AFC South Roundtable: Guess Who's First?
In a blatant attempt to keep ourselves sane during the dog days of the offseason, SB Nation's AFC South bloggers have vowed to analyze each division rival's prospects for the coming season. I've been tasked with preparing some biting literature about that team that the Texans somehow manage to own every season. You might know them as the Jacksonville Jaguars. That piece of classic blogging will be coming shortly. But first things first: What do our division rivals think of the tumultuous offseason experienced by our beloved Texans?
Well, now we know what at least one rival fan thinks. In what may end up being an eerie bit of foreshadowing of the final standings of the AFC South, your Houston Texans were addressed first by our buddy BigBlueShoe over at our Indianapolis Colts site, Stampede Blue. His assessment of Houston's QB situation is, how do you say, NOT POSITIVE. Take a gander and bombard BigBlueShoe with comments questioning how he can see straight through those blue-colored spectacles he wears. He really likes that.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I disagree...
And with the effort you put into this, it saves lazy folks like me & BFD from having sit down and type out an argument. Well there's that, and the fact that my highest skill-set does not lie in the literary realm. So, a sincere thanks for beating me to this one.
By the way, my favorite part of your thesis:
"You left out "Reche Caldwell choking worse than Dirk Diggler's girlfriend" and "Rex Grossman turning in a performance that was slightly more painful to watch than your own grandma in a trucker gangbang" as things that helped Manning achieve "god" status."
Re: BigBlueShoe
And another thing...
Your skill-set
Indianapolis isn't that good
by Dan B on Jun 23, 2007 12:10 AM CDT reply actions
Re: Indy in 2007
Obviously, I disagree with Shoe's take completely on the Schaub acquisition, but I can understand why people outside Texans fanatics think the way they do. I think Shoe's take is a ridiculous stance that falls to pieces once a person takes the time to actually watch the Texans play, but why would anyone but true, certifiable NFL diehards that aren't Texans fans voluntarily do that week in and week out? The Texans haven't exactly provided consistently entertaining football for the past five years. Hell, I'm convinced that their conduct will end up costing me a perfectly good liver.
Guess what I'm saying is that I understand Shoe's basis for his take. I just happen to think that the basis is completely flawed.

by 



















