1 was that statement in a nutshell.

by knave64 on Sep 14, 2010 9:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed on point #1

I too am of the impression that Kubes isn’t afraid to risk it on 4th down in those situations and am surprised that so many people feel like it was a break from the norm for him.

by TexanKevin on Sep 14, 2010 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

the difference

is while he would go for it before, he didn’t have the team so physically ready to kick the other team’s ass like he did this year. See Steelers ’08 and Jets ’09.

"I'm trying to get a feel for Booty" - GK

by texanphil on Sep 14, 2010 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

picked jaw off of floor

when i saw them going for it. i was out the door to check the grill and to get back for a defensive stand. by the time i got to the fridge, picked up a brewski and headed for the grill i heard, "kubiak is going for it on forth, jaw hit floor, and when they picked it up the first, i didnt say it, but i started the celebration drinking…

by strokin_stros on Sep 14, 2010 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

I fucking loved the call

people say that we go passive and don’t have KILLER INSTINCT well that mofos was KILLER INSTINCT.

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 14, 2010 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

It was a great team performance. The passing game did seem a little rusty, but everything just clicked. Great work by the coaches and the players.

A Texas Wannabe, born and raised in New Zealand. Currently located 7539 miles South west of Houston.

by distant_texans_fan on Sep 14, 2010 6:12 AM CDT reply actions  

"and he was a revelation on par with sliced bread and/or cold-activated aluminum cans"

I see what you did there.

Is this your way of subliminally trying to get us to like Coors Light? Because im not falling for it!

Anyways, I started having faith in the run game after the 4th and 1 conversion. I haven’t seen a texans back bounce it to the outside like that since Domanick Davis Davis.

"Fuck you motherfucker!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Sep 14, 2010 6:27 AM CDT reply actions  

BTW

liking the new tags. 2-15 WOOT WOOT!

"Fuck you motherfucker!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Sep 14, 2010 6:28 AM CDT reply actions  

Good points for the most part, well thought out.

I have to disagree on the secondary.

57 attempts for 433 yards, ok, so that’s alot. But lets break it down.

Last year Manning made 571 attempts OR 35.68 attempts per game.
He completed 393 which is roughly 69% of those passes.
He averaged 7.9 yards per pass or 281.25 Yards PER game.

Last Sunday he attempted 57 passes.
He completed 40 OR……wait for it…..70% of those passes.
He averaged 10.8 yards per pass

If you reduce that number to his normal 35-36 attempts per game and give him 25 completions OR 71% completion rate.
He would have passed for 270-280 yards per game OR his exact average from last year.

We played a nickel practically the whole game and GAVE him the short pass in order to keep it in front of us.

Given those numbers and factors, I think the secondary actually did a GREAT job against the BEST quarterback in the NFL.

Can they improve? You bet. But I would argue aginst them having been a weakness on Sunday.

(Caveat: I failed Math…..several times…but my 8 year old did check this for me.)

"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."

What happens when an unstoppable force meets three defensive players? THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpWqMqrZwTU

by TexansForever on Sep 14, 2010 6:34 AM CDT reply actions   2 recs

Math update. His average or Sunday SHOULD have read 7.6 yard per pass which is LOWER than his average last year by .3.

I accidently based his average on ompletions not attempts for Sunday.

"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."

What happens when an unstoppable force meets three defensive players? THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpWqMqrZwTU

by TexansForever on Sep 14, 2010 6:38 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

That's also with the "nearly garbage time" long play to Collie.

Look at his numbers through three quarters…

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Sep 14, 2010 8:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think I agree with you

A few people singled out Kareem for getting beat, but part of it was that Manning was finding the soft spot in our zones. Furthermore, as you said, with one exception we managed to completely take away the long ball as an option for Peyton. But in the NFL — especially against a qb as good as Manning — it’s damn near impossible to take away both the long and the short passing game. And, once we were ahead, giving up the short stuff worked doubly in our favor because it also ran more time off the clock.

All in all, we did about as well as could be expected against the best in the business.

There will be other days when we will be tested in different ways, for sure. But this was a great start.

I'll eliminate you like I eliminate gluten from my diet.
www.battleredblog.com

by tehGrindCrusher on Sep 14, 2010 7:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

There is not much chance of stopping the Colts on the 3-5 yard slant.

But if your offense is working, and you’re running well, and all they get is the 3-5 yard slant, well, you saw it.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Sep 14, 2010 8:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Correction

There is not much chance of stopping the Colts on the 3-5 yard slant when you don’t allow your CBs to press opposing WRs at the line.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 14, 2010 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree.

The danger there is they slip past your baby CBs and run for a million yards, a la the Collie Almost Garbage Time TD.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Sep 15, 2010 1:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

As much as people were complaining about the cover2, we ran it pretty well this sunday. It’ll give up alot of yards underneath the coverage, but it slows the offense down which gives the defense more opportunities for a drive stalling deflection, sack, or interception.

Some people want to play more man coverage, but we just don’t have the personell for that. Both of our starting corners would really struggle if they were asked to play man to man consistently and both are the prototypical cover2 CB as far as their play style and physicality goes…

The only issue I see is that we have a CB tandem best suited for cover2 and safeties that would be best off playing more cover3. I still think cover2 is the way to go, because Wilson is at least an average cover safety when healthy and while Pollard would be better off in a cover3 where he could play “in the box” more, he’s athletic enough not to be a “total” liability in coverage even if it’s not his strength.

by Bryan72076 on Sep 14, 2010 8:44 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

On Amoeba Okoye

I’m looking forward to seeing what Rivers says about this after his analysis, but I went back and re-watched the first half, paying special attention to the d-line play. Amobi looked pretty good. There were at least two plays that I can recall where he was so fast off the snap that I thought he was going to get called for offside. He seemed to be pretty good at getting into the backfield.

And Mario… Dear God. Mario played as well as I’ve ever seen him play. He was unbelievable.

I'll eliminate you like I eliminate gluten from my diet.
www.battleredblog.com

by tehGrindCrusher on Sep 14, 2010 7:09 AM CDT reply actions  

I've been saying Okoye looked good.

I thought he looked good in preseason. Stronger, faster and meaner than I’ve seen him. Our little D lineman is all grown up! (Or I hope so, anyway.)

Mario gets tons of pressure one, because he’s great, and two because Smith and Okoye were causing so much trouble there was no one to help on Mario, except RBs he tosses around like rag dolls, or simply ignores.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Sep 14, 2010 8:13 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Contract year

Don’t think Mario didn’t notice what Julius Peppers just got paid.

Here or not, Mario will be the highest paid DE in football in 2011. I REALLY hope it’s here.

by Mike Kerns on Sep 14, 2010 8:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

recc'd

that just made me feel warm and fuzzy inside. Optimism for this season is in danger of becoming absolutely unbridled.

by knave64 on Sep 14, 2010 9:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

They

I dub the Colts....Unforgiven!

by Rip Jersey on Sep 14, 2010 8:43 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

and as soon as I can get myself free

I’ll let you know what it is they did…..

I dub the Colts....Unforgiven!

by Rip Jersey on Sep 14, 2010 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

They don't determine post-season appearances based on the first game of the season?

You may want to check your short-term memory and rethink that statement.

I dub the Colts....Unforgiven!

by Rip Jersey on Sep 14, 2010 8:46 AM CDT via mobile reply actions   1 recs

Touche

"MDC: Droppin' knowledge like a librarian with Parkinson's." --Jonathan Loesche

by MDC on Sep 14, 2010 9:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

2 things

- (re: #8) – When I first saw the dropped TD by Jacoby, I felt the same as you. But then I saw the replay, where the DB was already pulling on Jacoby’s back and twisting him before the ball got there. Would Andre have made the catch? Of course. But that is no easy catch to make when you’re handing out pony-rides.

- Special Teams game ball – I don’t disagree that Rackers earned it. His 40-something yarder kept us in the game in the 1st half. But there is no way Kevin Walter shouldn’t get at least the co-ST-game-ball with Rackers. For reference, see your own #10.

If the Treasury Secretary doesn't have to pay taxes, then why do I?

by Shake on Sep 14, 2010 8:55 AM CDT reply actions  

i only heard the 1st half on radio

I heard the coverage on kickoffs shutting down the Colts around or inside the 20, consistently. I also think Van der Meer’s radio calls were excellent in describing the plays.

I dub the Colts....Unforgiven!

by Rip Jersey on Sep 14, 2010 9:20 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Yeah, Mark is pretty good

But that fucking Andre Ware just drags the show into a pit of suck, both with his shitty radio voice and his Emmitt-esque commentary.

If the Treasury Secretary doesn't have to pay taxes, then why do I?

by Shake on Sep 14, 2010 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

Why?

I can’t fathom why producers (610 & ESPN) think that winning a Heisman makes a guy into a decent broadcaster.

But if this tradition is going to continue, then I pray that they give Reggie’s trophy to VY. And then hire him as a broadcaster and pair him with Shannon Sharpe. Because that would be some epic announcing.

If the Treasury Secretary doesn't have to pay taxes, then why do I?

by Shake on Sep 14, 2010 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think Anre Ware is that bad. I also think that van der Meer and Ware are a good broadcasting tandem

They work well together.

I will say that I didn’t like Ware on the 610 morning radio show. As an announcer though, I do not find him objectionable.

I dub the Colts....Unforgiven!

by Rip Jersey on Sep 14, 2010 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Walter for sure...

…gets a game ball. Those kind of plays, like on the onside kick, are the kinds of plays we’ve been on the wrong end of so many times.

by Jeff S. on Sep 14, 2010 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Let's not forget Jesse Nading's onside recovery

Dude was at the bottom of the pile, reached a paw out and hungy hungry hippoed the ball. Until that point, I still had visions of Rosencopter flashing in my head.

Q: If losses by fewer than 7 points are 3 times more likely than blowout losses to cause Tim to get blindingly drunk, do you take the over or the under on the number of Scott appearances as 3.5?

TexansDC: False. You can’t get drunk from Coors Light.

by LoneSpot on Sep 14, 2010 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

True

And if Nading had leaped 17 feet into the air to catch the ball, and then been gang-raped on the way down….then I would have nominated him for a game ball.

If the Treasury Secretary doesn't have to pay taxes, then why do I?

by Shake on Sep 14, 2010 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

MDC was right.

You are a smart-ass. Too bad Walter couldn’t duplicate that effort. Hence the Nading love.

Q: If losses by fewer than 7 points are 3 times more likely than blowout losses to cause Tim to get blindingly drunk, do you take the over or the under on the number of Scott appearances as 3.5?

TexansDC: False. You can’t get drunk from Coors Light.

by LoneSpot on Sep 14, 2010 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Disclaimer: I'm a fan of smart-asses.

Q: If losses by fewer than 7 points are 3 times more likely than blowout losses to cause Tim to get blindingly drunk, do you take the over or the under on the number of Scott appearances as 3.5?

TexansDC: False. You can’t get drunk from Coors Light.

by LoneSpot on Sep 14, 2010 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

Takes one to know one

Q: If losses by fewer than 7 points are 3 times more likely than blowout losses to cause Tim to get blindingly drunk, do you take the over or the under on the number of Scott appearances as 3.5?

TexansDC: False. You can’t get drunk from Coors Light.

by LoneSpot on Sep 14, 2010 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Great. Nice job on that comment, LS.

Now none of MDC’s hats will fit, due to the automatic head-swelling that occurs ever time someone types a comment that he was right.

Way to think that one through, buddy.

If the Treasury Secretary doesn't have to pay taxes, then why do I?

by Shake on Sep 14, 2010 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Had to Rec.

Fucker.

Q: If losses by fewer than 7 points are 3 times more likely than blowout losses to cause Tim to get blindingly drunk, do you take the over or the under on the number of Scott appearances as 3.5?

TexansDC: False. You can’t get drunk from Coors Light.

by LoneSpot on Sep 14, 2010 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

7. Perhaps the best part of such a quiet opener for the Texans’ passing game? Giving the Redskins, who figure to know the Texans offense better than anyone thanks to Mike and Kyle Shanahan, what should be a very uneasy feeling about Sunday’s tilt. You can’t just expect the Texans to air it out like they did last year. Small sample size and all, but the Texans have shown they have the means to be much more than a one-trick pony on offense.

i had that same thought. and what do you gameplan against now? do you throw away your prep based on sunday? that means starting all over from scratch, and the game is only 5 days away now. i don’t envy shan and baby shan, that’s a tall order ahead of em. while our defense has the advantage, considering we practice against that style of offense week in, week out. i expect us to get a lot of pressure this week… and i’m going on record saying texans record more than 5 sacks for the game.

"If i wasn't a gentleman, i'd punch you square in the mouth!!!!" - Arthur Spooner
http://www.twitter.com/chrisdogan

by chrisd21 on Sep 14, 2010 9:26 AM CDT reply actions  

Was intersting to watch the Skins/Cowboys game

Nowhere near as much zone blocking as i thought there would be…lots of power schemes. And I don’t feel too anxious, oddly enough, about Shanahan knowing what we do. We took care of Denver when Shanahan was still there. I realize that’s a bad comparision…different teams, talent level etc…but Shanahan knows exactly what Kubiak does and it didn’t make much of a difference.

by ~Buck on Sep 14, 2010 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not worried at ALL about the Skins.

Two team. Same playstyle.

One team is good.
One team is not good.

We winz.

"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."

What happens when an unstoppable force meets three defensive players? THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpWqMqrZwTU

by TexansForever on Sep 14, 2010 9:40 AM CDT reply actions  

It is an unfamiliar feeling for us. Yes it makes sense.

"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."

What happens when an unstoppable force meets three defensive players? THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpWqMqrZwTU

by TexansForever on Sep 14, 2010 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

One thing i've noticed

Is that the Texans fan base as a whole tends to wear their emotions on their sleeves and live almost soley in the moment. When they team performs well then we’re a juggernaut than will run through anyone who gets in our way.. however at the first sign of trouble “they” are a terrible team, Kubiak should be fired, Frank Bush is a moron, ect, ect.

There’s going to be peaks and valleys for any team during the course of a season and even during games, the “fanatics” tend to lose sight of that a bit and make too much out of both the highs and the lows.

by Bryan72076 on Sep 14, 2010 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agree. But the Redskins suck. That's a fact.

"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."

What happens when an unstoppable force meets three defensive players? THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpWqMqrZwTU

by TexansForever on Sep 14, 2010 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

We simply have no history of any success to fall back on

We aren’t the Patriots who can shrug off a loss and have faith that they will turn it around, we just don’t have a history of that kind of success, so when we get a taste it just tastes so good, but then when things go wrong it just seems like the same old story.

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 14, 2010 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

One game at a time

The coaching staff has last weekend’s sloppy game against the cowpukes to game-plan on. I think the Skins are what they appeared to be. McNabb is still dangerous. He can make plays because he is still mobile. The defensive front four must pressure him without losing containment. McNabb has become wiser in his older years and realized it is not good to get hit, so he runs a lot less, but he can give himself time to find the open man by moving and rolling out. The Shanny-cest offense will likely utilize that strategy.

I dub the Colts....Unforgiven!

by Rip Jersey on Sep 14, 2010 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

NFL teams typically have a let-down

after a big win. The best teams have less of a let-down than bad teams (when they win anyway). That’s why I think this was such an important game – much more so that a typical week 1 game where you say its not the end of the season, win or lose. That was still true (it always is) but now that Houston is primed for somewhat of a let-down we will see whether or not we truly are one of the best teams. The good news is that the Skins are also primed for a let-down after they beat the Cowbrats and comparing how they played in their win with how we played in ours – I definitely like our chances.

by Mikus318 on Sep 14, 2010 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

The Colts and Redskins are two different teams

The things that worked against the Colts probably won’t against Washington. I’d be stunned if our running game is very effective against Washington’s front 7, and Schaub is going to be under fire all game long whereas the Colts get good pressure on the QB but at the cost of run defense… The Redskins with their 3-4 defense likely will be able to do both at least somewhat effectively. As often as we were in the Colt’s backfield chasing Manning, the Redskins probably got even more pressure against Dallas who probably has a much better line than the riff raff the Colts put on the field…

I’m not predicting a loss, but it’s surprising how many people think we’re going to just run over Washington when in reality we should probably be slight underdogs given how the teams matchup. Stylistically I can totally see the Redskins able to frustrate our offense on D and if they keep McNabb protected he has the ability to shred our secondary. I think we win the game, but it’s a close enough matchup that I wouldn’t put money on it even being a Texans fan.

by Bryan72076 on Sep 14, 2010 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

We should win that one handily.

Not sayng that on swagger from Sunday but because the Redskins are a BAD team right now.

They have a decent defense but their offense is not looking good.

Glad we get them early.

"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."

What happens when an unstoppable force meets three defensive players? THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpWqMqrZwTU

by TexansForever on Sep 14, 2010 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't see anyone saying we're going to just run over the Redskins like the Colts

I, for one, think this Texans team has a more varied attack with the addition of it’s running game. Now they can mix it up, go strong on the pass, or go strong on the run, whatever is called for based on what the opponent gives them. The coaches know that and the fans on BRB know that. When it comes to offense, variety just gives them more options and opportunity to be effective.

I dub the Colts....Unforgiven!

by Rip Jersey on Sep 14, 2010 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

There is also such a thing as psyching yourself out.

The Texans have so many things on offense that they can try to get too creative or show different looks instead of focusing on execution. We saw that with kid shanny and it cost us a couple of games. I think Dennison sticks to what works and that is how the game will be dictated on Sunday. If we can execute we win, and if we can’t we lose.

Feeling the five stages of grief since 2002.

by NoSafetiesNeeded on Sep 15, 2010 12:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

Did anyone else notice

The patience that Arian Foster showed while racking up the yardage Sunday? It seemed to me that, unlike Slaton, he took his time approaching the line and used excellent vision to make the appropriate cut. With our one-cut ZB scheme, Foster seems to be that puzzle piece that we were missing with Slaton. He really impressed me out there, and his stats show it. Not to knock Slaton, but he is what he is (a great change of pace back).

The Super Bowl is in Dallas, and an AFC team HAS to go. Why not the Texans?

by Christopher Allen on Sep 14, 2010 10:07 AM CDT reply actions  

I have been preaching Foster since last pre-season. The guy READS the holes and then goes. No dancing in the backfield.

That is what this system is designed for. Pick the hole and commit. Don’t dance and deliberate.

"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."

What happens when an unstoppable force meets three defensive players? THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpWqMqrZwTU

by TexansForever on Sep 14, 2010 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Seems like Slaton gets "happy feet", and by that time the hole is gone!

The Super Bowl is in Dallas, and an AFC team HAS to go. Why not the Texans?

by Christopher Allen on Sep 14, 2010 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yep, Foster showed great patience

He allowed the defender to engage the blocker and then made his move. Plus, I will add that the Colts defenders were spread out, making it easy to block. Is that a valid observation? Would like to hear other opinions on that.

I dub the Colts....Unforgiven!

by Rip Jersey on Sep 14, 2010 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

Happy Feet

reminds me of Vernand Morency

"F**k you motherf**ker!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Sep 14, 2010 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Mr. Mittens also used to get them.

The Super Bowl is in Dallas, and an AFC team HAS to go. Why not the Texans?

by Christopher Allen on Sep 14, 2010 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

Feeling the five stages of grief since 2002.

by NoSafetiesNeeded on Sep 15, 2010 12:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Also the change in philosophy by Dennison

Seems like LZ was the guy that brought it up, but Dennison focuses on getting to the edge and looking for cutback lanes on your way there. Foster was turning the corner on those wide running plays, which got the D flowing hard to the sides, which in turn started opening up huge HUGE lanes on the backside.

by ~Buck on Sep 14, 2010 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Yes, I think this goes along with my comment just up one. Yes, he had Foster looking to the edge and then cutting when the opening appeared.

This might relate to what I was saying about the Colts defenders appearing to be spread out.

I dub the Colts....Unforgiven!

by Rip Jersey on Sep 14, 2010 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Off topic, but...
@JasonLaCanfora: #Jets DT Kris Jenkins tore his ACL and is out for season #NFL

Somewhere, Chris Myers is smiling…

by Mike Kerns on Sep 14, 2010 11:48 AM CDT reply actions  

Watching them suck on offense? I feel better.
Watching Cromartie and Wilson give up penalties? I feel better.
Watching Todd Heap find all the open spots? I feel better.
No Kris Jenkins? I feel A LOT better.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 14, 2010 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

We all knew Cromartie would suck right?

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 14, 2010 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Actually

There are about 47 different baby-mommas that disagree with you.

If the Treasury Secretary doesn't have to pay taxes, then why do I?

by Shake on Sep 14, 2010 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dirty.

Bryan just flagged this comment.

"F**k you motherf**ker!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Sep 14, 2010 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Christmas came early this year.

"F**k you motherf**ker!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Sep 14, 2010 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

Beat me to it.

Q: If losses by fewer than 7 points are 3 times more likely than blowout losses to cause Tim to get blindingly drunk, do you take the over or the under on the number of Scott appearances as 3.5?

TexansDC: False. You can’t get drunk from Coors Light.

by LoneSpot on Sep 14, 2010 11:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

#12

Its harder for me to feel sorry for their offensive line when Paytun adapts and overcomes so easily. I actually came real close to feeling sorry for their defensive line, however.

They didn’t bring their big boy britches to that game.

"I'm trying to get a feel for Booty" - GK

by texanphil on Sep 14, 2010 2:28 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your big-time home for big-time analysis and big-time rants about all things Houston Texan.

Hate Mail Goes Here

Brb_small Tim

Absurdly Talented Writers

Lucy_small bigfatdrunk

Tumblr_l2ecwbvekp1qbhedwo1_500_small MDC

Vlcsnap-00003_small riversmccown

Tumblr_l4i6iruxha1qbs5d3o1_400_small TexansDC

Chairman_meow_blink_small UprootedTexan

Absurdly Talented Writers, Part Deux

Photo_small Vega

Alec-baldwin-glengarry-glen-ross-always-be-closing_small tehGrindCrusher