What I'd Like To See: Run, Draw, Screen
Every week this season, I'm going to attempt to play the role of alcohol-fueled blogger strategist and focus in on a match-up or area that I believe will be key for the success of your Houston Texans on Sunday (or those rare Thursday and Monday games).
For Week One, I would like to see Arian Foster, his back-ups, and the offensive line take over and dominate the Colts defense. Why are the running backs key to this game? The answers are just a JUMP away...
Luckily, the Texans have the talent to run that kind of offense. Arian Foster is a bigger running back who attacks the hole hard and fast with his impressive weightspeed. He averaged six yards per carry in the pre-season, and a similar effort could control the game and make the play-action pass more deadly than it was in 2009. As for screen passes, Steve Slaton may not be the Slaton of old, but he is still the ideal running back for the screen given how well he can move in space. Of course, all of this is useless without an offensive line.
With Kasey Studdard being replaced by Wade Smith and Antoine Caldwell being more experienced, the offensive line is definitely stronger than last season. In this game, the Texans offensive line should also have a strength advantage as they outweigh the starting Colts defensive line by 25 pounds, averaged according to official roster pages. This weight advantage should help on the initial push at the first level. While some BRBers criticize the line, there can be no denying that these offensive linemen block on the move as well as anyone else in the league. If you combine that fact with the fact that those speedy Tampa-2 linebackers traditionally play a tad bit deeper than normal LBs, you'll arrive at the conclusion where running right between the tackles, using the draw play, and throwing screen passes would be very effective calls because the Texans should get into the second and third levels for big gains until the Colts are forced to adjust from their scheme. If the Texans can execute with the backs, then the Indy defense could be slowed down, run over, and worn out (especially if the roof is open to allow that wondrous Texas humidity in).
Let's not forget the advantage that a ball-control, running back-heavy offensive gameplan gives the defense. Yes, Peyton Manning can score a touchdown on any given play, but how many times have you seen him impatiently pacing on the sideline when an opposing offense is playing ball-control offense? He gets impatient because his offense isn't allowed to really get into a rhythm or control the pace of the game. As far as I'm concerned, an impatient Manning is better than a comfortable Manning. Given the youth on the Texan defense, the best Houston defense against Peyton Manning is to minimize his opportunities on the field.
If the Texans are smart, we'll see Foster run against the smaller defensive line with Slaton screens on the outside. The running back heavy gameplan is what I'd like to see the Texans do on offense to attack the Colts and control the game. How about you, faithful BRBers? What do you want to see?
70 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Is it a good thing when 5 o line men only out weigh 4 d line men by 25 pounds? Or am I missing something this early in the morning?
Otherwise, nice post and I agree with you.
Miss-placed Houstonian living and going to school in the wilderness of Wyoming.
jeez how dickish you are...
Winning season... Check. Higher expectation bar... big Check.
by BattleRedHusker on Sep 8, 2010 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions
technially there could be 6o-line if you put in a tightend.
so thats not that good i think. anyways i knew what you meant and i really think we should run at them the whole game. I cannot name one linbacker on their team.
he means take their four linemen and get an average and our five linemen and get an average. our average manweight is 25lbs heavier.
by big daddy texan#1 on Sep 8, 2010 7:26 AM CDT reply actions
But does that mean that our average weightspeed is less?
A Texas Wannabe, born and raised in New Zealand. Currently located 7539 miles South west of Houston.
by distant_texans_fan on Sep 8, 2010 5:06 PM CDT up reply actions
Great Plan
The Problem is this. Every Team in the League has been using this same Gameplan with the Colts for the last what 7 years? And What is the Colts Record in that time?
"Of all the things I have lost , I miss my mind the most-Random T-shirt
"There is a fine line between Genius and Insanity"-Unknown Author
by I draft the Cowboys!!!! on Sep 8, 2010 8:15 AM CDT reply actions
NOT A PROBLEM
no other team has ANDRE JOHNSON to play action pass to.
exactly!
our offensive threats are for real
not for pretend
Andre Johnson is just one of MANY tools we are waiting to unleash on the Colts.
i have a feeling that they are thinking the same thing when the look at our young secondary :/
Winning season... Check. Higher expectation bar... big Check.
by BattleRedHusker on Sep 8, 2010 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions
Love this statement had to make it my sig, if you dont mind :-)
"Our offensive threats are for REAL...not pretend"-BattleRedFan
by RedDutch on Sep 8, 2010 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
LOL
not a problem
=) thanks for telling me you made it your sig
I actually like your improvements to the comment.
The problem is
most teams want to run, but they are forced to get away from it because they don’t score touchdowns and try to catch up.
"Lord, beer me strength."
I want Schaub to throw about 15-20 times.
I want Foster to rush for 150 yards, I pray Dennison just stuffs the fucking ball down their throats. I am talking 25 touches for Foster and 15-20 for Slaton.
keep Peyton off the field?
I’m all for it. He’s his most lethal when he’s got his hurry up offense on the field taunting corners into thinking that they’re doing a good job then
WHAM! a down
BZZZT! a touchdown
and we’re left wondering how we lost the lead . . .
yes keep him off the field . I think we can pull it off this year.
Allow me to go against the conventional wisdom
I don’t think the “keep Manning off the field as much as possible” strategy does anything.
For one thing, when Manning runs the hurry-up offense, it absolutely slaughters the Texans. They are never prepared for it. I’m not sure if that holds up against other teams, but pretty much every time he goes into the actual hurryup, he slaughters us. Dunta Robinson preens hello.
Secondly, as weird as it is to find myself on the side of Frank Bush, I think you allow the underneath stuff and try to either sack him, get a penalty, or a turnover. That means the defense will be on the field for awhile, and that means you are going to give up some long drives. Hopefully, some of those drives end before they reach the end zone because the Texans get the Colts in an unfavorable down/distance.
Third, the offense should be doing whatever it can to optimize it’s yards and points, not optimize the time they hold the ball. The Colts have had the best offense in football for aeons, nothing is going to change that. Admit to yourselves you have to score as much as you can, and act as such.
And honestly, if I’m game planning…I want a surprise onsides kick at least once. That offense is probably going to score most of the time anyway, you might as well take a stab at getting a defacto turnover from them.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter | SB Nation Houston | Battle Red Blog
Colts fan here
I still think the Texans lose this one, but I think you’re on the right track. Colts have a more difficult time defending against a Colts-style attack.
"We ARE going to our own private island, Chris: it's called the State Fucking Fair!"
by naptown_ninja on Sep 8, 2010 8:53 AM CDT up reply actions
There are a few facts that you have twisted around in order to make your point
The Colts have not been the best offense for aeons. First of all, you made up that word. Second, the Tom Brady led Patriots have surpassed the Colts in more than one season in offensive production, setting records along the way. You make the Colts sound like they are the team of the decade. They only have one Super Bowl victory to show for it, and more than one other team has multiple Super Bowl championships this decade…so they can be beaten. But your main point, just stop them, is very valid. It doesn’t have to be a 3 and out. But it has to be part of the game plan to pressure until they break.
There is no one way to beat the Colts, may I point out. It will have to be culmination of favorable outcomes that propels the Texans past the Colts. They need to win the turnover battle. They need to excel in the areas where they are hoping to excel, such as the running game, not over-pursuing on defense, rookies playing like veterans, key plays at key times, no injuries to key personnel, no coaching lapses, and playing hard until the final whistle.
And, I like your last mention of a surprise onside kick. Something like that, that has been practiced and perfected would be a good addition to the game plan. Although, an onside kick scares me a little if not used at the right time. A move like that needs to be executed to perfection, otherwise you are giving the Manning-led Colts a big advantage.
I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?
hmmm 4 solid quarters . . .
yep we’ll have to hope we do put together 4 of them back to back in one game against the Colts .. I’ve never seen the Texans put together 60 minutes of solid game that I recall.
Hopefully this will be our first
by BattleRedFan on Sep 8, 2010 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Disappointingly Troll-esque Response, Rip
First of all, anyone who disputes that the Manning-Colts offense is one of the all-time great ones in NFL history is just trolling. Secondly, yeah, the Pats have beat them a few years, and the Pats have had a better offensive season in a few years. What does that have to do with my main point? Nothing.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter | SB Nation Houston | Battle Red Blog
Um...OK???
Reading between the lines I feel like he was saying they are and have not been the best offense for Aeons. Also, they were 16th in yards, 11th in pts. scored last year. Of course they were 28th in Time of possession, so there goes the keep Payton off the field theory!
Shit!
Does any one know voo doo?
It takes a big man to walk away, but a bigger man to break his freaking jaw!
by USMC_Texas on Sep 8, 2010 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Right, and the full season of points scored and yards gained means a lot to a team that played 14 games and then let Curtis Painter out on the world.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter | SB Nation Houston | Battle Red Blog
Actually, I am on crack.
The Colts were way better… I was looking at preseason per game average and not regular season. They were 4th in both categories during that 14 game time span.
It takes a big man to walk away, but a bigger man to break his freaking jaw!
Are you being sensitive today?
Where does it say I have to agree with everything you say?
I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?
You're right about one thing....
the Texans need to score 7.
There’s a reason why the Colts can mask their run defense and pin their ears back for sacks…..teams don’t score. If you can score then you can run the ball to your heart’s content.
Can someone attack the defense differently? Yes, but I looked at it from a scheme point of view.
"Lord, beer me strength."
by TexansDC on Sep 8, 2010 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
The BIG play
Over the top on Sanders and Bethea to AJ or JJ….or KW!
I think it can be done. I think those three WRs are capable of juking them and getting clear. And, I think Schaub is capable of making the throw. That is the play I am looking for early in the game to give the Texans the lead and momentum. Then I see the Texans frustrating the Colts the rest of the game by pounding the rock very effectively and playing inspired defense.
I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?
The first series or two will be key.
After that, Bob Sanders will go out with an injury and things should open up.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
What happens when an unstoppable force meets three defensive players? THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpWqMqrZwTU
by TexansForever on Sep 8, 2010 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
Beat the Colts
Last year we outplayed them twice, but lost both games.
We out gameplanned them, outplayed them, outmanned them, etc.
Its all mental for us v. them. Hopefully there’s enough new guys and pissed off vets so we can finally turn the f-in page against that team from Indy.
"I'm trying to get a feel for Booty" - GK
I.. LOVE.. OPENING.. KICKOFF.. WEEKEND..
I found this site a few years ago and its a pretty cool/interesting supplement for NFL and NCAA games. The website is basically a simulation engine and they simulate weekly matchups 10,001 times for NFL and NCAA games. With that being said, they simulated the Texans/Colts matchup and we [Houston] won 63% of the time with an average score of 25-21… Below is a link to the game stats.. It looks like the game is going to be pass-heavy and Rackers is going to have to make some FG’s.
Houston dominates Indy LINK
I tend to agree with Rivers
Our game plan in the first game worked as well as could be expected. I think we should go with kind of a rope-a-dope style on defense, and if that means giving up tons of yards to Dallas Clark underneath in 6-yard increments in the middle of the park because we’re taking away Reggie Wayne deep, then I’m all for it.
Defensively, I’d like to see us take advantage of what appears to be a brittle Colts O-line, specifically Saturday, who is cleared to play but has been banged up. I believe that pressure up the middle on Manning is infinitely better than pressure from the edges, which Manning can dodge simply by stepping forward in the pocket. I’d like to see quite a few stunts that bring Mario inside. Amobi Okoye, this is your time to shine.
So, on defense, I think we should be fairly vanilla in the secondary but kinda crazy on the line.
On offense, we should be fine.
I'll eliminate you like I eliminate gluten from my diet.
www.battleredblog.com
by tehGrindCrusher on Sep 8, 2010 10:49 AM CDT reply actions
I almost made this post about the DTs versus the Colts interior line
but then Arian Foster looked too good in the pre-season for him not to be the focus.
If you told me that Foster runs for (at least) 125 yards on Sunday, I think the Texans win.
"Lord, beer me strength."
He will run for 124.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
What happens when an unstoppable force meets three defensive players? THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpWqMqrZwTU
by TexansForever on Sep 8, 2010 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions
I thought I was the only one who didn't cry themselves to sleep about that first half
where Clarke gained 500 yards. If they don’t score, who teh fuck cares?
Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?
how are the colts looking
as far as injuries? if there is an area of concern where they are at least somewhat depleted, I would (of course) love to see it possibly taken advantage of
It's hard bein whimpy
by WhimpyJimmy on Sep 8, 2010 11:57 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Jeff Saturday is returning from injury.
I doubt he’ll be at 100%. Clint Session was nicked up during camp, but I believe he’s at 100%. Other than losing Kevin Thomas (CB) and Jamie Silva for the season we aren’t looking too bad injury-wise. It’s the healthiest we’ve been heading into the regular reason for about as far back as i can remember.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Sep 8, 2010 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions
Serious question
are all Texans fans wholeheartedly drinking the Arian Foster koolaide? He did look good in preseason, but Joe Addai was averaging 6-7 ypc in the preseason too. I don’t expect him to average that much against you all. I feel like he’ll be a very serviceable back and could break into the top half of NFL RBs this year with some help from your o-line, but do you really see him as the answer to all your problems?
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Sep 8, 2010 12:11 PM CDT reply actions
Do I expect 6 YPC?
No, but between his impressive pre-season performance, his performance as starter last season (216 yards, 3 TDs in 2 starts), the way he runs (good vision, decisive and hard runner), and the improved line….yeah, I’m drinking the Kool-Aid and think he’s got 1,200 yard potential (barring health of course).
"Lord, beer me strength."
annnnd
he finished last season against starting defenses and looked great… you also have to realize our collective yearning for a steady good back…
It's hard bein whimpy
by WhimpyJimmy on Sep 8, 2010 12:20 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
See that was my point.
I just wondered if Foster is really your answer at starting RB or if everyone just desperately HOPES he is.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Sep 8, 2010 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions
He doesn't need to be the next Eric Dickerson
He just needs to cut to the hole and make 4-5 yards per carry. The zone blocking system has a history of turning unknown backs into 1000 yard rushers because they have the vision to cut and go. There’s no doubt Foster can do that.
I'll eliminate you like I eliminate gluten from my diet.
www.battleredblog.com
by tehGrindCrusher on Sep 8, 2010 12:33 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I think the fan reaction is as you might expect
We are collectively hoping it is reality and not a dream. In the small sample size of games, ones that count and ones that don’t count, Foster has looked promising. We are all sitting by waiting for the season to start, hoping. We’ll drink that kool-aid until something happens. There aren’t many that aren’t, I can say that. There is no reason to say that.
I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?
it's pretty surprising
we have this much hope, considering the loss of Tate… it’s pretty crazy all the weapons we have on offense
It's hard bein whimpy
by WhimpyJimmy on Sep 8, 2010 3:16 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Yes, while we were all looking forward to Tate contributing,
we didn’t really have time or cause to miss him, with all those weapons. Plus, not sure we were expecting to turn into a true 50-50 run-pass team. This team survived on passing so much last season, I’m not sure you want to turn it off.
I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?
Unfortunately,
I have to agree with you Rip. The Kool-Aid does sure taste nice.
A Texas Wannabe, born and raised in New Zealand. Currently located 7539 miles South west of Houston.
by distant_texans_fan on Sep 8, 2010 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions
I'll talk to you Monday about if it is still tasty
I’m hoping!
I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?
I'll have to pay attention to him on Sunday.
I didn’t get to see him block much in preseason and I feel like with the Texans’ offense he’ll be required to do well in that roll.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Sep 8, 2010 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions
My beefs with Foster...
He’s not a very good back-field blocker. He has the size and strength to be one, but he doesn’t seem to have the awareness. Slaton is smaller and quicker, but seems to be able to read and react faster.
Also, when Foster hits the hole, a lot of times he’s too upright. He doesn’t lower himself enough often and also hits it too squarely.
If you can run the ball effectively...
And keep Manning off the field, you have a good chance to win. The key is long drives that end in touchdowns.
A quick score is awesome, don’t get me wrong. But the more time we kill with efficient clock management, the better our chances.
Oh, and also the most obvious…no nervous breakdown/meltdown helicopter moves to finish the game!
It takes a big man to walk away, but a bigger man to break his freaking jaw!
Scratch me from the keep payton off the field to beat him category..
He was almost dead last last year in time of possession and still cruised to an easy first place playoff berth.
Payton is just the best QB ever, plain and simple….We can and will beat him at least once this year…..
It takes a big man to walk away, but a bigger man to break his freaking jaw!
Interesting stat
Since Gary Kubiak became the coach in 2006, the Houston Texans are 24-8 when they have more rushing yards than their opponents and 19-2 when they run the ball at least 30 times in a game.
"Lord, beer me strength."
Shocking!
Wait, the opposite of that.
You run when you win, not win when you run.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter | SB Nation Houston | Battle Red Blog
True
Those records are a skewed stat, but if you run 30+ times that means it’s effective on some level.
I’m definitely presenting a conservative, basic scheme attack, but it makes sense within the traditional idea of the West Coast Offense: Wear them down with runs/short passes (the Shanny side of the tree uses the run more), knock ’em out with big play action passes, and then run it on home.
Scheme wise, the offense should control the pace of the game. While I typically love an aggressive game plan as you put out (and trust me, I’m all for aggressive gameplans), I’d rather force the Peytons to play at a slower pace then match them at their pace. Wear down their defense….let him play no huddle…..toss out that tired defense again…..to me, it makes sense.
Of course, planning it is one thing, executing is another, but you get the idea.
"Lord, beer me strength."
I've always felt
beating the colts not only takes great execution, but also a good deal of luck (fumbles, muffed punts etc.) which the Texans are due for
It's hard bein whimpy
by WhimpyJimmy on Sep 8, 2010 3:21 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
Balanced Attack
I’d love to see us come out and establish the run. The one win we have against the dolts came on the back of Dayne (150 yds) and a serviceable Mittens (no interceptions). Not saying a running game alone wins games (see dolts vs Rams circa 2009), but a balanced attack would keep Peighton off the field and allow us to put up more points… 2 birds, 1 rock. See what I did there?
I like killing one bird with two rocks
It's hard bein whimpy
by WhimpyJimmy on Sep 8, 2010 4:37 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
Just. Win.....
however many rocks it takes. I myself prefer the A-10 model of attack, a shit load of VERY BIG rocks in a very small area, in a short amount of time. Hey, it works on tanks.
Just my $.02
Even duct tape can't fix stupid
I STILL WANT US RUN THE BALL AT WILL
Just to demoralize them. I am fed up with the loses.Last year i went into a god damn rage after the colts game.The anger of 16 peyton butt rapings flowed from body. I just want us to pound their team, make the guys too god damn sore to get out of bed the next day. I do think it is key to run it in the fourth quarter though strategically. I f we can eat up clock with the run game, then execute in the redzone with a lead in the fourth quarter we have to win. It will do us no good though if we cant come away with 7 points in the redzone. I hope a D-lineman falls on top of manning and bust his damn spleen.
by b4theproffit on Sep 8, 2010 7:57 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Excessive Fuckstomp for the win
Feeling the five stages of grief since 2002.
by NoSafetiesNeeded on Sep 8, 2010 8:52 PM CDT up reply actions
Even though this post hits a lot of my pet peeves
I had to rec this. There is something special about this post.
I'll eliminate you like I eliminate gluten from my diet.
www.battleredblog.com
by tehGrindCrusher on Sep 9, 2010 12:44 AM CDT up reply actions
ohhhh man when we get to WHY I want Indy to lose to the Texans?
2009 season
Colts vs Texans: they stomp on us (in our own house)
Texans vs Colts: they stomp on us (in their house)
Jets vs Colts: they roll over and play dead in front of their own fans who braved bitter ice and snow to get to the EFFING GAME!
Colts roll over and play dead and a team we should have beat goes to the playoffs …I can never forgive the colts for rolling over and playing dead and making our bitter losses to them meaningless.
For that .. I dub the Colts. . . . Unforgiven
by BattleRedFan on Sep 9, 2010 7:02 AM CDT reply actions 4 recs
I am rec'ing this.
If I ever wanted Kubes to show some emotion, it would be at the end of this game! After the Texans are finished rolling up the score on the hapless Colts, I want him to grit his teeth…a mean look…and fist-pump the air so huge!
That’s how I feel about the Colts! It seems not many are playing this up, but this is my biggest motivation to this game. I want the “Roll Over and Play Dead” Colts to hurt when this is over and I want to beat it into them with all the graciousness of Ali looking over Liston

I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?
by Rip Jersey on Sep 9, 2010 8:03 AM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
hehe that's a great picture of Ali
like “I dare you to stand up”
“b/c this is going to hurt you more than it hurts me”

by 






















