Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Blake Griffin Slam Dunks: NBA Jam Style

The Morning After: A Rational Look At Yesterday, Eugene Wilson, & Frank Bush

After wins, I usually have done a write-up for the game's unsung hero, but this is not a glorious Monday morning. It's hard to immediately look at a loss rationally after your team completely lays an egg. The morning after? Well, that's the time to begin looking at the flaming pile of wreckage behind us and begin our turn towards the next Sunday.

Firstly, the Texans did what fans asked of them - they had a winning September. They won two out of three September games so there will be no scrambling to make up for a bad start. Yes, they completely sucked yesterday, but at least the loss came in a non-conference, non-division game. The Texans are 2-1 with Oakland next. Houston is where we had hoped thought it would be, so the sky is not falling right now.

Also, starting left tackle Duane Brown missing the game didn't hurt the offensive line too badly. Rashad Butler did an admirable job on Dallas OLB DeMarcus Ware. Yes, the stat sheet shows Ware with three sacks, but Texans QB Matt Schaub held onto the ball entirely too long thanks to good Dallas coverage. There's also the fact that the Texans matched TE Joel Dreessen on Ware at times - this led to one of the Ware sacks. Butler made some second level blocks and stuffed a few Ware spin moves. If anything, the Texans should've run more draw plays to the left to slow down Ware's rush, but hindsight is 20-20. All that said, Butler proved to be an adequate left tackle and should be fine through the next three games.

That said, silver linings, however slight, will only go so far when the game was filled with many disappointing performances. The post-game write up has pretty much everything that went wrong, and I think, despite the immediate post-game state of mind, it's still fairly accurate. There were a lot of execution errors, and the team just looked like it didn't care. However, I feel compelled to expand on two contributing factors to the loss. After the jump, the spotlight is on Eugene Wilson and Frank Bush (no, that doesn't mean the defense is solely to blame for the loss, but the offense isn't going to look that bad every week) because there are some things that need to be said.

Star-divide

The first area of discussion is our starting FS Eugene Wilson. The fact that Wilson is still starting is a complete joke. After three weeks, it is obvious that there is absolutely no logical reason for Eugene to be starting.

The young secondary needs his veteran presence? Not really. They have given up 1,106 passing yards in three games. It really can't be any worse. Plus, Gary Kubiak, in his reasoning over the release of Jacques Reeves, said that they were going young in the secondary so why is old, injury prone Eugene Wilson starting? It certainly isn't his on-field performance.

If you haven't seen his on-field performance then let's catch you up. Every week, Eugene misses three or four tackles, is late in providing help in the deep zone, drops an interception or two, gets fooled on play action, and gets beat deep because he's zombie slow...when his job is to be the deepest man on the field.  Seriously, this is what earns a multi-million dollar contract and starting spot? It's time for a change because the secondary is broken and needs a spark.

The Texans need to truly go young and give the faster, more athletic Troy Nolan a shot against Oakland. After three straight weeks of bad performances, it's time for the stone-handed zombie, otherwise known as Eugene Wilson, to hit the bench and stay there. Honestly, I'd rather cut Wilson because he's been that bad, but I'll settle for him sitting on the bench for the rest of the season. Is Nolan the answer? Who knows, but I know that Eugene Wilson isn't. He deserves to be benched.

Moving away from Wilson as wide receivers tend to do on Sundays, it's past time that defensive coordinator Frank Bush does something to plug the constantly exploited hole in his defense. Let me use a visual aid to show the Cover-2 Zone defense.

C2zdal_medium

You see those two yellow rings on that picture? The hole exists right between the cornerback's flat zone and safety's deep zone.  Indianapolis, Washington, and Dallas have all picked on those two holes in the scheme. It's not bad defensive play per se, but it's just a flaw in the scheme which can be exaggerated with smart play design to occupy the safeties and corners. Heck, let's see a play that could exploit that hole if a quarterback has time to throw.

C2zdalpl_medium

The Cover-2 Zone is defeated with the routes (in orange). The outside linebackers are delayed just enough by the go routes, one cornerback is pulled away by the running back to his flat zone, and I can hit the receiver who slips between the distracted safety and cornerback who thinks that safety has the receiver behind him. As long as the quarterback has time to throw, that receiver will be there all day - especially if the safeties and linebackers aren't reading the play or quarterback.

We've now seen three weeks of plays similar to this one. Three weeks of commentators talking about those holes in the zone. However, Frank doesn't change the look or disguise it in anyway. Frank just goes back to the same basic scheme with no adjustment as if the holes were a fluke.

These holes are nothing new as this was written about during the summer. Frank, the questions I ask you are - How can you be surprised that coordinators are finding and exploiting these holes? We know the holes are there and people are attacking them, so why aren't you doing something to exploit what we know about their gameplan? At the very least, why are there no adjustments to fill that hole which will force teams to change their own plan of attack?

Oakland is next, so hopefully the Texans can show up and act like a professional football team. Sound off with your tempered, rational observations from yesterday's game. Or rant and rave. Or rip the team's performance. Frankly, all are warranted after yesterday's game.

Comment 206 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I hate your visuals.

Because I can see ROY FRICKIN WILLIAMS taking advantage of those soft zones. ROY FRICKING WILLIAMS. But it’s not just him. Santana Moss did it too. And when that soft zone was covered, A TE would burn us deep.

Every year we have this issue. As bad and as young as our corners are, how do you expect them to grow when there’s no safety help up top. Our CB’s can’t be blamed for everything. When the ball is thrown in their zone, they usually make the tackle (minus that one mismatch of 5’9 McCain vs a 6’3 receiver). It’s obvious that Bush chooses to play zone so we can keep the receivers in front for short gains. But this logic doesn’t make sense when we’re going against a good o-line that can give the QB enough time to make the deep throw.

Im tired of seeing this highly talented team start a shit FS every season. Barber, The two gritty white guys that I don’t wanna bother remembering their name, Cant Cover Brown, Matt fucking Stevens. Enough is enough. Our weakness has been exposed for the past three weeks and other teams are just going to keep exploiting them. Im not too sure about spending a first rd pick on a safety but im done with drafting project safeties. We need a starting caliber FS by next season or we’re just going to keep running through the same problems.

"Fuck you motherfucker!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Sep 27, 2010 6:29 AM CDT reply actions  

If they're currently jobless

They probably aren’t upgrades.

A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com

by bigfatdrunk on Sep 27, 2010 7:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

I hope we're not one of those teams.

"Fuck you motherfucker!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Sep 27, 2010 7:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

i hope not too.

Ya’ll want some good news Glover quin still has not allowed a TD this year.

by southpaw70 on Sep 27, 2010 7:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

He will never allow any td's!

BEST CB IN FRANCHISE HISTORY

"Fuck you motherfucker!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Sep 27, 2010 7:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sure he did

The long TD to Collie at the end of the Colts game was on Quin. He had primary coverage in zone.

A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com

by bigfatdrunk on Sep 27, 2010 7:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

PSSSHHHHHH

We don’t talk about that. It was SHZ’s fault.

"Fuck you motherfucker!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Sep 27, 2010 7:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

Take your pick

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d81a76d04/Collie-73-yard-TD

I still think it’s Quin, though.

A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com

by bigfatdrunk on Sep 27, 2010 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

How many plays have you marked

“Hole in Zone” as the cover man?

Just curious.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Sep 27, 2010 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

Great now we have to deal with our own version of "global warming"...

…with the secondary getting “lit up” due to the “hole in zone” players… Opposing team’s possessions are getting longer and the overall average temperature of our secondary has risen by 10 degrees Fahrenheit weekly since the beginning of the season. While they are at the level of “toast” currently, at this rate of increase they should be able to melt titanium by week 17.

by DilloTex on Sep 27, 2010 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Too many.

For the most part I try and mark who probably had the coverage as part of the zone as the second defender.

I also mark too many players as “uncovered.”

by riversmccown on Sep 27, 2010 6:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's what I was afraid of.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Sep 28, 2010 1:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Now that I look at it again...

It’s both. Looks like McManis had the initial coverage on Collie and Quin is the one that comes diving across when Collie catches it. Maybe Quin had over the top coverage or maybe he was just trying to break on the ball when he saw it going that way? Not a scheme expert here, so I’m not sure if McManis was trying to release him to someone else or if he should have stayed with him the whole way.

by NWestTexan on Sep 27, 2010 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

It is a really well run route by Collie

Texans are in Cover3, with Pollard, Quin, & (I guess) Wilson all deep. The ball is thrown right when Collie hits the top of the sort zone and McManis breaks off. Then McManis reads the pass and starts chasing again. Quin sees the ball coming and breaks on it, just missing the INT, Pollard comes across the top.

But at the end of the day. You can’t stop a perfect throw and a perfectly run route when you show what your defense are doing so clearly. You can blame any of the three.

A Texas Wannabe, born and raised in New Zealand. Currently located 7539 miles South west of Houston.

by distant_texans_fan on Sep 27, 2010 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Matt Stevens says hello

in his wheelchair from the unemployment line.

"Fuck you motherfucker!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Sep 27, 2010 7:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nice, TDC

Eugene Wilson, I shall hereforth call you Shiz: Stone-Handed Zombie.

A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com

by bigfatdrunk on Sep 27, 2010 6:30 AM CDT reply actions  

Heh

It’s hard to NOT girlishly LOL in our old age :-)

A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com

by bigfatdrunk on Sep 27, 2010 7:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ha!

Don’t let that senior shuffle fool you! I still beat the other “near dead’s” to the checkout line on senior 10% off day!

by Xetuoh on Sep 27, 2010 7:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

At Denny's?

"Fuck you motherfucker!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Sep 27, 2010 7:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Does the smell of Denny's

make your tail waggle?

"Fuck you motherfucker!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Sep 27, 2010 7:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yup... I actually woke up for a moment...

… wagged tail…
… realized no Denny’s:
    - pancakes
    - sausage
    - bacon
    - egss
    … were in the offing…
… whined once…
… went back to sleep.

by DilloTex on Sep 27, 2010 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Denny's?

That’s “high end”! Mickey D’s kiddy meal or generic bargains on double coupon days at Krogers. Now your talking! [grin]

by Xetuoh on Sep 27, 2010 8:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Are you talking about the "Manager's Special"

rack of ribs and roasted chicken?

I haven’t had those in a while!

"Fuck you motherfucker!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Sep 27, 2010 8:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

MMMMMM, Mickey D's breakfast....

/ tail wags
/ realizes what a food hound he is
/ doesn’t care
/ wags again
/ goes back to sleep

by DilloTex on Sep 27, 2010 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

610 AM stat

Schaub is on “pace” for 58 sacks this year….

by Xetuoh on Sep 27, 2010 7:36 AM CDT reply actions  

That will probably slow down

Once he stops facing 3-4 defenses and the likes of Freeney, Mathis, Orakpo and Ware.

I'll eliminate you like I eliminate gluten from my diet.
www.battleredblog.com

by tehGrindCrusher on Sep 27, 2010 11:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nice TDC... excellent writeup...

One other issue that they MUST deal with is what to do about KJ or “Lil’ Toastie” as I like to call him. He had his part in making Roy Frikkin’ Williams look like an all-pro yesterday.

/foul mood continues

by DilloTex on Sep 27, 2010 7:36 AM CDT reply actions  

cushing and nolan

nolan does need to start he did great in preseason and with cushing coming back in two weeks the cover 2 will important guys

by fern25ji on Sep 27, 2010 8:30 AM CDT reply actions  

so is it Kareem or the Cover 2

or a bit of both?

living the Texas dream

by Joe25 on Sep 27, 2010 8:47 AM CDT reply actions  

The Cover 2

Kareem is just playing his zone

I would challenge you to a battle of wits, but you appear to be unarmed.

by The Night Owl on Sep 27, 2010 8:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's some of both

Kareem hasn’t gotten deep enough in his zone…especially when there’s no threat underneath. He’s not getting any help from the safeties, but if the WR settles into that intermediate hole in a cover 2 along the sidelines it’s very hard for the safety to get there in time.

Kareem and McCain were both beaten badly on man coverage yesterday as well. They also both struggled getting a jam on the WR when asked too. That alone could have knocked the rhythm of the play off and given the pass rush another beat or two to get in Tony’s face.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 9:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

Kareem

He may just being play his zone, but even I can stand there and miss tackles all day. Honestly it seems like every big play comes to him. I know he is just a rookie but he has looked AWFUL.

I will say that I don’t think we had enough pressure on Romo, but at least we held them under 400 passing yards…

Only one more game until we get Cushing back!!!

One more problem. I thought we had it fixed this year with an improved running game… but we still cant score on a 1st and Goal at the 1…. its costs us time and time again. I didn’t like the play call on 1st down either.

by forloveofthegam3 on Sep 27, 2010 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

Winston

Well Winston was defnitely our Alex Barron of the game.

by forloveofthegam3 on Sep 27, 2010 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

Karma

I live in Dallas (this week is gonna suck) and love taunting obnoxious Cowboy fans about Barron (Flozelle last season), at least Winston didn’t directly cost us the game.

by forloveofthegam3 on Sep 27, 2010 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

depends on how you look at it.

if he was not holding we woul have had another 4 chances at the 1.

by southpaw70 on Sep 27, 2010 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

But it shouldn't take 7 chances to score at the 1

Thats the problem. It should take 3 or less. We can’t count on the defense bailing us out and giving us 4 more downs. 1st and goal at the 1 has to be a TD everytime. If we cant score on the first 4 downs, what makes you think we can score on the next 4.

by forloveofthegam3 on Sep 27, 2010 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

If you add the 7 points from Winston's hold

and subtract the Dallas FG kicked after time was out – we’d talk about a different ballgame.

Of course, had JFK had the bubble-top on the Lincoln that day…..

"When's the last time your mother went fast?" DA

by CowboyH8ter on Sep 27, 2010 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

There are alot of Shoulda, Coulda, Wouldas in this game

But the truth is we fell on our sword. Refs mistakes…good teams win even if against em. And Poor playing by the D & O
always turns into a Loss.
We play again next week.
Cheers & Semper Fi

People need to stop insisting that society is taught through omission, instead of education. Removing an "offensive" program from TV does not put an end to vulgarity. Removing "sexy" posters from a store does not abolish indecency. Anything you're exposed to is your doing, because there is ample opprotunity to stop it.... Your TV has a remote, your radio has a station dial. GET OVER IT.

by SteelBlueUSMC on Sep 27, 2010 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

What Rivers said

It’s just really important to remember Jackson is a rookie, and rookie CBs rarely excel. That we’ve put him in this position is more a testament to our drafting/developmental failures than Jackson’s fault.

A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com

by bigfatdrunk on Sep 27, 2010 9:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

Even Revis

took what? 2, 3 seasons?

I am Sancho

by HoustonTransplant on Sep 27, 2010 10:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

it's technique.

toast isn’t getting a deep enough drop on his zone. if he extends it out another 2 or 3 yards, from the QB’s POV the reciever doesn’t look open.

"If i wasn't a gentleman, i'd punch you square in the mouth!!!!" - Arthur Spooner
http://www.twitter.com/chrisdogan

by chrisd21 on Sep 27, 2010 8:54 AM CDT reply actions  

What would you think about trading for Danieal Manning from the Bears?

He’s got speed, experience, a cheap contract, & younger depth behind him. Since Atogwe isn’t likely, why not go for this option?

I would challenge you to a battle of wits, but you appear to be unarmed.

by The Night Owl on Sep 27, 2010 8:57 AM CDT reply actions  

Football trades are rare

And the Bears are 2-0, so there’s no reason to make a deal like that.

A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com

by bigfatdrunk on Sep 27, 2010 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

I know, just wishful thinking

But the do have Major Wright as a rookie FS, so they might want to see what they have in him since Manning is on the last year of his deal, and if we offer them a good enough pick (3rd or 4th maybe), maybe they’ll bite

I would challenge you to a battle of wits, but you appear to be unarmed.

by The Night Owl on Sep 27, 2010 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

We've tried plenty of Man too

It’s been beaten just as badly, if not worse. They could adjust to a different zone, cover 3 maybe, but that will leave the middle fairly open. Several times on the cover 2 the corners just flat out didn’t execute. They tried to play a press technique, and the corners couldn’t even get their hands on the WR, much less an effective jam. Every scheme has weaknesses…right now we’re not even stopping the routes that should play right into the schemes strength.

I don’t disagree with anything you say here, It’s just getting harder and harder to blame Frank Bush when 4 of 5 DBs(including McCain) have just been plain bad…and I’m giving Quin the benefit of the doubt on that. The LB’s aren’t very good in coverage either. Wash, Dallas, and Indy all used a lot of quick throws so that the pass rush had no chance to get to the QB in many cases, so I don’t even know how much good blitzing would do. The fact that teams are throwing so many quick passes against us and we still can’t defend them is scary to me. The longer a DB has to stay in coverage the greater the chance of someone getting open. Guys wide open almost immediately after the snap is not something you can scheme away easily.

Does that mean Frank is doing a great job? Of course not. whether it be teaching the DB’s better technique, finding the scheme that works best with our personnel, or doing a better job of preparing them for what to expect from the opposition The defensive staff needs to do a better job. That being said, we are going to continue to have problems until the individual players begin to play better.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 8:58 AM CDT reply actions  

this.

plus at this point getting anyone new means at LEAST a 4 to 6 week learning curve with assignments, packages, etc. we’re back at square one. we gotta go with what we have.

"If i wasn't a gentleman, i'd punch you square in the mouth!!!!" - Arthur Spooner
http://www.twitter.com/chrisdogan

by chrisd21 on Sep 27, 2010 8:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Bears run the Cover 2/Tampa 2

So how hard would it be for D.Manning to adjust to that?

I would challenge you to a battle of wits, but you appear to be unarmed.

by The Night Owl on Sep 27, 2010 9:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

They tried to play a press technique, and the corners couldn’t even get their hands on the WR,

You noticed that too? That annoyed me to death. I saw Miles Austin open so many times because McCain kept trying to press him and bites on Austin’s double move. The sad part was, the FS was nowhere to be found.

You’re right about not everything should be played on Bush, a lot of these mistakes are on the players. But that’s what happens when you play with young CB’s and safeties that aren’t able to help out when needed.

And the Cover 3 idea, it’s not bad but I don’t think we have the right LB’s to play that scheme. Besides, the mere thought of it makes Frank Bush nervous.

"Fuck you motherfucker!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Sep 27, 2010 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agree

I see no way we can pull off a Cover 3 with our guys.

A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com

by bigfatdrunk on Sep 27, 2010 9:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

For reference purposes

I’m not advocating this at all, but I know we have some new people around that are trying to learn some of the terminology. Thought a Basic illustration of Cover 3 might help.

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

Actually I think this should be easier on the FS

In out current cover 2, The FS has to cover half of the field deep. In the cover three he only has to be responsible for a third of the field. I sukz at maths…but 1/2 is more than 1/3. You can also deploy this several different ways too. Maybe one corner stays in the flat to show a cover 2 look to that side, while the safeties shift over to that side and the other corner drops deep.

The big problem with this scheme is we would have 2 LBs covering the short middle of the field compared to the current 3 while relying on one LB and one safety to get out to the flats. We are getting beat over the middle with 3 players in the short middle zones…it would just get worse if we tried to cover the same area with 2.

I have seen us in what appeared to be a cover 3 before. I can’t think of a specific case this year though. I really only brought it up as an example though to show the point that every scheme has weakness and at some point the players have to execute and make plays to help cover those weaknesses.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know that Cushing is any better in coverage than Meco or Diles

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

better then diles had wat 4 int last year

how many has diles had here since he been here?

by southpaw70 on Sep 27, 2010 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

interceptions aren't always a good indicator of coverage abilities

If Wilson had any kind of hands at all he would have two picks this year and he has been terrible in coverage.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Might not but they can turn a game around.

I think we look into so much stuff but what about size. What i am saying is size matter in the game never really thought that until yesterday. Cowboys O-line is big and abused our D-line. Roy williams kicked our butts at corners. I think our size is hurting us right now.

by southpaw70 on Sep 27, 2010 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's part of the reason so many of us wanted a big NT

Okoye/Mitchell/Cody got moved off the ball with ease against the run on more than one occasion. Smith/Williams give us probably above average size at end. Quin and Jackson both have decent size for CBs.

My point on interceptions was that many times the guy with the interception isn’t the one who made the play happen. A lot of picks the result of someone else tipping the ball up in the air, or a WR just having once bounce of his hands. They can definitely change the game, but there’s a difference between getting an interception, and making one happen.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

I see what you saying.

They are going to have to figure it out soon.

by southpaw70 on Sep 27, 2010 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm still in the "Bush is not a good defensive coordinator" camp.

But you can’t make filet mignon out of a horse’s foot. This defense has, by my count, five players (Williams, Smith, Ryans, Pollard, Quin) that can be counted on to not shit themselves every week. Getting Cushing back will help, but it won’t solve everything.

by riversmccown on Sep 27, 2010 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm really not trying to defend Bush here

The fact is there have been plenty of good defenses built around a cover 2 zone, or even a cover 2 shell. If I felt like the players were executing what they were being asked to do I would be all over Bush, but I just don’t right now. There’s no way to know for sure without being in the film room and knowing the exact calls that were made, but it sure doesn’t look like the players are holding up there end of the deal.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

I have to agree.

can’t put this all on Bush people, players are the one to play the game. I kinda wish we could use bernard like pitt uses troy

by southpaw70 on Sep 27, 2010 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

In coverage

Bernard is part of the problem.

A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com

by bigfatdrunk on Sep 27, 2010 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Don't the Steelers (and maybe the Patriots) do that?

Build a Cover 1 or Cover 3 defense and let one playmaking safety go nuts doing whatever the hell he wants?

A Texas Wannabe, born and raised in New Zealand. Currently located 7539 miles South west of Houston.

by distant_texans_fan on Sep 27, 2010 4:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

It would be a steady stream of passes to the TE over the middle in the cover three

…that’s a little bit of my point though. There’s not a scheme you can draw up that doesn’t have weaknesses. it’s a matter of deciding which scheme fits your strengths well, and which scheme your players have the skill to minimize weaknesses.

Teams used to kill our cover 2 with the TE splitting the seam down the middle. Now they have been hammering that intermediate hole along the sidelines. Every team who runs a cover 2 zone has the exact same holes, and they still manage to not get completely shredded every week.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Except our team

A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com

by bigfatdrunk on Sep 27, 2010 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

I was about to say the exact same thing.

If other teams that run Cover 2 can minimize their mistakes, why can’t we?

I keep seeing the same mistakes we made last year. TE’s can still dominate the middle against us like Bennett did yesterday. And the more athletic TE’s keep burning us with that seam route like VD did last year and Cooley and Fred Davis did in week 2.

I don’t understand why it keeps happening.

It’s looking like our secondary is more dependent on our dline(duh!) than I thought. And if that’s the case, why aren’t we putting more emphasis on our dline play? I might’ve seen one or two plays where we ran stunts and it was semi successful. How can Frank Bush let this happen week in, week out? Which moves me throw out this weekly question: Why does Frank Bush still have a job?

"Fuck you motherfucker!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Sep 27, 2010 9:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

There's always a trade off

If we were to bring more pressure then we would have to trust the corners to be able to stop the quick,short routes. I’m not sure they can do that. Short of getting a player completely unblocked I don’t know that it’s possible to get there quick enough if the opposition has a competent QB to get rid of the ball quickly. Teams are already throwing a ton of very quick 3 and 5 steps drops at us.

i suppose giving up 80 yards on a slant might be a nice break from the usual. Sometimes you want to drink bleach, sometimes it’s nice to change things up and stab yourself in the eye.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

we all stuck on these certain kind of schemes and stuff.

cover 2 cover 3 etc etc. if you where a real Defensive coordinator you would come up with something new. I mean look at the jets and NE with that 1-5-5 i think B-more runs it too. If i was DC i would look at what i have and make something new up be different. yes i know i am going to get you don’t know shit speech but if team have been running the same D for years try something new. while im doing this i will be thinking of ways to do this.

by southpaw70 on Sep 27, 2010 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

There really isn't a whole lot that is truly new in football

Most of it has been tried before. The best you can really hope for is to add a new wrinkle. The spread that has taken college by storm and was considered “new” 10 years ago can be traced back to the 30’s. Baltimore’s formation (New England has done something similar as well) is really only different in that it has a bunch of guys standing up making it harder to identify primary rushers etc…but they are still running the same basic schemes we are talking about here out of it.

I’m not saying your an idiot at all. They need to try something. Personally, I don’t think much will change until the players themselves get better. Young guys like KJ, McCain, and GQ should get better, but at this point you have to worry about them completely losing confidence.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well first thanks for not calling me a idiot.

I think nothing will change either cuz they have been practicig the same stuff in and out all summer long. When will we see a corner blitz with K-jax i mean people ae losing faith in him and he needs to something. I like the kid and the way i see it all the corners we drafted all had good first season but either feel off or sucked next year, what if k-jax turns that around and not do good this year but for years to come will be great?

by southpaw70 on Sep 27, 2010 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Seriously, I get what you were saying and agree that they need to change something up

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

A little late to this....

but I started asking myself halfway through the second quarter why we weren’t moving the D-line around like we did against Indy? The three down D-lineman were down in their stances (and didn’t move) almost before Homo even got behind center….much less ready to take the snap.

Just my $.02
Even duct tape can't fix stupid

by txknight on Sep 28, 2010 6:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

**OFF TOPIC**

i gotta email my manager every monday with suggestions on how to improve the tailgating experience for everybody. so if you were out there yesterday, did you have any gripes? complaints? email me and let me know, and i’ll include all that information in my email that i gotta send to him. chrisdogan@hotmail.com

"If i wasn't a gentleman, i'd punch you square in the mouth!!!!" - Arthur Spooner
http://www.twitter.com/chrisdogan

by chrisd21 on Sep 27, 2010 9:43 AM CDT reply actions  

how to improve the tailgating experience for everybody

Win the damn game.

"Eff you mothereffer!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Sep 27, 2010 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

don't allow Cowboy fans on the premises

Seriously the only complaint I ever have about tailgating is that the guys directing traffic seem to be inconsistent. They often tell you two different things in regards to where you are supposed to go. At least three or four times a year, I have a parking lot attendant try to make me go in the opposite direction of where I’m trying get. I’m never there later than 8:30 at the absolute latest so it’s never been a major issue(I just go around or move a barrier myself if I have to), but we’ve been in more less the exact same spot since the beginning. It’s frustrating when someone tells me I have to go somewhere else, even if it all works out. It hasn’t been an issue this year though, but it has been in the past.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Look back at the first part of the game against the Colts

different alignments, zone blitzes, stand up ends…then Barwin went down and we have been much more vanilla since then. I saw at least one zone blitz yesterday, and Mario/Smith/Nading all stood up at different points. Still, it doesn’t seem like we have been doing as many different things, or at least doing them effectively, since Barwin went down.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 10:33 AM CDT reply actions  

We knew what to expect with the colts.

I wish oglyune whatever his name is will play. Get nading the fuck out, did anybody see denny play at all?

by southpaw70 on Sep 27, 2010 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

We probably knew what to expect with everyone.

Mike and Baby Shan? I figure we’d have some insight there – McNabb is a wild card but there are approximately 20 million hours of McNabb footage at this point.

The Cowboys? Didn’t we play them a couple of weeks ago? Was that vanilla crap true? I think not, I think that Dallas had to win this or their season was over. They wanted it a lot more.

I predict if we win 2 out of 3 plus one extra game the rest of the way, we will go to the playoffs.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Sep 27, 2010 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

True

i think they wanted it more and we just did not show up. Its funny cause i think somebody aske Demeco do you feel the hatred between these two teams and he said no he from Alabama. I think that is how all of them might have taken it cause not to many of them are from houston.

by southpaw70 on Sep 27, 2010 11:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not blaming this game on the refs.

I am in no way blaming this game on the refs… the Texans lost this game. But I’m curious what everyone thinks about the two big missed calls (IMO).

  1. - The halftime field goal with the play clock well expired.
  1. - The 3rd and 4 False Start called Offsides penalty late in the game. (Next play TD)

by forloveofthegam3 on Sep 27, 2010 11:09 AM CDT reply actions  

I was fuming at both these calls.

It was obvious that the halftime fg should have not counted since the play clock expired a whole second prior to the snap, which leads me to believe none of the zebras were really paying attention and were just ready to go get there halftime tea.
The False start was just a missed call… the replay shows that he flinched dragging smith and williams off the line, but i thought that is what the side line refs were for to watch the line… oh well.

I am tattooing a picture of Jacobi Jones to my Mannschaft, Because it loves to go deep and always does a dance in the end...zone!
Go Texans!

by Taco Joe on Sep 27, 2010 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

I hate the rule sometimes

…but they could have called the blow to the head of the QB thing on the Schaub sack near the goal line.

Also did they ever get it right on the kick off with 18 fouls? There was a holding call that should have been enforced against the cowboys DURING the play. The two personal fouls were AFTER the play and should have, and did, offset. As I understand things the holding against the Cowboys should have been marked off. The ref announced that the holding call would offset which made no sense, but since he was already so flustered and tripping over his own tongue who knows if that’s what he meant to say. They could have spotted it correctly though because they went to commercial immediately after that, and by that point I had lost all sense of where the ball should have been.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agree with everything everyone has said above.

However, if you’re winning 27-3, you don’t have to worry about the refs.

The Texans need to take care of business on the field.

"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."

What happens when an unstoppable force meets three defensive players? THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpWqMqrZwTU

by TexansForever on Sep 27, 2010 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Absolutely

That was just the first NFL game in a long time that the refs seemed somewhat incompetent to me. We did that to ourselves yesterday and the refs came in about 3,497, 561st on the list of things that caused us to lose yesterday.

All in all I think the refs in the NFL do a great job. There are always a call or two that I might disagree with, but I can usually see why they would call it the other way. NFL probably has the best refereeing of any major sports league. That’s part of the reason things stuck out yesterday because their just seemed to be so many basic things missed by the refs. It went both ways. KJ should have had a Pass interference, we got a way with a couple of very obvious blocks in the back.

The only major complaint I have with NFL officials week to week is holding…but they are pretty consistent with that in that they call it very loosely. It makes it frustrating when one goes against you at a key time, but it is usually called the same way.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

According to the box score, yes.

4-N.Rackers kicks 73 yards from HST 30 to DAL -3. 27-A.Owusu-Ansah to DAL 30 for 33 yards (34-D.Barber). Penalty on DAL-52-L.Williams, Unnecessary Roughness, offsetting. Penalty on HST-57-K.Bentley, Unnecessary Roughness, offsetting. Penalty on DAL-91-L.Ladouceur, Offensive Holding, offsetting, enforced at DAL 26.

by riversmccown on Sep 27, 2010 6:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not to mention

the personal foul on Brookings when he nearly to AJ’s head off. They only called PI on that play.

by Jahon on Sep 27, 2010 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

But in retrospect

he will most likely b fined for that.

I am tattooing a picture of Jacobi Jones to my Mannschaft, Because it loves to go deep and always does a dance in the end...zone!
Go Texans!

by Taco Joe on Sep 27, 2010 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

Player fines?

Aren’t player fines a tax right off, because they go to a charity?

by Jahon on Sep 27, 2010 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

probably...

maybe a one game suspension would be in order as well

I am tattooing a picture of Jacobi Jones to my Mannschaft, Because it loves to go deep and always does a dance in the end...zone!
Go Texans!

by Taco Joe on Sep 27, 2010 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

In the interest of pointing out the complete lack of skill on the part of the officials

Did you see the one where KJ (?) tackled the receiver streaking down left side at the goal line… before the ball actually got there? \laughs

by NWestTexan on Sep 27, 2010 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yah that was an interesting one

I think if he had not caught it they might have called pass interference, but because he caught they just saw he was out of bounds. He was hit way too soon.

by forloveofthegam3 on Sep 27, 2010 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm sure Dallas would gladly give back both those calls

In return for the Kareem Jackson “not pass interference” deep ball on Dez Bryant.

by riversmccown on Sep 27, 2010 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agree

With the NFL Ticket and an addiction to NFL football, I have seen a lot of bad calls all around the league. This is very nitpicky, but on Schaub’s last INT at the end of the game, Dallas had a 12th man at the top of the tv screen who did not get off the field. It would have had no bearing on the game obviously, so I guess the refs were in cruise control. Just sayin’.

by Huele on Sep 27, 2010 8:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

and just like last year

We got absolutely destroyed on delayed hand-offs and draws. Every other variety of running we play well, but aggressiveness and overpursuit just killed us on draws. Embarrassing – you’d think Bush would’ve done something about it over the offseason. Excuse me, I thought for a second we had a competent coordinator.

by cubic on Sep 27, 2010 11:09 AM CDT reply actions  

Problem is we have to play zone because our seondary blow.

That means you can’t stack the line because you need your linebackers in coverage. We blitzed what, 2 times on Sunday?

Unless things change we will remain the same Texans from last year. We will beat bad teams and lose to decent teams.

The Colts win was impressive, but if we played them 3 games into the season instead of first, my guess is they have their act together and win.

The offense cannot carry this team week in and week out, we saw that yesterday. The defense has to show up, and until that happens, we are unlikely to make the playoffs.

"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."

What happens when an unstoppable force meets three defensive players? THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpWqMqrZwTU

by TexansForever on Sep 27, 2010 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know

the Colts had a difficult time w/ denver yesterday. their secondary gave up enough yards to Orton that orton had more passing yards than Elway ever did in a game.

I am tattooing a picture of Jacobi Jones to my Mannschaft, Because it loves to go deep and always does a dance in the end...zone!
Go Texans!

by Taco Joe on Sep 27, 2010 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

Looks like Molden is back

so with that said you put him in over brice on nickel? Brice got speed we know but to get done like he did on that td was sad, did not even put a hand on him.

by southpaw70 on Sep 27, 2010 11:18 AM CDT reply actions  

I'd like to see Molden play some FS if Nolan doesn't get a shot

anyone must be better than SHZ, except for the collection of white boys we tried at FS

I would challenge you to a battle of wits, but you appear to be unarmed.

by The Night Owl on Sep 27, 2010 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

like I said, if Nolan doesn't get a shot

or fails badly when he does, which I hope doesn’t happen

I would challenge you to a battle of wits, but you appear to be unarmed.

by The Night Owl on Sep 27, 2010 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

Noal barely cracked a 4.6 at the combine.

As long as our CBs (read: Kareem) doesn’t drop back deep enough in his zone, that ain’t gonna cut it. He’ll be later than Eugene Wilson.

by Nashmeister on Sep 27, 2010 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

What?

Damn I’m groggy. Noal = Nolan. Not quite sure how that’s even possible.

by Nashmeister on Sep 27, 2010 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

But he shouldn't have to run people down, just keep everyone in front of him

And catch everything that hits him in the hands. And I’m pretty sure nobody can be later than mr. “no-show” wilson.

by NWestTexan on Sep 27, 2010 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

A couple things...

Your graphs showing the cover2 aren’t entirely accurate. Don’t get me wrong, you’re right in that the weakness of the zone is in the areas between zones, but the gaps aren’t near as large as depicted in the pics and CBs in the cover 2 don’t exclusively sit in their zone.

In the cover2, CBs will line up within 5 yards of the WR and when they come off the ball will try to force them inside off the snap through “jamming” or other means… Their first responsibility after that is containment, if there is a run or pass in the flat developing it’s their responsibility to force the play inside… After that they cover the void where-ever it may be. If a reciever passes through their zone and no one else is entering, they shadow said reciever untill he is picked up by the next zone.

Because of that, it’s not one route that “beats” the cover2 zone, but a combination of routes that forces recievers to be released before the second defender picks him up. Any zone coverage has that same weakness…

Besides that, our cornerbacks don’t have the speed and range to play the cover3 or man, which has been my biggest gripe with our corners… We have no scheme versatility at all and are almost forced into playing the cover2.

by Bryan72076 on Sep 27, 2010 11:19 AM CDT reply actions  

Also

The route you showed on the left sideline… When I played reciever in H.S. we ran a west coast offense so as a reciever we ran the full route tree in practice, i’ve never seen anything like that. To me it looks like a corner route where the reciever was forced inside by the corner before turning outside, in which case he’d be way behind the pass from the QB…. I’m not saying it’s not an actual route, just in all my years of playing and watching football, i’ve never seen a corner route off a slant like that, it calls for a pretty severe cut that would probably slow you down at least 50% off the break, which would seem to make it fairly easy to defend especially since you’re running the slant the corner is likely behind your outside shoulder so if he jumped the route he’d be in better position to make the catch than the reciever.

by Bryan72076 on Sep 27, 2010 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's probably

Just a case of not seeing it in a more simplified H.S. version of the west coast offense.., it just looks wierd to me is all… it’s like a comeback route ran at a diagonal across the field…

by Bryan72076 on Sep 27, 2010 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's MS Paint

It’s hard to do things in scale with it. As for the play, I merely took a play off “NCAA Football 10.”Hard to get exact and there are 100s of plays you could use, but I just took a simple one.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 27, 2010 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

That makes sense

I’ve seen corner routes much to the same effect, but they’ve had 2 seperate cuts… it’s hard to cut more than 45 degrees without seriously slowing down your momentum and “baby stepping” the cut, and not only is this a sharper angle but it also calls for a reversal of momentum… I know if I tried to do that at full speed i’d roll an ankle for sure…. or worse i’d lose balance and roll head over feet and make a fool of myself.

by Bryan72076 on Sep 27, 2010 5:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

We ran a similar route in the pre-season with Jacoby

Basically it’s just slant/post corner route kind of thing. Looks a little a wierd, but I knew what he was going for.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jesus, it's a simple illustration meant to show the basic coverage responsibilities of the basic scheme

Are you that desperate to impress people with your high school career? (that sounded snarky when I re-read this before posting. Don’t take that seriously)

Your right about the combination of routes. That’s where the corners have struggled in some cases in that they didn’t even need to be attacked by a route combination because they failed to shadow the WR even when their wasn’t another threat to their zone.

CB’s can line up in a variety of ways and still run the Cover 2. They can play an off technique. press coverage right along the line. Depending on what the coaches/gameplan call for they might play with inside leverage or out side leverage. What you describe is probably the best example of the base version, but there’s more than one way to skin a cat.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jesus would never run a cover 2.

I'll eliminate you like I eliminate gluten from my diet.
www.battleredblog.com

by tehGrindCrusher on Sep 28, 2010 6:19 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Late Response

Because I was trying to come up with a clever comeback. I have naught (except for some jibberish about drafting better and making them grow their hair out – a la Samson – so that they wouldn’t get thrown around by ol’ Roy) and at this point too much time has gone by for it to be humorous any way. For that, sir, you are rec’d.

by NWestTexan on Sep 30, 2010 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with NWest Texan

I’m not Jesus, and i’m not really trying to impress anyone either. I read the article and had an opinion so posted it…, one that you seem to have mostly agreed with as well…

by Bryan72076 on Sep 27, 2010 4:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thus the reason for the don't take it seriously part

I did agree with most of what you said. I was just giving you a hard time for being what I perceived as a little anal about the accuracy of quick, down and dirty diagram.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 5:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Eugene Wilson......wtf.....

And is it commentary on Troy Nolan, or Gary Kubiak, that Nolan is not replacing him?

"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."

What happens when an unstoppable force meets three defensive players? THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpWqMqrZwTU

by TexansForever on Sep 27, 2010 11:30 AM CDT reply actions  

With as bad as Wilson has played

It makes me think the coaching staff has no faith whatsoever in Nolan.

by Bryan72076 on Sep 27, 2010 11:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Which makes no sense

He seemed to play ok during preseason, and they didn’t bother to go out and add any other safety depth this offseason, which only made sense in the context that they must still really like Nolan.

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 27, 2010 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe Nolan....

is in the doghouse for some reason. It seems like with this coaching staff, once someone gets in the doghouse, their wayyyyyy in the doghouse. As in the very back of the doghouse where you can’t even see their paws.

Just my $.02
Even duct tape can't fix stupid

by txknight on Sep 28, 2010 6:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

The good news is the Raiders game shouldn't be a trap game eh?

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 27, 2010 11:41 AM CDT reply actions  

I'm more worried about their track team

If Galloway can burn our defense, think what these guys can do if they learned how to catch

I would challenge you to a battle of wits, but you appear to be unarmed.

by The Night Owl on Sep 27, 2010 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes well

Gradkowski and Campbell still have to get blocks, throw the ball accurately, and then the recievers have to actually catch the ball. Not to be a douche, but this is the raiders we are talking about.

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 27, 2010 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

I know, it's just the closet Raider fan in me that's taunting me

I would challenge you to a battle of wits, but you appear to be unarmed.

by The Night Owl on Sep 27, 2010 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

True.

I was watching the replay of their game against Arizona and it looked like Oakland had some kind of defense.

Just my $.02
Even duct tape can't fix stupid

by txknight on Sep 28, 2010 6:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe...

Bad news is the Raiders QB isn’t sipping lean anymore… ;)

Good news is Heyward-Bey can’t catch…

by forloveofthegam3 on Sep 27, 2010 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

Bad news is I hear he getting better

I would challenge you to a battle of wits, but you appear to be unarmed.

by The Night Owl on Sep 27, 2010 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Again the closet Raider fan is yelling is my head

those two catches will be deep ones for TDs

Not that I agree with him, but it’s getting deafening

I would challenge you to a battle of wits, but you appear to be unarmed.

by The Night Owl on Sep 27, 2010 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

It probably won't be a roflstomp like last year

but I think we come out fired up and the players win the game regardless of Bush’s moronism.

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 27, 2010 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

We have shown we can stop a running game

If all they can do is run the ball, I think we will be fine since I see us hangung a good 24+ on them.

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 27, 2010 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agree

McFadden is on my fantasy team… and will probably be sitting on the bench this week.

by forloveofthegam3 on Sep 27, 2010 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

If Seabass keeps shanking it

like Kris Brown, then we have nothing to worry about.

"Eff you mothereffer!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Sep 27, 2010 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

BTW

did you enjoy the sight of The Chargers failing?

"Eff you mothereffer!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Sep 27, 2010 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Seattle's home field advantage is ridiculous

If only Reliant could be that way…

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 27, 2010 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Their stadium was rockin.

I’ve seen reliant like that on Battle Red Days, but it needs to be an every home game thing for us.

"Eff you mothereffer!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Sep 27, 2010 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Who didn't?

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 27, 2010 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dan Fouts.

I think. Actually, im not sure. Since he was being very unbiased.

"Eff you mothereffer!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Sep 27, 2010 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Foster needs more carreiz

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 27, 2010 11:46 AM CDT reply actions  

^this

At one point during the game i remember seeing the stat 10 carries 73 yds… once we got in the red zone they stacked the box and blitzed like hell and Foster couldn’t get anything.

On a side note Brooking’s untouched sack I kept thinking, Why didn’t foster bump him at least. his passing route went right by him and Brooking was able to fly in to hit schaub.

I am tattooing a picture of Jacobi Jones to my Mannschaft, Because it loves to go deep and always does a dance in the end...zone!
Go Texans!

by Taco Joe on Sep 27, 2010 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

yes he does.

kinda hard to give more carries when you behind though.

by southpaw70 on Sep 27, 2010 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

The game was still close enough to run the ball into the third quarter

I thought we should have ran the ball more early.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

I would really like to win the next 3 games

our remaining schedule after that still looks like it could be tough. I guess the Jags don’t look very good and the Chargers have been up and down, but the Jets Titans Colts and Eagles and Ravens still look pretty tough.

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 27, 2010 12:02 PM CDT reply actions  

Although tbh

I’m not that scared of the jets, that pass defense still doesn’t seem very scary.

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 27, 2010 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

lack of playaction

was it just me, or did we go away from our bread-and-butter that is the play action fake? I know they were watching for it, but Foster was obviously running the ball well enough it would’ve worked more than just the 1 or 2 times I saw it used. 1 time (iirc) resulted in the long int in which Dre tripped on his own feet (ankle?), the other that I vividly remember, resulted in OD taking the ball to the 1 and almost rumbling into the endzone.

by darkmagician on Sep 27, 2010 12:52 PM CDT reply actions  

i hate

to open up this armchair GM “can of worms” but…if the Raiders continue to suck and just completely enter “rebuilding” mode…would it be out of the question for the Texans to offer our next year’s 1st rounder and 4th rounder along w/ Amobi for the beast that is Namdi Asomugha?? I typically don’t bring up propesterous trade ideas, but Amobi is becoming irrelevant to our team’s success, and we are in WIN NOW mode, so that 1st rounder next year if exchanged for the best cover corner in the game on a terrible team seems almost too good to be true. Shouldn’t Rick Smith atleast be ringing up Al Davis’s dungeon of doom and inquring about Asomugha’s availability??

oh, and Texans fans were horrible yesterday…sure we lost. But at the very least stay til the end and boo the Cowboys to the streets. Damn, we’re pathetic.

by wiseonekms on Sep 27, 2010 1:02 PM CDT reply actions  

Yes it would be out of the question

His contract sucks complete ass.

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 27, 2010 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

and that is a ton to give up in a trade for a player with a shitty contract

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 27, 2010 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

plus,

he’s got 2 years left on his deal, and if there were ANY way of restructuring the guaranteed money, shouldn’t we at least venture an inquiry on his availabilty in the near future?

by wiseonekms on Sep 27, 2010 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

but....does it really matter?

while it may suck, I’ve convinced myself that we’re not resigning Owen Daniels, and I think it’s about time we got some consistency in the secondary. I KNOW his contract sux….but damn, even if we overpay, he’s worth it.

by wiseonekms on Sep 27, 2010 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Is it worth it

if we can’t extend Williams and Schuab? Of course it matters when there is a salary cap.

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 27, 2010 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

right

but considering we’ll be trading away our 1st pick, Amobi and not signing Owen (and if we could restructure the guaranteed money…he’s got 2 years on his contract) I wouldn’t be adverse to it. Ya, but…we do gotta give Schaub and Mario their payday…damn. i wish oakland didn’t inflate his contract….

by wiseonekms on Sep 27, 2010 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

It would be a bad trade

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 27, 2010 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Okoye may not be who we hoped he would be, but that doesn't mean he's irrelvant

I saw plenty of things to criticize him on yesterday, but that goes for the whole team. I thought he did a nice job on a couple of runs and was getting a good push on Mario’s sack/intentional grounding. I saw him get a little pressure another time or two as well even though Romo got the pass off. I can’t say that about any of our other DT’s yesterday.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

texans fans leaving

I agree, I was seriously disappointed when they were showing the stands at the end and it was nearing empty except for a handful of Cowboys jerseys. I was hoping for a TD after that onside simply to make all those people feel like they were missing a great comeback

by darkmagician on Sep 27, 2010 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hideous

I am glad you are not the GM of the Texans!

#1. Asomugha is making crazy coin that the idiotic Raiders gave him. He is not taking a paycut to come to Houston. We let go of a corner if you remember in Dunta Robinson. what makes you think we would throw all of that money into one player? Makes no sense.

  1. One corner does not solve the ills of the secondary. We need a safety who can cover. Pollard is also not getting any younger, so add another safety to the mix. With the pass happy Colts and NFL in general, three top notch corners are the way to go.
  1. Depending on where we finish, the Raiders would be looking at a very low 1st round pick. Do they get marketedly better with the 25th or 27th player in the draft? Especially if they are suppossedly giving up the best player in the league as you say? And how are the Texans better by dumping Amobi? Now they must use a pick for a safety AND another defensive lineman, but you’ve just traded away two picks. No sense.

Amobi Okoye is a decent defensive lineman. He is improving. In this ridiculous scheme, he does not have an opportunity to succeed or at least play to his abilities. He is a quick guy who relies on speed. He needs activity around him. He cannot muscle people and swallow up blocks. He’s not that type of player. But Frank Bush continues to go with a four man front the majority of the time and Okoye can’t do it alone.

by CoachDent on Sep 27, 2010 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just to clarify

Dunta saved us from ourselves. We offered him big money (Not Asomugha money but still). He turned us down. After watching him one more year Rick Smith smartly decided to let him go because he wasn’t any good either.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

2-1 against passing teams?

I was just thinking… It seems like all 3 teams we have played have been more pass happy teams… Considering how bad our passing defense is I think its quite impressive that we came out on top winning 2 of 3. The question is what will happen when we encounter a Jones-Drew or Chris Johnson this season… Hopefully not what Chris Johnson did to us last season.

by forloveofthegam3 on Sep 27, 2010 1:43 PM CDT reply actions  

Rec'd for the first post and the quality post there

Agree with what was said……Frank Bush isn’t making the adjustments, isn’t playing to the strength of his players/match-ups, and really needs to put on his thinking cap.

Changes need to be seen on Sunday. The Raiders can sneak up on a team, but then we have the pass-happy Giants right after.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 27, 2010 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Frank Bush cont...

I was actually impressed that Bush has employed some 3-4 fronts this year. I wrote about it on my houston Chronicle blog. He showed some very aggressive blitzes out of that front. He brought Pollard on a few blitzes and I saw DeMeco Ryans coming on a delayed blitz on one occassion. Then game time rolls around and it doesn’t happen.

I do think…nay PRAY…that when Cushing comes back, you will see a more aggressive defense and Bush will feel more likely to bring pressure. We have definite cover issues at linebacker as the Redskins showed with Cooley. But that falls upon Bush as well. If you have linebackers who can’t cover and who don’t have speed, then you blitz them! Send them after the QB so they don’t have to cover people in space or matchup. High school crap really.

by CoachDent on Sep 27, 2010 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

We have definite cover issues at linebacker as the Redskins showed with Cooley

But thats nothing new. We have always had those issues. cough Vernon Davis cough

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 27, 2010 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

yep I made a comment during the Colts game that as soon as Barwin went down we seemed to simplify things quite a bit

I don’t know if it’s because Barwin was that big a part of the plan this year, or they just decided to go with a keep’em in front of you mentality after getting in fron of the Colts, but it seems to me the defense has gotten even more basic than even some of what we saw pre-season. When we have blitzed it has been ineffective. If our LB doesn’t come completely free they are just stopped dead in their tracks.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nice Post

The scheme may be simple because the secondary is so freaking young. I think Bush needs to challenge his boys this week b/c Oakland isn’t a gimmie by any means. Heyward-Bey, Murphy, and Miller aren’t pushovers. Oakland can sling it now.

Nolan or Barber better be starting this season. Wilson’s attempt to come up lame on the Williams TD was a cop out. He’s probably fine.

"There's two kinds of coaches, them that's fired and them that's gonna be fired." ~ Bum Phillips

by H-town Fanatic on Sep 27, 2010 4:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Who is saying vanilla now?

Yep Frank Bush was vanilla defense. I guess safeties and corners can never blitz in his defense. If the did blitz I missed it. What I saw was:

1. lackadaisical defense – D line was barely there – corners were as usual.
2. No bump in the bump and run. – If KJ had bumped Williams instead of chased him – no completion. It was a touch and chase.
3. I think the offensive playcalling was done with one of those spinner things – spin it for the next play – no matter the situation.
4. where the heck was Walter? – Not blaming him, he was hardly on the field on passing plays until the game was out of hand. I am convinced there were more 2 receiver only plays than I have ever seen any team run in a game.

"I want you guys to pair up in groups of three and then line up in a circle." - Bill Peterson former Oilers Coach

by Barryfromtexas on Sep 28, 2010 12:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

We can't blitz because we have to drop our linebackers into coverage because our secondary sucks.

We can’t defend the pass because we can’t blitz and pressure the quarterback into making quick throws.

It’s a vicious cycle that doesn’t end until you stop trying to be everything (Cover2 ) and start focusing on what you CAN do.

Our front seven CAN bring pressure. Relying on the front four to do it game in and game out is suicide. How many 4 man front in the NFL dominate offensive lines on a regular basis? NOT MANY and NOT OURS.

We need to shift to a blitzing defense. Yes you will get burned sometimes, but you will also create opportunities through turnovers and three and outs.

Frank Bush needs to get aggressive or get out.

"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."

What happens when an unstoppable force meets three defensive players? THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpWqMqrZwTU

by TexansForever on Sep 27, 2010 2:24 PM CDT reply actions  

CoachDent hit the nail on the head

Our scheme is a joke. I KNOW that zones have flaws and that a good QB can find gaps in coverage and exploit them, but that is not what I am seeing. I see wide open reciever after wide open reciever. When a WR runs a short stop route we have him completely surrounded… with a 5-8 yd cushion. When we blitz we only send one or two guys and they just get picked up with ease. Basically we are playing scared. The DBs are scared of getting beat so they drop too deep in their zones, The cornes dont trust the safeties help (bc they shouldnt) so the flats are wide open, the LBs dont trust the secondary so they drop too deep leaving the short middle and the coach doesnt trust the secondary so he rarely send an all out blitz. We play scared and it is not gonna last. We make NOTHING happen on the defensive side of the ball, no INTS, no Sacks, hellw e barely even hurry most guys. Its very frustrating and as a offensive strong team the one thing that messes with us the most is BLITZES AND CONFUSION from the defense we face. Why cant we understand that and use it? No excuses for our secondary but if given enough time… every WR and TE can GET open.

by theSpaceCityKid on Sep 27, 2010 2:28 PM CDT reply actions  

Judging by his answer to a question about the safeties

I think Kubiak doesn’t realize Eugene Wilson exists.

Question: You’ve talked about the cornerbacks, but what about the safeties – especially Eugene?

Answer: Well, I think we get the typical lunch-pail effort from Bernard…….and Gary remains focused on Bernard the entire question.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 27, 2010 3:39 PM CDT reply actions  

And Eugene does get a mention.....in the injury part of the conference

Eugene’s day-to-day with a hamstring injury. Durga……

Could this be Troy Nolan’s chance?

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 27, 2010 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

I generally try not to fall into the back up QB trap

I think there are probably more cases where a back up is the back up for a reason, than there are cases where the back up will be a significant upgrade over the starter. Even in cases where a back up came in and excels doesn’t mean there weren’t reasons he was still the back up or that the decision should have been made sooner.

I have been intrigued by Nolan since we drafted and would be curious to see him on the field. I know conventional wisdom might point to “He can’t be any worse”, but that’s ignoring that Matt Stevens existed. It is possible for things to get worse. If he gets his shot I hope he makes me cry tears of joy at the sight of a real honest to goodness free safety. Until then I will continue hoping for Wilson to not suck as much. Wilson has taken an almost Greenwood like tumble in his level of play. He’s gone from just OK to horrid.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

I know Nolan isn't the savior....

I just know Wilson seems to be done. Maybe he could slide down, somewhere, to a SS role, but he’s just not good at all.

Nolan, at least pre-season wise, was making plays. He made tackles, put himself in good places, and showed good instincts. To me, it’s worth seeing what Nolan really is especially since Wilson has shown nothing…and if we want change then something needs to change.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 27, 2010 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

I just think that taking action with a “we have to do SOMETHING” mentality often has similar results to whatever happens after “here, hold my beer”. It’s probably worth giving Nolan a shot. I would love to see it happen. Without seeing him everyday throughout camp and in practice and sitting through meetings with him to know if he has a grasp of what he’s supposed to be doing it’s hard to say for sure if it’s really even an option.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

That could be Kubiak speek for Eugene sucks

He doesn’t like to call out a player publicly unless he has too to motivate them. The fact that he completely ignored Eugene could be his way of avoiding having to say bad things about him…or it could mean absolutely nothing and Gary was just giving his standard talk without saying anything answer(which I have no problem with).

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's how I saw it.

“inconsistent’ is a Kubiak keyword for “sucked”.

by riversmccown on Sep 27, 2010 6:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jackson needs help...

and we all know this. Wilson is not the help Jackson needs. Nolan and Barber can’t do any worse IMO and the only reason Wilson remained the starter on Thursday was because of his forced fumble hit on Collie in the Colts game and the improved play late in the Redskins game. At this juncture, Bush has the plug on Wilson and try someone else. That 64 yarder Williams had yesterday was initially on Jackson, but that is only a 13 yard gain if Wilson was positioned correctly.

This pass defense is embarassing and the return of Brian Cushing isn’t going to make it improve dramtically. Bush makes a change or Rick Smith needs to make a change.

"There's two kinds of coaches, them that's fired and them that's gonna be fired." ~ Bum Phillips

by H-town Fanatic on Sep 27, 2010 4:25 PM CDT reply actions  

Good catch there. According to Kubes.....

That play on Jackson (the burn play)….Dallas changed the play. He said you can see them run-blocking, but Romo and Williams called a hot route because of the bad positioning of the safeties……Jackson got beat (wasn’t expecting help) and that’s all she wrote.

Lesson of the story……bad safety play makes Jackson look worse.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 27, 2010 4:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wait Jackson wasn't expecting help on that play?

Or am I reading that wrong. How does the safety play make him look worse if he wasn’t expecting help?

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Sep 27, 2010 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Kubiak’s quote wasn’t the easiest to interpret. It seemed the Texans were expecting run (hence why Jackson wasn’t expecting help). However, again Kubiakspeak, Romo and Roy saw the safeties cheat run/get in a bad position so they hot routed the play and changed from run to pass (Kubiak says the proof was how the play was blocked that they called a run play). The play was then Roy making the catch and TD…….all because the safeties (Kubiak didn’t specify which one) weren’t in the right position. The safeties helped make Kareem look worse….

Could Kareem have made a play? Sure. Did he look bad? Sure. However, if the safeties are in their spots then it doesn’t happen.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 27, 2010 5:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sigh.

Why oh why is Eugene Wilson ever cheating on a run or biting on a play-fake? He’s not going to make the tackle anyways. As long as we have bad CBs, he absolutely has to be behind them on every play.

I think I’m just going to hold off on Texans-related media for the next week, because I’m beyond confused as to how a player could be on the field nearly every play, and still manage to contribute so little. Whether it’s his own doing, or a product of the scheme, we might as well be playing with ten men on defense.

by Nashmeister on Sep 27, 2010 9:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Forget making a play

He’s a free safety, so I’m told, so his first job is: Play the pass.

Boggles the freakin’ mind. Hope his hamstring doesn’t improve this week.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 27, 2010 11:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

aggggg

wilson drops a pick every game i must say nolan pretty much a ballhawk if you look at his highlights hoping kub makes a desicion. no need to panic tho i think where good lets see how much cushing helps in coverage when he comes back

by irephou on Sep 27, 2010 10:40 PM CDT reply actions  

clay matthews

if your watching this monday night game bear vs packers once cushing comes back thats just how he would look plus he can drop into coverage what yall think

by irephou on Sep 27, 2010 10:43 PM CDT reply actions  

Reality check Texan Ball Club

texanTool
September 28th, 2010 at 9:44 pm

Reailty Check after 3 games

Overall in only 3 game the Texans DEAD-FENSE gave up 1,106 yds by air thanks to the infamous, lousy, overrated, OVERPAID, PATHETIC DEAD-FENSE backs , dead last in the NFL ranking! Let it be known they are Quin, Macain, Wilson, Pollard and finally the all time greatness #1 pick K. Jackson, OVERRATED, OVERPAID,and way way under achiever! After game! reaction is ok!
After game 2! Reaction- huh the defense???? ok we won, a nail biter,..bitter-sweet feeling on defense! Game 3 the Texas Superbowl only ONCE in 4 years! the DEAD-FENSE again shown the true color again, again, and again! The OFF-fense did their part too, but largely because the DEAD-FENSE can’t stop anybody. They did however managed to fell down, and fell asleep through 3 games! At home, sold out crowds, the Texans pay good money for it, in the worst recession of the time,…and that’s the kind of show they (texans)put on for their beloved FANS!PATHETIC X 100 to the tenth power! The game was not even close, NEVER HAD A CHANCE TO WIN IT! Cuz,…DEAD-fense was superb DEAD!And largely, thanks to MIGHTY, FAST,GIFTED, TALENTED #1 K Jaskson & his DB pals!NO MORE EXCUSE WHATEVER! We’ll see what happen at Oakland Rapers!

Another area of deeply concern, is that Matt QB, is being 11 sacks in 3 games!All offense coachs should take the blame of this mess! Starting with coah KUBIAK, Dennison, Benton, Pollack. If ya all can’t coach well after all this time,update ya resume, move out of the way so some else can coach sucucessfully! There are plenty of prosperts of decent coahes out there! Ya all are making ton of moneys, the dream job that not everyone get the same chances like ya all! It’s quite simple,…whenever we face a top notch defense (that’s a real DEFENSE not like the Texans DEAD-fense!) First, Design a three steps drop or quick release to the receivers/tight ends/backs,…etc.…we should have a ton of those plays handy, read to go,…that’s will take the pressure of the quarter (who isn’t moblie at all,,what kind of Athlete is that anyway, can’t enough run a few yards for the 1st down, hey Matt ,but you play ball all ya life. you will never ever be great QB if ,you can’t use them feets from time to time,…and that’s the fact! Matt ! Second, the Texan have a great RUNNING & PASSING game, why not sure both? You don’t have to be a NASA Rocket scientist to know that,…coah Kubi! Run the DAMMN Ball about 25-33 times a game until the enemy give up. What’s wrong with you,..coah Kubi, you always wanted the ground game,..now that you have A. Foster,…he been superb in all 3 games and then you just barely use him,..how PATHETIC is that. What’s a waste of time, effort, good forture, moneys, and talents on your behave! Last, all great coaches are RECREATIVE, KNOW HOW TO ADAPT QUICKLY ACCORDANCE TO THE GAME, and take SMART CHANCES to change to momentum to their favor,….A prime example right now is,…coah PEYON New Orlearn SAINTS for ref. check out the latest SUPERBOWLS, I rest on case! The Cowdungs ain’t that great, really…you coaches got outplayed and outcoaches at CRUNK TIME by the coach Philip , staffs and company! Man up or else History will repeat itself, if we refuse to learn from it!

by TexanTool on Sep 29, 2010 2:00 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your big-time home for big-time analysis and big-time rants about all things Houston Texan.

Hate Mail Goes Here

Brb_small Tim

Absurdly Talented Writers

Lucy_small bigfatdrunk

Tumblr_l2ecwbvekp1qbhedwo1_500_small MDC

Vlcsnap-00003_small riversmccown

Tumblr_l4i6iruxha1qbs5d3o1_400_small TexansDC

Chairman_meow_blink_small UprootedTexan

Absurdly Talented Writers, Part Deux

Photo_small Vega

Alec-baldwin-glengarry-glen-ross-always-be-closing_small tehGrindCrusher