Tape Study: Colts 24, Texans 34 -- Foster's Home For Imaginary Defenders (II)
Opinion seems to be split on Arian Foster's dominant day. Some seem to think that the holes were so wide that any back could make it through them, while others credit Foster specifically for the turnaround. Of course, on any given run one of these things could be the main factor, and if you focused on a specific run, you'd come away with what you saw on that particular play.
I think it's fair to say that both these things happened: Foster was great and the offensive line was great. To make matters worse, the Colts defense got increasingly desperate to stop the Texans and started using fronts that gave them five down linemen, and stacking the box. Good in theory, yes, but with the good blocking and a little bit of overpursuit, all it took was one great cut and Foster would be off to the races.
Credit where credit is due continues behind the jump, where we'll take a gander at Foster's cuts, Vonta Leach and the offensive line, and some overpursuit by the Colts. Along with some quick notes on the second half defense. 56 K Warning in effect.
Arian Foster has better vision than any other RB that has ever suited up for the Texans.
Foster has a lot of great qualities as a back. He's "shifty" (a/k/a big but can still avoid tackles), he has good speed (not track speed), he always seems to take a few more yards than you think he should after contact, and his cutting is excellent. But the real place he makes a difference is with his vision; not only are the cuts crisp and clean, but he has a knack for reading the defenses movements and cutting to the best place to maximize yardage.
Take a gander at this series of cuts with 2:21 left in the third quarter, first and 10 from the Houston 20:
I don't want to knock Steve Slaton, who had a few decent runs in his own right yesterday, but if Freeney spins Brown against him, that's a two yard loss. Instead, Foster turns this into an 11 yard gain with a series of excellent cuts around a few sub-par blocks.
Contrast that to this Slaton run and you'll see what I mean:
The way this play develops, Slaton is being begged to cut this outside to the left, either into the gap between Jacoby Jones and Andre Johnson or all the way to the outside. Instead, it's a short gain with no pile push. That, to me, is the biggest difference between these two right now.
Vonta Leach & the offensive line are still troubling...but for other teams this time.
You guys know my writing style by this point; I'm not big on all the buzzwords of the game. Emotion, intensity, sending a message in one play. That isn't the kind of thing I typically gush about, which is why I still have a certified degree from the "Bernard Pollard Is Slightly Overrated" Institute from last offseason.
There were many fine Vonta Leach blocks in this game, but if you want to talk about sending a message, then go no further than the first Texans rush of the entire game, where he annihilates Philip Wheeler:
There really wasn't anything special or new about the formations that Rick Dennison threw out there. It's your standard two running back, two wide receiver, one tight end I-Formation. He brought the wide receivers close to the line of scrimmage, moving them behind it at times on the snap; and that wasn't much of a difference from what Kyle Shanahan did here last year. The offensive line just played better; in particular, Chris Myers played a better game then I can recall him having all last season. Both he and Wade Smith got pushed back on a few plays, but they looked good blocking out front and picking up seal blocks. Here's one of my favorite Myers blocks yesterday, which coincidentally also contains a dose of Leach:
Whoooooaaa Coltie!
Once the Colts started stacking the box in the second half, the Texans stretch play cut-backs started to really burn them. Clint Session, in particular, always seemed to be lurching forward on the snap. He didn't get a lot accomplished by it; I think he caught Foster from behind to keep a play to three or four yards when he was blitzing from the weakside once, but on three or four other occasions his rashness led to bigger gains.
This isn't one of those plays that Session was involved in; just one example of the Colts' overpursuit:
Notice the stretch, the offensive line all goes right, and then the safety and linebacker follow, then Foster cuts it back and has a step on them. If he'd been able to shake Melvin Bullitt, and gotten a better block from Andre Johnson, this might've been a huge gainer. I'm also guessing the desire to stay inbounds at that point played a part in why this wasn't cut even wider out.
If you haven't savored this running attack enough yet, well, it was kind of a big deal to the media this week, both local and national. Here are some other links:
- Z Report podcast on zone game dominance.
- Steve Mariucci and later, Mike Mayock, breaking down the tape on NFL Network.
- Chris over at Houston Diehards with a detailed look of the opening drive of the second half.
- Doug Farrar's Cover 3 at Football Outsiders looking at a particular TD play, with quotes from Eric Winston.
Defensive adjustments.
After Kareem Jackson was exploited in the first half, he was only the main defender of two passes for the entire second half. Anyone wanna guess what was going on? Bueller? Bueller? Yep, it was zone coverage all-around. The Texans still got pressure, but Amobi Okoye morphed into somewhat of a non-factor. He only got one hurry in the second, so it became the Mario and Antonio show against the sad offensive line of the Colts.
Bush halted most of the blitzes, as the Texans only sent five three times in the second half. The good news? The two of them that came out of that three down lineman front got the Texans another sack and another pressure. Really, the four man rush was getting plenty of hurries in its own right. Especially noteworthy was the Glover Quin non-interception, which involved Manning's throw being offline because the Disruptacon had pushed Ryan Diem into Manning as he was throwing.
Due to the pressure and the zones, the Colts started running more quick drops and going underneath. Dallas Clark had another monster game, mostly accumulated in the second half, for this reason. Zac Diles, target of three passes in the first half, had eight go his way in the second. And he wasn't even really close to what you'd call "shadowing" his defender on any of them. He just made the tackle, lived with the gain, and we all moved on.
Was it optimal? Hardly. Good for the stat sheet? No. But the Texans outlasted the Colts.
By the way, since nobody else has done it (to my knowledge) in an actual post yet, the defense needs to be sending gift baskets to Joe Marciano and the special teams this week. Neil Rackers didn't launch a single touchback, but the Colts started from beyond their own 27 just twice: on the interception by Schaub, and on a punt from the Houston 24. The Colts had four drives of between thirty and fifty yards that yielded zero points because they started so far back. Kudos, kickoff coverage.
Colts vs Texans coverage | Colts vs Texans recap | Colts vs Texans boxscore
62 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
TWO HUNDRED AND THIRTY-ONE YARDS.
If some pole-smkoing douchenozzle thinks that ANYONE could have put up those numbers. They are gayer than than a John and Kate plus Eight viewing party.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
What happens when an unstoppable force meets three defensive players? THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpWqMqrZwTU
by TexansForever on Sep 16, 2010 9:45 AM CDT reply actions 3 recs
Yikes!
I feel bad when people find out they are gay from people on the internet. That’s how Falcons fans got me for saying that Dunta would be bad!
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter | SB Nation Houston | Battle Red Blog
by riversmccown on Sep 16, 2010 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions
Nothing makes you more gay
Than criticizing a player.
A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com
Not even
going to A&M?
"MDC: Droppin' knowledge like a librarian with Parkinson's." --Jonathan Loesche
by MDC on Sep 16, 2010 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Playing Army isn't the same thing.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
Sheepfucker
isn’t the same as gay.
Trust me, I went to A&M
Just your average, run of the mill hardcore casual Texans fan.
Goo'd
Q: If losses by fewer than 7 points are 3 times more likely than blowout losses to cause Tim to get blindingly drunk, do you take the over or the under on the number of Scott appearances as 3.5?
TexansDC: False. You can’t get drunk from Coors Light.
Shut up and mooooo-ve over on the couch!
Daddy wants to watch him some football.
Just my $.02
Even duct tape can't fix stupid
Ah yes
I’m gonna be loving this tape study all year. Awesome work (again, and again).
Great point about the special teams. I couldn’t help but notice the short kickoffs, and how that was allegedly the reason the Texans went with Rackers (though I think it’s lip service and I think Rackers won out because of Brown’s mental baggage and the destruction that one bad miss could start).
You really do kind of have to throw the defensive stats out the window against the Colts. Hopefully we’ll get a better idea of how the “real” defense will look against the ’Skins. I guess I need to be careful what I wish for.
Rivers – how do you sum up the impact of not having Cushing in this game? What did the team lose or gain from it?
Also – thanks for the linkage.
Chris - www.HoustonDiehards.com
by HoustonDiehards on Sep 16, 2010 9:49 AM CDT reply actions
I sum up the impact of no Cushing by saying
“Watch for the preview on SBN Houston tomorrow,”
/copout
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter | SB Nation Houston | Battle Red Blog
by riversmccown on Sep 16, 2010 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions
The credit goes all around
Arian Foster certainly didn’t have that hard of a time because the offensive line was so dominant, but as the video shows, he found A LOT of those holes when they weren’t right in front of him and he had to change momentum and that credit is all his. Between those two and Vonta Leach still causing those LB’s nightmares, it was just awesome to watch for a team that has been so frustrating historically in the running game.
R.I.P Jazz #6
You know now that i am older.
I can recall people back in the days saying denver o-line with TD and Elway was cheating and dirty with all the cut blocks, but now i look at what you did and on the chris myers play i see winston caldwell and jacoby all cutting. I have to say i like it cuz we all know d-lineman and linebackers do not like being cut so they are very protective of their legs, so they get distracted a little. It is nice to see the zone play work here in houston and i finally understand it somewhat. If they can do this week end and week out we might be lifting that Lombardi trophy pretty soon. good stuff rivers.
The cut blocks are great...when they work.
I think (and this is guesstimation, I don’t keep track) that the cut blocks fail more often than regular blocks. But when they do work, you get a better edge on somebody.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter | SB Nation Houston | Battle Red Blog
by riversmccown on Sep 16, 2010 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions
Looking at the game it's not the cut blocking that did it.
It’s the zone part of the scheme. Everyone always talks about the cut blocks, but it’s the zone part that gains the yards in my opinion IF – IF you have a back that can read field. If the back can read the field his other talents needn’t be awesome, that’s the success of the old Denver system in a nutshell to me. If you do find a back who can read the blocks, cut once and accelerate with power – look out.
Also I think the cut blocks are generally not aimed to hurt anyone, they’re to clutter the field and delay pursuit, mainly. A LB can easily shed most WR blocks, but he’s going to still have to jump or otherwise avoid a cut, even if its not at his knees. And generally those blocks aren’t. Because teams know that what goes around comes around, and it’s pretty easy to injure someone in the NFL if you really try.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
Hey guys....
Congrats on the win. I don’t care what anyone says, or who gets the credit. It was beautiful to watch. Glad the Saints don’t have to face that rushing attack in the regular season.
Football is, after all, a wonderful way to get rid of your aggressions without going to jail for it. ~Heywood Hale Brown
Glad we don't have to face that offense
SCARY.
A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com
by bigfatdrunk on Sep 16, 2010 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions
Ditto this.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter | SB Nation Houston | Battle Red Blog
by riversmccown on Sep 16, 2010 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions
I recall the Texans can throw it around a bit too.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
The Texans...
…remind me of the Saints from a few years ago, right after they got Drew Brees: a very talented offense with some pieces missing on defense. Holding the Colts to 17 points is a good start. I always pull for you guys. Hope this season comes together for ya. A Texans/Saints Superbowl would be great to watch.
Football is, after all, a wonderful way to get rid of your aggressions without going to jail for it. ~Heywood Hale Brown
A Gulf coast drunk fest in Dallas?
I really can’t think of anything that would bother them more up there.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
They wouldn't be happy if a bunch of Eagles fans showed up
I know that’s a stretch at this point though.
It turns out I overestimated my apathy, but not enough to matter.
Ha! You could put a long list of NFC teams together that would wind the cranks of Dallas fans
You know what? If Dallas doesn’t play in the SB in their stadium, it will be a total loss in the eyes of Dallas fans. Seems like they felt they were entitled, just because….
I dub the Redskins....Shanny-cest!
Beautiful, Rivers
Also, check out Myers on the first clip above. Talking about leading your running back to freedom. That’s Mitch King he’s driving all the way back into his own endzone.
A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com
Mitch King
Was pretty good at getting pushed off the LOS.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter | SB Nation Houston | Battle Red Blog
by riversmccown on Sep 16, 2010 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions
Beautiful work here, Rivers
And I agree that credit should be spread around for this rushing performance.
The O-line didn’t seem to open the “correct” gap for Foster on many of the running plays. But Foster is making cuts (the right cuts) so seamlessly without losing stride. It’s just beautiful to watch.
If the Treasury Secretary doesn't have to pay taxes, then why do I?
^This
Q: If losses by fewer than 7 points are 3 times more likely than blowout losses to cause Tim to get blindingly drunk, do you take the over or the under on the number of Scott appearances as 3.5?
TexansDC: False. You can’t get drunk from Coors Light.
Great work Rivers
Truly the most informative content on this site (No offense Tim). I look forward to a full season of knowledge being imparted on all of us Monday morning qbs. Keep up the good work.
by Texans 'Til I Die on Sep 16, 2010 11:34 AM CDT reply actions
Somebody has to make up for my suckiness :-)
A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com
by bigfatdrunk on Sep 16, 2010 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions
I lurk on here enough (read too often)
to know you have your own special contribution to BRB. I’m not sure what it is yet, but I’m sure it’s special.
by Texans 'Til I Die on Sep 16, 2010 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Special
In the short bus sense of the word.
I'll eliminate you like I eliminate gluten from my diet.
www.battleredblog.com
by tehGrindCrusher on Sep 16, 2010 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions 3 recs

If the Treasury Secretary doesn't have to pay taxes, then why do I?
by Shake on Sep 16, 2010 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions 4 recs
In order to suck
you actually have to put up some content on the site.
"Fuck you motherfucker!"
-Bernard Pollard-
by Jordann on Sep 17, 2010 2:01 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Oh Tim won't be offended
He made the “rivers makes us look like rank amateurs” tag, not me.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter | SB Nation Houston | Battle Red Blog
by riversmccown on Sep 16, 2010 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions
The kickoff coverage unit was fantastic
They seemed to be down there within a second….and Joel Dresseen and company didn’t miss any tackles. Good job all around for them.
"Lord, beer me strength."
In case anyone missed it
…JD is the 10th leading tackler on the team at the moment.
Dude hustled his ass off on Special Teams against the Colts, and I really hope he keeps it up.
Just your average, run of the mill hardcore casual Texans fan.
I've been checkin' some vids...
I noticed the did block very well, but there were times when you can see Foster looking for the running and making the moves to get through them.
It was simply superb execution on everyones’s part.
It also made me weep with joy.
GO TEXANS!!!!
Our time will come...
I left out the words, offensive line and lanes.
GO TEXANS!!!!
Our time will come...
by Texanmaniac on Sep 16, 2010 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions
off topic....
but i told ya’ll! lol.
Foster on the bow he does after he scores….
"I thought about it all (offseason)," Foster said of the celebration. "I feel like every running back should have their own little stamp on the game, and mine kind of stems from the core of what I believe. It’s a Namaste. It means respect. It’s a Hindu greeting and it just means, ‘I see the god in you.’ It’s paying my respects to the game of football.
"If i wasn't a gentleman, i'd punch you square in the mouth!!!!" - Arthur Spooner
http://www.twitter.com/chrisdogan
He's like Ricky Williams without the pot.
Actually the guy he kind of reminds me of his Robert Smith.
Which means, perhaps, he won’t stick around to see his body broken beyond repair.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
I HOPE that he isn't going to start talking...
… just shut up and run the dern ball across the pretty yellow line, bow if you want to and oh yeah, continue that whole shutting up thing.
Nice work Rivers
A performance like that requires execution all around. Way to point that out and I really enjoy this bi-weekly analysis.
I do feel like emotion can not be overated in the game of football. Someone like Pollard getting fired up amd knocking the piss out of everyone around them will raise the level of play on the team as a whole.
It is kind of like why a coach gets into it with a ref.. Sometimes he does it to fire up his team. Prove a point, yes, but raise the emotional level of his players.
It takes a big man to walk away, but a bigger man to break his freaking jaw!
My take on this (and feel free to tell me how wrong I am)
I think emotion plays a bigger part in every sport the lower the level of play is. When we get to the NFL, these are professional athletes, the best of the best, and when they make a 53 man roster, they are only very rarely placed there despite emotional baggage (i.e. quitting on plays, dogging it, or what have you). Ergo, it shouldn’t be a big deal to have someone like Pollard as opposed to an even keeled individual in the NFL.
I think we grow up thinking that the emotion matters more than it does because WE remember situations where it did matter when we were kids/teenagers on our own teams. I wasn’t always the best little leaguer, but I know that when a certain teammate of mine who went on to become a minor leaguer in the Pirates org got fired up and got on us, we played with more focus. I don’t think that’s necessarily a singular story, we all have someone who has put an emotional impact into our lives like that, even if it’s not sports. But I think because of the impact it has on our own lives, we overrate it in professional sports, where it’s incredibly rare to see someone lose their focus or composure in the first place.
As for the coaches, I’ll paraphrase Earl Weaver and say the manager gets out there and hollers at people because it doesn’t matter if he’s tossed, not to fire up his players. The players just need someone to say what they can’t.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter | SB Nation Houston | Battle Red Blog
by riversmccown on Sep 16, 2010 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions
I think it explains
why you throw deep on the first play after a turnover, why home field matters, and why Fat Albert is riding the pine.
Yeah, I think emotion plays more of a part than you think.
"I'm trying to get a feel for Booty" - GK
A play that you may have cited...
would’ve been Antonio Smith’s laughable offsides penalty immediately after Connor Barwin was carted off the field.
I do agree that emotion does play some part in the game (which I don’t think Rivers is disputing). I do feel like there’s too much of an emphasis on emotion…because not every athlete is emotionally driven like Mr. Pollard.
"Lord, beer me strength."
Foster's performance Sunday confirmed what I suspected all of last season and for the end of 08:
Steve Slaton has absolutely no vision. None. I think that if he has a future with this team, it’s going to be as Kevin Faulk-lite and nothing more.
Or at least a cheaper version of Reggie Bush
I would challenge you to a battle of wits, but you appear to be unarmed.
by The Night Owl on Sep 16, 2010 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions
I think Slaton does have vision. Not great, but some.
Right now he’s so preoccupied with not fumbling that he doesn’t even look up.
Look at year before last and tell me that’s a guy with no vision.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
I have. There was a marked change in Slaton in the first three quarters of 08 and the last quarter of 08.
I don’t have an explanation for it other than that may be when his neck started to bother him and he could indeed have been preoccupied with not fumbling (I think he had no fumbles in the first 12 games and 2 in the last 4).
Speaking of running backs does anyone know what's up with Ward?
We have usually had to use all of our rb’s and then some so I’m surprised that there is no mention of him anywhere. Was he even on the field against the colts?
Feeling the five stages of grief since 2002.
by NoSafetiesNeeded on Sep 17, 2010 2:00 AM CDT up reply actions
Missing.
Presumed safe.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
Very nice
This is what brings me to BRB day after day.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
So, why are you a Cowboys fan and coming here? Thinking of changing loyalties?
I dub the Redskins....Shanny-cest!
Divided, maybe
Having grown up with the Cowboys, they are just simply ingrained and I could no more abandon them than the Astros. Hell, I still have a fondness for the Titans, Bud Adams and all. But the Texans are a team I’ve tried to like since the start, and lately they’ve become a fun team to watch. If it comes to a Superbowl between Dallas and Houston, I’ll just smile and be proud to live in Texas. For now, it’s great to have two games to watch on Sunday afternoon.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.

by 




























