Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Raiders' GM Begins The Purge

Leaching Snaps: What Formations Should The Texans Run Most Often?

After watching the preseason and charting all of the minutes up through the Dallas game, I've come to a conclusion that basically anyone could have just watching the games:  This team has a lot of damn weapons. Assuming Owen Daniels comes back healthy, the Texans can go four deep at both wide receiver and tight end with either established threats or players who have shown that they could use an expanded role.

On the other side of the ranch, fullback Vonta Leach is coming off a noticeably poor year blocking. The Texans tried to bring in competition for him in camp via Justin Griffith, only to watch Griffith hurt himself before they even got to a preseason game. Leach won the job because of the two sweetest words in the English language: de-fault.

So on the surface, it seems like the confluence of these two factors would mean that the Texans would spend less time in the trusty I-Formation. For the non-football savvy, the I-Formation essentially means that there are two backs in the backfield (for example, Leach and Foster) lined up together. There is a basic I, which has them in a straight line, and the Offset I, which has Leach split off to the side rather than lined up right behind the quarterback. The Texans last season adapted to their lack of a run game, but actually spent a LOT of time in the I-Formation anyway. According to Football Outsiders, they ran with a single running back just 50% of the time, which was 25th in the league. Yet, they also ran out of the I-Formation just 55%, good for 24th in the league. 

Basically, because of the poor effectiveness of the run game, the Texans threw a lot more out of the I-Formation last season. What that led to is a lot of snaps being wasted on a fullback (Leach) who brings nothing to the table in the passing game, particularly when he is not blocking well like last year. I'll go more in-depth behind the cut, but try to answer the poll question before you go there. What formation do you want the Texans to run most of their plays out of this year?

Star-divide

Obviously, the first question that pops in my mind when we're talking about formations is the effective plays. By which I of course mean: the play-action pass. The play-action pass has been the Texans biggest gainer for the entirety of the Kubiak era, and a majority of the biggest gains we've had over the past two seasons have been the direct result of an incredible play-action fake. 

The Texans used play-action just about two-thirds of the time out of the I-Formation last season. That's a stat that seems to back the continued use of Mr. Leach. If you break down the data even further, you'll find that the ten longest play-action passes the Texans threw, seven of them came out of the I and three of them came out of the single-back, which is about on par with what you'd expect given the split. While it's certainly a comfort zone thing for Kubiak, I don't actually think the numbers bear out that the play-action loses effectiveness for the Texans when they ditch the I-Formation. 

Now of course, the Texans were also a bit limited last season by the rash of injuries at tight end. No such excuses for that this year, as they should have Daniels, Joel Dreessen, James Casey, and Garrett Graham ready to go for Week One. If Kubiak and Dennison are still hell-bent on running with a second person in the backfield, they can always run with two tight ends and have one of them go into motion behind the line. Or even, perhaps, use Dreessen (the best blocker) as a pure H-Back, as the Texans did in some shotgun snaps last season.

I'm extremely interested to see what kinds of formations and personnel mixes the Texans use this season. On paper, they should have a very versatile offense. The only player that doesn't fit is Leach. Nothing personal, Vonta; you just weren't born for the passing age. Get your 2007 form back and I'd be happy to see you get some more snaps and give the offense even MORE versatility. 

But as it stands right now, Leach is the weakest and most one-dimensional player in the Texans offense. And I'm really hoping he's spending a lot more of the season on the sidelines waiting for the goal line unit to be called to duty. 

I like both the idea of more two-tight end sets and more three-wide sets, but I'd like to see the Texans run three-wide most. If they can force nickel backs onto the field, they should have an advantage blocking-wise with how good Kevin Walter is at it and how big and physical Andre Johnson and Jakespeare are. Add Dreessen to the mix and you've got four blockers who should be able to beat their men, and we all know that this offensive line is going to need every little bit of help it can get. I won't even get into the delicious possibilities of Johnson, Walter, Jacoby Jones, and Owen Daniels on the route tree, but that is a scary offensive set for any defense. 

But that's just one man's opinion. What formation do you most want to see and why?

Poll
Which formation should the Texans run the most plays out of given their current personnel?
The I-Formation
28 votes
Single back, two tight ends
116 votes
Single back, three wide receivers
192 votes
Other/TE joke
36 votes

372 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 63 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

but but but

Leach is a stud at the ol’ FB pass

by killtacular on Sep 7, 2010 9:11 AM CDT reply actions  

*sigh*

Yeah, I think the breakdown in Leach’s game has been coming for a while. We’ve been asking him to do two things: run block and catch the vaunted Vonta Swing Pass © (sic). He’s been unable to do those things, especially last year. And with only three more lifetime carries than me, it’s not like he’ll be able to help in the run game.

Walter is a fantastic blocker for a WR, and if we can keep three WRs out there along with one of our athletic TEs, defenses will be forced into at least their nickel packages, making them a bit smaller. With the huge Foster, this could be a large advantage.

A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com

by bigfatdrunk on Sep 7, 2010 10:10 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

^This

Well said. Spread the defense, make them replace a LB with a nickel CB (other than when we play SF, as Willis covers all WRs at once), and let Foster’s weightspeed carry the day.

"MDC: Droppin' knowledge like a librarian with Parkinson's." --Jonathan Loesche

by MDC on Sep 7, 2010 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Yes, this is ideal

Supposedly the ZBS is supposed to be able to go to the second level anyways, isn’t it? Kinda negates the need for a FB. I think that is the question at hand in this thread. Let me go a little deeper into the whole ZBS thing and feel free to correct me if I make a fool of myself. The ZBS is supposed to create a seam; a hole if you will, that is supposed to open up just as the RB gets there and that RB is supposed to make his decision to go there instantaneously as it opens. This is ideal. What do you need a FB for? Isn’t there a good chance he is just getting in the way? The hole opens and then the FB moves in and isn’t he more likely to just get in the way than open the hole anymore and provide a brief window for the RB to shoot through? I feel there is some logic to this point of view. Tell me I am off base.

I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?

by Rip Jersey on Sep 7, 2010 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

you aren't entirely off base

but realize that the FB will sometimes be utilized to block in other places and in other fashions

by Cut Block on Sep 7, 2010 1:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

I see

You put the © where the™ should be. Again.

by grungedave on Sep 7, 2010 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

I did?

Oops.

Tee hee <— Al Bundy

A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com

by bigfatdrunk on Sep 7, 2010 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Purely accidental.

Purely.

BWAHAHAHAAHAHAH!!!

A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com

by bigfatdrunk on Sep 7, 2010 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Married With Children

references/pictures will always get a rec’d for me.

by Jordann on Sep 8, 2010 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Four touchdowns in a single game. FTW!

Q: If losses by fewer than 7 points are 3 times more likely than blowout losses to cause Tim to get blindingly drunk, do you take the over or the under on the number of Scott appearances as 3.5?

TexansDC: False. You can’t get drunk from Coors Light.

by LoneSpot on Sep 8, 2010 4:00 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I always get a good laugh out of passes to Leach.. I have the image of him running along the line of scrimmage and getting tackled for no gain burned into my mind.

by Toolshed1 on Sep 7, 2010 10:17 AM CDT reply actions  

Texans I Formation....

now that i got my TE joke out of way since i already voted for that.

I believe the Texans are going to either live in a three Wide set, or a Two TD set… whether they run Singleback, or shotgun it doesn’t matter. But when teams see u with Matt Schaub and the top Receiving corps in the League, on the field it is a scary site. I say top receiving corps because Manning can make an average WR/TE look amazing. Our guys are just all around good.

"Your mother is a hamster and your father smells of elderberries! Now Go away or I shall taunt you a second time!"
Go Texans!

by Taco Joe on Sep 7, 2010 10:43 AM CDT reply actions  

good THEY’RE GREAAAT!!!

"Your mother is a hamster and your father smells of elderberries! Now Go away or I shall taunt you a second time!"
Go Texans!

by Taco Joe on Sep 7, 2010 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

Two TD set??!!

yeah, lets go for that one. If we can find a formation to score two TD’s out of on one play, then obviously it is the one to have.

But in my opinion, the reason for our awesome passing game last year, was the play action pass. which shouldn’t have worked, but it did. So I think we do more of the same and force people to stop the run, so teh Schaub can pass over their heads.

A Texas Wannabe, born and raised in New Zealand. Currently located 7539 miles South west of Houston.

by distant_texans_fan on Sep 7, 2010 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

the 3 reciever set...

is most deadly. you have AJ, OD, JJ , KW and arian all on the field at the same time. you gotta respect the deep threat (AJ and JJ) as well as the middle OD (when healthy) as well as the bubble screen, or a draw play.

"And Richie... you're still blocked on twitter." - David Anderson
http://www.twitter.com/doobieman21

by chrisd21 on Sep 7, 2010 11:29 AM CDT reply actions  

reminds me of MJD's Smorgasbord (ret. 2007)

MJD used to write about LT2’s FB (Lorenzo Neal) much the same way we write about Leach… and his inner monologue every time Neal got the ball was hilarious.

Of course, these days I think Vonta’s inner reaction when he sees the swing pass thrown his way is much like ours: “oh, shit!”

by grungedave on Sep 7, 2010 11:39 AM CDT reply actions  

To be fair

It may just be because I’m jaded to the pain of the swing pass, but Kubiak seemed to use it less last year. Because who needs the swing pass when you have Chris Brown, noted NFL QB.

by JimboTexan on Sep 7, 2010 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

The idea of Walter or JJ against a nickel back

and any of our many TE against a LB at the same time, gives me wood. So you can guess which one I voted for.

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 7, 2010 11:48 AM CDT reply actions  

Math

Am I the only one trying to add these numbers to make 105%, even though I’m pretty sure they are from 2 different categories (total plays & run plays)?

According to Football Outsiders, they ran with a single running back just 50% of the time, which was 25th in the league. Yet, they also ran out of the I-Formation just 55%, good for 24th in the league.

If the Treasury Secretary doesn't have to pay taxes, then why do I?

by Shake on Sep 7, 2010 12:19 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Math is hard.

Was on my way down the list to post the exact same observation

Q: If losses by fewer than 7 points are 3 times more likely than blowout losses to cause Tim to get blindingly drunk, do you take the over or the under on the number of Scott appearances as 3.5?

TexansDC: False. You can’t get drunk from Coors Light.

by LoneSpot on Sep 7, 2010 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

me

three

"I'm trying to get a feel for Booty" - GK

by texanphil on Sep 7, 2010 7:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Count me four.

Maybe we’re just that good?

by Jordann on Sep 8, 2010 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

You should get 100% twice.

Single back – Run play = 50%. Single back – Pass play = 50% Total 100%
I-Formation – Run play = 55%. I-Formation – Pass play = 45% Total 100%
                                                                                                           Grand Total 200% (lol)

A Texas Wannabe, born and raised in New Zealand. Currently located 7539 miles South west of Houston.

by distant_texans_fan on Sep 7, 2010 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Damn Rivers, and his Confucious phrasing of things

If the Treasury Secretary doesn't have to pay taxes, then why do I?

by Shake on Sep 7, 2010 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'd love to see the Texans go three wide

Like you said – AJ, KW, OD, and Jakespeare on the field together is a scary prospect for opposing teams.

by cubic on Sep 7, 2010 12:26 PM CDT reply actions  

How about 3-WR, 2-TE sets?

Andre, Walter, Jacoby, Daniels, and Thor (or Dreessen if you want the extra blocker).

The mix-and-match combinations with our personnel should really give defensive coordinators nightmares….there’s just so much this team can do.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 7, 2010 12:28 PM CDT reply actions  

3 TE

2 WR. Oh yeah baby. Hell we could probably throw out a competent 4 TE offense. That would be highlarious in the end zone.

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 7, 2010 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Its just so frustrating

if we could throw the damn fade route we would be a billion times better in the red zone.

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 7, 2010 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rec'd 1000 times

Q: If losses by fewer than 7 points are 3 times more likely than blowout losses to cause Tim to get blindingly drunk, do you take the over or the under on the number of Scott appearances as 3.5?

TexansDC: False. You can’t get drunk from Coors Light.

by LoneSpot on Sep 7, 2010 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

I really like this

really I do!!!!

Doin stuff so nasty that you have to do it twice to confirm the level of nasty!!

by TEXSON on Sep 7, 2010 9:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Then run the QB Draw...

Orlousy would be great for this… Rosencopter part 2!!! Ha Ha Ha!!!

Doin stuff so nasty that you have to do it twice to confirm the level of nasty!!

by TEXSON on Sep 7, 2010 9:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Conversations with self FTW!

Q: If losses by fewer than 7 points are 3 times more likely than blowout losses to cause Tim to get blindingly drunk, do you take the over or the under on the number of Scott appearances as 3.5?

TexansDC: False. You can’t get drunk from Coors Light.

by LoneSpot on Sep 8, 2010 9:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

Neither am I...

especially since the play action is such a huge part of the pass attack, but…could anyone cover those 5 at the same time if the Texans threw it out for a play or two to catch people off-guard?

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 7, 2010 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes.

See: Every red zone possession we had last year.

by riversmccown on Sep 7, 2010 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Their playcalling is more the fault than anything

It’s either run, run, run, or pass, pass, HB pass, or just disjointed confusion. I’d love to see them run that Play-Action Bootleg more often in the red zone out of a 2 TE set.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 7, 2010 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

We could run

Last year…? I had no idea. I just assumed we would be passing every play we actually wanted to gain yards.

by JimboTexan on Sep 7, 2010 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

We still ran a lot

Just to make the LB’s do their job.

A Texas Wannabe, born and raised in New Zealand. Currently located 7539 miles South west of Houston.

by distant_texans_fan on Sep 7, 2010 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm all for the offense that....

doesn’t get schaub killed. Whatever offense that is we need to run it at least 60 percent of the time. The less amount of hits schaub takes the better. And if we could run one with 11 te’s we would have try it at least once. The defense won’t know what hit them.

Feeling the five stages of grief since 2002.

by NoSafetiesNeeded on Sep 7, 2010 3:02 PM CDT reply actions  

I'm not in favor

of running an offense that will get Schaub killed 40% of the time.

"I'm trying to get a feel for Booty" - GK

by texanphil on Sep 7, 2010 8:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

It seems like we should be able to get a better fullback

I think the Jets had a rookie who was cut, who apparently was nicknamed the terminator or something because he hits so hard.

It's hard bein whimpy

by WhimpyJimmy on Sep 7, 2010 4:02 PM CDT reply actions  

They cut Richardson

not Conner, unless I’m remembering it wrong.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 7, 2010 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Cut the Fullback

How about no I formation and run a 2 back formation with Slaton and Foster.

by DPar on Sep 7, 2010 6:25 PM CDT reply actions  

Why not keep the fullback

And run the wishbone….

A Texas Wannabe, born and raised in New Zealand. Currently located 7539 miles South west of Houston.

by distant_texans_fan on Sep 7, 2010 6:34 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I miss the wishbone

A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com

by bigfatdrunk on Sep 7, 2010 7:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Texas Succeeds!!!

Or run the anexation of Puerto Rico < Little Giants

Doin stuff so nasty that you have to do it twice to confirm the level of nasty!!

by TEXSON on Sep 7, 2010 9:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rec'd

If the Treasury Secretary doesn't have to pay taxes, then why do I?

by Shake on Sep 7, 2010 7:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Its a passing league

and we have a potent offense without the threat of a balanced attack (see 2009).

I want at least 3 WRs on the field at all times. 4 or 5 when we get in the red zone. TE jokes aside, I would love 3 TE sets in the red zone.

"I'm trying to get a feel for Booty" - GK

by texanphil on Sep 7, 2010 8:22 PM CDT reply actions  

OD & JD in a Double-TE set

with Casey as the FB

That could be fun.

If the Treasury Secretary doesn't have to pay taxes, then why do I?

by Shake on Sep 7, 2010 8:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

It sure would be fun

And you could move Casey around too. Start him at TE, move into FB or vice versa.

A Texas Wannabe, born and raised in New Zealand. Currently located 7539 miles South west of Houston.

by distant_texans_fan on Sep 7, 2010 10:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

What te jokes?

Those were serious possibilities of how utilize the 2000 te’s that we have on the roster.

Feeling the five stages of grief since 2002.

by NoSafetiesNeeded on Sep 8, 2010 8:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'd like to see more 2TE sets

But I think we’re going to see a lot of I-formation anyway even if Vonta keeps regressing. It seems like the staple of Kubiak’s offense. Foster has great vision and is pretty successful running between the tackles.

I would be pretty excited if we ran a 4WR single back set with OD as the 4th WR. If that doesn’t spread the defense, I don’t know what else can.

by Jordann on Sep 8, 2010 1:59 PM CDT reply actions  

Red Zone Offense Sucks

Why is it between the 20’s, the Texans have a track meet…Then in the red zone they have an east-west offense…we never attack the end zone!…Is just me or what….we have the best WR(and he is tall) in the NFL and we can not throw the fade….an interference call get a 1&goal at the one…..someone help me out here….The game against the “Boys” illustrates my point in the 1st half…..who makes those red zone calls…Koobs?…the OC…..Now that we have a N-S RB…lets use him…..we need TD’s…not FG’s…..FG’s are sloppy seconds for the most part…unless it’s a GW at the end or OT

by flitemedic on Sep 8, 2010 2:26 PM CDT reply actions  

These questions

are right up there with:
“What’s the sound of one hand clapping?”
“If a trees falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it, did it really make a sound?”
“Why buy the cow when you get the sex for free?”

"MDC: Droppin' knowledge like a librarian with Parkinson's." --Jonathan Loesche

by MDC on Sep 9, 2010 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your big-time home for big-time analysis and big-time rants about all things Houston Texan.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Imgres_small
AFC South Eternal Thread #219: I love 80085
Heehaw_small
Google Ad Blocker  FTW
Heehaw_small
Said, Weekly Caption Contest Winner, Winner
Bugs-maroon_small
Thanksgiving in January

Recent FanPosts

Img00136-20110130-0953_small
Some Important Dates This Offseason
Small
Play the Draft
Obama-they-live_small
Dallas fan crying about his treatment in houston!
Charlie_small
Would you trade...
Johns_small
If I'm Rick Smith
Tah_lion_3_700_dpi_small
So the reason I didn't see a post announcing that JJ Watt won DROY
Title_pic_small
The Houston Texans Breakup Letter
Obama-they-live_small
Ramblings of a Central American
Yates_small
Texans' 2012 Salary Cap Situation

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Hate Mail Goes Here

Brb_small Tim

Absurdly Talented Writers

Lucy_small bigfatdrunk

Screwdriver_small MDC

Vlcsnap-00003_small riversmccown

Tumblr_l4i6iruxha1qbs5d3o1_400_small TexansDC

Chairman_meow_blink_small UprootedTexan

Absurdly Talented Writers, Part Deux

Copy_of_homer_simpson_small Vega

Alec-baldwin-glengarry-glen-ross-always-be-closing_small tehGrindCrusher