Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

Dear Coach Kubiak, It's On You...

Dear Coach Kubiak,

How many times have I heard you say, "It's up to me to put them in position?" Too many times. But, you know what? If putting players in position to make plays is a good thing, then you are one of the best coaches in the NFL. Because, you do do that, Coach Kubiak. You put players in position to make plays. But, there is a big problem with that reasoning. What is that? It is, if you put your players into position to make plays, guess what? You are also putting the opponents players in position to make plays, too. And, this is the NFL, Coach Kubiak. Those players on the other team are NFL players. Think about it.

No wait, I will tell you. I will translate for you, just what I mean.

You are an NFL offensive mastermind. You certainly know how to spread the offense out, forcing the defense to get in awkward positions, allowing your team to make plays. No one is denying that. You know how to read defenses to find out what they are giving you and you know what type of play can take advantage of that defense's weakness. Moving players around and utilizing their offensive strengths is an art form at times and you have mastered that part of the game. Your offenses are capable of giving opposing defensive coaches fits as they try to counteract the chess moves you make.

Then, something happens. You change the game plan. You get a lead, sometimes a big lead and sometimes a small one. And, you change your game plan. You forget about what was working for you 10 minutes ago and you change it. What is it that you are thinking? Are you thinking that you have put the team in position and now it is time for your players to make plays? They made plays using the obviously successful formula, so now they can carry that over into a different formula and keep the ball rolling? Is that it? You practiced it in practice and you talked about it all week and they should be able to keep the other team at bay.... WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU THINKING?

Why is it that you open the door to the other team and give them an opportunity to beat your team? What is it about your job that you don't like that causes you to hand the other team the opportunity to make plays? Those are NFL players on the other team! You give them a chance and they will make plays. Your strategy of keeping the game close and putting your players in position to make plays give the other team's players the same opportunity! The strategy of keeping the game close and hoping that your players are the ones who will make the plays is only good HALF THE TIME! Look at your record if you doubt me! Sub .500 for your career. This year you have an okay defense and guess what? You just lost your 2nd game and you are traveling this week to the home field of one of the preseason favorites for the Super Bowl. They are hoping that you maintain your strategy of just putting your players in position, because the Ravens know that with their home crowd and their defense, they will be happy to be the players making the plays.

I expect a loss this Sunday because I don't expect you to understand what you are doing, playing to put your players in position.

I don't think you realize that it is this strategy that loses games. "Bringing it" on defense, passing to set up the run was working in the first half, but you know what? This is the 2nd half, so you put your players in prevent defense formation; you decide to try to run the ball up the middle even though you know it won't work, three and out. Then an opportunity arises for the other team's players to make a play. Why? Because by you putting your players in position, now the other team's players are in position. A missed assignment on a fake punt later and now the other team has the advantage. It's a 50-50 proposition, Coach Kubiak. Either your player makes the play or the other team's player makes the play. Either your team wins the game or the other team wins the game. You might as well flip a coin to determine which team will win. That's about what the results are. Whichever way the ball bounces when the players are under pressure. Half the time it bounces your way and half the time it bounce the other way.

Hell, might as well say that you play for a tie and overtime, with the coin flip determining who will win. What am I saying? I have even seen you take a pass on kicking a winning field goal in overtime so you could punt, hoping that you would get the ball back one more time! Infuriating! And so, Coach Kubiak, to conclude, you have no idea how to go for the jugular! You play for the tie! You play for the coin flip! You play to put your players in position to make a play! Well, sometimes they do and sometimes the other guy's players do. LOOK AT YOUR RECORD IF YOU DOUBT ME!

Thank You,

Rip Jersey

Comment 13 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Battle Red Blog

Thank You, Gary Kubiak

Jan 2012 by Vega - 50 comments

Bob McNair: "Gary's My Coach"

Jan 2010 by Jake - 133 comments

Does Gary Kubiak Let Off The Gas?

Dec 2009 by Jake - 102 comments

Comments

Display:

Thoughts

I agree, that Kubiak has lacked that “Killer Instinct”, this point was brought up last year. I’m not sure what to really think for the rest of the year.

2 Defensive Scores are in the Karma Bag
"Wade aid has lean in it, just saying"

by WreckNTexan on Oct 11, 2011 7:13 PM CDT reply actions  

I hate to beat a dead horse, but go back and watch the game and pay attention to the 3rd down plays for the Texans

and with a notepad and pen, add up the number of those plays that get totally shut down when Wade Smith blows his assignment and/or technique.

That’s not on Kubiak, or Schaub or Jacoby. It’s the reason Foster couldn’t rush effectively, it’s the reason balls got tipped, it’s the reason screens fell apart.

Seriously, after watching the film several times and catching this it made me sick to my stomach that good plays were called, Schaub and even shit pile Jacoby were doing their best to make plays, and Smith was nuking the team from within.

Texans 2011 Defense is evolving into an epic force to be reckoned with. I dub thee "Bayou Blitz" !!

by MeMongo on Oct 11, 2011 9:11 PM CDT reply actions  

This loss can be placed on one man & one man only, Al Davis

Think of all the questionable picks, reaches, & signings he’s made over the past years. Darius Heyward-Bey was about as notorious for dropping passes as Jacoby was & was drafted ahead of 3 other WRs that were considered better than him. Richard Seymour was over the hill (by Belichick’s standards) & got traded for a 1st round pick. Jason Campbell was considered a QB that couldn’t put it all together. Michael Huff was a player who hadn’t lived up to the expectations based on where he was drafted. Sebastian Janikowski was drafted in the 1st round, and who the hell drafts a kicker in the 1st round???

There’s a number of players like that on the Raiders. All of them knew that they weren’t gonna let “Coach Davis” down after he died. They were gonna try like hell to make sure that his risks paid off. DHB didn’t drop a pass until late in the 2nd half. Seymour dominated at the line. Campbell did everything he could to get them back in the game when the run game wasn’t working. Michael Huff sealed the deal at the end. But none of that would have mattered if Janikowski hadn’t kept them in the game when the offense couldn’t do crap. His freakish kicking leg was nailing field goals from distances that other teams would punt from. Sure, the Texans made some mistakes, but give the Raiders some damn credit. All those guys that Al Davis took risks on stepped up and made sure that they won that game for him.

Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."

by The Night Owl on Oct 12, 2011 1:15 AM CDT reply actions  

That being said

You’re dead to me Jacoby

Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."

by The Night Owl on Oct 12, 2011 1:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

Some of the commenters, not all, are focusing on the last game

This FanPost is not a comment on one game, but over five seasons of games. Gary Kubiak has laid down a pattern of just trying to eke out wins, relying of his players to make plays at crucial moments in games. Well, that strategy doesn’t work all the time. It works about half the time.

I will point to some teams with coaches that have known how to put away games: Bill Belechick and the Patriots, Dick LeBeau and the Steelers, Rex Ryan and the Ravens. These are coaches that find a weakness and it is part of their strategy to exploit that weakness and keep on exploiting that weakness.

On the flip-side, Kubiak finds a weakness, gets up on the other team and then abandons the strategy that got him the advantage, thence he opens the door for the other team to make plays to get themselves back in the game and eventually the other team either wins it or loses it half the time…. flip a coin. Kubiak is incapable of putting away a game. He does not coach to put away games. He coaches to get a lead if he can and then take the foot off the gas. Or, if he can’t get the lead, then he gasses it in a desperate attempt to catch up, sometimes falling short and sometimes actually doing it.

It’s a pattern that he has built over 5 seasons. It’s a pattern that he seems to not have learned from. I do not deny that he is a brilliant offensive mind. I am questioning his ability as a game strategist. He constantly puts the game into the other team’s grasp and half the time the other team takes advantage of it and wins. The outcome is really just a flip of the coin, whichever way the ball bounces, who’s player makes that bigger play or makes the bigger blunder.

If you want to just look at the last game, have at it. But, you are missing the point completely by doing that. Look at his record over 5+ seasons. We have all seen how the Texans are capable, sometimes with inferior players, of building a lead. Haven’t we? Then we see how the Kubiak mode changes during the game. He turtles up with a lead. He stops doing the things that got the lead. He moves his defense into prevent mode, allowing opposing offenses to move and score. He is content not to continue doing what got the scores on offense early in the game and at the most inopportune times the offense stalls out, going three-and-out-punt and gives the opposing team the ball back, where all they have to do is play like they are practicing, because they are going up against the very giving prevent that Kubiak is so fond of. Excruciatingly frustrating!

I didn't do anything wrong!.... and, I won't do it again.

by Rip Jersey on Oct 12, 2011 10:06 AM CDT reply actions  

Oakland Game

Arian only ran the ball 8 times in the second half. That is 8 out of 34 plays or roughly 23% of the downs. Of these runs, only twice did we run back to back running plays.

Drive 1.
Foster runs twice for a total of five yards, incomplete pass, 3 and out.

Drive 2.
Pass
60 yard screen to foster
Ogb run for no gain
Inc. pass
Inc. Pass
Missed field goal

Drive 3
Pass for 1st down
Foster run for 4
Foster run for 7 and a first down.
Inc. pass
Foster run for 2
Inc. pass

Drive 4.
Foster run for no gain
Schaub sacked
Inc. pass

Drive 5.
3 consecutive incomplete passes

Drive 6.
For the sake of brevity I will just list it as a 15 play drive with 1 run.

Drive 7.
Last drive of the game, all passes.

I know you mentioned that this post was pent up frustration on many games. However, I believe Kubiak has turned a corner. This is not like the colts game last year where the run game works so we decide not to run in the second half. In this game, nothing was working well. OD was our biggest offensive threat and more coverage was shifted his way and off of Jacoby.

Nothing offensively was working well. Kubiak went with the passing game the vast majority of the second half as it had resulted in big plays. He also called plays to get the ball to Foster in space. While Kubiak is not without faults, I do no believe this game was on him. Wade Smith had an AWFUL game as pointed out be MeMongo. Jacoby was basically a negative on the field. Jason Allen made DHB look like he deserved to be a first round pick (ok maybe this is too far). Schaub missed throws he usually makes.

In the end, the raiders made more plays than we did and outplayed us. Fighting a team with as much of an emotional burst as the Raiders had this week was not going to be an easy task and we weren’t up for the challenge.

by CoogmanSam on Oct 12, 2011 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nice effort CoogmanSam, but it's all for naught

I’m not interested in the game analysis for last Sunday’s game. I’m interested in beating the opponent so that he can’t beat us, which Kubiak doesn’t know how to do. He kept the game close so they the Raiders could beat him. It’s just another example of his career. He kept them in the game and they beat him. He kept them in the game and they beat him. It happens about half the time that he does that. Flip a coin. One week he will beat them. Another week they will beat him. It’s the best he can do. He has no idea he is doing it, either. Unless he reads BRB and comes to this page. He doesn’t understand his strategy leads to mediocrity. Another .500 season is where he is going.

But thanks for you analysis which proves my point, that all Kubiak is trying to do is keep the game close so his players can make a play, or not make a play. So, the other team can not make a play or make a play. Week in and week out. That is what happens. Kubiak strategizes during the game as it is happening, what does he have to do at that time to keep it close. Is this the time to throw that 60-yard bomb to Dreessen to make it close? Or, is this the time to run into the Raiders’ strength and get snuffed for a three and out? It’s easy to predict. At any point in the game, Kubiak is just trying to keep it close so his players are in position to make a play…. or not make a play…. to make a play….. or not make a play. If they make it, the Texans win. If they don’t, well, the other team wins. Flip a coin. Heads, we win. Tails, they win. Just get used to it, because that’s the way it’s going. Kubiak doesn’t even know he’s doing it.

I didn't do anything wrong!.... and, I won't do it again.

by Rip Jersey on Oct 12, 2011 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Never

let facts and evidence stand in the way of an emotional tirade. Way to stick to your guns sir!

I wish we could hire coaches without "having grown up in Houston" being a job requirement.

by DaGoaT on Oct 13, 2011 8:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

Facts and evidence

Fact: The Texans are under .500 under Kubiak.
Evidence: Look at their record.

I didn't do anything wrong!.... and, I won't do it again.

by Rip Jersey on Oct 13, 2011 1:07 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

He kept them in the game?

I am curious as to what about his play calling kept them in the game? The fact that we had 3 players play absolutely horrible games (Allen, Wade Smith, Jacoby) and we were never out of this game is not an indictment of Kubiak’s ability to coach. We were without Andre and lose Mario unexpectedly early in the game. Schaub did not play well, our O-Line did not give Schaub time or give Arian holes to run through and we still had a play at the end to win it.

Kubiak realized the running game wasn’t working and he moved away from it in the second half. He also adjusted to get Foster the ball in space. You cannot create a game plan that opens up 60 yard bombs all day long or you would win every game. He recognized the lack of ability to streych the field and played small ball to set up big plays. Walter is not a player you expect to be behind the defense yet he had an amazing catch after bursting through.

We are not good enough (especially without Andre and Mario and the raiders playing for Al) to be able to run away with this game. Their players are paid to make plays also and that is what they, especially their D-Line, did. I can guarantee you that Kubiak did not sit on the sideline and gameplan to have 3 and outs or missed field goals or poor special teams play or have Vickers drop a sure touchdown pass.

I am not saying he called a perfect game as I do not know anyone that can. His decision to challenge the Dreesen drop (a play that should have resulted in a first down) was more emotional than based on the evidence. I believe he let Dreesen talk him into it and that time out was very costly. I just fail to see how this game was Kubiak’s fault. It seemed to me to be due to poor execution.

by CoogmanSam on Oct 12, 2011 5:34 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your big-time home for big-time analysis and big-time rants about all things Houston Texan.

Hate Mail Goes Here

Brb_small Tim

Absurdly Talented Writers

Lucy_small bigfatdrunk

Tumblr_l2ecwbvekp1qbhedwo1_500_small MDC

Vlcsnap-00003_small riversmccown

Tumblr_l4i6iruxha1qbs5d3o1_400_small TexansDC

Chairman_meow_blink_small UprootedTexan

Absurdly Talented Writers, Part Deux

Photo_small Vega

Alec-baldwin-glengarry-glen-ross-always-be-closing_small tehGrindCrusher