Everyone Freaking Relax
I understand that Texans fans are eager to see Mario Williams "prove" that he was worthy of the No. 1 pick (or, more to the point, worthy of being picked ahead of Vince Young and Reggie Bush) in last year's draft. Really, I get it. But I'm getting a bit perturbed at all of the gum-flapping that's going on regarding how Mario is already a bust and/or that he REALLY needs to get it in gear after what observers deem to be two (2) below-average PRESEASON efforts. Seriously, the Chronicle may want to consider adding a section to the daily paper for this subject. It seems like the topic is beaten to death every day, and that Mario is a failure for not sacking the QB three times every snap. See Exhibits "A", "B", "C", and "D", all written in the last couple of days. If you didn't know better, you'd think Mario was picking dandelions and/or wearing his helmet backward instead of putting forth even the slightest of efforts.
People...Rome wasn't built in a day. As Matt eloquently pointed out in this post over at DGDB&D (albeit with regard to Jason Babin), the vast majority of pass rushers have a learning curve as they transition from the college ranks to the NFL. Battling the starting left tackle of any NFL team is going to be a significant step up from, say, going against the LT from Duke. It's going to take some time to adjust. And I've said it a million times, but I'll say it again: Mario was playing on a bum foot for the second half of last year. He wasn't physically right.
What's more, sacks alone are not the sole determining statistic of productivity for a defensive end. I know Mario was drafted to sack the QB. But his other contributions (tying up a second blocker, causing a play to be run to the other side, etc.) should not be discounted in assessing what he's done or what he's capable of doing. In other words, we shouldn't use his sack total at the end of the year as the be-all and end-all of his worth. Dwight Freeney only had 5.5 sacks (one more than Super Mario) last year. Think Indy is ready to question his talent? Of course not.
Mario Williams has played one season of professional football. Let's permit him to play one, two, or even three more before we label him a bust, shall we? I guess, however, it could be worse. Mario could be getting the Amobi Okoye Treatment:
"There's already talk in league circles that defensive tackle Amobi Okoye, the No. 10 overall pick in the draft, could be a bust.
The 20-year-old rookie from Louisville received plenty of hype in the run up to the draft. But the opinion of some is that he is undersized and not strong. As one source said, he's the "creation of a good P.R. campaign," and "there's no way he's a first-round pick."
Okoye already has been overshadowed in training camp and the preseason by Rams nose tackle Adam Carriker, the 13th overall selection. Carriker appears to be poised to make an instant impact at this level.
In our view, the biggest red flag regarding Okoye was raised when his college coach, Bobby Petrino, drafted defensive end Jamaal Anderson instead of Okoye. If Petrino, who had prior NFL experience, believed that Okoye could excel as a pro, Petrino surely would have taken the known commodity over the unknown quantity.
If Okoye falters, he'll be the third first-round pick on the Texans defensive line that has underachieved, including defensive tackle Travis Johnson and defensive end Mario Williams."
0 recs |
43 comments
Comments
Everyone Freaking Relax
by cseafous on Aug 22, 2007 10:27 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
How many times...
Okoye is good money, believe that.
by coltsfanawalt on Aug 23, 2007 1:49 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I wish Mario well, but
As for the coverage in the Chron, I think there should be a separate Mario Williams section to follow his progress (or lack thereof). Maybe this will motivate him, since the endless amount of guaranteed money and a prominent position in the greatest pro sports league in the world obviously doesn't.
by chillcharley on Aug 23, 2007 9:24 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Kind of missing the point there...
Also, if you could point me to these flashes of greatness that you have seen in a large sample size of other DEs, I would appreciate it.
by MDC on Aug 23, 2007 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great post
by MDC on Aug 23, 2007 10:51 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The heat is rightly on.
by Viper on Aug 23, 2007 12:12 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Sunday, November 18th
Don't try to argue with me, you can't prove me wrong for at least another 87 days, 2 hours, 6 minutes.
You will all treat me like C-3PO in the Ewok Village if my prediction holds true.
by Shake on Aug 23, 2007 12:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
And Tim...
by Shake on Aug 23, 2007 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was with you...
by MDC on Aug 23, 2007 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This
...putting the fun in disfunctional
by Shake on Aug 23, 2007 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
heh
by bigfatdrunk on Aug 24, 2007 4:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I will not be taunted...
by MDC on Aug 24, 2007 9:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
When is Opening Day?
At least it's only 8 days til CFB gets rolling.
by Shake on Aug 24, 2007 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
I loves me some CFB. I was going to make fun of my own team (Michigan) for playing a nobody week 1. Then I looked at the Horns schedule.
by MDC on Aug 24, 2007 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was you who opened this can...
{end argument}
by Shake on Aug 24, 2007 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
how about weeks 2,3, and 4
by MDC on Aug 24, 2007 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice trickery there, master-debator
But hey, I make mistakes sometimes. Let me go back and see what was typed.
"I was going to make fun of my own team (Michigan) for playing a nobody week 1. Then I looked at the Horns schedule."
Yeah, I could see how that is interpreted as all 4 OOC games.
by Shake on Aug 24, 2007 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
re:
Personally, I am starting to hope those Miami rumors are true. I need payback from 1990. Payback, with a vengeance.
by bigfatdrunk on Aug 24, 2007 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No Argument
by Shake on Aug 24, 2007 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You've backed me into a corner
by MDC on Aug 24, 2007 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also...
Looks like both UT & Michigan will have to show up for week 2.
In all seriousness, I am looking forward to Week 3, with the Mich-ND game. I won't be in Austin, so I'll get to watch that contest. I am truly rooting for a Wolverine to do to Jimmy-C, what I predicted Mario do to Reggie.
by Shake on Aug 24, 2007 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no kidding, Shake
by bigfatdrunk on Aug 24, 2007 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Please be careful...
by Shake on Aug 24, 2007 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
YES!
I guess the only difference, and it's a huge difference, is that Matt is considerably more loving with his touch. Fawning, even.
by bigfatdrunk on Aug 24, 2007 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Someone has to be...
by MDC on Aug 24, 2007 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
true that
BTW, if you have read this far and still know what the original post was about, give yourself a pat on the back. You....you deserve it.
/hijack (for now!)
by bigfatdrunk on Aug 24, 2007 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
heh
I am pretty sure that if anybody googles "mario williams okoye chubby chasers testicles," this will be first on the list. So you've got that going for you.
by bigfatdrunk on Aug 24, 2007 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You know me too well
by Shake on Aug 24, 2007 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This article should make our blood boil?...
by mello on Aug 24, 2007 3:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Scrutiny
As for the Chron, if every one of their writers hadn't offered at least one "Mario sucks" piece in the past fortnight, I don't think Scott, Tim, or I would be so annoyed with their brand of mediocre "journalism."
by MDC on Aug 24, 2007 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
if you read my actual post...
by mello on Aug 24, 2007 9:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, you caught me!
Of course, you conveniently ignore the whole point about there being a learning curve, which should also be "manifestly obvious" to anyone with an ounce of common sense.
Or, perhaps you think Jason Taylor and Michael Strahan are busts.
by MDC on Aug 25, 2007 9:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Chron
Nevertheless, thanks for reading and taking the time to offer constructive criticism.
by Tim on Aug 24, 2007 3:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Easy there...
by mello on Aug 24, 2007 9:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
BP Is Okay
by Tim on Aug 25, 2007 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll take the blame
by Shake on Aug 25, 2007 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
By the way...
"They say I have an anger management problem-that makes me soooo maaaaad!!!"
by mello on Aug 24, 2007 3:13 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
blogs
I think you make some good points. Yes, it is funny that Tim wants people to relax and it makes his blood boil. Heh, I didn't catch that the first time.
But, I think there are two primary things that differentiate the traditional media (TM) and blogs. First, we can have a two-way conversation on a blog. While it's true that the Chron now allows comments, I think the only person I've actually seen reply to said comments is Justice. The other is that the TM seems to cover sports from an angle of privileged knower to us little people. I hate that. Sincerely hate that. I've hated it for years, and it's a big reason why I almost entirely opt for non-traditional media formats. There are a couple of areas of this attitude that especially upset me, not only just in sports. But, needless to say, I would be happy to debate the "experts" in numerous fields on the very subject they are allegedly an "expert" in. And, I would win.
I know, a lot of words so far, but bear with me. My point is that blogs play a different role, and one of those roles is calling out the idiocy of the TM. Part of that is using fact-based, rather than subjective, analysis. This I believe MDC does well with his post. And then, calling someone a bust before he has even played a game is ridiculous. Patently. Rare is the DE, DT, or OL who steps into the league and instantly becomes a top 5 at their position. For those who do, don't they normally suffer a sophomore slump? As in, regression to the mean?
I do agree with you (and Viper and ChillCharley) that Mario will be under more intense scrutiny, as if he wasn't last year. But I think, if he doesn't get 10 sacks this year, that it would be fair to label him a bust, either. I mean, in all my years, really the only guy I considered to be a bust after one year was Ryan Leaf.
by bigfatdrunk on Aug 27, 2007 2:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Comments at the Chronic
by Shake on Aug 27, 2007 7:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















