Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Animated GIFs Of January

What I'd Like To See: Run, Draw, Screen

Every week this season, I'm going to attempt to play the role of alcohol-fueled blogger strategist and focus in on a match-up or area that I believe will be key for the success of your Houston Texans on Sunday (or those rare Thursday and Monday games).

For Week One, I would like to see Arian Foster, his back-ups, and the offensive line take over and dominate the Colts defense. Why are the running backs key to this game? The answers are just a JUMP away...

Star-divide

Let's not delude ourselves.  The Texans are not the Miami Dolphins with a huge, powerful offensive line, but the Colts don't have a defense with a lot of size. Indianapolis runs a Tampa-2 scheme, which requires quicker defensive players who happen to be undersized when compared to the league average. The Colts use this speed to rush the passer and force turnovers in the secondary. How do you counter that? You get the defense thinking as opposed to acting. The simplest way to slow down a faster, smaller defense is to run right at the defense, use draw plays, and throw screen passes.

Luckily, the Texans have the talent to run that kind of offense. Arian Foster is a bigger running back who attacks the hole hard and fast with his impressive weightspeed. He averaged six yards per carry in the pre-season, and a similar effort could control the game and make the play-action pass more deadly than it was in 2009. As for screen passes, Steve Slaton may not be the Slaton of old, but he is still the ideal running back for the screen given how well he can move in space. Of course, all of this is useless without an offensive line.

With Kasey Studdard being replaced by Wade Smith and Antoine Caldwell being more experienced, the offensive line is definitely stronger than last season. In this game, the Texans offensive line should also have a strength advantage as they outweigh the starting Colts defensive line by 25 pounds, averaged according to official roster pages. This weight advantage should help on the initial push at the first level. While some BRBers criticize the line, there can be no denying that these offensive linemen block on the move as well as anyone else in the league. If you combine that fact with the fact that those speedy Tampa-2 linebackers traditionally play a tad bit deeper than normal LBs, you'll arrive at the conclusion where running right between the tackles, using the draw play, and throwing screen passes would be very effective calls because the Texans should get into the second and third levels for big gains until the Colts are forced to adjust from their scheme. If the Texans can execute with the backs, then the Indy defense could be slowed down, run over, and worn out (especially if the roof is open to allow that wondrous Texas humidity in).

Let's not forget the advantage that a ball-control, running back-heavy offensive gameplan gives the defense. Yes, Peyton Manning can score a touchdown on any given play, but how many times have you seen him impatiently pacing on the sideline when an opposing offense is playing ball-control offense? He gets impatient because his offense isn't allowed to really get into a rhythm or control the pace of the game. As far as I'm concerned, an impatient Manning is better than a comfortable Manning. Given the youth on the Texan defense, the best Houston defense against Peyton Manning is to minimize his opportunities on the field.

If the Texans are smart, we'll see Foster run against the smaller defensive line with Slaton screens on the outside. The running back heavy gameplan is what I'd like to see the Texans do on offense to attack the Colts and control the game. How about you, faithful BRBers? What do you want to see?

Comment 70 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Is it a good thing when 5 o line men only out weigh 4 d line men by 25 pounds? Or am I missing something this early in the morning?

Otherwise, nice post and I agree with you.

Miss-placed Houstonian living and going to school in the wilderness of Wyoming.

by BigNate7 on Sep 8, 2010 7:11 AM CDT reply actions  

technially there could be 6o-line if you put in a tightend.

so thats not that good i think. anyways i knew what you meant and i really think we should run at them the whole game. I cannot name one linbacker on their team.

by southpaw70 on Sep 8, 2010 7:18 AM CDT reply actions  

he means take their four linemen and get an average and our five linemen and get an average. our average manweight is 25lbs heavier.

by big daddy texan#1 on Sep 8, 2010 7:26 AM CDT reply actions  

But does that mean that our average weightspeed is less?

A Texas Wannabe, born and raised in New Zealand. Currently located 7539 miles South west of Houston.

by distant_texans_fan on Sep 8, 2010 5:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

damn, I hope not!

Earl Campbell is the perfect combination of assmass and weightspeed. - Papabear

by Schlauton on Sep 8, 2010 5:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great Plan

The Problem is this. Every Team in the League has been using this same Gameplan with the Colts for the last what 7 years? And What is the Colts Record in that time?

"Of all the things I have lost , I miss my mind the most-Random T-shirt

"There is a fine line between Genius and Insanity"-Unknown Author

by I draft the Cowboys!!!! on Sep 8, 2010 8:15 AM CDT reply actions  

NOT A PROBLEM

no other team has ANDRE JOHNSON to play action pass to.

by b4theproffit on Sep 8, 2010 8:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

exactly!

our offensive threats are for real
not for pretend

Andre Johnson is just one of MANY tools we are waiting to unleash on the Colts.

by BattleRedFan on Sep 8, 2010 8:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

LOL

not a problem
=) thanks for telling me you made it your sig

I actually like your improvements to the comment.

by BattleRedFan on Sep 9, 2010 6:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

The problem is

most teams want to run, but they are forced to get away from it because they don’t score touchdowns and try to catch up.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 8, 2010 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

I want Schaub to throw about 15-20 times.

I want Foster to rush for 150 yards, I pray Dennison just stuffs the fucking ball down their throats. I am talking 25 touches for Foster and 15-20 for Slaton.

by b4theproffit on Sep 8, 2010 8:18 AM CDT reply actions  

keep Peyton off the field?

I’m all for it. He’s his most lethal when he’s got his hurry up offense on the field taunting corners into thinking that they’re doing a good job then
WHAM! a down
BZZZT! a touchdown

and we’re left wondering how we lost the lead . . .

yes keep him off the field . I think we can pull it off this year.

by BattleRedFan on Sep 8, 2010 8:19 AM CDT reply actions  

Allow me to go against the conventional wisdom

I don’t think the “keep Manning off the field as much as possible” strategy does anything.

For one thing, when Manning runs the hurry-up offense, it absolutely slaughters the Texans. They are never prepared for it. I’m not sure if that holds up against other teams, but pretty much every time he goes into the actual hurryup, he slaughters us. Dunta Robinson preens hello.

Secondly, as weird as it is to find myself on the side of Frank Bush, I think you allow the underneath stuff and try to either sack him, get a penalty, or a turnover. That means the defense will be on the field for awhile, and that means you are going to give up some long drives. Hopefully, some of those drives end before they reach the end zone because the Texans get the Colts in an unfavorable down/distance.

Third, the offense should be doing whatever it can to optimize it’s yards and points, not optimize the time they hold the ball. The Colts have had the best offense in football for aeons, nothing is going to change that. Admit to yourselves you have to score as much as you can, and act as such.

And honestly, if I’m game planning…I want a surprise onsides kick at least once. That offense is probably going to score most of the time anyway, you might as well take a stab at getting a defacto turnover from them.

by riversmccown on Sep 8, 2010 8:50 AM CDT reply actions  

Colts fan here

I still think the Texans lose this one, but I think you’re on the right track. Colts have a more difficult time defending against a Colts-style attack.

"We ARE going to our own private island, Chris: it's called the State Fucking Fair!"

by naptown_ninja on Sep 8, 2010 8:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

There are a few facts that you have twisted around in order to make your point

The Colts have not been the best offense for aeons. First of all, you made up that word. Second, the Tom Brady led Patriots have surpassed the Colts in more than one season in offensive production, setting records along the way. You make the Colts sound like they are the team of the decade. They only have one Super Bowl victory to show for it, and more than one other team has multiple Super Bowl championships this decade…so they can be beaten. But your main point, just stop them, is very valid. It doesn’t have to be a 3 and out. But it has to be part of the game plan to pressure until they break.

There is no one way to beat the Colts, may I point out. It will have to be culmination of favorable outcomes that propels the Texans past the Colts. They need to win the turnover battle. They need to excel in the areas where they are hoping to excel, such as the running game, not over-pursuing on defense, rookies playing like veterans, key plays at key times, no injuries to key personnel, no coaching lapses, and playing hard until the final whistle.

And, I like your last mention of a surprise onside kick. Something like that, that has been practiced and perfected would be a good addition to the game plan. Although, an onside kick scares me a little if not used at the right time. A move like that needs to be executed to perfection, otherwise you are giving the Manning-led Colts a big advantage.

I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?

by Rip Jersey on Sep 8, 2010 9:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

hmmm 4 solid quarters . . .

yep we’ll have to hope we do put together 4 of them back to back in one game against the Colts .. I’ve never seen the Texans put together 60 minutes of solid game that I recall.

Hopefully this will be our first

by BattleRedFan on Sep 8, 2010 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Disappointingly Troll-esque Response, Rip

First of all, anyone who disputes that the Manning-Colts offense is one of the all-time great ones in NFL history is just trolling. Secondly, yeah, the Pats have beat them a few years, and the Pats have had a better offensive season in a few years. What does that have to do with my main point? Nothing.

by riversmccown on Sep 8, 2010 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Um...OK???

Reading between the lines I feel like he was saying they are and have not been the best offense for Aeons. Also, they were 16th in yards, 11th in pts. scored last year. Of course they were 28th in Time of possession, so there goes the keep Payton off the field theory!

Shit!

Does any one know voo doo?

It takes a big man to walk away, but a bigger man to break his freaking jaw!

by USMC_Texas on Sep 8, 2010 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Actually, I am on crack.

The Colts were way better… I was looking at preseason per game average and not regular season. They were 4th in both categories during that 14 game time span.

It takes a big man to walk away, but a bigger man to break his freaking jaw!

by USMC_Texas on Sep 8, 2010 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Are you being sensitive today?

Where does it say I have to agree with everything you say?

I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?

by Rip Jersey on Sep 8, 2010 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

You're right about one thing....

the Texans need to score 7.

There’s a reason why the Colts can mask their run defense and pin their ears back for sacks…..teams don’t score. If you can score then you can run the ball to your heart’s content.

Can someone attack the defense differently? Yes, but I looked at it from a scheme point of view.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 8, 2010 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

The BIG play

Over the top on Sanders and Bethea to AJ or JJ….or KW!

I think it can be done. I think those three WRs are capable of juking them and getting clear. And, I think Schaub is capable of making the throw. That is the play I am looking for early in the game to give the Texans the lead and momentum. Then I see the Texans frustrating the Colts the rest of the game by pounding the rock very effectively and playing inspired defense.

I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?

by Rip Jersey on Sep 8, 2010 9:25 AM CDT reply actions  

So true.

Can’t help but laugh. rec’d

by Jahon on Sep 8, 2010 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Beat the Colts

Last year we outplayed them twice, but lost both games.

We out gameplanned them, outplayed them, outmanned them, etc.

Its all mental for us v. them. Hopefully there’s enough new guys and pissed off vets so we can finally turn the f-in page against that team from Indy.

"I'm trying to get a feel for Booty" - GK

by texanphil on Sep 8, 2010 9:55 AM CDT reply actions  

I.. LOVE.. OPENING.. KICKOFF.. WEEKEND..

I found this site a few years ago and its a pretty cool/interesting supplement for NFL and NCAA games. The website is basically a simulation engine and they simulate weekly matchups 10,001 times for NFL and NCAA games. With that being said, they simulated the Texans/Colts matchup and we [Houston] won 63% of the time with an average score of 25-21… Below is a link to the game stats.. It looks like the game is going to be pass-heavy and Rackers is going to have to make some FG’s.

Houston dominates Indy LINK

by ChadillacSHSU on Sep 8, 2010 10:27 AM CDT reply actions  

I tend to agree with Rivers

Our game plan in the first game worked as well as could be expected. I think we should go with kind of a rope-a-dope style on defense, and if that means giving up tons of yards to Dallas Clark underneath in 6-yard increments in the middle of the park because we’re taking away Reggie Wayne deep, then I’m all for it.

Defensively, I’d like to see us take advantage of what appears to be a brittle Colts O-line, specifically Saturday, who is cleared to play but has been banged up. I believe that pressure up the middle on Manning is infinitely better than pressure from the edges, which Manning can dodge simply by stepping forward in the pocket. I’d like to see quite a few stunts that bring Mario inside. Amobi Okoye, this is your time to shine.

So, on defense, I think we should be fairly vanilla in the secondary but kinda crazy on the line.

On offense, we should be fine.

I'll eliminate you like I eliminate gluten from my diet.
www.battleredblog.com

by tehGrindCrusher on Sep 8, 2010 10:49 AM CDT reply actions  

I almost made this post about the DTs versus the Colts interior line

but then Arian Foster looked too good in the pre-season for him not to be the focus.

If you told me that Foster runs for (at least) 125 yards on Sunday, I think the Texans win.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 8, 2010 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

He will run for 124.

"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."

What happens when an unstoppable force meets three defensive players? THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpWqMqrZwTU

by TexansForever on Sep 8, 2010 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

I thought I was the only one who didn't cry themselves to sleep about that first half

where Clarke gained 500 yards. If they don’t score, who teh fuck cares?

Have you ever tried just turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?

by nolander on Sep 8, 2010 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

how are the colts looking

as far as injuries? if there is an area of concern where they are at least somewhat depleted, I would (of course) love to see it possibly taken advantage of

It's hard bein whimpy

by WhimpyJimmy on Sep 8, 2010 11:57 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Jeff Saturday is returning from injury.

I doubt he’ll be at 100%. Clint Session was nicked up during camp, but I believe he’s at 100%. Other than losing Kevin Thomas (CB) and Jamie Silva for the season we aren’t looking too bad injury-wise. It’s the healthiest we’ve been heading into the regular reason for about as far back as i can remember.

"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James

by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Sep 8, 2010 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

shit

It's hard bein whimpy

by WhimpyJimmy on Sep 8, 2010 3:17 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Serious question

are all Texans fans wholeheartedly drinking the Arian Foster koolaide? He did look good in preseason, but Joe Addai was averaging 6-7 ypc in the preseason too. I don’t expect him to average that much against you all. I feel like he’ll be a very serviceable back and could break into the top half of NFL RBs this year with some help from your o-line, but do you really see him as the answer to all your problems?

"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James

by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Sep 8, 2010 12:11 PM CDT reply actions  

Do I expect 6 YPC?

No, but between his impressive pre-season performance, his performance as starter last season (216 yards, 3 TDs in 2 starts), the way he runs (good vision, decisive and hard runner), and the improved line….yeah, I’m drinking the Kool-Aid and think he’s got 1,200 yard potential (barring health of course).

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 8, 2010 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

annnnd

he finished last season against starting defenses and looked great… you also have to realize our collective yearning for a steady good back…

It's hard bein whimpy

by WhimpyJimmy on Sep 8, 2010 12:20 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

See that was my point.

I just wondered if Foster is really your answer at starting RB or if everyone just desperately HOPES he is.

"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James

by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Sep 8, 2010 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

He doesn't need to be the next Eric Dickerson

He just needs to cut to the hole and make 4-5 yards per carry. The zone blocking system has a history of turning unknown backs into 1000 yard rushers because they have the vision to cut and go. There’s no doubt Foster can do that.

I'll eliminate you like I eliminate gluten from my diet.
www.battleredblog.com

by tehGrindCrusher on Sep 8, 2010 12:33 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

I think the fan reaction is as you might expect

We are collectively hoping it is reality and not a dream. In the small sample size of games, ones that count and ones that don’t count, Foster has looked promising. We are all sitting by waiting for the season to start, hoping. We’ll drink that kool-aid until something happens. There aren’t many that aren’t, I can say that. There is no reason to say that.

I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?

by Rip Jersey on Sep 8, 2010 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

it's pretty surprising

we have this much hope, considering the loss of Tate… it’s pretty crazy all the weapons we have on offense

It's hard bein whimpy

by WhimpyJimmy on Sep 8, 2010 3:16 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Yes, while we were all looking forward to Tate contributing,

we didn’t really have time or cause to miss him, with all those weapons. Plus, not sure we were expecting to turn into a true 50-50 run-pass team. This team survived on passing so much last season, I’m not sure you want to turn it off.

I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?

by Rip Jersey on Sep 8, 2010 7:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Unfortunately,

I have to agree with you Rip. The Kool-Aid does sure taste nice.

A Texas Wannabe, born and raised in New Zealand. Currently located 7539 miles South west of Houston.

by distant_texans_fan on Sep 8, 2010 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'll talk to you Monday about if it is still tasty

I’m hoping!

I suppose if all of the stars, moons and planets align it could be possible, but what are the chances of that?

by Rip Jersey on Sep 8, 2010 7:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'll have to pay attention to him on Sunday.

I didn’t get to see him block much in preseason and I feel like with the Texans’ offense he’ll be required to do well in that roll.

"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James

by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Sep 8, 2010 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

My beefs with Foster...

He’s not a very good back-field blocker. He has the size and strength to be one, but he doesn’t seem to have the awareness. Slaton is smaller and quicker, but seems to be able to read and react faster.
Also, when Foster hits the hole, a lot of times he’s too upright. He doesn’t lower himself enough often and also hits it too squarely.

by SubCrim on Sep 8, 2010 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

If you can run the ball effectively...

And keep Manning off the field, you have a good chance to win. The key is long drives that end in touchdowns.

A quick score is awesome, don’t get me wrong. But the more time we kill with efficient clock management, the better our chances.

Oh, and also the most obvious…no nervous breakdown/meltdown helicopter moves to finish the game!

It takes a big man to walk away, but a bigger man to break his freaking jaw!

by USMC_Texas on Sep 8, 2010 12:39 PM CDT reply actions  

Scratch me from the keep payton off the field to beat him category..

He was almost dead last last year in time of possession and still cruised to an easy first place playoff berth.

Payton is just the best QB ever, plain and simple….We can and will beat him at least once this year…..

It takes a big man to walk away, but a bigger man to break his freaking jaw!

by USMC_Texas on Sep 8, 2010 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Interesting stat

Since Gary Kubiak became the coach in 2006, the Houston Texans are 24-8 when they have more rushing yards than their opponents and 19-2 when they run the ball at least 30 times in a game.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 8, 2010 12:46 PM CDT reply actions  

True

Those records are a skewed stat, but if you run 30+ times that means it’s effective on some level.

I’m definitely presenting a conservative, basic scheme attack, but it makes sense within the traditional idea of the West Coast Offense: Wear them down with runs/short passes (the Shanny side of the tree uses the run more), knock ’em out with big play action passes, and then run it on home.

Scheme wise, the offense should control the pace of the game. While I typically love an aggressive game plan as you put out (and trust me, I’m all for aggressive gameplans), I’d rather force the Peytons to play at a slower pace then match them at their pace. Wear down their defense….let him play no huddle…..toss out that tired defense again…..to me, it makes sense.

Of course, planning it is one thing, executing is another, but you get the idea.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 8, 2010 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

I've always felt

beating the colts not only takes great execution, but also a good deal of luck (fumbles, muffed punts etc.) which the Texans are due for

It's hard bein whimpy

by WhimpyJimmy on Sep 8, 2010 3:21 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Balanced Attack

I’d love to see us come out and establish the run. The one win we have against the dolts came on the back of Dayne (150 yds) and a serviceable Mittens (no interceptions). Not saying a running game alone wins games (see dolts vs Rams circa 2009), but a balanced attack would keep Peighton off the field and allow us to put up more points… 2 birds, 1 rock. See what I did there?

by NWestTexan on Sep 8, 2010 3:32 PM CDT reply actions  

Just. Win.....

however many rocks it takes. I myself prefer the A-10 model of attack, a shit load of VERY BIG rocks in a very small area, in a short amount of time. Hey, it works on tanks.

Just my $.02
Even duct tape can't fix stupid

by txknight on Sep 8, 2010 7:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

I STILL WANT US RUN THE BALL AT WILL

 Just to demoralize them. I am fed up with the loses.Last year i went into a god damn rage after the colts game.The anger of 16 peyton butt rapings flowed from body. I just want us to pound their team, make the guys too god damn sore to get out of bed the next day. I do think it is key to run it in the fourth quarter though strategically. I f we can eat up clock with the run game, then execute in the redzone with a lead in the fourth quarter we have to win. It will do us no good though if we cant come away with 7 points in the redzone. I hope a D-lineman falls on top of manning and bust his damn spleen.

by b4theproffit on Sep 8, 2010 7:57 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Excessive Fuckstomp for the win

Feeling the five stages of grief since 2002.

by NoSafetiesNeeded on Sep 8, 2010 8:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Even though this post hits a lot of my pet peeves

I had to rec this. There is something special about this post.

I'll eliminate you like I eliminate gluten from my diet.
www.battleredblog.com

by tehGrindCrusher on Sep 9, 2010 12:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's the first and last lines

it gives me the warm fuzzies.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Sep 9, 2010 1:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

hehe that's a great picture of Ali

like “I dare you to stand up”
“b/c this is going to hurt you more than it hurts me”

by BattleRedFan on Sep 9, 2010 8:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

New sig

I dub the Colts....Unforgiven!

by Rip Jersey on Sep 9, 2010 8:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your big-time home for big-time analysis and big-time rants about all things Houston Texan.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Imgres_small
AFC South Eternal Thread #219: I love 80085
Heehaw_small
Google Ad Blocker  FTW
Heehaw_small
Said, Weekly Caption Contest Winner, Winner

Recent FanPosts

Small
Sanu vs. Jeffery
Small
Why not trade Tate/TJ?
Img00136-20110130-0953_small
Some Important Dates This Offseason
Small
Play the Draft
Obama-they-live_small
Dallas fan crying about his treatment in houston!
Charlie_small
Would you trade...
Johns_small
If I'm Rick Smith
Tah_lion_3_700_dpi_small
So the reason I didn't see a post announcing that JJ Watt won DROY
Title_pic_small
The Houston Texans Breakup Letter

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Hate Mail Goes Here

Brb_small Tim

Absurdly Talented Writers

Lucy_small bigfatdrunk

Screwdriver_small MDC

Vlcsnap-00003_small riversmccown

Tumblr_l4i6iruxha1qbs5d3o1_400_small TexansDC

Chairman_meow_blink_small UprootedTexan

Absurdly Talented Writers, Part Deux

Copy_of_homer_simpson_small Vega

Alec-baldwin-glengarry-glen-ross-always-be-closing_small tehGrindCrusher