Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

One Reason Not To Fear Wade Phillips

Yesterday the search for Frank Bush’s replacement as defensive coordinator began, but the fact that Wade Phillips will eventually be named DC of the Texans may be the worst-kept secret in the NFL.  Gary Kubiak and Co. are dragging their feet a bit the same way they did last time they were "searching" for a new DC, when everyone knew that Frank Bush was already earmarked for the gig.  Now that a writer employed by the team is publishing Phillips’ track record, obviously designed to sell fans on the merit of Wade as DC, I would be shocked if someone else was named to take over the defense.

Personally, I’m ok with it.  Yes, he’s part of the good ol' boys club.  Usually, that practice of hiring a familiar face will land another inept, Denver-originated defensive coordinator who employs vanilla schemes that aren’t hard to beat.  This time, however, might be a case of a broke clock being right twice a day.  Wade Phillips might be the right man for the job, even if most fans are frustrated by how he gets the job.

Everyone else around the Texans blogosphere seems to think Wade as DC is a foregone conclusion as well.  I’ve already seen several posts and notes on Twitter about who already on the roster will be good for Wade’s 3-4 defense, and what positions and players will need to be targeted in free agency and the draft to fill any holes.  Most talk revolves around nose tackle and various secondary help, which is logical since it has been years, if ever, that the organization invested anything real in a real nose tackle or safety.  Truly, these would be a position of need whether a switch is made to a 3-4 or not.

Another position of focus is outside linebacker.  Fans and bloggers have their theories of who will play the role of rush linebacker, and those theories range from Brian Cushing to drafting a difference-maker such as Von Miller with the eleventh overall pick.  The discussion of who will play this role is an important one.  Wade Phillips coordinated six defenses which were a 3-4 scheme, constituting 19 seasons.  In 13 of those years, Wade had at least one linebacker tally double-digit sacks, which doesn’t account for the strike-shortened 1982 season or 1981, when apparently they didn’t record sacks.  The sack-leading linebacker in those years averaged an impressive 13 sacks per season.  A Wade Phillips defense lives and dies by its ability to apply pressure on opposing quarterbacks, and that pressure is usually applied by a rush specialist linebacker.

The person I think will thrive the most seems to be the most overlooked.  Besides a great write-up of how the personnel fit in a 3-4 by John Hallam at the Texans Bull Blog, I haven’t seen anyone show any enthusiasm towards Connor Barwin.  But I think he might be just as, if not more, important to the Texans' chances of making the 3-4 work than any other defensive player.

Star-divide

Barwin was slated by many to be a mid-round pick in 2009 until an amazing showing at the Combine elevated his status to as high as a first round pick.  Despite playing only one year as a defensive player in college, Barwin’s raw athleticism made him an enticing prospect as an outside rush linebacker in a 3-4 defense.  I myself did a mock draft in which I projected the Patriots selecting him in the first round to fill just that role.  Furthermore, I remember that when the Texans selected Barwin in the second round after taking Cushing in the first, many people were so confused that it was thought that the Texans might be switching back to the 3-4.  A certain blogger from a forgotten website named DGDB&D even wrote a post titled "<expletive deleted> Me in the <expletive deleted> with a Sandpaper Chainsaw" detailing how stupid a switch to the 3-4 would be (I really wish I could link to it, but the site's archives were nuked).  In a move that no one could have foreseen, it looks like Barwin will still end up fulfilling that role.

Barwin had a decent season in 2009 as a true 4-3 defensive end, leading all rookie DEs with 4.5 sacks.  He was slated to be a big part of the Texans defensive scheme in 2010 (insert joke here) before he dislocated his ankle in Week One and was placed on injured reserve.  Most of the plan to utilize Barwin supposedly focused on allowing him to stand up and use his athletic ability and speed to overwhelm slower offensive linemen.  That sounds pretty much exactly what Phillips did with linebackers like DeMarcus Ware.

Speaking of Ware, Barwin fits the mold of linebacker that Wade has historically favored as a rusher.  He is the same height and weight as DeMarcus Ware and Shawne Merriman, both of whom led the league in sacks at least once under Phillips.  Despite Cushing’s similar size, Barwin is a much more natural pass rusher, especially off the edge when leverage, speed and block-disengaging are key.  Cushing also hasn’t shown the best ability to keep containment this year, something that the OLB will be asked regularly to do.

As for drafting a rush specialist linebacker, why spend such an investment on a player who likely played with his hand in the dirt in college and hope he can make the transition?  With Barwin, the Texans' coaching staff that remains (like Bill Kollar) has already seen that Barwin can play in space, because they’ve been mentoring him to do just that all last offseason.  He may not be a proven commodity, but he is much more proven than a rookie who has never played a down of football in the NFL.

Wade may be a mediocre to bad head coach, but he has a proven track record as a defensive coordinator.  His ability to apply pressure on the quarterback is exactly what is needed to try and overcome a bad secondary, which even with free agent acquisitions and draft picks, the Texans will still have next season.  I personally believe that Barwin will be the key to that pressure, and that could elevate him to Pro Bowl status in the near future.  What’s your take?

Comment 53 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I know Kubiak says "win now"

Never thought I would hear that, but that’s besides the point. Anyways, if you want to win now, you have to win with the guys you got. Yes, a few key FAs wouldn’t hurt. And, yes, the Texans could dedicate the first three rounds of the draft towards defensive players that might be able to contribute. But, back to my first point and your point, yes, Conner Barwin should be a key guy if this thing is going to work in year one.

I can’t believe I said that, “year one.”

I didn't do anything wrong!.... and, I won't do it again.

by Rip Jersey on Jan 4, 2011 5:47 PM CST reply actions  

Assuming he comes back from his injury ok.

I’m not convinced that he will, sadly.

I'll eliminate you like I eliminate gluten from my diet.
www.battleredblog.com

by tehGrindCrusher on Jan 5, 2011 1:50 AM CST up reply actions  

All good points

The “bat shit crazy” factor for this team leaves all of this in such uncertainty.

We are all expecting them to focus on the defense since it looks like Kubiak is staying, and in all fairness, the offense is a top 5 NFL offense right now. That being said, it would not surprise me in the least to wake up tomorrow and read that McNair fires Kubiak and hires Harbaugh, and then trades Schaub to Carolina for the #1 pick so he can grab some Luck.

They have rarely done what anyone expects with regards to drafting, trading and FA.

Uncomfortably numb......thanks to the Texans

by MeMongo on Jan 4, 2011 5:47 PM CST reply actions  

I don't know, that would surprise ME

What wouldn’t surprise, sadly, is a couple more tight ends, a running back, and an O lineman in the draft, then a couple of late round project linebackers. Sad, what wouldn’t surprise, isn’t it?

by JBal on Jan 4, 2011 6:59 PM CST up reply actions  

Totally wrong.

We only take safeties as late round projects, duh.

I'll eliminate you like I eliminate gluten from my diet.
www.battleredblog.com

by tehGrindCrusher on Jan 5, 2011 1:50 AM CST up reply actions  

Brandon Harrison

says hello

"Eff you mothereffer!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Jan 5, 2011 11:01 AM CST up reply actions  

I would take that bat shit crazy scenario any day

Unfortunately it’s a pipe dream now with Kubiak staying. Never say never though, maybe the Houston kid will want to bring his coach back home with him years down the road after Schaub and Dre are done.

I'm a man!! I'm forty!!

by Hydroshock on Jan 4, 2011 8:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Love it

I’ve been a huge Barwin guy since the first time he stepped on the field.

by Amivy on Jan 4, 2011 5:58 PM CST reply actions  

Hey on this note

any word on how Barwin is doing on his recovery? That was a horrific looking injury even from my vantage point at the stadium.

Uncomfortably numb......thanks to the Texans

by MeMongo on Jan 4, 2011 6:34 PM CST reply actions  

The pic looked bad too

I am totally optimistic about the Texans new season - at least until the first of the 4 or 2 (if any) preseason games

by Barryfromtexas on Jan 4, 2011 7:51 PM CST up reply actions  

it almost made me ill

It was right in front of me. No one else by me saw it and wondered why I was turning my head and saying " OH JESUS his FUCKING LEG" over and over

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Jan 5, 2011 9:57 AM CST up reply actions  

What's Barwin's injury status?

Do we expect him back at 100% next season?

by WhiskeyR on Jan 4, 2011 6:55 PM CST reply actions  

Look guys!

It’s a Travis Johnson cameo!

"Eff you mothereffer!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Jan 4, 2011 6:58 PM CST reply actions  

Nice catch

and thanks for the reminder…

by WhiskeyR on Jan 4, 2011 7:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Don't hate!

We got Trindon Holiday for that draft pick!

Guy can return the hell out of those kicks…. oh wait… nvm.

"Eff you mothereffer!"

-Bernard Pollard-

by Jordann on Jan 4, 2011 7:07 PM CST up reply actions  

His hands transplant

was a success – so I am told

I am totally optimistic about the Texans new season - at least until the first of the 4 or 2 (if any) preseason games

by Barryfromtexas on Jan 4, 2011 7:51 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree with ya, Jake.

I believe Barwin’s the perfect rush LBer especially with Cushing on the Strong OLB.

I’m still not sold on Mario at OLB. I know the arguments for him, but I’d love to see him bull rush at DE.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Jan 4, 2011 7:25 PM CST reply actions  

My thoughts exactly.

Barwin, in my mind, would do a much better job off containing than Mario. Either a season or two ago, we were playing the Titans and Vince Young was flushed out of the pocket, scrambled and was trying to get around the edge – Mario’s edge. Mario was so close to catching him, but in the end dove and was a hair short. Obviously, that was the 4-3. But, I do believe Barwin would have had better speed off the edge than Mario would have in that situation. In a 3-4 if Barwin was lined up behind Mario at DE that would cause a nightmare for the opposing team. I dare say even more than the Mario / Smith combo I’ve previously read.

Until next year...

by DieHardTexan on Jan 4, 2011 7:32 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Yes sir...

Barwin and Mario off one edge with a blitzer coming from somewhere else? That’s a fun match-up in Houston’s favor.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Jan 4, 2011 8:22 PM CST up reply actions  

Cushing & Demeco at IBLs, Barwin at WOLB, Pollard blitzing from SOLB position

an ACL’s nightmare

This comment has been brought to you by...

Clorox Eye Wash
Has the Texans defense become too excruciating to watch? Clorox Eye Wash is the solution for you. Apply directly to the eyes & the slight pain will provide everlasting relief from the vision of the Texans Defense

and by

Drano Classic Milkshakes
Drano Milkshakes, For when a slow, painful death is preferable to watching the Texans play defense

by The Night Owl on Jan 4, 2011 11:36 PM CST up reply actions  

great point

I would definitely like to see more of Mario and Barwin on the field at the same time in the future, assuming his recovery is going well and he’ll be able to move around like he was.

I'm a man!! I'm forty!!

by Hydroshock on Jan 4, 2011 8:52 PM CST up reply actions  

The Texans already have,

a scary 3-4 linebacker setup. Mark Anderson, Cushing, Ryans, and Barwin sounds good to me. Speed outside, power inside.

by jxjx on Jan 4, 2011 7:53 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

If Pollard can shift to OLB, that can be scary

This comment has been brought to you by...

Clorox Eye Wash
Has the Texans defense become too excruciating to watch? Clorox Eye Wash is the solution for you. Apply directly to the eyes & the slight pain will provide everlasting relief from the vision of the Texans Defense

and by

Drano Classic Milkshakes
Drano Milkshakes, For when a slow, painful death is preferable to watching the Texans play defense

by The Night Owl on Jan 4, 2011 11:38 PM CST up reply actions  

This is what i'm hoping for, actually.

Though, from what i’ve read, he’d also be serviceable as a SS.

by typhoon.infamous on Jan 4, 2011 11:46 PM CST up reply actions  

If I were to pick for a 3-4

I’d want Ryans, Cushing, Pollard, and Williams as LB’s and Barwin, Smith, and a big tubby NT as the D-line.

That Anderson kid looked decent enough this year to give him some shots to fill in at the DE positions for breathers.

by SubCrim on Jan 5, 2011 12:13 AM CST up reply actions  

I hope Barwin is progression well in his recovery

He was the single player in the draft that I didn’t already have an opinion on. I was shocked that we took him where we did but saw a ton of upside in the pick at the same time. He’s a project that could be a bit of a gamble but the payoff is pretty sizable if he pans out, especially in a good defense that lets him stand up

I’ve watched some of his raw work out vids and the dude’s a gym rat. Hopefully the ankle heals up and doesn’t give him any long term problems because you can bet he’ll work his ass off to get back out there.

I’m in the camp that believes Barwin can make the transition to a 3-4 OLB, probably easier than Mario. Being a former TE is a plus because you have to be quick and agile enough to get off blocks and work in space. It also means he understands TE pass routes, blocking tendencies, etc.

Hell yeah, stand him up and let him play LB in a 3-4….I’d pay to see that.

I'm a man!! I'm forty!!

by Hydroshock on Jan 4, 2011 9:13 PM CST reply actions  

Haven't seen

And can’t find information, but this is a recoverable injury. I say this from secondary past experience and not as a doctor.

Yes, I am disclaiming myself.

A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com
"Blind fandom is all I got left." - LoneSpot

by bigfatdrunk on Jan 4, 2011 9:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Has Mario ever played 3-4? in college?

Mario seems like an overall good guy and I don’t think we’ll have the Haynesworth fiasco in Houston concerning him not being happy about playing in a 3-4.. Just curious if anyone had any thoughts about that.

by Stros Bro on Jan 4, 2011 10:24 PM CST reply actions  

Haynesworth was because he was asked to occupy blockers and not rush

Williams if he switched to OLB would be asked to rush on just about every play, the only huge difference is that he’d have his hand off the ground at the snap.

by was385 on Jan 5, 2011 1:38 AM CST up reply actions  

even at DE Mario would still be asked to rush the passer in this system

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Jan 5, 2011 9:59 AM CST up reply actions  

And Haynesworth is a nutcase

He showed signs long before his stand against the Bourgeoisie 3-4, including the face-stomping incident. I’ve never seen anything even close to that from Mario.

by Jason Brown on Jan 5, 2011 10:11 AM CST up reply actions  

My problems with Wade

While I don’t care for the 3-4, I’m not saying I know for sure it wouldn’t work here. I made a post about our stats this season and after looking at the number of rushing 1st downs and scores, it’s obvious our D-line was getting hammered in the trenches. I think our LB corps would be great in a 3-4. Our D-line, no way in hell. The chances of us fixing our secondary AND coming up with a D-line for the 3-4 are pretty slim. Not saying it couldn’t happen, but I think fixing picking a monster DT and getting help in the secondary would be easier to do in our current scheme.

Second, half of our defense just doesn’t seem to have that fire…that hunger to punish the opposing offense. I don’t see Cool Hand Wade coming in and turning that around. I want our defense to be slavering barbarians intent on making the opposing offense dread coming onto the field.

I, personally, would rather wait and see how things develop around the league a little. I would love for Fisher to get the axe and come be our DC. I know we’ve talked about him running a dirty defense, but minus Chuck Cecil and Finnegan, they have exactly the attitude we need here. I seriously doubt he would come come here after being fired and would probably take at least a year off after having coached so long, but you have to have dreams.

I don’t care so much about a different scheme as I do about a different attitude. Sometimes confidence is the biggest factor.

by SubCrim on Jan 4, 2011 10:31 PM CST reply actions  

Correction

That was supposed to say “but I think fixing the 4-3 by picking a monster DT”

by SubCrim on Jan 4, 2011 10:33 PM CST up reply actions  

I get your point about the defense sometimes not having the fire or intensity, but in my opinion, it’s hard to get aggressive when you play soft zone all game. Poorly disguised blitzes and soft zone are the exact opposite of aggressive. I would lack passion and intensity too if I knew that my sole game on defense was to play soft and cross my fingers that Mario got the the quarterback.

by Amivy on Jan 4, 2011 10:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Excellent point

I’m hoping whoever we get will not have to be so concerned with our secondary that he will be as reluctant to blitz as Bush was. I understood his thinking that the secondary needed all the help it could get, but it was getting hammered so much anyway, why not blitz more?

by SubCrim on Jan 5, 2011 12:21 AM CST up reply actions  

About fixing the D line

If you look at the Cowboys D Line, which you can assume that he will try to emulate since it was Wade’s defense, and the previous posts discussing the Wade Phillips 3-4, you can see that we have adequate personnel for the Dline. Jay Ratliff, who most would say is a very effective NT in the WP 3-4, is only 6-4, 303. He attacks one gap, and attempts to beat centers/guards with speed and not necessarily mauling them. You don’t need a Kris Jenkins (but I want him, badly) to run Phillips 3-4 effectively. Amobi, Mitchell, Cody, Lewis, and Antonio Smith could be effective at the 3-4 DE positions, with Amobi or Lewis possibly playing an aggressive 1 gap NT. Addressing it in the draft early with a DT like Marces Dareus or Stephen Paea, or in free agency could also make sense if the confidence wasn’t there with the position.

Many people who have disliked Mario at WOLB, but I think he would be fine. The guy ran a 4.66 at 295. His jobs would be to rush the passer from a standing position, make open field tackles on RBs, play contain, and occasionally cover a flats zone. I think he is perfectly capable of doing that, and like MDC said, I think Mario is capable of doing everything Demarcus Ware can do, and he has done pretty well in WP system.

The strong do what they have to do; the weak accept what they have to accept

by Riott on Jan 4, 2011 11:06 PM CST up reply actions  

That's nice and all but you're forgetting one thing

The Dallas Cowboys in the 2010 season were ranked #23 overall in defense (we were 30).

They were #12 in rush defense (we were 13)
They were #26 in pass defense (we were 32, dead last)

If you say that our players right now can play as well as the Cowboys did in the 2010 season, that’s kind of a low expectation. Under Wade in the 2010 season, they were not good at all.

I understand people are desperate to win. I truly do. But in a draft, your 1st round pick will probably play every game, if he’s not injured. You’ll be lucky if you get one or two more guys who become an integral part of your offense/defense in every game. Most players take a couple of years to develop, and if we’re in a “win now” mindset, drafting for the 3-4 is a long shot at best. If we can trade/sign for enough quality veterans to build a 3-4, then I wouldn’t be overly opposed to it. But this organization likes to build through the draft. We sign maybe one veteran each off-season and rarely trade. And based on the number of rushing 3rd-and-shorts plus the number of rushing TD’s we allowed, I do not think our D-line has the players to make an effective front three.

by SubCrim on Jan 5, 2011 12:09 AM CST up reply actions  

Two things:

1) We’re looking at Phillips’s record as defensive coordinator, not head coach and I think there is a difference.
2) Even if the Texans moved up to 23 in overall defense, that would be a HUGE improvement, and likely enough to have gotten us a few more wins this year. It’s not like we need to have the Steelers defense in order to win with our offense. All we need to do is give up less than 24 points per game.

I'll eliminate you like I eliminate gluten from my diet.
www.battleredblog.com

by tehGrindCrusher on Jan 5, 2011 1:58 AM CST up reply actions  

I actually felt our D-Line was the best unit on the defensive side

The LB’s were crap. Demeco got hurt. Cush took a while to get going. Diles was horrible. Bentley is nothing more than depth. Adibi looked like he was trying to avoid playing time. Sharpton made a few promising plays, but was that just a case of getting too excited over a few nice plays because they were from a kid you didn’t expect? There’s a decent chance Demeco will never be the same so in my mind that leaves us with major holes/depth issues at LB…even if Mario and Barwin are OLBs in a 3-4.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Jan 5, 2011 10:04 AM CST up reply actions  

The one "positive" I get from this

Is depth at ILB might be the “cheapest” position to fill in a 3-4 and can be done with wily veterans or mid round picks. It’s a position that can be effective if you are strong there, but also maybe the one position that you can somewhat hide if you aren’t real strong.

by Jason Brown on Jan 5, 2011 10:08 AM CST up reply actions  

I've been waiting for this to pop up

I have this suspicion that our run D isn’t really fixed so much as the pass D was sufficiently horrid enough that teams chose to attack it more.

by Jason Brown on Jan 5, 2011 10:06 AM CST up reply actions  

This

100% this.

"I'm trying to get a feel for Booty" - GK

by texanphil on Jan 5, 2011 4:55 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Only the smart ones

The others use the interview process as a smoke screen to justify a foregone conclusion.

by brittmayo on Jan 5, 2011 6:48 AM CST up reply actions  

Isn't that how it normally works in the business world?

I'll eliminate you like I eliminate gluten from my diet.
www.battleredblog.com

by tehGrindCrusher on Jan 5, 2011 7:40 AM CST up reply actions  

Football is a business and not a good ole boy network?

I didn't do anything wrong!.... and, I won't do it again.

by Rip Jersey on Jan 5, 2011 9:42 AM CST up reply actions  

Like many businesses - both

I am totally optimistic about the Texans new season - at least until the first of the 4 or 2 (if any) preseason games

by Barryfromtexas on Jan 5, 2011 10:05 AM CST up reply actions  

life is a good ole boy network

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Jan 5, 2011 10:05 AM CST up reply actions  

Life is

good
a highway
too short
a bowl full of cherries
a dream
a struggle
what you make of it
crashing down all around me, but enough about me

I didn't do anything wrong!.... and, I won't do it again.

by Rip Jersey on Jan 5, 2011 10:49 AM CST up reply actions  

I hope he could be serviceable at OLB

but I don’t like putting all my eggs in the basket of a guy who has never even played that position. Rushing the QB is only one aspect we would need him to do. Does anyone feel comfortable with him in sideline to sideline pursuit, or covering a TE or RB in the flats? Its very risky, I dunno if I would be comfortable with him starting, maybe as depth. Hopefully I am wrong.

Choo Choo! Get on board the Marvin Lewis John Fox train for 2011 Defensive Coordinator.

by DaGoaT on Jan 5, 2011 7:35 AM CST reply actions  

Yes, the title of this article said "one reason"

What are the others? Or, should it have said “the one reason”

I didn't do anything wrong!.... and, I won't do it again.

by Rip Jersey on Jan 5, 2011 9:44 AM CST up reply actions  

This defense needed 5-6 new starters in 2011 anyway

Now we just need 6-7. I welcome Wade wiith open arms.

Oh, and Go Coogs!

"I'm trying to get a feel for Booty" - GK

by texanphil on Jan 5, 2011 4:58 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your big-time home for big-time analysis and big-time rants about all things Houston Texan.

Hate Mail Goes Here

Brb_small Tim

Absurdly Talented Writers

Lucy_small bigfatdrunk

Tumblr_l2ecwbvekp1qbhedwo1_500_small MDC

Vlcsnap-00003_small riversmccown

Tumblr_l4i6iruxha1qbs5d3o1_400_small TexansDC

Chairman_meow_blink_small UprootedTexan

Absurdly Talented Writers, Part Deux

Photo_small Vega

Alec-baldwin-glengarry-glen-ross-always-be-closing_small tehGrindCrusher