The Weekly Red Zone Review of Comcastic Proportions, Replete with Comcasty Comcastness
I have to be honest here, trying to write a post, let alone a post about how the Texans performed in the red zone, after a gut-wrenching loss like that is difficult. It's only that much harder when you take a look at just how many times they were in the red zone and you think, "That could have been a touchdown," or "They should've put it in the end zone there." But that's neither here nor there.
Going by the red zone numbers, you would think the Texans had another banner day. What numbers you ask? Well, that's a secret reserved only for you, me, and the rest of the English-speaking world, so long as nobody else clicks on the jump.
First Quarter
First Red Zone Drive
The first trip to the red zone came in the opening drive of the game. The Texans entered the red zone after an 11-yard run by Ben Tate got them to the Saints' 15-yard line with just under 11 minutes in the first quarter.
With the success that Tate had on the last run, Kubiak gave him the ball again, only to see Tate gain one yard, prompting a second-and-nine from the 14-yard line.
That's all it would take, it turned out, as Schaub launched a seven yard pass to Owen Daniels who scampered an additional seven yards into the end zone for the first score of the game.
Time Spent in Red Zone: :45
End Result: Owen Daniels Touchdown Reception!
Score: Houston 7 - New Orleans 0
Second Red Zone Drive
On the Texans' second drive of the day, they get to the red zone again. Once again it's propelled by another 11-yard run by Ben Tate. He seems to be pretty good at this whole running thing.
The Texans start their red zone drive at the Saints' 11-yard line when Tate got another run, this time a three yard charge to the Saints' eight-yard line.
Second down came and Schaub, trying to recreate the same results as the first drive, passed to Owen Daniels, only for it to fall incomplete.
The Texans decided to air it out again on third-and-eight, this time a pass complete to Andre Johnson who takes it four yards, four yards shy of a first down.
Neil Rackers then came out and successfully kicked a 22-yard field goal.
Time Spend in Red Zone: 1:34
End Result: 22-yard Neil Rackers Field Goal
Score: Houston 10 - New Orleans 0
Second Quarter
Third Red Zone Drive
The Texans wouldn't find themselves in the red zone again until the middle of the second quarter. By this time the Saints had put some points on the board and it was starting to look like the shootout we'd all been expecting. Well, okay, I was expecting a defensive battle because I'm weird like that. But anyway, they got back into the red zone after a lovely 23-yard pass to Owen Daniels. This would land the Texans at first and goal from the Saints' nine-yard line.
The first play in the red zone was a pass to Jacoby Jones, one of only two times he was targeted today, which was completed for no gain.
The Texans took to the air again by trying to pass to Owen Daniels which fell incomplete.
They try passing again on third and goal from the nine, this time to Andre Johnson, which again falls incomplete.
Finally, on fourth down, the Texans settle...again...for a 27-yard field goal from Neil Rackers which was good.
Time Spent in Red Zone: :52
End Result: 27-yard Neil Rackers Field Goal
Score: Houston 13 - New Orleans 7
Fourth Red Zone Drive
Our fourth drive of the game came a lot sooner than expected, thanks in no small part to a Johnathan Joseph interception. The Texans got into the red zone with another monster run by Ben Tate for 19 yards.
The Texans had a first-and-10 from the Saints' 14-yard line, and started the red zone drive with another Ben Tate run for, unfortunately, no gain.
This didn't sit well with Tate, apparently, because on second-and-10, Tate ran the ball again, this time for a five yard gain to the Saints' nine.
Then on third-and-five, the Texans air the ball out to Owen Daniels which falls incomplete. Which means...yep, you guessed it...
In came Neil Rackers to knock through another 27-yard field goal.
Time Spent in Red Zone: :56
End Result: 27-yard Neil Rackers Field Goal
Score: Houston 16 - New Orleans 10
Third Quarter
Fifth Red Zone Drive
Our fifth drive within the 20-yard line comes, not surprisingly, thanks to another excellent run from Ben "Particles" Tate, who took the ball eight yards to the Saints' 17-yard line.
On second-and-two, the Texans decide to throw all logic out the window and let Steve Slaton run the ball. No, I still don't know why either. As you would expect from a run by Steve Fumblina Slaton, he lost a yard on the play, setting up third-and-nine for the Texans.
Finally seeing the light, the offense decides to throw to Andre Johnson again, unfortunately, this pass falls incomplete setting up...say it with me, kids!
...A 36-yard field goal attempt by Neil Rackers! Who didn't see that coming?!
Time Spent in Red Zone: :50
End Result: 36-yard Neil Rackers Field Goal
Score: Houston 19 - New Orleans 17
Fourth Quarter
Sixth Red Zone Drive
Our last trip into the red zone comes after Schaub completes a 10-yard pass to Kevin Walter, who is, in fact, still playing for the Texans, and gets them to the Saints' 20-yard line.
The only play of this drive is probably one of the greatest catches I've ever seen, and certainly the best I've ever seen in the history of Texans football. I can't even begin to do this catch justice, so I'll put a link here so everyone can relive it, again and again as often as they want, and simply say that Kevin Walter completes a 20-yard touchdown pass from Matt Schaub.
Time Spent in Red Zone: :05
End Result: Awesomeness in the form of a 20-yard Kevin Walter Touchdown Reception!
Score: Houston 33 - New Orleans 32
Final Results
Number of Trips in Red Zone: 6
Total Amount of Time in Red Zone: 5:02
Average Amount of Time in Red Zone: :50
Red Zone Efficiency: 6/6 (100%)
Scores in Red Zone: 2 TD (Daniels, Walter) 4 FG (22, 27, 27, 36)
53 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Tate and the redzone run game
Just wasn’t there. I thought the third drive they should have given him a chance but it’s not like it was successful at all yesterday. Now we see the impact of Foster and Ward not being healthy.
And it may be just me but I think Tate really got worn down by the 4th quarter. The coaches didn’t want to use Slaton in the run game (we all saw why) and with Tate being the only guy he wore down. They’ve ridden him a lot the last 3 games.
Texans tried several things yesterday and didn’t execute any of them well in the redzone. I thought many of the passes were going short instead into the endzone and as mentioned the run threat was non existent.
Prediction: 11-5 AFC South champions.
To me that
that is still a great mystery of why Slaton is still on this roster…
I guess they figure they’ll stick with the devil they know, than the one they dont.
There was one great pass to OD, he was inches away from grabbing it
So heartbreaking.
"Kareem — verb: to be so horrible in coverage that the camera man is forced to zoom out in order to find the defender responsible for whoever just waltzed into the end zone." -Nashmeister
Does anyone think that we shoul start using vickers in the redzone??
At some point in the 4th quarter I saw him kill someone…and then that person got really upset…
by SMITHILLIAK on Sep 26, 2011 7:06 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Guys..
Arian had like 16 TDs in the red zone last season. Arian and Ward are the key to our red zone efficiency. We need at least one of those guys back ASAP.
^ This ^ !!!
We have been happy with Tates performance but this game really showed that we NEED foster to play with the big dogs…
Red Zone Schmed Zone
What happened to the Texans defensive front yesterday? Did ANY OLB make a play? Did Mario & Barwin even play? Did Reed get on the field?
With Foster, at least one or two trips in the red zone would’ve been TDs instead of FGs & the Texans would be 3-0 today.
Thank goodness it was a non-conference, non-divisional game.
This is exactly why this redzone efficiency is so flawed
I mean, if we’re inside the 20 what i likely to happen to get us below 100%? If we fumble, throw an interception, miss a field goal, or take a knee then we’re less than 100%.
This whole idea of red zone efficiency is completely ridiculous if field goals count for the same amount as TDs. This team fucking SUCKED in the red zone yesterday.
Lol yes
I missed most of the game but it seems to me that fg’s are 3/7 of the possible points (3/8 if u count going for 2) so they should only count for 42% instead of 100%…so that makes our real redzone percentage 61.9% which makes a lot more sense with a loss that 100%
by SMITHILLIAK on Sep 26, 2011 9:43 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I think that if you're going to do it point based
you should do it out of 6, since you only go for 2 in very specific situations. If we’re running over a team, and score 6 touchdowns + PAT, our Red Zone Efficiency would only by 88%. That doesn’t seem very accurate since they did everything they wanted to.
by BrownCrayon on Sep 26, 2011 10:47 AM CDT up reply actions
I don't think FGs should count at all. Seriously, a FG is not at all efficient
So in my book we succeeded 2 out of 6 times for 33% efficiency.
"Kareem — verb: to be so horrible in coverage that the camera man is forced to zoom out in order to find the defender responsible for whoever just waltzed into the end zone." -Nashmeister
by RocketsAstros on Sep 26, 2011 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions
I did 4 FG’s for 12 pts + 2 TD’s for 14 pts for 26 total redzone pts. All of that over 6(number of redzone visits) x 7(number of possible pts) for 42 possible pts… 26/42×100= 61.9%
by SMITHILLIAK on Sep 27, 2011 9:50 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Only with the rose colored glasses of the BRB are we 100% in the RZ.
Everybody else who is associated with the NFL, including Kubiak, considers a FG in the RZ a failure. We were 2/6 yesterday.
You can blame the D all you want for the loss, but we knew going into the season we still have gaping holes of suck on that side of the ball. You can only cover your weaknesses for so longbut sooner or later they’ll get exposed. When we stopped getting pressure on Brees our secondary got torched.
Watching our D in the 4th qtr yesterday was like watching a kitten trying to cover up an elephant turd in a litter box filled with gravel. Weakness exposed by a top 5 O.
It’s up to our ‘top 5’ O to help cover for our D. We are 5/16 or 31% in the RZ for the season. We were 4/9,44% in the RZ after the first two games against teams that are a combined 0-6 for the season so far. If you want to take into account we let up in the 2nd half against the Colts because of our lead then you should consider 2 of the RZ TD’s in that game were served by the D with a TO and a short field.
The way I look at it, our high powered O accounted for 2 scores in each of the first 2 games against lousy teams. ST and the D did the rest.
I know it’s early and I’m not worried about the Saints loss but 44% in the RZ isn’t going to cut it against the better teams in this league. Going 50-60% may win you a game or two but we need to be hitting at 60-80% to compete against the best teams in the league and to keep some pressure off our D. Kubiak knows it, Phillips knows it, alot of you know it, too. We have to depend on our O to win games.
Time to unleash the Kraken
Alcohol is necessary so that a man can have a good opinion of himself, undisturbed by the facts.
by Seaborn1 on Sep 26, 2011 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
ROFL imaginative ;-)
Watching our D in the 4th qtr yesterday was like watching a kitten trying to cover up an elephant turd in a litter box filled with gravel. Weakness exposed by a top 5 O.
I had to rec it — the image you conjured was priceless.
#Texans2011 — Where reality and dreams collide!
~~ Fuzion
by BattleRedFan on Sep 26, 2011 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions
Let's hope
That Foster coming back helps with the Red Zone TD efficiency, because the last 2 weeks have been pretty bad. Judging by how the Steelers looked last night, I am expecting a win this week.
Defense lost the game
Even if we had converted two of the Red Zone FGs into TDs we would have only scored 41, the Saints would’ve kicked the game winning FG as time expired and we still would have lost. No matter how frustrating it is that we couldn’t punch it in, the defense is what cost us the game.
I don't think any one phase or thing lost the game
Did the defense give up too much in the 4th qtr? Yes
Were the OLBs mostly ineffective – Yes
Did teh Schaub miss on some throws that could have made a difference? yes
Was the running game piss poor in the red zone? yes
And still it was a close game over all. They played a really good team, and part of them being really good made the Texans look bad in some phases of the game.
I only saw a few blitzes yesterday, but Brees burned us pretty bad on all of them.
Mario Williams will have 4 sacks and 1 int by Game 4 of the regular season.
by Barryfromtexas on Sep 26, 2011 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions
We could never know. If we got TD's off of those FG's, it could of killed any momentum the Saints had.
The momentum swung in their favor because we allowed them to stay in the game.
I figure if we scored TD's and up 3 scores going into the 4th
The D pins their ears back and goes after Brees and the DB’s play tighter coverage.
Alcohol is necessary so that a man can have a good opinion of himself, undisturbed by the facts.
Yeah, it's one of those could of/would of type of situations.
I do agree with you that we would of went after Brees more if we weren’t so close.
I dont think the defense was that bad
The 4th quarter was terrible, but the first 3 were good. Let’s not forget that the Saints scored over 30 and the Pack and Bears too. They can put up the points on anyone.
Agreed.
We only allowed 17 pts in the first 3 qtrs and then 23 in the 4th… Our D got gassed and lost it at the end. But that is what drew brees and the offense does. If we had foster we win that game. A lose is a lose but i say that because come playoff time (if/when) we make it we will likely have foster back and will be capable of winning big games like this one.
This game, the steelers, ravens, and falcons are the teams that had me the most worried…and with the defense only getting better every week(hopefully) I can still see us with 11-12 wins(again, hopefully) and the real test will be against the falcons when our D should be completely complete and our Arian brother shoul be back to 100% and barring injuries this could be a superbowl preview
by SMITHILLIAK on Sep 26, 2011 9:50 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Agreed but the Falcons are probably the one I am least worried about.
They do not look as good as the Saints. They are inconsistent and we got them at home. Ravens are the one’s who will be a major test since it’s a road game and their offense is much better. As for the Steelers, I don’t know why but I feel like we are going to beat them by 10+ more points.
Right now I think the Ravens have the better D compared to the Steelers.
That looks to be our other very tough game (after the Saints).
But the Raider’s run game is worrying me.
by Jonathan Fosburgh on Sep 26, 2011 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions
I'm going to take it one game at a time.
I’ll worry about the Raiders run game after the Steelers. Right now, I’m more interested to see how the Texans respond after losing a winnable game. Playoff teams usually respond after losing in the fashion that the Texans did so it’s a good measuring stick on where we are at.
Consider anything I said about trading foster
Taken back. hes extremely vital to our red zone offense. On that note, consider my views that jason allen and brandon harris are both better then kareem….. Still 100% believed.
OFFICIAL MARIO WILLIAMS 2011 SACK COUNT; (2)
by Carter Liles on Sep 26, 2011 9:56 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
shaub and boobieak
good qb’s have great stats. great qb’s have wins. get the picture duck and fall schaub. and as for you boobiak, this is your last season. ever since the oilers sitting back and playing conservative on defense, and the texans following suit, you would think of trying to play aggressive and do some all out blitzing. the results can’t be any worse. why doncha try it boobieak ??
ps. the reason baby schaub was holding his ear was because he was hearing an earful from off.coord.
Last I looked Koobs was the Head Coach.....
he calls the offense. If you want to blame the D, complain about Wade & his coaches.
Cheers & Semper Fi
Our football, who art in Houston, Texans be thy name. Thy wins will come, this will be done at Reliant and on the road. Give us this year our winning season, and forgive us for our penalties, as we forgive those who false start against us. And lead us not into overtime but deliver us a Superbowl !! ~TheNightOwl
by SteelBlueUSMC on Sep 26, 2011 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
Irrational hate is irrational
Kubiak doesn’t make the throws. He doesn’t play defense. He’s not a CB. He doesn’t call defensive plays.
A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com
"Blind fandom is all I got left." - LoneSpot
by bigfatdrunk on Sep 26, 2011 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions
honestly,
the hostility in this post is uncalled for.
I thought I heard an interview on ABC where Kubes was saying that he got aggressive in play calling (did he say play calling on the offense? I don’t remember) — which made it sound like he might have taken it out of Dennison’s hands … it might be that the offense is more comfortable under Dennison’s tutelage then under Kubiak’s.
Maybe the 4th quarter meltdown on the offense was b/c Kubiak interfered with what was working in the 3 quarters previously.
Just a thought. I still don’t like the venom in TR’s post — scoring 33 points against a recent Super Bowl champ is nothing to be ashamed of. Could we have won the game if we’d played our cards differently? Hell yeah!
You know what? We made them have to score 40 points to beat us. There’s a saying ..
If you don’t win the race, make the person ahead of you break the record.We didn’t win the race but we pushed them to make 40 points to beat us — I think THAT’S impressive. Well done, TEXANS!
Coulda/woulda/shoulda — all part of the path we didn’t take. It’s totally lost to the alternate universe we’ll never see in this one. No need for hostility of that magnitude.
#Texans2011 — Where reality and dreams collide!
~~ Fuzion
by BattleRedFan on Sep 26, 2011 9:13 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
Nicely done.
A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com
"Blind fandom is all I got left." - LoneSpot
by bigfatdrunk on Sep 26, 2011 11:01 PM CDT up reply actions
yup... rec'd
"Fanaticism consists in redoubling your efforts when you have forgotten your aim." - George Santayana
I have a suggestion for Kubiak and Dennison...
If you are inside the 10 yard line redzone, use all four downs in an attempt to score TD’s instead of settling for FG’s. Here’s why:
1. FG’s are a concession and emotional let down to the offense. Sure it’s 3 points, but it gives the whole team a sense they failed to meet the true reason for being down there. It also gives a slight morale boost to the other team’s defense that they stopped the TD score.
2. As this game (and several last year) proved, you WILL lose games if you are scoring FGs to the other team’s TDs.
3. Even if you turn over on downs, it pins their offense inside their 10 yard line and gives your defense a chance to be disruptive. From here the defense may get a turnover and score, or force a punt and shift field position advantage to the next offensive series.
Kicking field goals inside the 10 yard line is just insane. It shows lack of confidence, and the math doesn’t support the philosophy. Especially when the defense is facing a high powered offense who WILL get TDs for their side.
Agree
If you want to pin anything on Kubes, I would’ve gone for it after Andre got stopped at the two (the first or second FG, I believe). The other three times? Not sure, but I do believe it changes the entire game.
A Texans fan. Really. No, I'm not kidding.
http://www.battleredblog.com
"Blind fandom is all I got left." - LoneSpot
by bigfatdrunk on Sep 26, 2011 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions
I would like to see the real stats on this for the league
Even 1 year’s worth
Of “Inside the 10” 4th down attempts, scores, and scores after failed attempt (by either team)
I don’t think being ahead or behind by 10 points or less should be huge factor on making the decision – sure there are other factors ) like if not much time on the clock, etc – then again FGs can be blocked too.
Then again I remember a couple of 90+ yard drives the Texans put on the Ravens last year.
Mario Williams will have 4 sacks and 1 int by Game 4 of the regular season.
by Barryfromtexas on Sep 26, 2011 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions
At first I was happy to see Kareem talking junk.
Then, whoever he was talking with started to carve him up.
Then I had a sad.
I'm a household name... at my house.
Michael Vick is the best throwing running back of all time.
My put your name on it prediction for the Housotn Texans.
10-6, with a first round playoff upset over either the Ravens or Steelers.
That would be Lance Moore.
Kareem should be ashamed. How can you talk back to someone who’s burned you numerous times…..
Because he's still playing and acting like a rookie.
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." -- Benjamin Disraeli
"If you really want something in life you have to work for it. Now quiet, they're about to announce the lottery numbers." -- Homer Simpson
"There is no rehab for stupid." -- Chris Rock
Never try to baptize a cat.
Agreed
Seriously, the best way he could of dealt with Moore’s trash talking is to play shut down coverage and jam him at the line of scrimmage. That would speak more volumes than to return the trash talk then get burned on the play right after….
Saints fan here
I was at the game yesterday, and all I have to say is that it was a great game between two explosive offenses and two limited defenses. You were missing Foster, we were missing Vilma. We were also missing anyone with a clue as to how to cover Mr. Johnson (not that such a person exists-he is a beast). Anyway, good hard-fought game…if Houston does not win the depleted AFC South this year Kubiak should be fired, because you have assembled some very nice talent. Hope to see your team in the playoffs.
"I have had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't it." Groucho Marx
by BenDerDonDat on Sep 26, 2011 6:11 PM CDT reply actions 4 recs
=) thanks
I agree with you. I wish we had won but I’m impressed that we made your team go out and score 40 points to win the game. I’m pissed that we got fooled TWICE on the 2 point conversions. But still , your win was a VERY impressive beating for us.
Thanks for leaving such a classy post!
and LOL yes awesome name ;-).
#Texans2011 — Where reality and dreams collide!
~~ Fuzion
by BattleRedFan on Sep 26, 2011 9:25 PM CDT up reply actions

by 
























