Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

This Week in the Red Zone, or, Notes on a Curb-Stomping: Houston Texans v. Southern Kentucky Titans

It's been said that there are 400,000 words in the English language.  Whether this is actually true or not is debatable.  What is not debatable, however, is the fact that so many words are not enough to describe how incredibly satisfying it was to watch the BE-SFs get exposed as the frauds they are, their spirits breaking like Matt Hasselbeck's glass...well...everything, and the misery on the faces of the Traitors fans in the stands.

The only thing that would have made it better was if the Texans' offense were to set an all-time NFL record for most yards gained on offense against in a single game against them, but I guess you can't have everything.

Simply beautiful.  I hope that on his day off, we can get a poet (I'm looking at you, Arian Foster) to put the awesomeness that was Sunday's game into words eloquent enough for what we saw yesterday afternoon (or morning, you know, whatever).

What was also a beauty to behold was the Texans' performance in the red zone this week, especially compared to the beige zone offense we saw last week.

Click the jump and soar, like the mighty pterodactyl, to check out how our Houston Texans fared in the red zone this week.

Star-divide

First Quarter

First Red Zone Drive

The first of our many trips to the red zone comes off the heels of a five yard run by Arian Foster, leaving the Texans at first-and-10 from the Traitors' 19-yard line.

On third-and-two, the Texans call on Arian Foster for one of his numerous carries on the day and gain three yards on the play, good for a first down.

Then on first-and-10, the Texans rush the other 100-yard runner on the day, Ben Tate, who unfortunately loses a yard on the play.

This results in a second-and-11 from the Traitors' 17, when Duane Brown gets called for an illegal use of hands, resulting in a 10-yard penalty.  Thanks, Duane.

Now on second-and-21, Matt Schaub throws, from the shotgun, a pass to Owen Daniels that falls incomplete.

Third-and-21 comes and Schaub, again from the shotgun, hands off to Foster who gains 13 yards on the play, insufficient for a first down.

Neil Rackers then comes in on fourth-and-eight and nails a 32-yard field goal, good for the first points of many on the day.

Time Spent in Red Zone:  2:35
End Result:  Neil Rackers Field Goal (32)
Score:  Houston 3 - S. Kentucky 0

Second Quarter

Second Red Zone Drive

The second red zone drive comes at the hands of a double-whammy against South Kentucky.  Not only did Schaub complete a 10-yard pass to Owen Daniels, but the Traitors also got called for...wait for it...unnecessary roughness.  I can tell y'all are surprised.  This results in the Texans getting the ball at the Traitors' 12-yard line.

Foster gets the first play of the red zone drive and runs it off the right side of the line for a gain of two yards. 

The Texans face second-and-eight from the 10 when Schaub tosses a pass complete to Joel Dreessen in the end zone for a touchdown. 

Time Spent in Red Zone:  :43
End Result:  10-Yard Reception by Joel Dreessen for the Touchdown!
Score:  Houston 10 - S. Kentucky 0

Third Red Zone Drive

Our third trip into the red zone begins after Schaub completes a seven-yard pass to Kevin Walter to get the Texans to the edge of the red zone, the 20-yard line.

After that, on first-and-10 at the Traitor 20, Schaub hands the ball off to Foster, who gets five yards for his efforts.

Second-and-five comes and Schaub launches a pass that falls incomplete.

With third down and five yards to go, Foster catches a pass from Schaub and takes the ball an additional four yards, just short of the first down.

With time running low, and on fourth-and-one, Rackers comes out and kicks a successful 29-yard field goal to end the half.

Time Spent in Red Zone:  1:05
End Result:  Neil Rackers Field Goal (29)
Score:  Houston 20 - S. Kentucky 0

Third Quarter

Fourth Red Zone Drive

The good times keep rollin' as the Texans get into the red zone after a spectacular 24-yard run by Ben Tate.

Needless to say, it's first-and-10 (it's needless, but I'll say it anyway) at the Traitors' 14-yard line.  Foster gets the carry as he takes the ball up the middle and gains four yards, getting to the 10-yard line as a result.

It's second-and-six at the BE-SF 10-yard line and Schaub zips a pass to tight end Owen Daniels, who comes up just short of the touchdown, with a nine-yard gain.

Finally, on third-and-goal from the one-yard line, Arian Foster takes the ball and soars majestically over the pile of demoralized Traitors for the touchdown.

Time Spent in Red Zone:  1:08
End Result:  Arian Foster takes flight for a Texans Touchdown!
Score:  Houston 27 - S. Kentucky 0

Fourth Quarter

Fifth Red Zone Drive

And in the last quarter of the game, the Texans made their final appearance in the red zone, courtesy of a 15-yard run by Ben Tate to the left side of the line, getting the Texans to the BE-SFs' 12-yard line.

With a fresh set of downs and the game pretty well under control, the Texans decided to run the ball, and run it often.  The first of those runs was by Ben Tate, who advanced the ball 10 yards to the Traitor two-yard line.

They figure that worked out so well they might as well try it again on first-and-goal from the two with Tate.  Unfortunately, this time he gets pushed back a couple of yards for the loss.

Now it's second-and-goal from the four-yard line and Foster's name gets called.  He, too, gets pushed back and loses a yard for his efforts.

Never fear though, dear Texan fan, for the mighty pterodactyl struck back, gaining five yards and getting the last offensive touchdown on the day.

Time Spent in Red Zone:  2:14
End Result:  Arian Foster takes it to the house for another Texans Touchdown!
Score:  Houston 34 - S. Kentucky Tears

Number of Trips in Red Zone:  5
Total Amount of Time in Red Zone:  7:45
Average Amount of Time in Red Zone:  1:33
Red Zone Efficiency:  5/5 (100%)
Scores in Red Zone:  3 TD (Dreessen, Foster x 2) 2 FG (Rackers 32, 29)

I can only imagine what kind of fresh hell awaits Jacksonville next week.

Texans vs Titans coverage

Comment 59 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

moar slants to kevin walter

seems like he runs it well, and more importantly he can actually catch the ball.

by Toolshed1 on Oct 24, 2011 5:36 PM CDT reply actions  

A nice thing to see on all the red zone success in this game

"The greatest danger in planning for tomorrow is using yesterdays logic."
Marc Kahlberg

by Barryfromtexas on Oct 24, 2011 5:43 PM CDT reply actions  

Ben Tate was awesome yesterday

dude runs like a bulldozer

Watch me all in flames, on a butterfly I ride

by nolander on Oct 24, 2011 5:48 PM CDT reply actions  

He also had a couple runs

with very nice cutbacks. He reminded me of a slightly larger Michael Dyer on Sunday.

The Two-Day Hangover @ Battle Red Blog (2011) & SBN Houston (2010) | Twitter

by MDC on Oct 26, 2011 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

I said it a few times...

I really thought the offense would come around this year. I think they did!

CUT KAREEM JACKSON CUT KAREEM JACKSON CUT KAREEM JACKSON CUT KAREEM JACKSON CUT KAREEM JACKSON CUT KAREEM JACKSON CUT KAREEM JACKSON CUT KAREEM JACKSON CUT KAREEM JACKSON

by Carter Liles on Oct 24, 2011 5:49 PM CDT reply actions  

Having all 3 of our RBs healthy was nice

Getting AJ and Thor back will be even better :)

"Never underestimate the dumb with JJ" - Hugh Jarce

by Mumford on Oct 24, 2011 5:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

I mentioned somewhere else

I think some credit should go to Dennison if the rumors are correct, that he was calling the plays

I didn't do anything wrong!.... and, I won't do it again.

by Rip Jersey on Oct 25, 2011 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

That first red zone trip made me nervous. Actually I wasn’t really comfortable with until about half way through the second quartrer. And hey, vickers didn’t suck. Yaaaaaaaay vickers.

by HTown80 on Oct 24, 2011 6:03 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

I'm a wet blanket

Vicker’s blocking was less than stellar. I didin’t see him blow anybody up. Most of Arian’s big runs were when he cut back, after the line had swept the field the other way. It seemed like every time he tried to follow Vickers through a hole, either there was no hole, or Vickers fell down.

by Kidaster on Oct 24, 2011 6:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

this

Vickers is the CJ2YPC of FBs

by Toolshed1 on Oct 24, 2011 6:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Okay, small point maybe, well no, this is a big point and if someone can follow up on it, I think it would be a real big thing!

Did anyone notice, in the previous two games against the Ravens and Raiders, where Foster was not getting anything on the backside of cutbacks, those teams were hitting him early with a Safety taking away the cutback. Against the BESFs, they weren’t playing a Safety down close trying to shut down the cutback. I don’t have the game DVRed, but someone that does, would you check to see why? Were the Texans doing something different? Were they using their TEs differently to try to get the Safety out of there? Were they setting it up with more TE passes to the cutback side to keep the Safety out, and then following that up with play-action fakes and what-not? I think this is a good point if someone can look into it. Because the cutback that wasn’t there for two games was there last Sunday and Foster took advantage of it.

I didn't do anything wrong!.... and, I won't do it again.

by Rip Jersey on Oct 25, 2011 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

This post will probably get lost and the answer may never be known

I really wish someone could follow up on this. From shutting down Foster’s cutback to getting it back, I would really like to know how they did it. Please! Any BRB Writers able to look at this would be answering a question that needs answering.

I didn't do anything wrong!.... and, I won't do it again.

by Rip Jersey on Oct 25, 2011 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe it was a LB the Ravens and Raiders used, maybe a Safety

It seemed like a Safety to me. If they were cheating a Safety, I would like know.

I didn't do anything wrong!.... and, I won't do it again.

by Rip Jersey on Oct 25, 2011 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

Did the Texans use two TEs more against the BESFs to open the cutback

Need to know

I didn't do anything wrong!.... and, I won't do it again.

by Rip Jersey on Oct 25, 2011 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Foster can't do it all on his own

If the cutback isn’t there, it isn’t there, and against the Ravens and Raiders it wasn’t there. Against the BESFs it was there. Someone tell me what was going on.

Okay, I’m going to go get another coffee…

I didn't do anything wrong!.... and, I won't do it again.

by Rip Jersey on Oct 25, 2011 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Damn Rip

U just talkin to urself or what?? Lol an the games r downloadable online but I don’t remember where…I’m gonna look for them today and check out what ur saying

by SMITHILLIAK on Oct 25, 2011 10:26 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

My puter can't handle the downloads, old technology and I'm too cheap to upgrade it....

At least someone reads what I write and takes it seriously. Thanks Smitty! I look forward to a report on this. Big thing, ya’know!

I didn't do anything wrong!.... and, I won't do it again.

by Rip Jersey on Oct 25, 2011 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know about the two TE sets part

But my game time observations against the Ravens and especially Raiders was that they were getting good initial penetration up the middle throwing off the timing of the run. Probably most importantly they did a damn good job of gap discipline.

I know the Giants did some things with their front 7 alignment that caused the Texans a lot of trouble last year. Maybe the Raiders/Ravens did something similar.

"If my hips had pockets, I wouldn't wear pants at all." @NotBurtReynolds
64 percent of all the world's statistics are made up right there on the spot
82.4 percent of people believe 'em whether they're accurate statistics or not
I don't know what you believe but I do know there's no doubt
I need another double shot of something 90 proof
I got too much to think about

by papabear on Oct 27, 2011 9:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes, thanks for commenting and keeping this topic alive

I think it is key for the Texans. Their run game is pivotal to their success. The Ravens and Raiders turned it off and then it was turned back on with the BESFs. I’m not saying every play, but I think I did see a lot of plays with OD and Dreessen both on the field, in fact, that TD catch that Dreessen had, OD was one of the first guys to congratulate him in the end zone. Anyways, I think the two TE sets could be used in more than one way to benefit their cutback run game and QB rollout game.

One way, you have an additional blocker on the backside.

Another way, if the D doesn’t cheat someone to the backside, well, that TE goes out into the flat, taking that LB or S with him, anyways.

But, I don’t have any of the games DVRed so I am going by my memory and my memory tells me that too many times, both the Raiders and Ravens had a guy cheating and either catching Foster on his cutback or if it was a pass and Schaub was rolling out, that same guy skipped looking for the pass and just continued in pressuring Schaub on the rollout. It sounds so easy.

Well, the next part of my theory is that after two weeks of that and failing to cure it, Dennison and Kubiak put their heads together and said, the only way to stop that guy is to go into a two TE set and that TE is tasked with taking care of the cheating S or LB, by either blocking him or punishing the other team with short quick passes until they decided to cover the TE, which again, takes the cheating S or LB away from the backside cutback of Foster and also keeps the pressure off Schaub on rollouts. It was so noticeable to me that it didn’t happen for those two games and then it came together for the Texans against the BESFs.

I didn't do anything wrong!.... and, I won't do it again.

by Rip Jersey on Oct 27, 2011 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

This is really interesting.

I dunno if I still have the Ravens’ game on DVR, but, if I do, I’ll check this out.

The Two-Day Hangover @ Battle Red Blog (2011) & SBN Houston (2010) | Twitter

by MDC on Oct 26, 2011 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Please, and thank you! Really, I just want to see it analyzed is all

It sure looked like the Ravens and Raiders were cheating a Safety or LB on the backside. In fact, I think they were doing that and it was doing two things. It was taking away Foster’s ability to cutback on the backside AND if it wasn’t a run play, it was allowing that same guy to continue on and take away Schaub’s rollout!!! Do you see what I am talking about? It is so simple and obvious when you think about it. Well, the BESFs either didn’t do it or the Texans did something different to counteract it. I think what they might have done is go to more two TE formations. What that does is force that guy, Safety or LB, whoever, to cover the TE when he goes out into the flat, which takes him away from being able to take away the cutback and/or rollout. Did you notice the Texans had both the cutback and rollout working against the BESFs but neither worked against the Ravens and Raiders? Check into this theory, MDC! Thank you!

I didn't do anything wrong!.... and, I won't do it again.

by Rip Jersey on Oct 26, 2011 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great post

It’s afterglow until at least Wednesday, right?

Every time I read S. Kentucky BE-SF Traitors, I laugh. HAH – see…

by Kidaster on Oct 24, 2011 6:46 PM CDT reply actions  

Ha...this guy pissed them off I think...

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ycn-10233787

He compared them to the ever-underachieving Oilers…which is a fair comparison excluding yesterday’s game :D

by Peckerwood on Oct 24, 2011 7:08 PM CDT reply actions  

.....

Double post and it didn’t show the link or my comments? Wtf…http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ycn-10233787

Fair comparison really to the under-achieving Oilers…excluding yesterday’s game of course. TALK ABOUT A BEAT DOWN! And then the Saints had to go and top us….bastards lol

by Peckerwood on Oct 24, 2011 7:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

MotherShip Quotes

After reading the Kube article I couldn’t stop thinking about Shannon Sharpe.
Is the combo of OD/Dreessen comparable to the HOF’r?

1 Defensive Score is left in the Karma Bag
Hmm Hmm Good, Wade Aid hits the spot.
"Wade aid has lean in it, just saying"

by WreckNTexan on Oct 24, 2011 7:15 PM CDT reply actions  

curious...

did any Titan fans come over and say anything? Nice? Mean? Respect?

All I want to do is FAAAARRRRRRRRRMMMMMMMMM!!!....and COok.

by Mellowcheese on Oct 24, 2011 7:25 PM CDT reply actions  

Haven't heard from them really.

Maybe a couple have come by to say we won the division. Otherwise, the trash talkers who’s been here since the Raiders game have completely vanished.

by Tony Ung on Oct 24, 2011 7:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

A couple of them checked in yesterday afternoon, Dreadlocks, Hal...humbled as expected.

Gotta give them credit for swinging by with congrats. Good folks and fans.

'Without change something sleeps inside us, and seldom awakens. The sleeper must awaken.' -Frank Herbert

by chuckiepoo on Oct 24, 2011 7:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, my respect for tits fans has improved a ton. Their owner on the other hand

can suck a fart out of my ass.

This sig intentionally left blank.

by MeMongo on Oct 24, 2011 7:33 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

All quiet on the Methopotamian Front.

I really want to tell some of their posters from last week – you kept running our team down, telling us the Texans weren’t as good as TTs. Well? What now?

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Oct 24, 2011 7:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

It took everything I had to not troll the shit out of them last week.

Its completely laughable that the BESFs are going to take the division. Their homerism might be beyond anything we’ve yet to see this year. Aside from their OLine they didn’t even attempt to back it up with any sort of reason, they just kept saying they were going to win like a determined 8 year old and “wait for Sunday”.

Yeah, Sunday came and went. Where are they now?

Personally, I also do NOT want to see any kind of good will between BRB and MCM. I’m glad there were no official ask the other team posts like we normally have. They should be ignored and treated with nothing pure disdain.

by WhiskeyR on Oct 25, 2011 8:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

After last night's game, I might be more worried about the Jags

With that D, they are capable of beating any team. Not saying they will always do it, but they are capable and should be feared.

I didn't do anything wrong!.... and, I won't do it again.

by Rip Jersey on Oct 25, 2011 10:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

The thing about Jax

you get ahead of them quickly, they dont have the talent to catch back up.

"Taco Joe - the beacon of optimism" TexansDC
THEREALALLENOU: "@Joeeatstacos... You're like the second testicle to my Tom green. I dont NEED you, but life is better when your around lol"
AllenOU is the Montgomery to my Patton
God blessed Texas, but he has forsaken the Texans

by Taco Joe on Oct 25, 2011 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

Truth

I'm a man!! I'm forty!!

by Hydroshock on Oct 25, 2011 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

that is why we need to strike hard strike fast and blow them out of the water, kinda like my sex life.

"Taco Joe - the beacon of optimism" TexansDC
THEREALALLENOU: "@Joeeatstacos... You're like the second testicle to my Tom green. I dont NEED you, but life is better when your around lol"
AllenOU is the Montgomery to my Patton
God blessed Texas, but he has forsaken the Texans

by Taco Joe on Oct 25, 2011 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

They are still 2-5 however

Not trying to degrade their performance last night, but if the D was truly that dominant they should have a better record.

"Never underestimate the dumb with JJ" - Hugh Jarce

by Mumford on Oct 25, 2011 8:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

That could have gotten real ugly

Possibly even to the point where we were begging for Bo$$man to be allowed back

Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."

by The Night Owl on Oct 27, 2011 2:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

It would have had to gotten.....

REALLLLLLLYYYYYYY bad for that. lulz

Just my $.02
Even duct tape can't fix stupid

by txknight on Oct 27, 2011 6:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

A couple came over to congratulate us for the win.

Other than that, not really.

Despite my better judgment, a manager at Battle Red Blog.

Supreme Galactic Editor of Battle Red Onion.

I am a visionary, I am a genius, and now I am angry! Now where are those pants at?!

Football is war by other means. - Carl von Clausewitz...sorta.

by UprootedTexan on Oct 24, 2011 7:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

well...

i dunno i came like 2 days before that they swarmed in and talked…..so w.e. now they vanish what a suprise :P

All I want to do is FAAAARRRRRRRRRMMMMMMMMM!!!....and COok.

by Mellowcheese on Oct 24, 2011 7:30 PM CDT reply actions  

Great article!

Where’s the MNF thread? We gotta start pulling for the Jags and Colts to win a few and drop out of the top five draft positions.

This sig intentionally left blank.

by MeMongo on Oct 24, 2011 7:35 PM CDT reply actions  

An improbable Jags win would be nice here.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Oct 24, 2011 7:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

You know what I liked best about this week?

No turtling on play calls.

The Texans starting getting aggressive sometime in the first quarter and didn’t really stop until mid 3rd when the game was well and truly out of reach.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Oct 24, 2011 7:36 PM CDT reply actions  

^^^THIS!!^^^

'Without change something sleeps inside us, and seldom awakens. The sleeper must awaken.' -Frank Herbert

by chuckiepoo on Oct 24, 2011 7:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

...of course four to six at a pop running helps. :- )

'Without change something sleeps inside us, and seldom awakens. The sleeper must awaken.' -Frank Herbert

by chuckiepoo on Oct 24, 2011 7:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

But being aggressive in the passing game helps that.

The Texans can put defenses in a no-win situation better than any team in the league with the possible exceptions of NO, GB and NE. But all those teams get their running threat primarily off their great passing game, the Texans are much more balanced. That doesn’t mean better, but it might mean more versatile.

GB, NE, NO really have no hope of surviving a QB injury. The Texans might.

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Oct 24, 2011 8:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Shush!

Don’t speak of such things.

Dallas Cowboys, all hat and no cattle since 1996.

by Jonathan Fosburgh on Oct 24, 2011 8:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yep

And – team attitude was better. Everyone wanted to lay some wood. Even Rackers.

Did you see J. Joseph leapfrog McCain on the INT/TD? Everyone was fired up.

of course, that’s easier when you are up 5 TD’s…..

by Kidaster on Oct 24, 2011 7:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

But that attitude helps you get up 5 TDs.

It’s funny. I’m a baseball (now basketball and football) stats geek from way back. I used to think that things you couldn’t really quantify had no real impact on winning or losing. I now believe that’s wrong. Leadership matters a great deal, especially in football and basketball.

Look at SF. That’s the same cast of character, the same “no hope” QB. All that’s different is their coach, and their approach.

I sometimes wonder what Bellichick could do with this roster…

"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."

Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake

by Xiane on Oct 24, 2011 8:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure what you mean by aggressive...

But the Texans ran the ball 47 times and passed it 23 times. I think you’re equating “successful” with “aggressive”.

by Nashmeister on Oct 24, 2011 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think so too.

When our running game is rocking, our passing game goes much much better. We played like we were supposed to play, the way Kubiak intends but doesn’t always get done.

by WhiskeyR on Oct 25, 2011 8:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

That game was Kubiak's wet dream.

There’s nothing he loves more than wearing down a defense to the point that you rip off 8-10 yard runs routinely.

by Nashmeister on Oct 25, 2011 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

I know I have said it elsewhere, but let's give Dennison some credit for calling that game

He put it out there on the field. Kubiak just had to lay back and enjoy that ride…. sure, maybe he got wet….

I didn't do anything wrong!.... and, I won't do it again.

by Rip Jersey on Oct 25, 2011 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your big-time home for big-time analysis and big-time rants about all things Houston Texan.

Hate Mail Goes Here

Brb_small Tim

Absurdly Talented Writers

Lucy_small bigfatdrunk

Tumblr_l2ecwbvekp1qbhedwo1_500_small MDC

Vlcsnap-00003_small riversmccown

Tumblr_l4i6iruxha1qbs5d3o1_400_small TexansDC

Chairman_meow_blink_small UprootedTexan

Absurdly Talented Writers, Part Deux

Photo_small Vega

Alec-baldwin-glengarry-glen-ross-always-be-closing_small tehGrindCrusher