Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Texans-Colts: Observations from a Thumping

After watching the media coverage of last week's game against the Colts, you would have thought that Peyton Manning invented the game of football, and his teammates wouldn't be able to find the field without him. Sure, he's their best player and one of the best quarterbacks in the league, but this is a team that has won eight division championships in the nine years of it's existence. Not to be too snide, but something tells me they have a few other players that may have had something to do with it. To make it seem as though the Texans just beat a UFL team is unfair coverage to say the least.

 

After watching the game again, I can honestly tell you that the Texans would have soundly beaten the Colts even with number 18. He would have had nothing to do with a defense that gave up 257 yards and 27 points in the first half. Nor would he have had anything to do with a punt coverage unit that resembled a gaggle of blind cockroaches trying to find the nearest shade when the lights come on while surrendering a 79 yard punt return for a touchdown. I'm not sure, but I don't think he would have helped Dwight Freeney from being a complete non-factor for four quarters either. All things considered, the zone blocking scheme and the development of the offense has put the Texans on equal footing in matchups against Indianapolis.

 

Anyway, here are some of the things that jumped out at me:

 

1.     People not praising Mario Williams for his performance don't really know football.

Everybody’s talking about how his two sacks came against Dallas Clark. First of all, not every sack for DeMarcus Ware or Julius Peppers come against All-Pro tackles. In many cases, because of a miscommunication by the line, they’re not even touched. On both sacks, Williams didn’t even have to use his size advantage, because the smaller, quicker Clark was severely beaten by Mario’s speed. He barely got a hand on him. The, in the third quarter, he forced Kerry Collins into an intentional grounding penalty by simply overpowering right tackle, Jeff Linkenbach. Overall, and after only one game, Wade Phillips looks like he was right on target with Williams' ability to excel as a 3-4 under outside linebacker.

 

2.      Duane Brown was had his best game as a Texan.

On running plays, he did a great job moving Dwight Freeney completely out of the play. In his pass blocking, he still gets off balance at times, but on several occasions, I was impressed with how he re-anchored and withstood the bull rush from Freeney and recovered when he tried to use his quickness against him. This time, there was very little reaching, simply readjusting mid-play. In addition, he showed great quickness in moving to the second level to take on linebackers as well. Overall, the line played very well, but Brown should be highlighted because of the fact that Freeney has owned him in the past. As I stated earlier, the Colts’ defensive end didn’t even appear on the stat sheet.

 

3.      Both sides were sloppy in the second half, especially the offense.

The defense’s miscues were less pronounced, but their focus certainly took a hit as there were a few breakdowns in coverage. Offensively, they were nowhere near as dominating in the trenches, and you could tell that the intensity was lacking. Also, Ben Tate fumbled in the fourth quarter while carrying the ball well away from his body (something he did not do earlier in the game), which led to the Colts’ only score of the game. Consequently, they gained only 127 yards in the second half, which was less than half of what they produced in the first. All in all, it seemed as though the Texans were just going through the motions after halftime.

 

4.      Matt Schaub was slightly above average.

His first interception was really Andre Johnson’s fault. Sure, it was high, but AJ got both hands on it and should have brought it in. The second one was simply a bad, lazy throw over the middle that would have had to magically flow through the arms of Indianapolis’ Gary Brackett in order to be completed. Many of his passes were high and he just seemed to be off his game.

 

5.      The defensive line was fantastic.

I cannot say this enough: J.J. Watt is going to be a serious player. He was a constant nuisance to any Colts’ offensive lineman he faced. Whether rushing the passer or chasing a back down the line of scrimmage, his violent hands and motor are going to make him a Pro Bowl player. Antonio Smith has really taken to his role in Wade Phillips’ system. The scuttlebutt when he left Arizona was that he didn’t like the 3-4 and how he was being used. However, the little time he’s been in this system, he has been an absolute beast for teams to try and handle. His extremely quick inside move on the sack-strip in the first quarter displayed why he is the prototypical one gap, 5-technique. Not surprisingly, Shaun Cody is not a true fit at nose tackle, but he makes up for some of his deficiencies with hustle. Pro Bowl center Jeff Saturday found it difficult to keep him from knifing into the backfield on either side.

 

6.      The special teams were...well, special. 

Like the defense, it was totally different than last year. Danieal Manning and Jacoby Jones both had great returns and the latter made good decisions when it came to fielding punts (something that was lacking in previous years). Brett Hartmann, a rookie punter, had only one kickoff returned against him, while the rest of them were booted well into, or through, the end zone. Lastly, and it almost goes without saying, Neil Rackers was perfect.

 

7.      Ben Tate will be the second string back by the fifth game.

Granted, he doesn’t have the breakaway speed of Arian Foster, but he runs hard. His ability to beat up defenses and provide a viable alternative will keep Foster from wearing down as the season progresses. Moreover, his vision was better than expected, as he "created" several yards by redirecting when the hole wasn’t there. Towards the and, it looked as though Indianapolis defenders were actually shying away from contact when Tate broke through the line.

 

8.     You may have issues with him as a head coach, but Gary Kubiak is a class act.

How many times have Texans fans seen Peyton Manning still in a game with six minutes left, up 21 points, and the Colts still throwing the ball? Way too many if you’re a Texans’ fan, or any other team for that matter. Manning and the Colts have survived the criticism in the past because of Peyton's "aw shucks" demeanor and Tony Dungy's deserved reputation as a good man. As they get older and fall from their dominant perch, I think many teams will run up the score on the Colts as much as they can. However, when Kubiak had the chance to hang 50 on the Colts and really embarrass them, he chose to call off the dogs. He only called nine passing plays in the second half and two in the fourth quarter.

Comment 19 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Peyton Manning

I think you’re understimating the effect that Peyton Manning would have had on this game. Specifically, you mention that he wouldn’t have had anything to do with a defense that gave up 27 points in the first half.

If Peyton Manning is in, a few things probably would have been different. For one, he probably wouldn’t have fumbled the snap from the Center that led to one of our early touchdowns. Another thing is that he probably would have gotten rid of the ball before he was sacked (on the play where Smith forced a fumble. He still would have been sacked on Mario’s first sack).

In addition to not giving the Texans the ball inside the red zone twice, Manning (or at least a healthy Manning) would probably have led the colts on at least one scoring drive. So in reality, if we’re playing against Peyton Manning and not Vodka Collins, we’re probably looking at a halftime score of 7 – 13, assuming that Peyton doesn’t drive the field on our defense more than just the one time.

I agree with the first 6 points you made after the intro. I don’t disagree with the 7th point per se, but one of the things people talked about with Ben Tate was that he had breakaway speed. Arian Foster is fast, but he’s definitely not a burner.

With point 8, I think BFD put up a post about how Kubes didn’t really change his play calling until either late in the 3rd quarter or the 4th quarter. When he did, it wasn’t really a matter of not going for the throat as much as it was protecting his star players.

by Tailgate Andy on Sep 15, 2011 3:04 PM CDT reply actions  

Hey Andy, thanks for the comment.

It’s not that I underestimate Peyton’s effect, but I think you’re underestimating the offense. To assume that the Texans wouldn’t have scored any points without the fumbles means that the Colts’ defense would have had to stop the offense, which simply didn’t happen in the first half. Also, it would have been difficult for Manning to get the ball out on Antonio Smith’s strip, because it took all of about 1.5 seconds after the snap.

On Kubes play-calling, you may be right on the reason for the shift, but they had receivers running free all day. All I know is that Manning and Co. wouldn’t have let off the gas.
Tate had decent breakaway speed at Auburn, but it wasn’t something that made me think he would be a home run threat in the NFL. Arian’s speed comes from his long strides. Remember, while he’s a loper, which doesn’t usually look very fast, he had no problem beating the Raiders’ secondary (one of the fastest in the league) to the end zone last year for a 70+ yard TD run.

You can catch more of Jimmy Neil's work at www.doctorfootball.com.

by Jimmy Neil on Sep 15, 2011 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

I still think the offense would have scored

but without those fumbles, they would have had to drive 80 yards (maybe less if the Colts kicked the ball to Danieal Manning). They might have scored in the same amount of time, but it probably would have taken them longer. The other thing is that the longer the drive, the more opportunities there are for mistakes. I think we still would have been ahead, but I think that the Colts not having Peyton was a pretty big deal.

With the Disruptacon sack/strip, I don’t know if Manning would have had time to get the ball to a receiver, but I’ve seen him throw the ball away at the last second way too many times to think that he would have just taken the sack. Couple that with his pocket awareness, and I think that we would have been looking at an incompletion instead of a Texans first and 10.

I’ll defer to you on the speed issue. I seem to remember Arian getting caught from behind on a lot of 30 yard runs, where a faster back would have been able to take it to the house, but I can’t remember any specific instances, and I can’t look for those examples right now.

by Tailgate Andy on Sep 15, 2011 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

How about the point that...

if a healthy Manning is playing, the Colts have the ball much longer than they did which gives the Texans less time to score. So we would have had to score a lot faster than we did, not just in the same amount of time.

Actually, I agree with both of you! How about that for riding the fence? With Manning in the game for the Colts I think the final score would have been a lot like last year’s, i.e. 34-24 Texans still win.

by Mikus318 on Sep 16, 2011 3:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

re: #4

He’s no Calvin Johnson, sure, but don’t blame Andre for that interception! If anything, he made it more difficult because the defender behind Andre would have been blinded by the sunlight beaming out of his ass.

Also, I’ve never seen “Shaun Cody” and “hustle” in the same sentence before. So, first time for everything.

I agree the Texans would have won the game even if Peyton had played, but it would have been a lot closer. It’s nice to see someone out-suck the Texans on special teams too.

by JBal on Sep 15, 2011 3:25 PM CDT reply actions  

I can't tell because of the sunlight joke

but are you serious about the first interception not being Andre’s fault?

by Tailgate Andy on Sep 15, 2011 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

As realistic as I try to be about the Texans...

I will believe nothing bad about Andre Johnson. My wife says when I talk about him she can see hearts popping around my head. I’m exaggerating of course, but without re-watching it I remember my impression being that the pass was too high and hard. Schaub was not 100% on during this game, as I saw a few errant passes and at least one other that really should have been an INT.

by JBal on Sep 15, 2011 7:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

The one bad thing I've noticed about Andre Johnson

is that if he drops a pass, it tends to be an easy one. This one wasn’t a perfect pass, but it looked very catchable to me.

I agree with Schaub not being perfect during the game, but most quarterbacks aren’t. You have to settle for them being good enough (by which I mean, you can’t expect a pass right on the numbers that catches the receiver perfectly in stride every time, but you can expect them to throw a catchable ball).

by Tailgate Andy on Sep 16, 2011 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

oh I know. Not riding Schaub too hard

every QB will have a few goofy throws if they throw it enough. He seems to have one or two inexplicable throws per game that are just bizarrely bad, but overall I’m definitely on the Schaub bandwagon. I still blame Schaub more than Johnson for the first interception though. remember the INT last year in the San Diego game where AJ kneed the ball out of his own hands? That was Frank Bush’s fault. Sorry, but for me to blame AJ for anything at all, he’ll have to be a LOT more obviously wrong than that.

by JBal on Sep 16, 2011 8:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Also, I didn’t mean to imply that it would have been a blowout with Peyton, but I think it would have been similar to last year’s game – it would look close on the scoreboard, but watching it would leave you with an entirely different interpretation.

You can catch more of Jimmy Neil's work at www.doctorfootball.com.

by Jimmy Neil on Sep 15, 2011 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

LOL – love the use of the term “out-suck”, JBal. Classic!

Sorry, but I disagree on the first interception. That’s a ball that Andre comes down with nine out of 10 times. He was able to get both hands on it without full extension, and I think he’d be the first to tell you that was easy compared to some of the atches we’ve become accustomed to.

On Shaun Cody, if you watch the interior line during the game, you will see that he consistently got lower than Saturday, which is very tough to do and got really good push into the backfield.

You can catch more of Jimmy Neil's work at www.doctorfootball.com.

by Jimmy Neil on Sep 15, 2011 3:35 PM CDT reply actions  

O_o

Capt. Nately: You're a shameful opportunist! What you don't understand is that it's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.

Old man in whorehouse: You have it backwards. It's better to live on your feet than to die on your knees. I know.

-Catch 22-

by Jordann on Sep 15, 2011 4:02 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

What's really sad...

is that after we beat the Fins by 20+ on Sunday, national media will be talking about how bad Miami’s defense is this year and how Henne’s performance against the Pats was an aberration and he can’t do that consistently. It is going to take many, many dominating wins and/or an appearance in the playoffs before we get the respect we deserve. Even then there will always be someone talking about why the Texans are lucky to be where they are and how they will choke eventually. That’s fine with me – give us more motivation to go out and stick it to the opponent.

by Mikus318 on Sep 15, 2011 5:15 PM CDT reply actions  

Mikus,

To be totally honest, until the Texans actually do something they’re not necessarily deserving of a lot of respect. And I agree, this team needs to be hungry – they don’t react very well to compliments and attention.

It will be interesting to see if they roll off a few more wins, beat the Saints and Steelers, how they’re treated. I remember how the Rams of ‘99 weren’t taken very seriously until the beat the 49ers for the second time that year, and both of them were blowouts.

You can catch more of Jimmy Neil's work at www.doctorfootball.com.

by Jimmy Neil on Sep 15, 2011 6:16 PM CDT reply actions  

What I noticed...

…is that my Bronco’s vanted running game had less to do with Shanny than it did with the ‘Kube’. I wish he was my Broncos head coach……………….

I really do….

Guardian of the Gate to La La Land!
Gonsoulin, Taylor, Wright, Gradishar, Atwater, and Davis.....
Why are they not in the Hall...I just don't understand.

by Mike Clark on Sep 15, 2011 8:23 PM CDT reply actions  

Respectfully disagree.

Shanny had learned to favor thefamed Bobb McKittrick ZBS, after the time he spent as offensive coordinator, in San Francisco.

Kubiak spent time with Shanny in SF, as well, and I have no doubt that he contributed greatly to Shanahan in every aspect during their time together. But those Bronco teams were in Shanahan’s vision, first and foremost. Shanahan deserves much more credit than you’re allowing.

I am curious as to why you would say “Kubiak”, however, and not someone like Alex Gibbs?…

by Cut Block on Sep 16, 2011 1:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

lol @

Watt’s “violent hands”

by DerrickDoll 7 on Sep 15, 2011 10:28 PM CDT reply actions  

Interesting analysis

Mario Williams will have 4 sacks and 1 int by Game 4 of the regular season.

by Barryfromtexas on Sep 16, 2011 12:11 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your big-time home for big-time analysis and big-time rants about all things Houston Texan.

Hate Mail Goes Here

Brb_small Tim

Absurdly Talented Writers

Lucy_small bigfatdrunk

Tumblr_l2ecwbvekp1qbhedwo1_500_small MDC

Vlcsnap-00003_small riversmccown

Tumblr_l4i6iruxha1qbs5d3o1_400_small TexansDC

Chairman_meow_blink_small UprootedTexan

Absurdly Talented Writers, Part Deux

Photo_small Vega

Alec-baldwin-glengarry-glen-ross-always-be-closing_small tehGrindCrusher